Quote:
Originally Posted by
Archaea 
So for the soundscape 10's with 84dB sensitivity -- why wasn't the amp enough to hit 90-92dB peaks with a 96dB peak as a high in Terry's retest? I'm not saying it was sufficient - there was obviously something wrong!!! The numbers seem off to me though?!?!
Because the transistor was bad and was causing the amp on the left side to be underpowered. It explains why no one heard distortion on the right side concerning all speakers. I think most of what you (we) were hearing was the amplifier issue and the weakness in some of the recordings (edgy sounding vocals at times), which if you recall we intentionally chose to see how each speaker would react. As Terry mentioned, most of what we listen to on a day-to-day basis isn't "audiohphile" recordings, so it made sense to put in some poor and average ones, as that reflects what we actual listen to. Your description of losing bitrate quality when hearing the "speakers struggle" is a good one, and further leads me to believe it your seating location and/or recording showing it's flaws.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Archaea 
1) Friday night we listened to Terry's speakers with some home theater demo material louder than anything we listened to on saturday during the actual demos and I noticed no distortion on Terry's speakers. True --- the speakers were using the fmod inline resistor to roll off frequencies at a rate of -12dB per octave from 70hz so this may be just the fact his speakers weren't having to recreate any bass ----- BUT then he also demoed the speakers for me without subs and I thought they were exceptionally clear on the black eyed peas track on friday night. On Saturday's meet from my listening position I could hear they were distorting a bit during the same song. On friday night I thought they seemed to be playing louder without distortion, and my videos I took seem to show the drivers moving more on Friday night than my video of them on saturday????? I don't know what to make of this at all. Terry said the left amp measured 1.5 dB less than the right amp. 1.5 dB alone sure doesn't explain what I heard if that's the only difference in left and right channels. Is there more problem than a 1.5dB deficancy?
Yes there is more to the problem. Klaus (the amp designer) admitted the amplifier's characteristics could have changed and caused what we heard. The reason Terry's distorted on Saturday and not Friday is because you used subwoofers with the FMODs on Friday, and probably because we continuously drove the crap out of the amp on Saturday, perhaps causing the issue to worsen. You'll also recall we "hot swapped" speaker cables with the amps turned on, and even though Terry was careful about the leads not touching perhaps it further worsened the conditioned of the transistor? I'm no expert, so I am just including all possible scenarios here.
The fact that you heard no issues on Friday night (even when run full range and listening louder than Saturday) shows something was wrong on Saturday, and it appears to have been the amplifier. I also agree with Randy that sitting where you did (on the floor off center) was not a good spot to evaluate speakers. It was likely the worst seat in the house.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Archaea 
2) Ignoring the Black Eyed Peas track - The 'distortion' I heard seemed to be mostly in the highs and midrange rather than the bass in on occassions in the orchestra and chorus music on every speaker I encountered -- which is a weird place for distortion to occur (rather than distortion in the bass sound)!?!?! I felt the mids and highs seemed to become less clear, blurred, distorted as the bass swelled in these dynamic peaks. The distortion sound was similar on these first speakers. On the Black eyed peas track it was definately the woofers distorting. By contrast, -the distortion sound on the Salk 10 was more of a warble which seemed to occur lower than the mids and highs. Whereas the other speakers just sounded a bit overrun by the material - the Salk 10's sounded like something was defective - which is why I got anxious and started talking to you guys by track 3. Amp or not - no matter what the cause of the distortion on the Salk 10 - the distortion sound was different in my mind during this demo.
When an amplifier clips it doesn't only distort in the bass frequencies coming from the speakers. The reason the issue was more prominent on the SoundScape 10's is because they are power hungry work horses and had the most resolving/detailed midrange drivers. It's also very possible the damaged amplifier was taxed even harder with the SS's than with the other speakers (at our listening levels, transients could have exceeded 300 watts during dynamic peaks), thus the amps weren't up to the task to begin with; the amp with the damaged transistor simply amplified the distortion more prominently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Archaea 
Terry's comments linked above (as I read them) seem somewhat skeptical of an amp issue as it relates to the speakers outside of the Salk 10s. - based on ownership of these amps and post meet checkups.
If you had just hosted a GTG with 25 people would you easily submit that your amp was flawed, especially since you've never heard it before (because he uses subs)? I'd be skeptical and protective too. It's not his fault, as he never heard the distortion because he crosses to subwoofers, and I still think the GTG was a success.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Archaea 
Given the decent wattage those amps provide and the levels we listened to and the guess that many of you run these speakers on less amp than Terry I'm sure - have you guys tested your speakers full range to see how they sound on your home gear?
Yes, I've tested this issue in my home, which I already mentioned in this thread. I went home and tested (I think it was Monday night), and while running full range using the same songs and listening at the same levels I heard no distortion, and my amp puts out less power. An amp could be rated for 1000 watts into 8ohms, but if it's damaged it is compromised and cannot be fully relied on. Concerning the distortion in all of the other speakers that you heard, since no one else really heard it I blame your seating location; it's simply not where you are suppose to sit while auditioning speakers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Archaea 
The fact that most people seem to have not heard the distortion on the Salk 10 completely baffles me. It was an irritating warble that I heard early on on the very first clip.
You've repeated the statement that you were the one to hear the distortion a number of times already, implying the others were less experienced than you or don't hear as well/know what to listen for. I think that's a little rude. When Terry waved me over (I was in the kitchen mid-conversation) I heard the issue, but I waited until I was sure because I knew some of the musical tracks weren't "audiophile quality." Terry clearly heard the issue too, as did Pete, Jim, etc. Others may have too but perhaps didn't want to speak up about it at that time for a number of reasons unbeknownst to me. Or, as you said, since the right speaker seemed fine perhaps most people sitting off the floor and more centered and to the right didn't hear it as clearly or at all. After all, you were sitting on the floor and closer to the left speaker, so you
should have heard it clearer than everyone else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Archaea 
I can't hardly figure how it wasn't noticed by everyone --- unless they were just sitting exclusively in front of the right speaker...
There you go again.

Remember, Jonathan, you were on the floor more towards the left speaker, and subjectively in the worst seat in the house. Speakers aren't meant to be sat 6 feet away from, off to the left and on the floor; that can introduce a number of other issues such as comb filtering. That's why you were asked "Are you sure you want to sit on the floor" on Saturday.
