or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Insidious - Page 3

post #61 of 65
I must be getting soft in my old age because I kind of enjoyed this one. Agree with the "LOUD NOISES" and the problem with the "Helpers".
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Mixing Poltergeist with The Frighteners is never a good idea. Completely changing the tone in the middle of the movie then try to change it back is a complete fail. Do writers add the silly distraction because they aren't confident in the scary material? Either go balls out horror (if you can) or make it a fun & spooky horror-comedy. This probably would have worked even better as a Drag Me to Hell/Frighteners mashup. What do I know though - it made $54m!

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #62 of 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airboss View Post



I guess loud noises are really scary for some people.

Aiboss, this is for you!

This Horror Film contains:

289
post #63 of 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by wizzack View Post

Aiboss, this is for you!
This Horror Film contains:
289

Damn, that scared me. eek.gif
post #64 of 65
This just in:

Yesterday, FilmDistrict announced their plans for the sequel, INSIDIOUS CHAPTER 2, which involves bringing back everyone - Patrick Wilson, Rose Byrne, Lin Shaye and Ty Simpkins - for next year's follow-up, with James Wan back behind the camera directing from another Leigh Whannell script. Ah... it's like they're putting the whole band back togeth
post #65 of 65
Here's the new Insidious 2 trailer...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home

Gear mentioned in this thread: