AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Software › The Lord Of The Rings Extended
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Lord Of The Rings Extended - Page 53

post #1561 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milt99 View Post
It should be obvious that questioning Bill Hunt's supposed "motives" is really childish and without foundation.
He has no reason for and no history of not being honest.
The format war is ancient history get over it.
Studios can give reviewers special perks like exclusives by giving them blu-rays earlier than everyone else to review or even give them access to upcoming productions they're funding, access to the sets etc.

I'm not saying that Bill Hunt falls into this category but to say that professional reviewers don't have any possible motive to be more positive about releases than perhaps they should be is not entirely accurate.
post #1562 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by swanlee View Post
My take is the green tint is probably there but not nearly as bad or pronounced as the Bootleg\\foreign version make it out to be. Something exaggerated the green tint in those captures\\conversions.

I'm NOT a bill Hunt apologized and still feel his dealing with the format war will never be forgotten but come on he went directly to the source bypassing the studio's for Peter's take on this.

At this point nothing further can really be gained until more people see the retail disc in their homes and relate if the green effect is as bad as the early leaked versions or not.
The original batch of screenshots were from a retail source. A foreign retail source but a retail source nonetheless.

There is now a rip from the retail Region A disc. I compared them and everything about it is 100% identical at every point in the movie.

Therefore the original screenshots are a 100% accurate reflection of the change in colour timing from the TE to the EE.

This cannot be argued any more. Just accept it guys.
post #1563 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingkong650 View Post
Studios can give reviewers special perks like exclusives by giving them blu-rays earlier than everyone else to review or even give them access to upcoming productions they're funding, access to the sets etc.

I'm not saying that Bill Hunt falls into this category but to say that professional reviewers don't have any possible motive to be more positive about releases than perhaps they should be is not entirely accurate.
All this reviewer questioning is bordering on being rude. Of course you are implying that Mr. Hunt might fall into that category. Sheesh. You seem to take his differing opinion personal.

Jeff
post #1564 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by elario View Post
The original batch of screenshots were from a retail source. A foreign retail source but a retail source nonetheless.

There is now a rip from the retail Region A disc. I compared them and everything about it is 100% identical at every point in the movie.

Therefore the original screenshost are a 100% accurate reflection of the change in colour timing from the TE to the EE.

This cannot be argued any more. Just accept it guys.
It is stipulated that there has been a color/colour timing change from TE. The question remains is what is on the EE BD what PJ/AL approved or .. and here's what I think some are pushing ... is it liked by the colorati?
post #1565 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post
All this reviewer questioning is bordering on being rude. Of course you are implying that Mr. Hunt might fall into that category. Sheesh. You seem to take his differing opinion personal.

Jeff
It's not a matter of being polite, rude, or whatever. It's about healthy skepticism. You should never rely on someone's opinion when there is a real or perceived conflict of interest. Bill Hunt is neither independent in fact nor appearance, due to his relationship with the studios in question. That goes for any other reviewer who has any connection or side benefit received from the people who produce the products they are reviewing, inclusive of free product.
post #1566 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post
.. and here's what I think some are pushing ... is it liked by the colorati?
"I didn't want to see this!" (CE3K)

Nothing would personally make me happier than to see a reference-quality LOTR EE Blu-ray.

If we can establish soon enough that there is a problem, perhaps we can get action taken sooner, before the usual wagons circle.

We're still in that stage of verifying there's a problem.

(It's not looking good. Another source on HTF just confirmed that the "foreign" discs (source for the caps) are identical to the Region A discs.

If you read the other forums, you'll see that now Bill Hunt is spending a lot of time justifying his review process (he had the LOTR EE Blu-rays for something like six hours before posting his "Cliff Notes"--his term--review). I wish the guy would just learn how to do accurate screenshots; it would save him--and his readers--a lot of trouble.)

