AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › The physics and understanding of low frequencies
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The physics and understanding of low frequencies - Page 5

post #121 of 345
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bone215 View Post

I think there is a very serious language barrier here.

By the way, I asked how old you were to determine your age, period, don't worry about what I was assuming, I was just asking.

You seem to be a person whose natural first language is not English. If that is true, I think that is contributing to some of the confusion.

The other possibility is, well unkind and I won't say it. Good luck.



I just got on here to learn a thing or two about sound, just because I'm not accepting anything someone says blindly doesn't mean I am on here to start something and me having bad writing skills doesn't stop me from understanding what you're saying.

You tell me not to assume anything yet you then say you thought english wasn't my first language, so obviously you were thinking if I was like 14 you would excuse my disagreement on here.
post #122 of 345
^^^

dude, there's no "excuse" for your disagreement... you simply are wrong... you can restate your points over and over again, but it's not going to change anything...

you can choose to accept that and learn from what people are trying to tell you, or you can beat your head up against the wall... it won't take much longer for people to lose interest in trying to educate you...

did you buy "the master handbook of acoustics" yet?
post #123 of 345
I had gotten the impression that he did finally see the light about 4 or so posts back...
post #124 of 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymalmsteen887 View Post
Thanks for giong to such lenghts to help me understand but thats exactly what I was talking about notice in the vioin wave that when it repeats that whole pattern that is the fundemental you are adding multiplae sinwaves at deifferent frequencies. You make it sound more complicated when you say minute changes its not that its having to react like a person having to hit their breaks because a car pulled out in front of them. look at the violin wave again put a dot at any loctation of the wave that would be the excursion the speaker would be at at that moment, its like raise the signal by+8 then subtract+4 then add+2 then add+4 then +subtract+2 then subtract +8 etc.
I hope youre understanding what I mean it played any of these fluctuations at different times wouldnt make since.

I know if you have multiple drivers then phase of waves could be off by some because they have different locations but the ear just mixes sine waves together thats why the sounds are still recognizable. Kinda like if two violins are tuned the same but the players dont play the note at the same time so they are slightly off(is their a name for this?) but the difference hear is that they all have their own harmonics where as the speaker is seperating the range.

But yeah the THD stuff I get.
Even though for the most part you can think of periodic waves as consisting of a series of sine waves, I would guess that there's a difference between vibrating a cone at one frequency vs many frequencies. Can that result in more distortion to any given component of the wave so to speak? I don't know. But I could see where it would be true.

Not sure if that's what you are asking though.
post #125 of 345
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccotenj View Post

^^^

dude, there's no "excuse" for your disagreement... you simply are wrong... you can restate your points over and over again, but it's not going to change anything...

you can choose to accept that and learn from what people are trying to tell you, or you can beat your head up against the wall... it won't take much longer for people to lose interest in trying to educate you...

did you buy "the master handbook of acoustics" yet?

Look I am not saying you're wrong. When I got an hdtv for the first time I thought it had decent sound so i was looking forward to getting a "real sound system" and actually bass. I didnt have the opportunity to buy some speakers but dad had these speaker towers from the 90s and I bought a stereo reciever for it and played some PS3 games on it and thought it sounded good not what I was expecting but at least there was some bass now. I wanted to do a comparison to the speakers on the hdtv I mentioned and turned the bass all the way down on the towers to get started. I listened to several different songs multiple times and could not hear any improved differences and at times I felt the tv speakers sounded better. I thought they would at least sound better since it had a midrange and horn but there was no justified difference for the money I spent on the reciever on anything other than the bass. I played a sine wave sweeps and individual tones to see what frequencies they could both play and the tv played from 16000 and all the way down to 100hz or maybe slightly lower. The towers played 16000 down to around 40hz(I can only hear this frequency when playing a sine wave since its not loud enough to be heard over the other music). That confused me cause the midrange on the towers were 3 inches and the tv speakers were 1inx0.5in. So I guess I dont have the ears then for this stuff but I do enjoy sound and wish that there was something there for me to get into and thats why I came here to be enlightned but I heard mostly the same things I've read about online just technical stuff not anything to do with your ears and enjoyment and if someone has had said something like that I apologize.

By the way on the sine wave comparison each speaker made its own sounds at irregular intervals but I dont notice them when listening to music.

