AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › 2 Channel Audio › Do i need an external dac with HK3490 + Vienna Bach Speakers
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Do i need an external dac with HK3490 + Vienna Bach Speakers - Page 5  

post #121 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veda View Post

My theory,

Is that an unproven theory by any chance?
post #122 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by geekhd View Post

Is that an unproven theory by any chance?

If I say "my guess" would it make you feel better? LOL...
post #123 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnarus View Post

Such products as also crap by design. We will gladly concede that all products that are crap by design will sound different from products which are not crap by design. So you've been here since 2008 and you've never encountered the term, "level matching"? You really ought to read more closely.

Is there a list of products that are "crap by design" that you think others should avoid buying? I never once ran across them since 1996 where I started reading these scientist vs audiophile debate. If you guys got the time it would really help making a list. Can you show me a list of the components you have right now in your system? They must be the best this world can offer... Level matching? Sure but we're talking about a whole product package and how it sounds differ to another straight out of the box without alteration.
post #124 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnarus View Post

Another audiophile who can't tell the difference between his mistress and his wife without looking at the pricetag.

Ahh don't be so quick to judge. Being audiophiles, of course we look at the physique first before laying down the big $
post #125 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDLehner View Post

See...I told you guys I was fairly, comparatively moderate...lol.

Dude, it's been going on for decades. If you don't give them a reality slap you'll never get your point across. Otherwise you're just wasting your time, like what they're doing right now. But it's fun to see them jumping up and down once in a while, of course still not grasping the overall situation that none of these matters, that the seller was able to make the buyer happy, that if the seller is lying to the consumers the feds would have gone down the legal path to lock them up (no class action lawsuit so far), that they should be spending their time making $ instead of posting stuff noone cared about so they can spend carelessly like those buyers as life is too short to waste on such trivial things... pitiful really.

Why am I doing this? 1) it's fun 2) maybe some of these scientists can be saved afterall though unlikely...
post #126 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veda View Post

Can you show me a list of the components you have right now in your system?

I've asked this, seemingly easy question...over, and over, and over. Of course you know...most won't answer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veda View Post

...that if the seller is lying to the consumers the feds would have gone down the legal path to lock them up (no class action lawsuit so far)

I said something similar; that if all gear sounded the same, and all this money had been wasted...you'd think it was a story that would have broke somewhere bigger than this chat board...lol.

But I don't want to take this opportunity to beat-up on the objectivists (although this is what it feels like when they gang-up on someone...I just never had a co-pilot in this thing); they have a point in there somewhere...if they just wouldn't take things to such extremes.

CD
post #127 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veda View Post

Can you show me a list of the components you have right now in your system?

That's very nosy of you.
post #128 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veda View Post

if the seller is lying to the consumers

They know how to write up their ads to avoid getting lawsuits. You just have to know how to dissect the wordings of their ads which you don't.

Quote:


the feds would have gone down the legal path to lock them up (no class action lawsuit so far)

Is that what you came up with after extensive search on this subject?
post #129 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDLehner View Post

I said something similar; that if all gear sounded the same, and all this money had been wasted...you'd think it was a story that would have broke somewhere bigger than this chat board...lol.

It's because it's not a story. It's dog bites man. People waste their money on crazy stuff all the time. Magic bracelets, diet pills and belly fat ointments, burnt toast that looks like the Virgin Mary, 9/11 conspiracy and moon hoax theory DVD's, penis enlargement paraphernalia, etc. etc.

You can add audio nonsense right in the mix. It's the exact same lack of critical thinking that leads to all of it. Barnum was an optimist, there's way more then one sucker born every minute.
post #130 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by geekhd View Post

Is that what you came up with after extensive search on this subject?

It's so simple why would I waste time researching this subject. You didn't see it?
post #131 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by geekhd View Post

That's very nosy of you.

Geek, you still don't get it...do you? Enthusiasts want to talk about their gear. The very fact that you find it "nosy", tells me you have no interest in audio, as an endeavor; only the science behind it.

That's fine...but like I've said in the past, it's like a restaurant critic debating a Biologist; they are bound to see things from differing points of view.

The critic is talking about how this lobster tasted better than any lobster he's ever had, and the Biologist says "your body didn't see it any different than any other lobster you've ever had". It's not about how it passes through you, it's about how it comes into you.

Read my sig.

CD
post #132 of 146
Quote:
You can add audio nonsense right in the mix. It's the exact same lack of critical thinking that leads to all of it. Barnum was an optimist, there's way more then one sucker born every minute.
Are you saying that I can stop coloring my CDs with green Magic Marker?
post #133 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veda View Post

Yet all you scientists fail to note that some packaged DACs may have been designed to intentionally alter the sound by emphasizing certain freqs as to make them sound "better".
Then it's NOT just a DAC

I have always said anyone can make x or y sound different and then market that difference.

Just like MIT 'Music Interfaces'. They may or may not do something but please for the love of whatever higher power stop calling them cables.

There should really be only one thing in the chain that alters sound: an EQ (whether simple PEQ or DSP driven). If you are purchasing a DAC that has prewired EQ you should be told about it.
post #134 of 146
Quote:


If you are purchasing a DAC that has prewired EQ you should be told about it.

Also, you're a fool.
post #135 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veda View Post
It's so simple why would I waste time researching this subject.
So you made up about "(no class action lawsuit so far)".
post #136 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDLehner View Post
Geek, you still don't get it...do you?
Funny to see such reply from the one who has demonstrated his reading comprehension problem here time and time again.

