AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › SE WI Tower speaker GTG
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

SE WI Tower speaker GTG - Page 52

post #1531 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

Randy - if that's directed at me - I fully admitted in my first post I have bias...as I think eveyone does. I didn't have any speakers to root for in this meet - I own none of the speakers but I do have an enjoy a pair of JTR Captivator subs. I rated how I honestly thought. If JTR placed last in my mind I would have probably shared it anyway. I didn't think they placed last - I thought they placed a solid third and I'd be pleased as peach to own a pair (ha - or for that matter any of the speakers in this meet!!! as they would likely all be varying degrees of incremental improvment over my own speakers)! As to my bias ??!?? My room is all hard surfaces, no treatment, and has a ceramic tile floor - I get a lot of reflection in my room and some additional treble compared to a treated room. That might be why a slight bias towards high frequencies that others mentioned didn't offend me for instance...My bias also is responsible for telling me when I got home that my Wharfedale speakers are plenty to keep me happy when I played the same demo material through them. Perhaps if I lined the Wharfedales up against these other speakers in a blind test I would place my wharfedales last or perhaps others collectively would...:P at any rate, I'm game, I don't know what I really have to lose?! I hope you do host a speaker meet!!!!!!!!!!! I'd be happy to participate in the blind test - but do keep in mind I'm of the mindset that I don't think I could probably tell much difference if the speakers weren't distorting (were played within means) and were played with a crossover to eliminate bass bias as we talked about on the way home!

You are starting to learn/realize that money to performance means JACK SH%T and some fancy brand boutique loudspeakers aren't really that good... same goes for some amps... LOL (there are imposters in ID as well though)

You seem IMHO to be the one that was there with a so called "golden ear".

PS Buy a CARPET!!! ROTFL
post #1532 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solid-State View Post

and some fancy brand boutique loudspeakers aren't really that good

Depends on your definition of "good". For example a speaker can be super accurate but loses to one that has properties the listener is looking for at that listening session. Afterall this hobby is like wine, all subjective described with the same flowery language to depict something that is... well all too personal. But there is one solid fact that cannot be disputed and that is my speakers are better than yours or anyone else's

Instead of bickering and wasting time, why don't you guys make more $ and order all the speakers you ever want to hear. It doesn't really cost that much compared to let's say collecting exotic cars. The poor sells time, the rich buys it...
post #1533 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMFamily View Post

Sounds like a road trip to me! Somehow, I bet it will be when we are taking our kids to Disney..........

Hehe - it'll be fun. Since you cannot make AK Fest this year (nor can I now) I hope you can attend RMAF.

Quote:
Originally Posted by holt7153 View Post

You know this was inevitable, but I appreciate all the effort it took to pull this off.

Thanks - I appreciate your appreciation. These things are never easy, and even if they go off without a hitch you still get dumped on by some people. That is why I am done with these events, or at least holding them on public forums.
post #1534 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

So for the soundscape 10's with 84dB sensitivity -- why wasn't the amp enough to hit 90-92dB peaks with a 96dB peak as a high in Terry's retest? I'm not saying it was sufficient - there was obviously something wrong!!! The numbers seem off to me though?!?!

Because the transistor was bad and was causing the amp on the left side to be underpowered. It explains why no one heard distortion on the right side concerning all speakers. I think most of what you (we) were hearing was the amplifier issue and the weakness in some of the recordings (edgy sounding vocals at times), which if you recall we intentionally chose to see how each speaker would react. As Terry mentioned, most of what we listen to on a day-to-day basis isn't "audiohphile" recordings, so it made sense to put in some poor and average ones, as that reflects what we actual listen to. Your description of losing bitrate quality when hearing the "speakers struggle" is a good one, and further leads me to believe it your seating location and/or recording showing it's flaws.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

