AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Official LG 47LW5600/55LW5600 "Passive 3D" Owners Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official LG 47LW5600/55LW5600 "Passive 3D" Owners Thread - Page 51

post #1501 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thompsonbrook View Post

Can anyone please explain the repercussions of the new 1080i algorithm. Will it work with a 120Hz set or will it make the 5600 redundant?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGoatLantern View Post

I don't think anyone could explain it until we know what sets the firmware is being applied to. AFAIK nothing concrete has been reported yet, just wild speculation

Quote:
Originally Posted by alston80 View Post

Has anyone noticed 3d PQ improvement with the last firmware update? I noticed that directv 3d channels have much better quality. I have not noticed any quality difference with 3d blurays like Avatar.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbsstuff View Post

I found this explanation:

As per Flatpanelshd, LG has modified the algorithm for processing 3D on their Cinema 3D sets..

Before the Cinema 3D technology worked like this: During a time period of 1/200 seconds the TV showed 2 frames; 540 lines for the left eye and 540 lines for the right eye.
The new algorithm shows 4 frames instead of 2 during the 1/200 second time frame. It shows 1080i for the left eye and 1080i for the right eye.

When these are combined the two pictures create a 1080p picture according to LG. LG believes that this update improves picture quality on their Cinema 3D TVs to compete directly with the active 3D TVs such as 3D plasma TVs. You need to turn off TruMotion to utilize the new algorithm.

If this new logic indeed enables Passive 3D to match the Active 3D picture resolution, it could really be holding all the aces over Active.
____________________________________________________________ _____
Doesn't say which models this applies to but if you have to have Trumotion off to use the algorithm would the fact that it is 120Hz or 240Hz matter ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by justsomeavdude View Post

See post #182 over in the "LG Passive LW6500" thread in the 3D Displays Forum:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...1321920&page=7

shingdaz provided a link to an excellent in-depth review of Passive 3D TVs where the reviewers were using a 120Hz LG 55LW5600 model with a pre-release version of the 1080i algorithm firmware. So yes, we know that it can work on 120Hz models (at very least, that particular model)....but we still don't know when/if it will be released for sure (or if it already has). Keep in mind that just because we know that it can work on 120Hz models doesn't necessarily mean that LG will definetly release it for ALL models, even though that has been implied. Things are always subject to change without notice (as we've seen with the 65" LW6500's refresh rate).

Also keep in mind that we won't really know if this new firmware will be anything too spectacular either until we have a way of knowing for certain that it's actually been released and then hearing people's reports on it. I've seen a 55LW5600 running the old firmware and thought it was pretty darn good 3D, so I really don't think it'd make all of LG's 120Hz sets "redundant" or bad if they didn't get the update...it'd still be a pretty sweet 3D experience, imo...perhaps slightly less sweet at worst. Personally, I'd feel pretty confident buying a 120Hz model and thinking that I'd be getting the extra perk of the new 1080i firmware at some point down the road.

Who knows..maybe it's already been released...LG should give release notes with their updates. Some posters are saying that they think their 3D might have improved recently. And some are also saying that they think the 6500's 3D looks better than the 5600's...so maybe some extra processing or bells/whistles were added to the 6500 lineup or something...or maybe it's just wishful thinking...or maybe it's due to inconsistent viewing environments...or maybe that 240Hz refresh rate makes a difference. Too much speculation and variables for the moment. Not worth losing sleep over.

