AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › Are room modes really bothersome with high spl movie sound tracks?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Are room modes really bothersome with high spl movie sound tracks?

post #1 of 31
Thread Starter 
I looked at some room mode calculators but they mention piano sounds instead of being based on how audible a room mode is when playing a high spl movie soundtrack?

I am not! questioning if room modes exist.
I am questioning that if a room mode is not able to be heard or noticed then is it really that bothersome?

I.e a recording studio still has room modes but they focus on delivering direct sound so that sound reflections are much less noticeable.

I think of most room modes like an annoying cellphone ringtone during the movie but with a high spl movie sound track you never even hear it.

I noticed some folks telling me that if a room mode is tamed then I can get more base?

But in my experience in a concrete room I get lots of base even with modest equipment.
The only noticeable problem for me is room decay times in a bare concrete room but then there is no way you are going to get me to listen to anything in that until its stuffed with books, carpets, drapes, etc.

For example a store purchased modest 12 inch powered subwoofer that just barely manages to sound ok? in a wooden home sounds quite powerfull in a concrete home so we are getting plenty of base from the solid concrete.

At our business with 75 watts going to 12 inch(cheap 5 buck) subwoofers they do manage to flex the plateglass window( hmm I will try and upload a video in a week or two).

So folks mentioning getting more base if room modes are tamed has me interested.

But my wifes reaction is:
""its too loud and you want it to sound even louder?""
Oh well
post #2 of 31
What is "base"? Do you mean "bass"?
post #3 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell Burrows View Post

But my wifes reaction is:
""its too loud and you want it to sound even louder?""
Oh well


I hear that a lot as well, but you may also want to look into controlling the reflections in the mid and high frequencies. By just doing that, it won't sound as "loud" but will actually measure the same. It will be a cleaner sound-As long as you arn't producing a distorted sound in the first place.


dbl
post #4 of 31
The way I understand it is you want to treat room modes not to get "more" bass but to get cleaner, more even bass (and actually technically "less" bass). You mentioned long decay times which is tied to the room modes - the frequency being produced is propagated by the room creating a standing wave that does not dissipate when the subwoofer stops producing the sound - giving you a long decay time, a louder note than is intended, and boomy/ringing bass = bad. The notes is louder at that frequency than it should be since the wave is bouncing off the walls in phase causing the wave to get reinforced (louder). You can't think of room modes as a cell phone that gets drowned out when the music is playing loudly enough, it's more like an amplifier of certain notes so no matter how loud you've got it turned up those notes will be louder than they're supposed to be (and will require EQ to treat). Actually in my experience room modes are more troublesome at loud playback than at modest levels. I've got a room mode right around 40hz which sounds great when listening to music at lower levels but when turned up it's like all you can hear is that 40hz tone overpowering everything else in the track
post #5 of 31
I find tubby boomy bass more bothersome as level increases.
post #6 of 31
You're observant, but you're missing the important clues.

Good bass = equal bass at all frequencies, from all seats. This never occurs in untreated, concrete-walled listening rooms.

Clues
- concrete room has lots of bass
- 12" sub barely OK in wooden house, but loud in concrete
- 75W sub flexes plate glass

When you excite a resonant system, such as the air in your concrete room, the energy tends to pool where it dissipates least: standing waves. These start at the longest 1/2 wavelength that fits in your room, and continue up in frequency. However, it's only in the low bass that we see individual modes, modes that are difficult to suppress.

When energy hits a transition, it has three choices, reflection, absorption and transmission. To have a resonance, you must have a reflection.
- concrete reflects sound well
- wooden construction allows transmission
- flexing of plate glass is an example of absorption (conversion to heat).

I can tell from your post that you think your concrete listening room has really good bass. I can tell from your tone that you're unlikely to be open to honest opinions about your concrete room. I'm also not able to listen for myself.

What I can tell you is that when I measured my bass frequency response, it was unusually flat above 10Hz. It's taken me years to understand why. My room is:
- matchstick construction
- only one strong reflector (a fireplace)
- which is opposite staggered walls (a big doorway)
- lots of plate glass (3-frame sliding glass door)
- paneling was installed over furring strips
- corner cupboards in 2 corners, bookcase in the others
- carpetted and padded hardwood floors

Note that I've got 2 diaphragmatic absorbers (paneling, plate glass), corner treatments that disrupt bass reflection, plus the positive effect of carpet/pad, curtains, cloth furntiture, etc. in a non-reflective room.