1) Friday night we listened to Terry's speakers with some home theater demo material louder than anything we listened to on saturday during the actual demos and I noticed no distortion on Terry's speakers. True --- the speakers were using the fmod inline resistor to roll off frequencies at a rate of -12dB per octave from 70hz so this may be just the fact his speakers weren't having to recreate any bass ----- BUT then he also demoed the speakers for me without subs and I thought they were exceptionally clear on the black eyed peas track on friday night. On Saturday's meet from my listening position I could hear they were distorting a bit during the same song. On friday night I thought they seemed to be playing louder without distortion, and my videos I took seem to show the drivers moving more on Friday night than my video of them on saturday????? I don't know what to make of this at all. Terry said the left amp measured 1.5 dB less than the right amp. 1.5 dB alone sure doesn't explain what I heard if that's the only difference in left and right channels. Is there more problem than a 1.5dB deficancy?

Yes there is more to the problem. Klaus (the amp designer) admitted the amplifier's characteristics could have changed and caused what we heard. The reason Terry's distorted on Saturday and not Friday is because you used subwoofers with the FMODs on Friday, and probably because we continuously drove the crap out of the amp on Saturday, perhaps causing the issue to worsen. You'll also recall we "hot swapped" speaker cables with the amps turned on, and even though Terry was careful about the leads not touching perhaps it further worsened the conditioned of the transistor? I'm no expert, so I am just including all possible scenarios here.

The fact that you heard no issues on Friday night (even when run full range and listening louder than Saturday) shows something was wrong on Saturday, and it appears to have been the amplifier. I also agree with Randy that sitting where you did (on the floor off center) was not a good spot to evaluate speakers. It was likely the worst seat in the house.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

2) Ignoring the Black Eyed Peas track - The 'distortion' I heard seemed to be mostly in the highs and midrange rather than the bass in on occassions in the orchestra and chorus music on every speaker I encountered -- which is a weird place for distortion to occur (rather than distortion in the bass sound)!?!?! I felt the mids and highs seemed to become less clear, blurred, distorted as the bass swelled in these dynamic peaks. The distortion sound was similar on these first speakers. On the Black eyed peas track it was definately the woofers distorting. By contrast, -the distortion sound on the Salk 10 was more of a warble which seemed to occur lower than the mids and highs. Whereas the other speakers just sounded a bit overrun by the material - the Salk 10's sounded like something was defective - which is why I got anxious and started talking to you guys by track 3. Amp or not - no matter what the cause of the distortion on the Salk 10 - the distortion sound was different in my mind during this demo.

When an amplifier clips it doesn't only distort in the bass frequencies coming from the speakers. The reason the issue was more prominent on the SoundScape 10's is because they are power hungry work horses and had the most resolving/detailed midrange drivers. It's also very possible the damaged amplifier was taxed even harder with the SS's than with the other speakers (at our listening levels, transients could have exceeded 300 watts during dynamic peaks), thus the amps weren't up to the task to begin with; the amp with the damaged transistor simply amplified the distortion more prominently.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

Terry's comments linked above (as I read them) seem somewhat skeptical of an amp issue as it relates to the speakers outside of the Salk 10s. - based on ownership of these amps and post meet checkups.

If you had just hosted a GTG with 25 people would you easily submit that your amp was flawed, especially since you've never heard it before (because he uses subs)? I'd be skeptical and protective too. It's not his fault, as he never heard the distortion because he crosses to subwoofers, and I still think the GTG was a success.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

Given the decent wattage those amps provide and the levels we listened to and the guess that many of you run these speakers on less amp than Terry I'm sure - have you guys tested your speakers full range to see how they sound on your home gear?

Yes, I've tested this issue in my home, which I already mentioned in this thread. I went home and tested (I think it was Monday night), and while running full range using the same songs and listening at the same levels I heard no distortion, and my amp puts out less power. An amp could be rated for 1000 watts into 8ohms, but if it's damaged it is compromised and cannot be fully relied on. Concerning the distortion in all of the other speakers that you heard, since no one else really heard it I blame your seating location; it's simply not where you are suppose to sit while auditioning speakers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

The fact that most people seem to have not heard the distortion on the Salk 10 completely baffles me. It was an irritating warble that I heard early on on the very first clip.