I got a new update to my 5600 a few days ago, and I can see a definite improvement from the cable 3D (1080i or 720P) on Demand movies. Not as much difference from sitting back 12 feet, but as I get closer, the perception of the "interlaced" effect is virtually gone until less than an arms length away. The image looks more solid almost all the way up to the TV.
They also allowed allowed for more of the image to be smoother and possibly removed Just scan mode to clean up the edges of video that were not supposed to be seen. In the old method, you may have had 1/2 inch on each side that was set as the edge of each eyes viewpoint that would converge together, leaving blank space around the screen. Now, the image is adjusted more to the edge during 3D playback. Basically it looks like they went from Just scan to 16x9 mode while in 3D.
Overall, the image quality is looking VERY good, and I had to re-adjust my 3D video mode settings after the update, but there is a noticeable difference to me when viewing a lot closer.

vegggas
post #1502 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegggas View Post


i got a new update to my 5600 a few days ago, and i can see a definite improvement from the cable 3d (1080i or 720p) on demand movies. Not as much difference from sitting back 12 feet, but as i get closer, the perception of the "interlaced" effect is virtually gone until less than an arms length away. The image looks more solid almost all the way up to the tv.
They also allowed allowed for more of the image to be smoother and possibly removed just scan mode to clean up the edges of video that were not supposed to be seen. In the old method, you may have had 1/2 inch on each side that was set as the edge of each eyes viewpoint that would converge together, leaving blank space around the screen. Now, the image is adjusted more to the edge during 3d playback. Basically it looks like they went from just scan to 16x9 mode while in 3d.
Overall, the image quality is looking very good, and i had to re-adjust my 3d video mode settings after the update, but there is a noticeable difference to me when viewing a lot closer.

Vegggas

+1
post #1503 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by sktvavs View Post

Yes, The TV should be hooked up either wired or wirelessly. Thats how the mediasharing works. Give it a try and let us know how do you like the app.

?? the TV is already hooked up wired, can view youtube, update firmware etc.

But where do I go on the LG TV to connect with the imediashare app?


The TV is on,
The Imediashare app is active on the iphone, wifi on, select a photo, when it trys to detect , it detects nothing..

What do I do next?


If it detects the TV, where do I have to go on the TV to view it?


It works on the PS3, and imediashare detects PS3. once detected i just have to go to PS3 menu, go to photo, imedashare, etc.


can't get it to work, my DLNA server on the LG input shows off too? how to I turn that on.
post #1504 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegggas View Post

I got a new update to my 5600 a few days ago, and I can see a definite improvement from the cable 3D (1080i or 720P) on Demand movies.

Can you check and let us know what version of the firmware you currently have? I'm trying to figure out if you were slow in getting the last update or if I should be watching for another new one soon. Thanks!
post #1505 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by clemon79 View Post

Can you check and let us know what version of the firmware you currently have? I'm trying to figure out if you were slow in getting the last update or if I should be watching for another new one soon. Thanks!

It's the Software Version 03.11.04 that was released on Thursday 5/26. I had to retouch my 3D video settings over the weekend after the update and for viewing with a large group in a bright room and decided to keep them there after viewing in various configurations, even in a darkened room. I left my 2D settings the same since they didn't seem to need to be adjusted.
Reading through the posts about YouTube 3D, I was confused because it's always worked for me and I had the TV delivered the first week of April and immediately had a software update at that time.

vegggas
post #1506 of 8111
How is the picture quality in 2D compared to a Samsung UN55D6900?

I am debating between the LW6500 and UND6900, but I need to make a decision fast.

Any help is greatly appreciated.
post #1507 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegggas View Post

It's the Software Version 03.11.04 that was released on Thursday 5/26.

Mmkay. I had it in my head that I got that one much sooner than last week, but I guess it's only been about a week, yeah.
post #1508 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alterno View Post

How is the picture quality in 2D compared to a Samsung UN55D6900?

I am debating between the LW6500 and UND6900, but I need to make a decision fast.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Wouldn't know? If all you are looking at is 2D, go with the Samsung, or better yet, a decent plasma that will actually cost less and look better. If you want smooth 3D without a hassle, LG Passive tech is a winner on so many levels over shutter glasses.

vegggas
post #1509 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegggas View Post

Wouldn't know? If all you are looking at is 2D, go with the Samsung, or better yet, a decent plasma that will actually cost less and look better. If you want smooth 3D without a hassle, LG Passive tech is a winner on so many levels over shutter glasses.

vegggas

My break down would be 15% 3D 85% 2D. The 3D could climb depending on the blurays available in 3D and PS3 games available in 3D. I will be doing 50% gaming 10% TV 40% Movies. Hence the reason for a little bit of emphasis on the 2D picture. Was thinking about the VT30 from Panasonic, but plasmas are just too risky with the way TVs are handled in my household.