Have fun,
Frank
post #7 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell Burrows View Post

I looked at some room mode calculators but they mention piano sounds instead of being based on how audible a room mode is when playing a high spl movie soundtrack?

I am not! questioning if room modes exist.
I am questioning that if a room mode is not able to be heard or noticed then is it really that bothersome?


Room modes are mostly important as a bass phenomenon. They are related to the wavelength of the sound, the dimensions of the room, and the position of the speaker/listener. Modes cause peaks and nulls in three dimensions. That means that the loudness of certain frequencies are positionally dependent. Thus, some seats may be good, but others will have either uncontrolled peaks at that particular frequency or be radically lower in volume at that frequency in another listening positions. This phenomenon is highly undesirable in a theater with multiple seats.

Quote:


I.e a recording studio still has room modes but they focus on delivering direct sound so that sound reflections are much less noticeable.

The design of a recording studio is irrelevant to the design of a theater.

Quote:



I think of most room modes like an annoying cellphone ringtone during the movie but with a high spl movie sound track you never even hear it.

I noticed some folks telling me that if a room mode is tamed then I can get more base?

On average the bass should be the same, it's just more evenly distributed in space.
Quote:



But in my experience in a concrete room I get lots of base even with modest equipment.

Yet, it isn't evenly distributed across all listening positions. If you were to measure the bass response across multiple frequencies in multiple locations in the room you would see how crappy the bass distribution is and how far it is from the soundtrack's intent.

Quote:


The only noticeable problem for me is room decay times in a bare concrete room but then there is no way you are going to get me to listen to anything in that until its stuffed with books, carpets, drapes, etc.

The decay characteristics of a room have little to do with 'modes' or standing waves but more to do with how much of the energy content of the sound field is absorbed by the room. It is the rooms ability to 'dampen' the sound. This is important at all frequencies but is most important above mid-bass, and especially important in the frequencies important for dialog (ie 1-3K)

Quote:


For example a store purchased modest 12 inch powered subwoofer that just barely manages to sound ok? in a wooden home sounds quite powerfull in a concrete home so we are getting plenty of base from the solid concrete.

At our business with 75 watts going to 12 inch(cheap 5 buck) subwoofers they do manage to flex the plateglass window( hmm I will try and upload a video in a week or two).

So folks mentioning getting more base if room modes are tamed has me interested.

But my wifes reaction is:
""its too loud and you want it to sound even louder?""
Oh well

Fixing the room makes it better, not necessarily louder.
post #8 of 31
Thread Starter 
You folks are right.
I have no clue but the path to learning is being willing to ask questions and learn from those responses.

The new room I am planning is a mancave with room just barely for the subs, projector, mains, two person couch and the wife.

But this is the info I wanted:

When you excite a resonant system, such as the air in your concrete room, the energy tends to pool where it dissipates least: standing waves. These start at the longest 1/2 wavelength that fits in your room, and continue up in frequency. However, it's only in the low bass that we see individual modes, modes that are difficult to suppress.

So if we get no low bass room bothersome modes then the room is maybe ok?(well with a two inch thick dacron layer in the entire room).

I got wonky numbers when running my proposed new HT concrete room?
It shows no modes for low frequency? (under 100 HZ)
Hmmm.
So for my proposed HT tubular room of 1.90 meteres by 1,99 metere by 2.95 meteres:
It showed room modes but the lowest one was at 191 hz where even plain dacron(I figure 2 inches thick dacron will kill any reverbs?) will absorb that frequency?

http://www.marktaw.com/recording/Aco...WaveCalcu.html

191 hz
post #9 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell Burrows View Post

You folks are right.
I have no clue but the path to learning is being willing to ask questions and learn from those responses.

The new room I am planning is a mancave with room just barely for the subs, projector, mains, two person couch and the wife.

But this is the info I wanted:

When you excite a resonant system, such as the air in your concrete room, the energy tends to pool where it dissipates least: standing waves. These start at the longest 1/2 wavelength that fits in your room, and continue up in frequency. However, it's only in the low bass that we see individual modes, modes that are difficult to suppress.

So if we get no low bass room bothersome modes then the room is maybe ok?(well with a two inch thick dacron layer in the entire room).