You've repeated the statement that you were the one to hear the distortion a number of times already, implying the others were less experienced than you or don't hear as well/know what to listen for. I think that's a little rude. When Terry waved me over (I was in the kitchen mid-conversation) I heard the issue, but I waited until I was sure because I knew some of the musical tracks weren't "audiophile quality." Terry clearly heard the issue too, as did Pete, Jim, etc. Others may have too but perhaps didn't want to speak up about it at that time for a number of reasons unbeknownst to me. Or, as you said, since the right speaker seemed fine perhaps most people sitting off the floor and more centered and to the right didn't hear it as clearly or at all. After all, you were sitting on the floor and closer to the left speaker, so you should have heard it clearer than everyone else.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

I can't hardly figure how it wasn't noticed by everyone --- unless they were just sitting exclusively in front of the right speaker...

There you go again. Remember, Jonathan, you were on the floor more towards the left speaker, and subjectively in the worst seat in the house. Speakers aren't meant to be sat 6 feet away from, off to the left and on the floor; that can introduce a number of other issues such as comb filtering. That's why you were asked "Are you sure you want to sit on the floor" on Saturday.
post #1535 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

You've repeated the statement that you were the one to hear the distortion a number of times already, implying the others were less experienced than you or don't hear as well/know what to listen for. I think that's a little rude.

Wow now the attendees are arguing with each other. Chill people chill...
post #1536 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veda View Post

Wow now the attendees are arguing with each other. Chill people chill...

We're not arguing, we're discussing. He and I aren't throwing insults or getting heated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Bessinger View Post

My word, expectation bias is everyone else but me. Guys, if you want to do a blind tests, I might do it but back off on your opinions saying everyone else is bias but me. I know I have bias, and I might do a blind tests but Jonathan it will include Nuance AND you so be careful what you wish for as ego can take a crash. Jonathan can tell you about what I do not TAKE on faith (I have no faith) but love science, but it has to be done right and it is DAMN hard and somtimes expensive (that is why we are losing it in the USA....uh oh political). I might also get some people who are friends to help me from the Detroit contingent. These things are really hard though.

I am not sure Sean will even respond anymore since he gave me his time and I gave up on doing it, but this thread makes me want to do it because I see well so much "competition". This will be so much work if you really want to do it. Do you? It has to be in my opinion not blind but double blind.

Here is the hard thing, give me the parameters and the room (remember if Dennis Erksine is right 80% is the room in which case we are "pissing in the wind").

P.S. Not making judgements but Johathan you do realize you are saying placebo is inherent in the subjective assessments (which I agree with you) and then you are trying to make "scientific" assessments of why you are right. I can say somewhat the same thing about Nuance except he has said he can identify in a blind test some thing which you say he can't. That should be testable. I had not wanted to get involved in this and I still may back off but there are so many "assertions" and I am all about science and not about failth.

Randy,

I am bias, I admit it. That's the beauty of a double blind test, though - no bias. I am certainly willing to participate, but only if it is performed correctly, and I honestly don't see that happening, which I mean no offense by; I think you were right to drop it in the first place...it's just too difficult to control everything.

Regarding myself, I am confident, yes, but I don't mean that to come across as being an egotistical d-bag. I'm confident because I love this hobby, have put in a lot time and effort to learn and feel that it has not all been for nothing. We learn by researching and doing, and in case some people weren't aware, I've partaken in blind tests before (that's when I heard the Salk's for the first time, and I didn't even know they would be part of the test); they intrigue and excite me, as I too love the science behind this hobby. I think I've learned a lot over the last 10 years, and I now find it easier to correlate measurements to listening. Thank God for people like Floyd Toole, Nousaine, Olive, Geddes, Linkwitz, etc; they are all amazing teachers that had the decency to share their findings and studies with us. I'm so grateful! So yes, I do think I'd be able to pick out the speakers we listened to at the GTG blind (Terry said he could too, and I believe him), but it has nothing to do with my own ego; each speaker had a difference in sound characteristics, and you cannot tame those with EQ in my opinion. I could be completely wrong, though, and I admit it. I (we) have also heard our speakers in at least 2 other locations, and while there were certainly differences due to the room acoustics, I (we) was still able to hear the general sound of each speaker in each room.