Quote:
Enthusiasts want to talk about their gear.
Those are audiophiles. You are confused, once again.

Quote:
The very fact that you find it "nosy", tells me you have no interest in audio, as an endeavor; only the science behind it.
So you feel that CruelInventions made a good poin. "That's a good point"
Then try another post by him. You should feel the same about this as well. http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showp...5&postcount=98
post #137 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnarus View Post
Also, you're a fool.
I wouldn't say that someone purchasing a DAC with a preset eq/voicing to them should be called a fool.

If that is what they like far as sound goes that is great. Just when recommending that same piece to some one let them know what it actually is. That is is something that is not simply converting a digital to analog signal with the least amount of coloration to the signal as possible.

My DCX is a DAC, but it is also more. I don't go around saying it's just a DAC.
post #138 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by geekhd View Post

Funny to see such reply from the one who has demonstrated his reading comprehension problem here time and time again.

Listen...I've come to tolerate you, for the most part. But if you keep posting that I have a "reading comprehension problem", you can explain it to TOS.

Just because I don't agree with you...of all people...doesn't mean I have a "problem". I think reading, what you tend to write, would be confusing...not to mention exasperating...to most.

CD
post #139 of 146
Quote:


I wouldn't say that someone purchasing a DAC with a preset eq/voicing to them should be called a fool.

I can't think of a non-foolish reason to purchase such a device. If you want to alter the EQ, there are much, much better tools for that.
post #140 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnarus View Post

I can't think of a non-foolish reason to purchase such a device. If you want to alter the EQ, there are much, much better tools for that.

Let me hop on the opportunity to agree with mcnarus...when I can If you want to alter the EQ, I'd at least want to be able to see what is going on...not leave it "blind", from something inside the box (that's fixed).

CD
post #141 of 146
Quote:


Let me hop on the opportunity to agree with mcnarus...when I can

Oh, god, did I say something wrong?
post #142 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnarus View Post

I can't think of a non-foolish reason to purchase such a device. If you want to alter the EQ, there are much, much better tools for that.

While I am not saying they are a fool, I am also not saying they are going about it the best way.

As a consumer purchase what ever you want with your money. Just do it with solid and well grounded information.
post #143 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDLehner View Post

Listen...I've come to tolerate you, for the most part. But if you keep posting that I have a "reading comprehension problem", you can explain it to TOS.

Just because I don't agree with you...of all people...doesn't mean I have a "problem".

If it's that easily recognizable by oneself, it wouldn't be considered a problem and I'll bet you are not aware of that.

Quote:


I think reading, what you tend to write, would be confusing...not to mention exasperating...to most.

Based on your posts last couple of months, just about everyone's writing is confusing to you. "I read, and re-read it; I don't know how you misinterpret that? What do you think he's saying?" http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...5#post19549495 And I don't expect you to get that now either so don't bother.
post #144 of 146
cool it guys
post #145 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabbu1 View Post

I have been bitten by the audio bug over the past month. It got worse after I bought a pair of Vienna Acoustics Grand Bach Speakers at throwaway prices at BB. The speakers are currently powered by a HK3490.

The music comes either from my $50 Sony DVD player
or my squeezebox receiver (both using digital connections to the HK3490).

I am really enjoying listening to music with the speakers and the HK3490 but I was wondering if i am missing something "significant" by not having a dedicated DAC ($300-500)?

My other possibility
Buy a decent bluray player (eg NAD T557 going at $300 ) + a squeezebox touch (supposedly it has a decent dac too).

I mostly listen to music (as far as video goes in addition to the dvd player i am using a CRT tv...i am just waiting it for it die)

Thanks.

Always nice...after a mod has to come in here, and tell us to knock-off our petty bickering...to try and get back to the OP.

Dabbu1...if you're still anywhere near this thread...lol...maybe an SBT is the right path for you. I've been a Squeezebox fan for years, it offers a ton of convenience and features, if you're looking to stream; and as opposed to worrying about an external DAC, the one it sports...as you say...will probably suit you just fine.

CD
post #146 of 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabbu1 View Post
I have been bitten by the audio bug over the past month. It got worse after I bought a pair of Vienna Acoustics Grand Bach Speakers at throwaway prices at BB. The speakers are currently powered by a HK3490.

The music comes either from my $50 Sony DVD player
or my squeezebox receiver (both using digital connections to the HK3490).

I am really enjoying listening to music with the speakers and the HK3490 but I was wondering if i am missing something "significant" by not having a dedicated DAC ($300-500)?

My other possibility
Buy a decent bluray player (eg NAD T557 going at $300 ) + a squeezebox touch (supposedly it has a decent dac too).

I mostly listen to music (as far as video goes in addition to the dvd player i am using a CRT tv...i am just waiting it for it die)

Thanks.
As usual for these types of discussions, the OP has been driven from this thread and possibly the forum. Should you still be around, the best way to try to get feedback might be to open a new thread by asking for responses from only those that have actual experience from using external DAC's. You can decide for yourself which of the (typically) subjective real-world feedback has value to you, but as with most things in life, you can not and should not take advice from people with no first-hand experience with the subject being discussed.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: 2 Channel Audio
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › 2 Channel Audio › Do i need an external dac with HK3490 + Vienna Bach Speakers