Could someone explain to me why those tv speakers can get as loud as they do? Its loud enough to be unpleasant and vibrates the tv like crazy. The towers can get loud enough that high pitches physically hurt the ears but I would have no use for that advantage
post #126 of 345
I am surprised you can actually compare a flat TV speakers to floorstanding speakers, but i guess it depends what kind of tower you actually had in what condition they were.

But in general flat TVs are very poor on the sound side, which is why manufacturers try to push "sound bars" as upgrades. For example i had a samsung LCD C6500 i think, it had one driver on the back, the sound was horrible for anything either a bit loud or the lower frequencies. Even man voices sounded bad.

The speaker is so bad that you have to play it loud just to be able to understand what people are saying, and that cause the speaker to saturate and make the TV plastic back to vibrate. Of course that the speaker was firing at the back of the TV did not help.

So when you say "loud enough to be unpleasant and vibrates the tv like crazy" i guess you are talking about the same thing, very early saturation.

With a good speaker at least you can clearly understand voice so that you can play them at low volume without losing clarity.
And a good speaker can play very loud without being unpleasant (if you stay within reasonable SPL of course), if at a given volume the sound seems unpleasant, saturated, you are either at the limit of the speaker of the speaker is just poor and high volume amplifies the weaknesses.

But then not all TVs are the same, you can have decent sound for TV watching, but nothing approaching the dynamic of a real sound system.
post #127 of 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymalmsteen887 View Post

Could someone explain to me why those tv speakers can get as loud as they do? Its loud enough to be unpleasant and vibrates the tv like crazy. The towers can get loud enough that high pitches physically hurt the ears but I would have no use for that advantage

Ah, now we're getting somewhere, to the genesis of the issue.

Do you have any idea what towers those were? 3" drivers isn't all that large. 5" is usually standard for bookshelves.

The TV can be loud enough to be unpleasant and vibrate like crazy because distortion sounds "loud". What is the make/model of your TV?

Here's what happens when you give speakers more power than they can handle. They start distorting, maybe even clipping. When clipping happens, your THD goes through the roof because a clipped waveform generates harmonics like crazy.

For example, here is a spectrum of a 60Hz sine wave vs a 60Hz square wave (full clipping)



In this picture, for the sine wave (top) we see a small harmonic at 120Hz, and another at 240Hz. Ignore the peak at 190Hz as that is not a harmonic. That's fan noise from the room I am in.

On the bottom of this picture, the square wave is generating strong harmonics at 180, 300, and 420Hz. But it's actually worse. I widened the spectrum out a bit...



Going all the way out to 2KHz, we can clearly see the first 16 odd harmonics of this clipped 60Hz waveform! So not only are we getting 60Hz, we are also getting sound output at 180, 300, 420, 540, 660, 780, 900, 1020,1140, 1260, 1380, 1500, 1620, 1740, 1860, and 1980Hz!

This is where bigger speakers come into play. If you drive small speakers into clipping, they will sound much louder, and much more annoying, because of the distortion. Recall that a complex sinewave has many, many different frequencies in it. If you clip all those, you are going to get hundreds if not thousands of odd harmonics coming through the speakers. That turns sound into noise.

Bigger speakers can handle much more power than the small ones. So you can have them louder without them being noisier.

Another advantage of separate speakers is the wider you can space them apart, the larger your "soundstage" will be. So your stereo effects will be much ore enveloping.

Your room also can play a part in how speakers sound. If you have hardwood floors with no carpet, and a vaulted ceiling, most any sound system will sound bad. This is because as the room echoes, those echoes become noise. So carpet and furniture in general can help.


Out of curiosity, what is your native language? I moved to Germany and got a basic understanding of the German language, but I can't imagine being able to carry on a conversation as complex as audio theory with a native German speaker. So you're doing better than I am!
post #128 of 345
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwickers View Post

I am surprised you can actually compare a flat TV speakers to floorstanding speakers, but i guess it depends what kind of tower you actually had in what condition they were.

But in general flat TVs are very poor on the sound side, which is why manufacturers try to push "sound bars" as upgrades. For example i had a samsung LCD C6500 i think, it had one driver on the back, the sound was horrible for anything either a bit loud or the lower frequencies. Even man voices sounded bad.