I got wonky numbers when running my proposed new HT concrete room?
It shows no modes for low frequency? (under 100 HZ)
Hmmm.
So for my proposed HT tubular room of 1.90 meteres by 1,99 metere by 2.95 meteres:
It showed room modes but the lowest one was at 191 hz where even plain dacron(I figure 2 inches thick dacron will kill any reverbs?) will absorb that frequency?

http://www.marktaw.com/recording/Aco...WaveCalcu.html

191 hz

Are you sure your number are right?
In imperial measurements we have 6'L x 6.5'W x 9.5'H?

That's a closet.
post #10 of 31
Thread Starter 
116 inches long by 79 inches width by 75 inches height.

Yes.
I want something small that a bothersome standing wave is unable to fit inside of.
Something that just comftorably fits two folks with no room for bothersome wifes sisters, mother in laws , etc. that yaketty yak all movie long...sigh.

Subwoofers are going IB.
post #11 of 31
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbldare View Post

I hear that a lot as well, but you may also want to look into controlling the reflections in the mid and high frequencies. By just doing that, it won't sound as "loud" but will actually measure the same. It will be a cleaner sound-As long as you arn't producing a distorted sound in the first place.


dbl

I never play it when there is distortion and in the present room its stuffed to the gills with merchandise on every wall along with my reading books(1236 at last count).


In the new HT room:
I figure an entire room coating of a two inch thick dacron layer will kill any reflections above 97 hz?
post #12 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swampfox View Post

Are you sure your number are right?
In imperial measurements we have 6'L x 6.5'W x 9.5'H?

That's a closet.

I know guys with subs that big.
post #13 of 31
A couple of comments:

An enclosed space will have modes when energized. A room will have modes dictated by its dimensions, the lowest frequency will be determined by the longest wavelength supported by the boundary. A concrete room will contain the energy for a longer period of time than a room whose shell can flex.

A room will have modes, this is unavoidable, however, you may be able to reduce their destructive influences in many ways. You can control their frequency extension and distribution via dimensions. You can avoid placing yourself and loudspeakers in areas that will exasperate problematic modes. You can introduce shell construction systems that will dampen low frequency energy, along with shell resonances. You can introduce interior acoustic treatments that are designed to absorb low frequencies. Once you've done all that you can passively, calibrate the system at your standard listening level.
post #14 of 31
Thread Starter 
The LOWEST? mode that fits in my room is 191 hz and a 1/4 to 1/2 inch layer a dacron will absorb frequencies from 125 hz and up?

So a two inch thick dacron layer will absorb anything from 100hz and up to 20, 000 hz?

So essentially acording to the room mode calculator and dacron absorption there are going to be zero, zip, nada when it comes to low frequency room modes in my proposed concrete tubular HT room????

Hmm my wonky idea is looking better today???
post #15 of 31
Quote:


dacron absorption

What is that? are you sure about its absorption coefficient?
post #16 of 31
If you are trying to absorb sound energy using a "resistive" material like foam or fiberglass, it will need to be a 1/4 wavelength thickness of the lowest frequency targeted. I'm not sure of your dimensions or calculations, but with your 9' 5" ceiling height, you'll have a fundamental mode at about 59 Hz. A 1/4 wavelength at this frequency would mean material about 4' 8" thick. Any fabric covering will also determine upper frequency absorption coefficients.

I would suggest using acoustic panels that incorporate diaphragmatic absorption along with fiberglass as a thin, broadband treatment.
post #17 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell Burrows View Post

116 inches long by 79 inches width by 75 inches height.

Yes.
I want something small that a bothersome standing wave is unable to fit inside of.
Something that just comftorably fits two folks with no room for bothersome wifes sisters, mother in laws , etc. that yaketty yak all movie long...sigh.

Subwoofers are going IB.


Frankly, I can't image building a room that small. The ceiling height is ridiculously low, the room is barely wide enough to fit furniture, the length is too short. The overall feeling of the room will be claustrophobic, and anyone with any amount of claustrophobia wouldn't tolerate the room for the length of a movie.
More ironic is the use of IB subs, which will could require an enclosure as large as the primary room.
post #18 of 31
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Varney View Post

If you are trying to absorb sound energy using a "resistive" material like foam or fiberglass, it will need to be a 1/4 wavelength thickness of the lowest frequency targeted. I'm not sure of your dimensions or calculations, but with your 9' 5" ceiling height, you'll have a fundamental mode at about 59 Hz. A 1/4 wavelength at this frequency would mean material about 4' 8" thick. Any fabric covering will also determine upper frequency absorption coefficients.