I didn't meant upset you Randy, and I certainly never said you're the only one with bias (who said that?). Meeting you was an absolute treat for me, and I hope to hang out again in the near future. The last thing I wanted was to do was upset/offend you...
post #1537 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

We're not arguing, we're discussing. He and I aren't throwing insults or getting heated.



Randy,

I am bias, I admit it. That's the beauty of a double blind test, though - no bias. I am certainly willing to participate, but only if it is performed correctly, and I honestly don't see that happening, which I mean no offense by; I think you were right to drop it in the first place...it's just too difficult to control everything.

Regarding myself, I am confident, yes, but I don't mean that to come across as being an egotistical d-bag. I'm confident because I love this hobby, have put in a lot time and effort to learn and feel that it has not all been for nothing. We learn by researching and doing, and in case some people weren't aware, I've partaken in blind tests before (that's when I heard the Salk's for the first time, and I didn't even know they would be part of the test); they intrigue and excite me, as I too love the science behind this hobby. I think I've learned a lot over the last 10 years, and I now find it easier to correlate measurements to listening. Thank God for people like Floyd Toole, Nousaine, Olive, Geddes, Linkwitz, etc; they are all amazing teachers that had the decency to share their findings and studies with us. I'm so grateful! So yes, I do think I'd be able to pick out the speakers we listened to at the GTG blind (Terry said he could too, and I believe him), but it has nothing to do with my own ego; each speaker had a difference in sound characteristics, and you cannot tame those with EQ in my opinion. I could be completely wrong, though, and I admit it. I (we) have also heard our speakers in at least 2 other locations, and while there were certainly differences due to the room acoustics, I (we) was still able to hear the general sound of each speaker in each room.

I didn't meant upset you Randy, and I certainly never said you're the only one with bias (who said that?). Meeting you was an absolute treat for me, and I hope to hang out again in the near future. The last thing I wanted was to do was upset/offend you...

I am not offended. Things get heated sometimes.
post #1538 of 1776
When people get offended about comments regarding electronics this is what I think of.



Like I said earlier if someone insulted my shirt or pants or something... girlfriend...

It would bother me... but electronics!

LOL

WHAT EVER MAN

LOL

PS I guess if it was on a set of $20k speakers I just slammed money down on I might be... slightly annoyed LOL
post #1539 of 1776
^ That was hilarious.
post #1540 of 1776
A little levity for the thread. I am in St. Louis getting ready to travel for a trip to Indiana for rememberance and I am in my underwear, wife in pj's and fire alarm just went off. Down 5 floors of stairs and college kids came up.....false alarm "somebody pulled the alarm".
post #1541 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

There you go again. Remember, Jonathan, you were on the floor more towards the left speaker, and subjectively in the worst seat in the house. Speakers aren't meant to be sat 6 feet away from, off to the left and on the floor; that can introduce a number of other issues such as comb filtering. That's why you were asked "Are you sure you want to sit on the floor" on Saturday.

Six foot might be a bit of a under exageration - prolly more like 8 or 9 foot distant. Consider I'm 6'3" and in the pics my legs are still prolly a good six foot away from the left speaker. The vids in my review posts on page 34 show my seating position pretty well.

My opinion was it was a surprisingly good spot when compared to the sweet spot I sat in briefly a couple times as I mentioned before. As to reflections from the vaulted ceiling and comb filtering issues I honestly don't know. I didn't hear anything terrible related to my position or I would have stopped sitting there when I auditioned the sweet spot the few times. I could still definitely hear stereo separation through the auditions! I'm not saying it was the best place, but I don't think it was the worst spot in the room by any means. I was around ear height with most of the tower speakers. It wasn't like I was in a hole or something. At one point someone behind me asked me to move a little bit one way or the other so I would be out of the direct path of the channel to their seating position in the sweet spot - (meaning they at least thought I might be blocking the sound a bit -- so I take that to mean I was in the main sound field). I've heard a lot of folk say a loudspeaker should ideally be on the same plane as your ears. I was pretty much there ------ with the exception of the JTR and Catalyst monoliths on their stands... also if you want to really hear what a speaker is doing when critically listening do you go closer to the speaker or futher away?