Bottom line, we're awaiting more info, and evaluating it as it comes in. So cut us a break. We all want the same thing, which is the best possible LOTR EE Blu-ray. And if we can't get it, we'd like to see it fixed, sooner rather than later (or never).
post #1567 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strevlac View Post
It's not a matter of being polite, rude, or whatever. It's about healthy skepticism. You should never rely on someone's opinion when there is a real or perceived conflict of interest. Bill Hunt is neither independent in fact nor appearance, due to his relationship with the studios in question. That goes for any other reviewer who has any connection or side benefit received from the people who produce the products they are reviewing, inclusive of free product.
Typical forum. Everybody is right, but everyone else is biased with ulterior motives .. unless they agree.

Jeff
post #1568 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strevlac View Post
It's not a matter of being polite, rude, or whatever. It's about healthy skepticism. You should never rely on someone's opinion when there is a real or perceived conflict of interest. Bill Hunt is neither independent in fact nor appearance, due to his relationship with the studios in question. That goes for any other reviewer who has any connection or side benefit received from the people who produce the products they are reviewing, inclusive of free product.
So.. basically, what you're saying is that we should trust anonymous forum members more than most professional reviewers. Oh come on...
post #1569 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikke73 View Post
So.. basically, what you're saying is that we should trust anonymous forum members more than most professional reviewers. Oh come on...
And why not? RAH is about the only person posting reviews whose professional credentials qualify him to authoritatively speak on such matters.... most "professional" reviewers are no different than anonymous forum members, except they get free screeners.
post #1570 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penman View Post
"I didn't want to see this!" (CE3K)

Nothing would personally make me happier than to see a reference-quality LOTR EE Blu-ray.

If we can establish soon enough that there is a problem, perhaps we can get action taken sooner, before the usual wagons circle.

We're still in that stage of verifying there's a problem.

(It's not looking good. Another source on HTF just confirmed that the "foreign" discs (source for the caps) are identical to the Region A discs.

If you read the other forums, you'll see that now Bill Hunt is spending a lot of time justifying his review process (he had the LOTR EE Blu-rays for something like six hours before posting his "Cliff Notes"--his term--review). I wish the guy would just learn how to do accurate screenshots; it would save him--and his readers--a lot of trouble.)

Bottom line, we're awaiting more info, and evaluating it as it comes in. So cut us a break. We all want the same thing, which is the best possible LOTR EE Blu-ray. And if we can't get it, we'd like to see it fixed, sooner rather than later (or never).
I don't know Bill, nor have I ever read any of his reviews. But I suspect that he is doing what he can to substantiate his opinion. And that doesn't seem any different than some on this thread who have staked out the "it's too green" territory. And now anyone that says otherwise is a shill - or incompetent.

Jeff
post #1571 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strevlac View Post
You should never rely on someone's opinion when there is a real or perceived conflict of interest.
You mean "imagined" don't you?

Jeff
post #1572 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikke73 View Post
So.. basically, what you're saying is that we should trust anonymous forum members more than most professional reviewers. Oh come on...
There is no such thing as a "professional" bluray reviewer. You should research the issues as best you can using the available evidence, and formulate your own conclusion. Certainly a screenshot, prepared correctly, is a more objective piece of evidence than a "reviewers" narrative description.
post #1573 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post
You mean "imagined" don't you?

Jeff
You would never make it as an auditor.
post #1574 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strevlac View Post
There is no such thing as a "professional" bluray reviewer. You should research the issues as best you can using the available evidence, and formulate your own conclusion. Certainly a screenshot, prepared correctly, is a more objective piece of evidence than a "reviewers" narrative description.
Well, there's the rub ... screenshots from who knows where compared to a reviewer who has watched the released Blu-rays.

Jeff
post #1575 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strevlac View Post
You would never make it as an auditor.
An editor?
post #1576 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by 42041 View Post
And why not? RAH is about the only person posting reviews whose professional credentials qualify him to authoritatively speak on such matters.... most "professional" reviewers are no different than anonymous forum members, except they get free screeners.
RAH certainly is knowledgeable regarding film but I sometimes wonder about his expertise regarding anything digital.
post #1577 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post
An editor?
Auditor.
post #1578 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post
I don't know Bill, nor have I ever read any of his reviews. But I suspect that he is doing what he can to substantiate his opinion. And that doesn't seem any different than some on this thread who have staked out the "it's too green" territory. And now anyone that says otherwise is a shill - or incompetent.

Jeff
My point was that Bill was spending an awful lot of time defending his process when he could have been reviewing the discs in some detail. When you talk process it means you don't want to talk product.

But let's let Bill Hunt speak for himself, from HDD:

Quote:
All right, come on. I'm under no illusions that there are plenty of forum members here and elsewhere that spit whenever my name is mentioned, and there's no doubt that much of that animosity goes back to my views during the HD format war. But some of the comments I read here are more than a little unfair.

I've been making contributions to the online enthusiast community and the home video industry in general since 1997. I've spent countless hours over the years convincing studios of the benefits of things like releasing DVDs in anamorphic widecreen back in the day, convincing studios that certain titles (like Blade Runner) deserved special edition treatment on disc, convincing mastering techs to use less edge-enhancement and noise reduction. I promote consumer issues when I speak at industry conferences, out of the public eye. When discs are defective and readers come to me looking for help, I go out of my way to help raise the problem with the studios, to get them to respond, to set up disc exchange programs. You may or may not like my reviews, my opinions, The Bits or me personally, but I have more than given of myself over the years to help share our love of films, to help make these disc formats better and more user friendly for consumers, and to help improve the consumer experience for everyone. I don't talk about these things much, and I generally don't make any money from these efforts. I do it because I love this stuff as much as you guys do. In fact, a few studio execs probably consider me a thorn in their side. But I've done my part over the years, and believe it or not all of you have benefitted from my efforts in one small way or another.

I've now been called unprofessional by several members in this thread. It seems to me that "unprofessional" might also include reviewers ripping other reviewers in a discussion forum. One thing I would never do is single out a fellow reviewer by name - especially someone that I don't even know personally - and call them out on the carpet - for whatever reason.

On the subject of my Lord of the Rings Blu-ray review, I've reviewed these films and all the contents in this box set in extensive detail in the past. What my readers on The Bits generally want to know from our Blu-ray reviews is two things: 1) Does the A/V meet their expectations? and 2) Do all the extras from the DVD carry over? And they want to know these things as soon as possible, so they can make purchasing decisions. Sure, I could easily write a 30 page review, and go into endless detail about the subtle nuances of the transfers, etc. But my readers on The Bits are less interested in those highly-specific topics than some of you may be, and I also know that there are MANY other fine websites and forums - this one included - where other talented reviewers (including people who have attacked me in this thread) WILL go into that kind of depth and detail for those who want it. My readers want the Cliffs Notes - not War and Peace - and they want them fast. So just because I had my review up within 12 hours of the discs arriving for review, doesn't mean I'm unprofessional and I can assure you it wasn't about trying to drive up web traffic. If I was trying to drive up web traffic, I'd have updated The Bits to blog format years ago, I'd make dozens of small news posts a day, and I've had a Digital Bits forum. It's not about traffic. Back on the subject of the review, the fact is I spent several hours sampling the transfers all the way through all of the movie discs, I sampled all the DVD features to make sure they worked and were all accounted for, and I made notes in my reviews that I felt were useful to my readers. I made comments that were honest, I attempted to address the growing controversy over the color-timing by investigating how and wide the changes happened (it appears that the director and DP made them), and I stand by what I wrote. If others have a different opinion, fine. More power to them. But calling me unprofessional for any of that is unfair.

As for American Graffitti, Tim Salmons - the Bits staffer who reviewed the title - is hardly alone is his opinion that the disc looks fine. Restoration professional Robert Harris - no slouch in judging transfer quality - made very similar comments about the disc on the Home Theater Forum. I can't speak for the opinions of the High-Def Digest reviewer who looked at the title, but I'm sure he wasn't lying - he called things honestly, as he saw them. People are entitled to their opinions, even when they differ.