I would suggest using acoustic panels that incorporate diaphragmatic absorption along with fiberglass as a thin, broadband treatment.

116 inches long by 79 inches width by 75 inches height.

I get 75 inches height as seven feet three inches as my space from floor to ceiling???

Hmm I was thinking of twenty or more very cheap car woofers tuned to 59 or 60 hz to serve as diaphragmatic absorbers??(behind the pj screen).

But my simplest option is just cut that bothersome freq with a paraband eq at 1/3 oct or 1/4 octave?

I am also wanting a small HT room since its going to take small amounts of power to make my ears bleed??
post #19 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell Burrows View Post

I get 75 inches height as seven feet three inches as my space from floor to ceiling???

Brain fart on that one... It's 6' 3" I was thinking about this earlier and the room will have less area than two 4' x 8' sheets of plywood laid down side by side with a ceiling 2" over my head - sounds like a fish house to me It's your room though
post #20 of 31
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swampfox View Post

Frankly, I can't image building a room that small. The ceiling height is ridiculously low, the room is barely wide enough to fit furniture, the length is too short. The overall feeling of the room will be claustrophobic, and anyone with any amount of claustrophobia wouldn't tolerate the room for the length of a movie.
More ironic is the use of IB subs, which will could require an enclosure as large as the primary room.

Why do you want furniture?

You are right that IB is not ideal since I forgot that what I wanted was a bed sized subwoofer cabinet as a low riser stage for chair/pillows futon.

And I like small rooms for entertainment since it excludes yapping wifes sisters and mother in laws from fitting in there and most importantly no fit then no yakityy yak yak during movies as my wife, kids and I enjoy a movie.
post #21 of 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell Burrows View Post

116 inches long by 79 inches width by 75 inches height.

I get 75 inches height as seven feet three inches as my space from floor to ceiling???

75 inches is 6'3". That is a very low ceiling. You want to put the seating on a platform? Even person of below average height would bump his head.

79" is 6'7" wide. The love seat in my family room is 5'6" wide. That leaves a bit over 6" on each side, which is far to narrow to get around.
post #22 of 31
Thread Starter 
Right!, forgot about the headroom so 75 plus 15 inches for 90 inches HT.
And I guess add 21 inches to the width and thats close to my final dimensions.??

And recalculate the 1/4 wave fund. for at what freq to set the cut for the 1/3 oct or 1/4 oct para eq. and I am set except for some cheap woofers for absorption.
post #23 of 31
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lennon_68 View Post

Brain fart on that one... It's 6' 3" I was thinking about this earlier and the room will have less area than two 4' x 8' sheets of plywood laid down side by side with a ceiling 2" over my head - sounds like a fish house to me It's your room though

Yes but then not everyone is six foot one or taller.
I am five foot seven so 8 inches clearance above my head is ok.
But I am going to add 15 inches more for the underfoot subs.
post #24 of 31
You plan on using a projector? How big is your screen?

I thought my 14x19x7 room was small but damn!!!
post #25 of 31
One of the major components of musical preference is a sense of space, defined in the literature as Apparent Source Width. The greater the ASW, the more we humans enjoy the sound. This requires space, distance from listener to walls/floor/ceiling, distance from speakers to walls, and uniform, broadband wall reflections, not resonant ones at single/narrow frequency ranges.

400 cu ft is a closet. Nothing will change that. If that's all the space you have, use it, but I think it would make a nice little workshop.

Have fun,
Frank
post #26 of 31
Thread Starter 
I understand its a closet and that there are going to be modes.
I just wanted a space that aproximates the ad reductio space of an automobile listening area so that I can try some time delay equipment for kicks.

I was thinking of trying that new led pj from Vivitar? the Qumi??

I just wanted to plan something different from the same huge HT with space to fit a blue whale in the corner.

I have sat in a few cars at IASCA events when the sound was ok so my DIY idea was why not translate that to a HT with a pj?(only without the offset seating positions) with definitively, positively no frigging room for any mother in laws or four wifes sisters that want to talk about soap opera shows or the latest gossip.