Do any of these speakers aim their tweeters up? If not - then I'm not sure why my position was that poor?

No hard feelings man - just discussing. This additional note does not counter the fact the amp may have had problems - it is just discussion about my sitting position solely. I don't sit much further away from my speakers at home in my own room as you'll note in the room pictures in my signature. I've no problem sitting about 8 foot away from speakers and listening from that close...when I wanted to evaluate the Lms5400 subs I sat immediately next to them so I could really hear just the subs. Several times folk walked right up to the speakers to observe their sound in close proximity. I think close listening has merits in addition to flaws.
post #1542 of 1776
You're right, it was probably more like 8 feet based on your pics; good call. Yours ears were not at tweeter level, though, which is where most manufacturers request they be (between 36-42 inches generally). You were also sitting off-axis of one speaker more than the other (not centered), so it will affect things. If you think that seat was fine - cool. We can agree to disagree. And yes, no hard feelings. I am glad you sat there, as it allowed you to hear the amplifier flaw on the left channel. Had you not been there at all the distortion may have not been brought up.

Regarding moving closer to a speaker, many designs need a specific distance to allow the drivers to properly blend, else comb filtering will occur. I doubt any of the speakers at the GTG were designed for near-field, and would suspect their performance would worsen when you hit that critical distance (got to close).
post #1543 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

....Thanks - I appreciate your appreciation. These things are never easy, and even if they go off without a hitch you still get dumped on by some people. That is why I am done with these events, or at least holding them on public forums.

This would be a loss for those of us who are unable to attend and enjoy reading/learning from the public discussions that follow.
post #1544 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

+1 Don't bother posting it; just look what the whiners did to this thread about our GTG. The thread hasn't even been on topic all day...

I have been a lurker on this thread. Some great information - many thanks to all the participants. My only comment is tune out the critics (keep the honest feedback, but ignore the trolls and complainers). There is a lot of value added from GTG's such as these.
post #1545 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by kma100 View Post

i have been a lurker on this thread. Some great information - many thanks to all the participants. My only comment is tune out the critics (keep the honest feedback, but ignore the trolls and complainers). There is a lot of value added from gtg's such as these.

+1

Although, I have learned something from the discussion with some of the "critics" as well.
post #1546 of 1776
Although, I stand by my general comments, making them personal to Jonathan and nuance was out of line so accept my apologies.
post #1547 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by tesseract67 View Post

I am planning on attending, also. Maybe I'll run into you and AJ.
I could help prevent this tragedy at RMAF 2012.

I'm sure you would. I guess Oct is far enough away where I could change my mind....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Bessinger View Post

Aj, I would really like to hear your speakers and I know you think I am a little nuts with 8000 speakers but that is not quite true. It is more like a lot of speakers over 50 years starting at about well 15 years old (me talking to my dad about good sound).

I say that in jest Randy. The quest for the grail never ends...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Bessinger View Post

Again, I would really like to hear yours, but I probably will not be able to get to the GT. I also attend some live concerts to kind of keep up and those dates interfere with that.

That's too bad. I was hoping you'd drag ADTG along, since I doubt the Mrs is going to let him out that weekend. You know most every show has live music, not sure about LSAF though (that's how I got to see/hear John Atkinson play bass..@ CapFest). Can't blame for for passing up listening to stereos vs attending live music btw...I'd do the same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuance View Post

Bummer man. So do you partake in any of those equipment tours? If so, where do I sign up?

Yep, but I/we've taken this thread far enough off course with mention of my speakers, which is worse than thread jacking - it's manufacturer self promotion. Feel free to PM me.