The speaker is so bad that you have to play it loud just to be able to understand what people are saying, and that cause the speaker to saturate and make the TV plastic back to vibrate. Of course that the speaker was firing at the back of the TV did not help.

So when you say "loud enough to be unpleasant and vibrates the tv like crazy" i guess you are talking about the same thing, very early saturation.

With a good speaker at least you can clearly understand voice so that you can play them at low volume without losing clarity.
And a good speaker can play very loud without being unpleasant (if you stay within reasonable SPL of course), if at a given volume the sound seems unpleasant, saturated, you are either at the limit of the speaker of the speaker is just poor and high volume amplifies the weaknesses.

But then not all TVs are the same, you can have decent sound for TV watching, but nothing approaching the dynamic of a real sound system.

The reciever I have was a Insignia 200W 2.0-Ch. Stereo so I dont know if that has something to do with. The woofers on the towers are rated 250 watts.
post #129 of 345
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanLW View Post

Ah, now we're getting somewhere, to the genesis of the issue.

Do you have any idea what towers those were? 3" drivers isn't all that large. 5" is usually standard for bookshelves.

The TV can be loud enough to be unpleasant and vibrate like crazy because distortion sounds "loud". What is the make/model of your TV?

Here's what happens when you give speakers more power than they can handle. They start distorting, maybe even clipping. When clipping happens, your THD goes through the roof because a clipped waveform generates harmonics like crazy.

For example, here is a spectrum of a 60Hz sine wave vs a 60Hz square wave (full clipping)



In this picture, for the sine wave (top) we see a small harmonic at 120Hz, and another at 240Hz. Ignore the peak at 190Hz as that is not a harmonic. That's fan noise from the room I am in.

On the bottom of this picture, the square wave is generating strong harmonics at 180, 300, and 420Hz. But it's actually worse. I widened the spectrum out a bit...



Going all the way out to 2KHz, we can clearly see the first 16 odd harmonics of this clipped 60Hz waveform! So not only are we getting 60Hz, we are also getting sound output at 180, 300, 420, 540, 660, 780, 900, 1020,1140, 1260, 1380, 1500, 1620, 1740, 1860, and 1980Hz!

This is where bigger speakers come into play. If you drive small speakers into clipping, they will sound much louder, and much more annoying, because of the distortion. Recall that a complex sinewave has many, many different frequencies in it. If you clip all those, you are going to get hundreds if not thousands of odd harmonics coming through the speakers. That turns sound into noise.

Bigger speakers can handle much more power than the small ones. So you can have them louder without them being noisier.

Another advantage of separate speakers is the wider you can space them apart, the larger your "soundstage" will be. So your stereo effects will be much ore enveloping.

Your room also can play a part in how speakers sound. If you have hardwood floors with no carpet, and a vaulted ceiling, most any sound system will sound bad. This is because as the room echoes, those echoes become noise. So carpet and furniture in general can help.


Out of curiosity, what is your native language? I moved to Germany and got a basic understanding of the German language, but I can't imagine being able to carry on a conversation as complex as audio theory with a native German speaker. So you're doing better than I am!

The TV is SYLVANIA LC420SS8 42-inch widescreen Limited Edition LCD and my native language is english.
post #130 of 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymalmsteen887 View Post

You tell me not to assume anything yet you then say you thought english wasn't my first isn't english...

Oh, dang, I'm sorry! I misread your statement a few posts back...
post #131 of 345
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanLW View Post

Oh, dang, I'm sorry! I misread your statement a few posts back...

What do you mean I had a typo so what.
post #132 of 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymalmsteen887 View Post

What do you mean I had a typo so what.

Yeah, the typo was what caused my misunderstanding.

Moving on...

Looks like the speakers in your TV are 10W speakers. So their sensitivity is likely at best 85db, meaning they will generate 85db of sound with 1 watt of power at 1 meter. Sound pressure decreases by 3db per doubling of distance in most rooms, so at 2 meters, it will be 82db, 4 meters 79db. Not sure how far away from your TV you sit, but we'll say 2 meters, about 6 feet, for the sake of argument. So at the listening position you will hear 82db with 1 watt going to the speakers. Now, the loudest you will hear is 92db if the speakers received a full 10W of power, assuming the amp in the TV can provide a full 10 watts per channel (and I don't see why it wouldn't) So, when you watch a movie, you will have to watch at least 13db below reference (reference being 105db peaks). So while most of a movie may sound good, once the action starts, you will probably not be getting near as good sound quality as with your towers.