Thanks for the reply though.
post #1510 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alterno View Post

My break down would be 15% 3D 85% 2D. The 3D could climb depending on the blurays available in 3D and PS3 games available in 3D. I will be doing 50% gaming 10% TV 40% Movies. Hence the reason for a little bit of emphasis on the 2D picture. Was thinking about the VT30 from Panasonic, but plasmas are just too risky with the way TVs are handled in my household.

Thanks for the reply though.

I got the 5600 mainly because of the size for price ratio. The 3d was a sideline little treat and I must say that I am quite impressed. Enjoy it much more than I thought I would.

I'm responding because most of my time, at least 60%, I'd spent on my ps3. The picture quality is amazing compared to my older 42 panny plasma. Could also be the jump from 42 to 55.

Either way I don't think you would be upset with this purchase. I'm completely sold on the 3d aspect and want to see more games support it.

Hope this helps a bit.
post #1511 of 8111
I only have 2 meters from my sofa and I can move away further. Any advice what size of this LW6500 TV I should get?
post #1512 of 8111
It seems the new update will get rid of the "just scan" option. My 5600 is currently connected to PC, and has 1:1 mapping with my video card output when using the "just scan" function. Does any body know if the new update will make the 1:1 mapping become impossible?
post #1513 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by X200T View Post
I only have 2 meters from my sofa and I can move away further. Any advice what size of this LW6500 TV I should get?
I would suggest 47" is enough for a 2 meter viewing distance. I have that setup with my 47" LW5600 and the size is huge in my small 14'x14' bedroom. Gives that theater feel. You will have a great experience with that size.
post #1514 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by jh87 View Post
It seems the new update will get rid of the "just scan" option. My 5600 is currently connected to PC, and has 1:1 mapping with my video card output when using the "just scan" function. Does any body know if the new update will make the 1:1 mapping become impossible?
It doesn't get rid of "Just scan" and it's still an option. It looks like they changed the algorithm for 3D mode from a "Just scan" type of presentation to a "16x9" type of presentation. I don't use a PC connected directly to the TV, so I'm not sure what happens if you were to label the input as PC if it will allow "Just scan" in that scenario.
For the record, Just scan is only to be used with PC signals anyway. Video is designed to have some overscan to hide the edges of the display for layers of video, closed caption data and other irregularities. Using Just scan will show things like the green lines on the side of video presentations that are not exact to frame, black and white flashing data blocks for closed captions across the top, signal markers across the bottom, etc. etc. PC outputs don't use any of that data, so a Just scan mode would be like using a monitor.

vegggas
post #1515 of 8111
Where in the menu do I turn off local dimming? Please note that I have the latest firmware from 5/26. Second, does anyone have the calibration setting by Chad B. I have tried all the settings on this thread but still not happy with the quality. Thank you for your help.
post #1516 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by alston80 View Post

Has anyone noticed 3d PQ improvement with the last firmware update? I noticed that directv 3d channels have much better quality. I have not noticed any quality difference with 3d blurays like Avatar.

The black margins (of 1 inch) on top/bottom/left/right disappeared now.
post #1517 of 8111
This is what I have:
- 55LW5600
- Adcom 500 II pre-tuner (only analog inputs)
- Mac mini 2010 as a Plex's server.

This is how I interconnect them:
- Analog audio output from Mac to adcom
- Optical audio output from LG to Mac digital/analog input

With those connections I can have audio from Mac (itunes, VLC, Quicktime, etc.), BUT I cant get audio from LG TV sources.
I enable Mac's digital input.

The only way I can get audio from TV is connecting 3.5mm cable from headphones output to Adcom rca input (mac passes its audio thru hdmi). I think this is not the best sound.

