Quote:
Originally Posted by WiWavelength 
Nope. I understand your logic. But it is not sound reasoning. Your implication that the bench tests measurements of a lower model can inform us about the potential measurements of a higher model is nothing more than an unsubstantiated assumption, which can go awry in many ways. For example, the 2311CI could be a purely Denon design, while the 3311CI could be a hybrid Denon/Marantz design. Or maybe we have it backward; the 3311CI could be a SR7005 clone, hence a Marantz design.
AJ

Nope. I understand your logic. But it is not sound reasoning. Your implication that the bench tests measurements of a lower model can inform us about the potential measurements of a higher model is nothing more than an unsubstantiated assumption, which can go awry in many ways. For example, the 2311CI could be a purely Denon design, while the 3311CI could be a hybrid Denon/Marantz design. Or maybe we have it backward; the 3311CI could be a SR7005 clone, hence a Marantz design.
AJ
Denon will not let the 3311 fall short of the 2311. The wattage difference may be minimal like the old (4310 vs 4810), especially outing 5 to 7 channels, but the pre side will be every bit as clean if not a little better.
My point was showing how much cleaner the 2311 is compared to the Marantz. Everyone is saying clone here and there between the two, but there is heck of a difference on paper between the two when it comes to looking at the results.





