Also, the tower's ability to play lower frequencies is a good thing. Ideally you want to cross your sub over to your main speakers no higher than 80Hz. This is because below 80Hz (60hz by some accounts) sound loses directionality. So if a sub is only playing 80Hz or lower, you won't be able to tell the sound is coming from the subs location. But if you have to cross it over at 120Hz in order to meet up with your TV speakers, you will be able to tell that the lows (80-120hz) are coming from the sub.

So external speakers would be good, if nothing more than for their lower frequency response. How much you spend is up to your own personal preference and budget.
post #133 of 345
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanLW View Post

Yeah, the typo was what caused my misunderstanding.

Moving on...

Looks like the speakers in your TV are 10W speakers. So their sensitivity is likely at best 85db, meaning they will generate 85db of sound with 1 watt of power at 1 meter. Sound pressure decreases by 3db per doubling of distance in most rooms, so at 2 meters, it will be 82db, 4 meters 79db. Not sure how far away from your TV you sit, but we'll say 2 meters, about 6 feet, for the sake of argument. So at the listening position you will hear 82db with 1 watt going to the speakers. Now, the loudest you will hear is 92db if the speakers received a full 10W of power, assuming the amp in the TV can provide a full 10 watts per channel (and I don't see why it wouldn't) So, when you watch a movie, you will have to watch at least 13db below reference (reference being 105db peaks). So while most of a movie may sound good, once the action starts, you will probably not be getting near as good sound quality as with your towers.

Also, the tower's ability to play lower frequencies is a good thing. Ideally you want to cross your sub over to your main speakers no higher than 80Hz. This is because below 80Hz (60hz by some accounts) sound loses directionality. So if a sub is only playing 80Hz or lower, you won't be able to tell the sound is coming from the subs location. But if you have to cross it over at 120Hz in order to meet up with your TV speakers, you will be able to tell that the lows (80-120hz) are coming from the sub.

So external speakers would be good, if nothing more than for their lower frequency response. How much you spend is up to your own personal preference and budget.

About your earlier comment on the 3inch driver that is the middle one the woofer in 12inches and the tweeter or horn or whatever its called is 1inch. The woofers however suck and dont have a large excursion and I have even taking them out and had an audio place try out some amps on it only got a little bit louder and they said if they gave it any more power it would destroy it.
post #134 of 345
Thread Starter 
Hey can someone point to a thread here or maybe some other site where people show of their home theater setups?
post #135 of 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymalmsteen887 View Post

Hey can someone point to a thread here or maybe some other site where people show of their home theater setups?

The first post in this thread has picture links out the wazoo:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=978755
post #136 of 345
Thread Starter 
Someone on another forum said that 20hz is hard to reproduce beacause I said I was pretty burnout on bass and thought I had already heard it all and that it was disappointing. If this is true then I am guessing those small 8 or 10inch woofers in those little enclosures at best buy don't cut if so what are they capable and at what volume. Also does imax have 20hz bass if it does it was pretty underwhelming.
post #137 of 345
IMHO the bass in theaters can be disappointing compared to a HT, it all depends on the theater setup and for example my local theater is not very good either with the sound or even the picture quality.

Go to a shop selling high end HT for a demo, not sure about BB unless they have dedicated HT rooms.
post #138 of 345
It's unlikely the Imax could generate high enough swept displacement to make 20 Hz (or below) worthwhile considering the sheer size of the space. But with enough displacement you could do just about anything.
post #139 of 345
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by goneten View Post
It's unlikely the Imax could generate high enough swept displacement to make 20 Hz (or below) worthwhile considering the sheer size of the space. But with enough displacement you could do just about anything.
That would mean even higher frequencies would get less volume the lower the frequency the more likely it is to get a boost in the room right because of a longer wave length
post #140 of 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymalmsteen887 View Post

That would mean even higher frequencies would get less volume the lower the frequency the more likely it is to get a boost in the room right because of a longer wave length

A bigger room will naturally have a lower resonating frequency. In the size space of the Imax theater it might be 10 Hz. Good luck achieving any kind of boost down there. At the end of the day in order to perceive a low frequency you need displacement and lots of it. To achieve clean 20 Hz output at levels you can perceive in a massive space like an Imax requires lots and lots of woofers with clean linear excursion and massive amounts of power.