My question: is there a 'hide' optical audio settings on LG TV or simply this configuration do not function?

Thanks.
post #1518 of 8111
Hey Guys,

I bought the Sony 46ex720 over the weekend at Fry's for $899, but have the option to swap it for the LG 47LW5600 tonight for $799. I was underwhelmed with the Sony's 3D and the cost of the glasses, would this LG be a better way to go, or should I keep the Sony? Any advice would be greatly appreciated!!

-Jeff
post #1519 of 8111
For $799 I have not see anything that can beat it.

- 3D
- Wifi
- Apps & Browser
- DLNA
- 2 remotes
- 8 pairs of glasses
- iphone remote app
- $200 credit for 3D movies thru your cable/sat provider.

it's a sweet deal. I don't know anything about the sony.
post #1520 of 8111
The Sony has the apps, although no included Wifi, but I thought it came with 4 pairs of glasses? Also, is the $200 credit in the box?
post #1521 of 8111
4 pairs of glasses in box. The extra 4 pairs are back ordered. Frys will call everybody that didn't get the extra 4 when they come in. I expect 2-4 weeks.

You have to go to the LG website for the $200 credit. You have to fax/scan in your receipt. 4-6 weeks to get it. Sort of like a rebate. The actual link is in this thread somewhere.
post #1522 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfatboy View Post

For $799 I have not see anything that can beat it.

- 3D
- Wifi
- Apps & Browser
- DLNA
- 2 remotes
- 8 pairs of glasses
- $200 credit for 3D movies thru your cable/sat provider.

it's a sweet deal. I don't know anything about the sony.

Just a heads up that the promo offer for 200 credit ended may 21st.
post #1523 of 8111
Yeah, just saw I missed out on that.

I am more concerned about the quality of the two TVs. Right now I am leaning towards getting the LG, unless anyone thinks there is a reason to stick with the Sony and Active shutter technology?
post #1524 of 8111
Whoops! You are right. I was looking at the wrong date. I was looking at the "claim date" of 6-21-11.

The TV is still a good deal
post #1525 of 8111
Once you go passive you'll never go back movieman, lol! Seriously, if you haven't done so, go by Best Buy and look at the LG lw5600 series!
post #1526 of 8111
If you are comparing a COSTCO 55LW5700 with a BEST BUY 55LW5600 the 5700 will not come with this remote. Why this is an issue with me is because LG sends out mixed messages as to whether this MM remote is included or not (check out the LG website under 5700 features- says "included" where on the same page under "Specifications" says extra cost!). After a battle with customer support, it is not included even if LG says so! They may have changed the 5700's feature list by now- if not they should!
post #1527 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboytoto View Post

I would suggest 47" is enough for a 2 meter viewing distance. I have that setup with my 47" LW5600 and the size is huge in my small 14'x14' bedroom. Gives that theater feel. You will have a great experience with that size.

Thanks, I knew I should get as big as possible

By the way, is 55" bit much then?
post #1528 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneonefive View Post

Where in the menu do I turn off local dimming? Please note that I have the latest firmware from 5/26. Second, does anyone have the calibration setting by Chad B. I have tried all the settings on this thread but still not happy with the quality. Thank you for your help.

I have a calibration appointment with ChadB next week. If he says it's okay to post the settings, I will do so.
post #1529 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by alston80 View Post

I have a calibration appointment with ChadB next week. If he says it's okay to post the settings, I will do so.


that would be awesome!
post #1530 of 8111
Quote:
Originally Posted by X200T View Post

Thanks, I knew I should get as big as possible

By the way, is 55" bit much then?

Yeah it might be. What TV do you have right now? I'm coming from a viewing movies from my Macbook Pro 15" laptop! So 47" was way overwhelming in the beginning but felt I've accustomed to it. If you want the 55" and can afford it just get it maybe you like huge screens in a small room. All preference. I know I read somewhere that a good distance for my 47" is six feet so I did right in purchasing my 47" LW5600
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Official LG 47LW5600/55LW5600 "Passive 3D" Owners Thread