Quote:
Originally Posted by leo2498 
thanks GSR,
definitely I will go for the pre/amp combination, but I tested the rotel rsx-1560 and it was huge better than my current denon(in sound quality) and it don't have audyssey but in general it was better, do you think that a dedicated pre like RsX1572 could be better than denon 4311?

thanks GSR,
definitely I will go for the pre/amp combination, but I tested the rotel rsx-1560 and it was huge better than my current denon(in sound quality) and it don't have audyssey but in general it was better, do you think that a dedicated pre like RsX1572 could be better than denon 4311?
This really isn't the thread to be discussing all your options in depth - there's a receiver / preamp-processor thread that's better suited for it. But IMO, the Denon 4311 would be a pretty big step up over your current Denon 3310 and Audyssey typically makes a big difference in sound quality unless your room happens to be acoustically perfect. If you haven't tried Audyssey on your 3310, give it a try (it won't cost you anything other than a little time to run through the calibration process) - that might make a big enough difference that you'd be happy sticking with what you've got for a while longer (keep in mind that the Audyssey XT32 in the 4311 is a big improvement). Did you mean RSP-1572 (I can't find a RSX-1572)? In any event, Rotel only seems to do parametric EQ, which isn't very useful unless it has a ton of filters and is used in conjunction with measuring equipment (to get a useful result, you would most certainly need to hire a professional). If you hate the thought of using room correction, Rotel makes quality stuff but I haven't auditioned any of their gear in years.























instead of 2.2, just by using the contrast enhancement by +1 with my Mitsubishi 73738 dlp It couldn't do that without it no matter what I tried
I consider it the icing on the cake for my shadow detail, blacks and contrast
check page 268 for details!
).