Look... very few of you here know me personally. Those of you do, know I'm a decent guy with honorable motivations. And after fourteen years and two format wars, I know there are always going to be haters and I have a pretty thick skin. You are all entitled to your opinions. But I would simply ask, once in a while, that you guys remember to try and keep your comments a little more courteous. If you have a problem with one of my reviews or whatever, my e-mail is always open and you guys know where to find me. In any case, I continue to wish you all the very best. And I sincerely hope, when the actual Rings discs are in your own hands, that you each enjoy them as much as I am.
post #1579 of 5278
Someone give me a list of reviewers that don't get comp'd(free) releases from the studios. There very well may be but they are few and far between.
Ralph gets free releases, is he suspect too now or are you afraid that if you accuse him that you'll get banned from AVS?
post #1580 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by 42041 View Post
and why not? Rah is about the only person posting reviews whose professional credentials qualify him to authoritatively speak on such matters.... Most "professional" reviewers are no different than anonymous forum members, except they get free screeners.
+1
post #1581 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordcloud View Post
+1
+2
post #1582 of 5278
Man, in the thread over at BluRay.com they're really at each other's throats!
post #1583 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by pteittinen View Post
Good morning all.

I'd like to point out (although perhaps unnecessarily) why proper calibration of the display is important -- especially in a case like this. Here are two color gamuts measured off the same 2011 model LCD LED television:



Left is pre-calibration, right post-calibration. Notice anything special about green and cyan on the pre-calibration gamut? Pre-calibration, this television would oversaturate (might not be the term I'm looking for) greens and cyans, making the green/cyan/teal tint of the image stronger and more noticeable. Also note how the white point is slightly skewed towards cyan/blue.

This sort of "wide colorspace" has been very common in displays for a while now. And yes, it applies to computer monitors as well.
Yes, good point. And complicating it even more is that the charts you posted are Rec. 709 standard and film is not shot at Rec. 709 but rather uses a wider color gamut.
post #1584 of 5278
who is RAH (reviewer)
post #1585 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trackman View Post
Yes, good point. And complicating it even more is that the charts you posted are Rec. 709 standard and film is not shot at Rec. 709 but rather uses a wider color gamut.
Well, ye-ssss... film certainly has a wider gamut than Rec. 709, but Blu-ray sources are supposed to be mastered for Rec. 709 adherence, AFAIK. So whatever wider gamut there originally exists on film is "shrunk" down to Rec. 709 for Blu-ray. It's why displays are calibrated to Rec. 709.

Penton-Man, bless his black heart, brushed this subject at br.com:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penton-Man
It is standard procedure that the color corrected data files are subsequently used as the source for home video and digital cinema versions. Generally, the home video version is created in SMPTE Rec 709 color space (from the film color space of the source files), and rendered out to 2K (2048x1556) .dpx files. A typical post production workflow is that of the 2K data being then transferred to HDCAM SR 4:4:4 (best) tape for distribution….what people here like to refer to as “the HD master”. This is then converted to the final 8-bit 4:2:0 colorspace used for the Blu-ray replication master from which all the progeny is produced.
post #1586 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_B_0673 View Post
who is RAH (reviewer)
Robert A. Harris.
post #1587 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertR View Post
Robert A. Harris.
thanks
post #1588 of 5278
Well given what the pro reviewers and the people who watched the new screenings are saying I am still not convinced the green screens caps we are seeing are how the discs actually look. Are the caps from the Thailand discs done by a person known to make accurate caps? Or is it just more random stuff from the interwebs? Are there caps available from a known and trusted person yet?
post #1589 of 5278
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingkong650 View Post
That middle picture that Bill Hunt took is a photo, not a screen capture, you can see that from the fact that the horizontal line on the top of the cyberlink dvd player box in the middle picture is not level with the top edge, as it would be if it was a screen capture. That makes that shot meaningless, because cameras often compensate for unusual colour balances, changing the colours from what they should be. That middle shot is misleading and inaccurate, though I assume that that was not his intention. Perhaps if he posted a proper screencap instead of a photo, his comparison would be more convincing.
The left and the middle are both from the same photo that Bill took when comparing the two side by side on his computer.
post #1590 of 5278
If bill hunt is playing the BD in his computer and not just say a standalone player then if someone could tell him how to do a proper screen grab the question of how teal, dark the retail disc is would be settled
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Software
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Software › The Lord Of The Rings Extended