And my focus is on a small HT listening area with four sweet spots instead of trying for sweet spots for the entire room.
post #27 of 31
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Varney View Post

A couple of comments:

An enclosed space will have modes when energized. A room will have modes dictated by its dimensions, the lowest frequency will be determined by the longest wavelength supported by the boundary. A concrete room will contain the energy for a longer period of time than a room whose shell can flex.

A room will have modes, this is unavoidable, however, you may be able to reduce their destructive influences in many ways. You can control their frequency extension and distribution via dimensions. You can avoid placing yourself and loudspeakers in areas that will exasperate problematic modes. You can introduce shell construction systems that will dampen low frequency energy, along with shell resonances. You can introduce interior acoustic treatments that are designed to absorb low frequencies. Once you've done all that you can passively, calibrate the system at your standard listening level.

What about avoiding the energy that creates the room modes?

What about using parametric eq. 1/3 or 1/4 octave to cut the energy?
I.e. problem room mode 59 hz is plus 10 db so a cut of 10 db on the equip. at 59 hz?
10db plus a cut at 10 db gives me flat at 59 hz?

Say six eq. each set to control a room mode?
post #28 of 31
Parametric eq is used in exactly that way. Here's the downside... Modes create not only peaks but also nulls within the room. These can be just as deep as the spike is tall.

Imagine that two of your seats happen to (or need to be) positioned such that one is in a 59hz peak of 10db and the other is in a 59hz null of -10db. What are you going to do with your eq now?
post #29 of 31
This thread is novel and a bit nutty! It reminds me of those video game places where kids sit inside a race car like thing with speakers that are almost like headphones. You have a space that is more like a van, or a really big set of headphones. You have an interesting task. You're also creating a big challenge.

If I were to create a tiny room like that, I'd probably put in a plasma, build in the speakers, make the whole thing like one big bass trap so it's a room within a room and cover all surfaces with absorption.

Firstly, about bass traps. You can hear modes at any level, it doesn't matter what level or if it's movies, rock music, "audiophile" music, whatever. When you hear the kind of bass you can only get in a well trapped room, then the modes will annoy you. It's a bit like when you're in a building with a central HVAC system. When it goes off you suddenly notice how loud it was, because suddenly it's quiet. Right now you are used to hearing modes ringing, but after you treat them you won't want to go back. You've probably had a similar experience elsewhere in audio.

I find rock music is enhanced with bass traps as much as anything else. Kick drums are tight and punchy. LFE has more control. Albums that never quite got there with the bass are a delight to listen to now. The same is true with movies. Everything improves. In fact, at higher levels the ears become more sensitive to bass and any problems are further magnified.

Bass traps can help reduce nulls, so in that sense they don't necessarily give you less bass, but overall you are likely to find that you sense a net decrease in bass. The reason is that in the time domain, the modes decay at a faster rate. Before trapping, they ring out in time and this creates the impression of more bass and more boom. So with traps you will actually sense less bass and I've found I'm running the subs harder. It's a bit like being able to turn your system up more and enjoy it at a louder level because it's more clean after say getting more headroom, more efficient drivers, etc. The overall effect is I now get bass that is more dynamic, more visceral and with more impact. I run them harder to get there, but because I've cleaned up the room artifacts it works far far better.

You can do a sim for modes in REW and it's quite a good tool. I did a quick sim and the bass looks ok, but the low midrange has some dips.

If you have a concrete room, you have real problems. However, every room pretty much needs trapping anyway, it's just in a concrete room you need it more. Once it's done, however, you may find you keep a bit more bottom end gain. One local retailer here has a concrete room with 4 large bass traps. The result was good, and their 10" 4th order bandpass (no more output than a sealed box) hit with a big stick in a big room. Far more impact than a 10" sub in a normal room.
post #30 of 31
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigus View Post

Parametric eq is used in exactly that way. Here's the downside... Modes create not only peaks but also nulls within the room. These can be just as deep as the spike is tall.

Imagine that two of your seats happen to (or need to be) positioned such that one is in a 59hz peak of 10db and the other is in a 59hz null of -10db. What are you going to do with your eq now?


One thing I found for something like that is imagining a mode like a bouncing ball inside a room.
For a null a chair with a hard back reflects? some mode energy?

And sometimes its a case of at that same listening position something as simple as cutting an inch or two from the chairs height changes whats being listened to? (or raising the chair by an inch or two).

Kind of like the subwoofer room crawl only I try it for listening positions?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DIY Speakers and Subs
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › Are room modes really bothersome with high spl movie sound tracks?