AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Software › The Lord Of The Rings Extended
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Lord Of The Rings Extended - Page 43

post #1261 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shagg View Post

There may be lots of differences between a retail disc and an unknown source dumped onto a hard drive. I think that's the real point.

Nobody really knows where the torrent rips were taken from, or what was done to them before uploading. It's not unheard of for unfinished versions of things like this to be leaked before release.

It leaked around the same time people began recieving shipment noifications and getting the real disc, so I'm guessing thats what it is. And it'd be a pretty crazy pirate to reencode 200GB worth of video for some reason. Anything is possible of course, but I'm guessing the simple explanation is the correct one.
post #1262 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingkong650 View Post

Lol, i think that'd be the quick way to a massive lawsuit from Warner, PJ and Co.

I can tell anybody that wants to know what tools I used and what settings, if they're interested.

here, here, me


from blu-ray.com:

All right, so I contacted Bill Hunt from The Digital Bits and his source confirmed to him that Peter Jackson and Andrew Lesnie not only approved the transfer but dictated the new color timing. There will be further information in his review of the films in the coming week. In the mean time, read below his reply email:

Quote:


Quote: This is from a non-studio source directly involved in the films and the BDs: “Peter and Andrew [Lesnie - the cinematographer] were invo[lved in all decisions regarding transfer and color timing on these new BDs. Any alterations and corrections were at their request.”

Not that that's going to satisfy anyone who doesn't LIKE the new color timing, but there it is. It was directly approved by the director and DP.

somehow i cannot believe that all directors suddenly begin to like the same look for every movie. i bet its the studios pressuring and telling them to approve the release, because that look might boost sales. and jackson turned to be a believer anyway at the academies when he talked about how his older gore movies were little sins of the past -.-

anyway, no matter what they approve or not, to me it remains what it is: an otherwise good release, apart from the colour scheme.
post #1263 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRO-630HD View Post

http://www.caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergl...ss=0#vergleich

Some very unimpressive screenshots from ROTK. Above is the only one where I could see any difference at all. I will wait for the remaster of the latter two films.

Movies with DIs don't get remastered.
post #1264 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by amoergosum View Post

...

He is in his own world so dont worry about it
post #1265 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRO-630HD View Post

http://www.caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergl...ss=0#vergleich

Some very unimpressive screenshots from ROTK. Above is the only one where I could see any difference at all. I will wait for the remaster of the latter two films. Neither were near reference quality. The first film is going to greatly overshadow the last two from a detail perspective.

EE has better contrast
post #1266 of 5278
whats the verdict about the colours of ROTK EE? when applying the same changes I do for FOTR, then the picture also becomes a little better most of the time tbh. also looks like theres a bit of a greenish look here (e.g. the ungolianth scene with frodo and sam looks somewhat teal as ****; also the fighting scene with the oliophants, the kings horse is not white, but somewhat greenish as well).

anyone able to confirm?
post #1267 of 5278
The mountain scenes are unbelievably bad. Blue skies and white snow, who doesn't know what that looks like in real life? You know that green looks wrong the instant you see it, you don't need a side by side comparison.

If they gave us top notch releases of all the films then the gravy train would be over for them. They have to leave room for an upgrade, so a few years from now they come out with de-green'd version and everyone buys again. That's the only explanation I can come up with when looking and the green sky and green snow in the mountain scene. It can't be because they thought it looked good.

And judging by some of the comments in this thread, there are people here who are far more color blind than me, but apparently they are not aware of it!
post #1268 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punkak View Post

They have to leave room for an upgrade, so a few years from now they come out with de-green'd version and everyone buys again...

That's the normal cycle, anyway. In a few years to come Blu-ray will no longer be state of the art, so this will most likely be the time for a new release. And besides, good old Peter Jackson rubber-stamped the new colour timing. So people should get used to it and continue with their every day lives (that is, if they still have one - judging from all the fuss based on screenshots I begin to doubt it).
post #1269 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punkak View Post

If they gave us top notch releases of all the films then the gravy train would be over for them. They have to leave room for an upgrade, so a few years from now they come out with de-green'd version and everyone buys again. That's the only explanation I can come up with when looking and the green sky and green snow in the mountain scene. It can't be because they thought it looked good.

And now the conspiracies start. Yes, they purposely changed the color scheme so that they can correct it down the line and sell it to us again. So is this also the reasoning behind the similar color "problems" in Blade Runner, Aliens/s, Lethal Weapon, Memento, Taxi Driver, Exorcist, French Connection, Fight Club, Gladiator, and every other modern remaster that has a new color scheme?
post #1270 of 5278
I wouldnt say that its done on purpose to correct it later again. but I'd say they do it, because that look is en vogue atm and some groups of consumers like it that the movie looks like a modern product.
post #1271 of 5278
Sigh
post #1272 of 5278
I usually dont have much of a problem with revised color schemes; compared to the likes of blade runner and alien, this seems more like an error than deliberate artistic choice, because it seems like literally the entire film has the same screwy white balance. The other movies are more selective in how its applied.
post #1273 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post

whats the verdict about the colours of ROTK EE? when applying the same changes I do for FOTR, then the picture also becomes a little better most of the time tbh. also looks like theres a bit of a greenish look here (e.g. the ungolianth scene with frodo and sam looks somewhat teal as ****; also the fighting scene with the oliophants, the kings horse is not white, but somewhat greenish as well).

anyone able to confirm?

No, I can't confirm, but I think you meant Shelob. Ungoliant is Shelob's mother from The Silmarillion.

btw are you greg, from the other site?
post #1274 of 5278
I dont think so, never used the name greg

whatever that spiders name is. as said, the look is quite greenish here as well, but I dont know in how far this is intended for the 3rd part.
post #1275 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Mack View Post

All we've seen is one post from someone on bd.com who says he received an email. Still nothing on thedigitalbits yet.....

It's there, now.
post #1276 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post

I dont think so, never used the name greg

whatever that spiders name is. as said, the look is quite greenish here as well, but I dont know in how far this is intended for the 3rd part.

Sorry, I just noticed that you quoted greg in post 1263, I thought you were him.
I haven't seen any caps of that particular scene you are reffering to, but would like to.
post #1277 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUR View Post

It's there, now.

Aaaand here comes the s***storm. Pass the popcorn.
post #1278 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUR View Post

It's there, now.

Got it
post #1279 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by pteittinen View Post

I was not referring to re-encoded Blu-ray rips. Discs shared on torrent sites etc. are 1:1 copies of the originals, i.e. 70-80 gigabytes and 2 dual layer BDs per movie. So in essence, screencaps taken from those are for all intents and purposes the same thing as screencaps taken from retail discs.

Out of curiosity, I tried to find one of these 70-80gb files and the only one that came even remotely close was 30gb for FOTR, and the actual movie was around 15gb with the rest being the extras. Person says it was encoded in the DVD9 format to preserve all of it's original quality. The movie was copied using DVDFab Platinum, then converted to an .ISO using Img burn.
There's also a 44gb but it's the complete trilogy. No mention how it was compressed.
No, I have no desire or inclination to download it. If this is the source, I think I can chill a bit until we at least have a reputable source.
post #1280 of 5278
If all three films were green 'round the gills I'd give the "that's what Jackson and Lenise wanted" argument a second thought. For just FOTR to be cyan, I don't buy it for a second. (And if they did bork the colors for just one film... well, that's almost worse, isn't it?) It's a real shame, too, since the EE transfer for FOTR seems worlds better than the prior transfer otherwise.

Still, I skipped the TE and find the long versions are the only ones worth revisiting... sigh. What's a geek to do?

Edit: Most of the 1:1 BD rips are on "private", invite-only communities. The re-encoded versions are scattered around elsewhere, and are kind of irrelevant to this discussion.

I have zero doubts that the Caps-A-Holic comparisons are accurate.
post #1281 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schils View Post

Wasn't it Warner that once released a statement (excuse) when some bad press started surfacing due to leaked grabs of something like "how can they give it negative scores when it's not even released yet?" Guess we can expect that one again any day now!

warner will not allow captures from the screeners to be used in reviews due to the lotr set
post #1282 of 5278
Still no comparison between FOTR and flashback scenes in TTT
post #1283 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kentai View Post

If all three films were green 'round the gills I'd give the "that's what Jackson and Lenise wanted" argument a second thought. For just FOTR to be cyan, I don't buy it for a second. (And if they did bork the colors for just one film... well, that's almost worse, isn't it?) It's a real shame, too, since the EE transfer for FOTR seems worlds better than the prior transfer otherwise.

Still, I skipped the TE and find the long versions are the only ones worth revisiting... sigh. What's a geek to do?

Edit: Most of the 1:1 BD rips are on "private", invite-only communities. The re-encoded versions are scattered around elsewhere, and are kind of irrelevant to this discussion.

I have zero doubts that the Caps-A-Holic comparisons are accurate.

Without getting into specifics, I looked there too. I don't think they exist.
post #1284 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt8 View Post

I dont think so, never used the name greg

whatever that spiders name is. as said, the look is quite greenish here as well, but I dont know in how far this is intended for the 3rd part.

skipped a bit further through and when I apply the same kind of regrading as for FOTR to other scenes, they often look a bit too bright and artificial. so I believe that teal look was really intended for ROTK, as it it only present in some scenes and not so much in others and/or correcting the other scenes looks quite a bit worse than in FOTR.
post #1285 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUR View Post

It's there, now.

Confirmation of the color timing change..........he did not mind it apparently, but not all will share that opinion obviously.
post #1286 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toe View Post

Confirmation of the color timing change..........he did not mind it apparently, but not all will share that opinion obviously.

If the information from Hunt is to be believed, it's not just a matter of him not minding the changes, it's a matter of him giving instructions to make the changes. An important distinction, don't you think?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Bits View Post

I've confirmed with production-related sources that Jackson and cinematographer Andrew Lesnie were directly involved in all decisions related to this new transfer and approved it personally. So to the extent that there are changes to the color-timing, they were made at Jackson and Lesnie's direction - the films look exactly as they want them to.
post #1287 of 5278
Bill Hunt, The Digital Bits:
Quote:


Jackson and cinematographer Andrew Lesnie were directly involved in all decisions related to this new transfer and approved it personally.

[Emphasis added]

This has to be hyperbole, because it could not be literally true. Thus it sounds like some PR person trying to douse a fast-moving brushfire. How long before Jackson "can't say with certitude" that he approved the FOTG?
post #1288 of 5278
That's a bit vague. What PJ approved and what people will see on the disc could be different if an error happended elsewhere, hopefully we can get an answer from Jackson himself as to whether the color cast is what he signed off on.
post #1289 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by pteittinen View Post

Aaaand here comes the s***storm. Pass the popcorn.

LOL!
You're right.

There won't be any time wasted in calling Bill Hunt unfit to pass judgement on the video.
After all....the guy doesn't have much credibility.
post #1290 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

After all....the guy doesn't have much credibility.

Not sure if thats sarcasm, but no argument from me
I remeber him being quite pleased with the first attempt at Gladiator.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Software
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Software › The Lord Of The Rings Extended