Now, there was a nice, peaceful enjoyable loudspeaker GTG in SE WI...

cheers,

AJ
post #1548 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

I could still definitely hear stereo separation through the auditions!

Good speakers properly positioned, simply disappear, generally with no hint of stereo separation, or rather, hard left and right pans. Did you get a good idea of what a soundstage is, with depth, pinpoint imaging and air around each performer/instrument? This experience is what I hoped for you to take away from the GTG. I was surprised to see you sitting on the floor.

Honestly, most audio enthusiasts have no clue what those terms mean, or sound like. They are used to hearing stereo sound come from left or right, not from the middle! 2 channel listening is an experience that few people understand. I didn't for years, until I heard a properly setup system, then I was hooked. Dove right out of car audio and into home audio.
post #1549 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by tesseract67 View Post

Good speakers properly positioned, simply disappear, generally with no hint of stereo separation, or rather, hard left and right pans. Did you get a good idea of what a soundstage is, with depth, pinpoint imaging and air around each performer/instrument? This experience is what I hoped for you to take away from the GTG. I was surprised to see you sitting on the floor.

Honestly, most audio enthusiasts have no clue what those terms mean, or sound like. They are used to hearing stereo sound come from left or right, not from the middle! 2 channel listening is an experience that few people understand. I didn't for years, until I heard a properly setup system, then I was hooked. Dove right out of car audio and into home audio.

Several of these tracks had very clear channel separation. Sax from left speaker - voice from right - that kind of thing. Sweet spot made the voices sound better - that was the main difference I noticed as I moved in and out of the sweet spot. --- most of that sweet spot audition experience for me occurred Friday night. On Saturday during the meet I only hit the sweet spot a few times.
post #1550 of 1776
Very cool GTG ladies and gents. I selfishly enjoy the hell out of the information provided and appreciate the effort.

edit: I want to say that it seems a bit rash at times how people talk to each other on these forums, but in this particular thread you can obviously tell that the disagreements/ conversations are out of passion and love of audio and not grinding of axes which is quite refreshing.

Thanks for sharing,
Jeff
post #1551 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcuDefTechGuy View Post

I agree completely.

And I base this opinion on both rationale and experience with auditioning many speakers and owning many speakers.

Speaker #1 plays the note of middle C accurately/faithfully.

Speaker #2 plays the note of middle C accurately/faithfully.

Speaker #3 plays the note of middle C accurately/faithfully.

All 3 speakers will play the note of middle C accurately/faithfully. They will sound the same.

In an anechoic chamber playing a sine wave, there may be some merit to this theory. But in the real world, it is perhaps a bit too simplistic.

If you are playing that middle C on an instrument, for example, the overtone structure of the instrument will be unique to that particular instrument. And since there is no such thing as a speaker that can reproduce a perfectly flat frequency response and each speaker's FR will vary by some degree, each speaker will reproduce that sound in a subtlety unique way.

The environment will also impact the results. Each speaker will vary in terms of off-axis response. So the overtones of that middle C will interact with the room differently based on each speaker's unique dispersion characteristics.

While there is some merit to the theory, we don't live in a theoretical world. In practice, there will be sonic differences that are both measurable and audible.

Of course, this is just my opinion and your mileage may vary.

- Jim
post #1552 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsalk View Post

In an anechoic chamber playing a sine wave, there may be some merit to this theory. But in the real world, it is perhaps a bit too simplistic.

If you are playing that middle C on an instrument, for example, the overtone structure of the instrument will be unique to that particular instrument. And since there is no such thing as a speaker that can reproduce a perfectly flat frequency response and each speaker's FR will vary by some degree, each speaker will reproduce that sound in a subtlety unique way.

The environment will also impact the results. Each speaker will vary in terms of off-axis response. So the overtones of that middle C will interact with the room differently based on each speaker's unique dispersion characteristics.

While there is some merit to the theory, we don't live in a theoretical world. In practice, there will be sonic differences that are both measurable and audible.

Of course, this is just my opinion and your mileage may vary.

- Jim

That makes sense.

And the soundstage and image may also differ. I think a quick switching of speakers back and forth within seconds could identify the differences easier.