One can't say that the Imax didn't thrill them simply because they couldn't detect 20 Hz. Either the content had sub-20 Hz information recorded in the soundtrack or it did not. At the end of the day, whether the content has the low frequencies recorded is irrelevant if the system is still incapable of shifting the required amount of air at those frequencies which is the most important criteria for determining whether you will or won't experience those frequencies.
post #141 of 345
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by goneten View Post

A bigger room will naturally have a lower resonating frequency. In the size space of the Imax theater it might be 10 Hz. Good luck achieving any kind of boost down there. At the end of the day in order to perceive a low frequency you need displacement and lots of it. To achieve clean 20 Hz output at levels you can perceive in a massive space like an Imax requires lots and lots of woofers with clean linear excursion and massive amounts of power.

One can't say that the Imax didn't thrill them simply because they couldn't detect 20 Hz. Either the content had sub-20 Hz information recorded in the soundtrack or it did not. At the end of the day, whether the content has the low frequencies recorded is irrelevant if the system is still incapable of shifting the required amount of air at those frequencies which is the most important criteria for determining whether you will or won't experience those frequencies.

I have no idea what you said and yes the bass at times was good but not what they advertise. I was at an american radio and they let me listen to two 15inch type Rs and it was tickling my throat and then I went to see avatar in imax and while exciting did not compare to the two 15s and was pretty much the same as the regular theater
post #142 of 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymalmsteen887 View Post

I have no idea what you said and yes the bass at times was good but not what they advertise. I was at an american radio and they let me listen to two 15inch type Rs and it was tickling my throat and then I went to see avatar in imax and while exciting did not compare to the two 15s and was pretty much the same as the regular theater

Even though I spent less than $1000 on my current setup, I still think my home theater system sounds better than most theaters. I can't really recall feeling good bass in a theater - perhaps one or two.

For tower speakers, very few can achieve 20Hz, and those that can are in the 5 figure range. Even the Klipsch RF-7s I want, which have two 10" woofers and cost approx. $3000 per pair only go down to about 30Hz. You need a good sub to achieve flat response down to 20Hz. And unfortunately, most big box stores don't sell subs capable of reaching that low.

The sad truth is that it's hard to experience a well set up home theater. You'd have to go to the smaller boutique stores that have a good demo room set up.
post #143 of 345
Thread Starter 
Then what frequency am I hearing when people are blasting subs in their cars and theaters
post #144 of 345
I believe the majority of the bass you hear booming out of cars is above 50hz.

as for theaters, im guessing they dont go much lower than 40hz just because of the sheer volume of air that would need to be pressurized.
post #145 of 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by schomas View Post

I believe the majority of the bass you hear booming out of cars is above 50hz.

as for theaters, im guessing they dont go much lower than 40hz just because of the sheer volume of air that would need to be pressurized.

You can hear the fundamental of the bottom piano note (27 Hz) in a large concert hall. "pressurizing" the room, while I kind of understand it, sometimes seems to me to equate to "make it like my car." Well, most of the sounds we're reproducing aren't like what occurs inside a car, so folks who seek the car experience in their homes are looking for something other than accurate reproduction, in my view, assuming I understand what folks seem to be saying. My little 10 inch sub will play 20 Hz loudly enough te be heard, but it's closer to flat only down to 25 Hz (and only if I don't get too loud. There is no reason at all that theaters cannot play down into the 20s, and in fact movies are mixed in theater sized rooms that have systems that are flat to below 20 Hz. It is neither necessary (in my view) nor possible once you exceed some specific room dimensions to create the kind of pressurization that easily occurs in cars, and that many can achieve in their home systems, in more manageable size (ie dimensions less than the wavelength of the bass frequencies). I'm not saying it isn't fun, just that it isn't necessary to "pressurize" a home theater room to play low.
post #146 of 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by schomas View Post

I believe the majority of the bass you hear booming out of cars is above 50hz.

as for theaters, im guessing they dont go much lower than 40hz just because of the sheer volume of air that would need to be pressurized.