Yesterday I redid all the volume matching of my speakers. I was able to switch between speakers within seconds. And I was able to tell the difference between the speakers.

Of course, my speakers are side-by-side and the room acoustics is compromised due to size and side-by-side speakers.

So I take back what I said about speakers sounding the same.

Hypothesis and reality are 2 different things for sure.

But the theory that all great speakers sound fantastic is true for sure.
post #1553 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post

So for the soundscape 10's with 84dB sensitivity -- why wasn't the amp enough to hit 90-92dB peaks with a 96dB peak as a high in Terry's retest? I'm not saying it was sufficient - there was obviously something wrong!!! The numbers seem off to me though?!?!

(snip)

I really don't know what to make of it all, but I have a hard time blaming the amp on everything...Has Terry posted any more findings on the amp since the posts I quoted above?

Here are a couple of thoughts...

First, there is a significant difference between "average" and "peak" power levels. During the tests, while the average power levels were well within the amp's capabilities, transient peaks were likely hitting well north of 250 watts. How audible this clipping was is a matter of debate, but there was definitely clipping taking place.

Secondly, if there was an issue with the left monoblock (and I'm relatively certain there was), there is a high probability that the issue was present with respect to all the speakers. While the distortion was totally noticeable with the left channel when the SoundScape 10's were playing, it was likely present with all the speakers, just to a lesser degree. It is not likely that the monoblock was distortion-free until it hit some threshold. It is more likely that it was progressive in nature. Which means that the higher the sensitivity of the speaker, the less noticeable the distortion would be since less power was being drawn.

I would have to re-read your analysis to see how you compared the various speakers, but I seem to recall that the speaker with the fewest issues was Mark's Catalysts. These speakers were self-powered, so the amp in question was not used.

With that in mind, I think you can rule out anything upstream of the amplifiers. And since I have tested that particular pair of SoundScape 10's at higher SPL's than were used at the GTG and was not able to reproduce the issue, the problem wasn't with the speaker either. That leaves the amp.

I can't speak to the other speakers involved, but I do know that when we test speakers prior to shipment, we stress test with higher SPL levels than were used at the GTG and do not hear what you clearly heard. So my conclusion is that much of what you heard with respect to ALL the speakers (except the Catalysts) was at least somewhat related to the amp.

Who knows, I could be wrong, but I can't think of any other explanation.

- Jim
post #1554 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by countryWV View Post

So is the answer
Yes one can tell the difference in individual speakers and
No one cannot tell the difference

depends on the source material being played
material that plays to a speakers strengths distinguishable
more general basic material undistinguishable
I love it when the answer is yes and no
makes me very frustrated
thanks
wvchris

Nobody, anywhere, ever, has said they cannot hear the difference in individual speakers.

Moving on...
post #1555 of 1776
Off topic but if anyone is available on Monday April 30 I might be in the SE Wisconsin area for some listening. PM me here if you're interested.
post #1556 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Craig View Post

Off topic but if anyone is available on Monday April 30 I might be in the SE Wisconsin area for some listening. PM me here if you're interested.

Where are you going to be? I'd open my home to you.
post #1557 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJHUB View Post


Where are you going to be? I'd open my home to you.

And I would invade your home and join you.

Jim Salk,

Thanks for your input.
post #1558 of 1776
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Craig View Post

Off topic but if anyone is available on Monday April 30 I might be in the SE Wisconsin area for some listening. PM me here if you're interested.

Rick,
As I mentioned in my PM reply, I would be interested as well. Let's us know more details.

Brandon
post #1559 of 1776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archaea View Post



Here is a short intro video that shows the room and some of the people who made the event.
http://s1191.photobucket.com/albums/...rent=Intro.mp4

Sorry, but what is the song in the background of this video? I have heard it but cannot put my finger on it, Joe Satriani?
post #1560 of 1776
I'm not sure whose house this GTG took place in, but whoever it belongs to: You have an absolutely beautiful home.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › SE WI Tower speaker GTG