I think it has more to do with the ability to keep bass in one theater from interfering with others in a multiplex. You would need some serious soundproofing in the common walls to contain output below 40hz or so.
post #147 of 345
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHAz View Post

You can hear the fundamental of the bottom piano note (27 Hz) in a large concert hall. "pressurizing" the room, while I kind of understand it, sometimes seems to me to equate to "make it like my car." Well, most of the sounds we're reproducing aren't like what occurs inside a car, so folks who seek the car experience in their homes are looking for something other than accurate reproduction, in my view, assuming I understand what folks seem to be saying. My little 10 inch sub will play 20 Hz loudly enough te be heard, but it's closer to flat only down to 25 Hz (and only if I don't get too loud. There is no reason at all that theaters cannot play down into the 20s, and in fact movies are mixed in theater sized rooms that have systems that are flat to below 20 Hz. It is neither necessary (in my view) nor possible once you exceed some specific room dimensions to create the kind of pressurization that easily occurs in cars, and that many can achieve in their home systems, in more manageable size (ie dimensions less than the wavelength of the bass frequencies). I'm not saying it isn't fun, just that it isn't necessary to "pressurize" a home theater room to play low.

Pianos dont produce hardly any bass, not to mention 27hz is so low that it would take a good enough volume to even be perceived. . About the cars I dont know what you guys mean about boomy. I am very familiar with a 50hz sound wave and it is most defiently not 50hz I am hearing. When you say boomy I am thinking loud which isnt a problem if its too loud turn it down. Most people who listen to rap music in cars want it hit at 35hz or lower. Also based on what I learned from someone at the beggining of this thread higher frequeicnies would be harder to be perceived giving that they're smaller in wavelength and will have less benefit from constructive interference, so if anything if the theater is 100ft long and 70ft wide between 16 and 11hz would start to benefit from the room size.
post #148 of 345
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bfreedma View Post

I think it has more to do with the ability to keep bass in one theater from interfering with others in a multiplex. You would need some serious soundproofing in the common walls to contain output below 40hz or so.

I dont see any reason why they could not sound proof the rooms and the volume reaching the next theater would have diminshed so much that it would not add to the bass waves going on at the time. Now during a quiet part of the movie sure but I doubt it would be like when youre waiting in line at a rollercoaster and hearing it go by the line.
post #149 of 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ymalmsteen887 View Post

I dont see any reason why they could not sound proof the rooms and the volume reaching the next theater would have diminshed so much that it would not add to the bass waves going on at the time. Now during a quiet part of the movie sure but I doubt it would be like when youre waiting in line at a rollercoaster and hearing it go by the line.

It's a much bigger problem with bass than with mids and highs. Given that low bass has a wavelength measured in feet, you would need, potentially, several yards of separation between theaters that would need to be filled with sound mitigating material.

Even if it was possible to retrofit existing theaters, I doubt they would be willing to give up the seating capacity - would be nice though.
post #150 of 345
Thread Starter 
Hey I have been listening to music and listening to different presets and messing with the equializer and trying to train my ears and I am surprised no one has brought this up, you can hear individual frequencies in a note. This is why I was arguing about the speaker not being able to vibrate fast enough then you want hear it. You can look at it like 100hz already a potential sound that can be activated in you r consciousness and the only way to make that sound percieved your ear drum has to vibrate back and forth at 100 times a second or 50 times every half a second or 25times every quater of a second(I am not sure how many waves have to happen at individual frequenices to before it wont be registered) So really saying 25hz or 50hz is misleading cause thats just a way for us to distinguish things for expirementation.

So I wanted to know to isolate frequencies in my mind. Ive messed around on a guitar and noticed that if I play a harmonic and then pluck the note haveing remembered the sound I can isolate it up to the forth harmonic its hard to hear the other ones(are they even contributing anything) so I would like to do this with listeing to music. Also is it normal if you turn up a sound system and hear sounds at your ear like it sounds like the sound is located at your ear and I am not talking about a low hz sound. Its really annoying and it happens at a volume that I dont consider that loud and would like to listen to it louder is this what you guys call harmonic distortion?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › The physics and understanding of low frequencies