AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › 2.35:1 Constant Image Height Chat › Help an old CRT user with transitioning to digital and CIH
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Help an old CRT user with transitioning to digital and CIH - Page 2

post #31 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Sonneborn View Post

I wish you could drop by. I think you would be happy with what you would see.

Art

That's what my wife told me once. 20 years later, I still am happy. :-D lol

BTW dropzone7, I know my system is not the most prettiest or flashy of builds, but it shows you how much you can do with a small place to work with. My dedicated room is only 12.5' x 14.5' x 8' and I'm running a 48" CIH 2.40 AR setup with an Epson 8350. Yes, manual zooming but I got it perfected to the point I can setup between ARs in less than 30 seconds.

Go to the HT Build forum and look for the Ruiz Cinema thread.

Edit: here is the link http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1325282
post #32 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropzone View Post



Quote:


I still don't have a real sense of whether or not my room will accommodate what it is I have in mind.

How about this?

LL
post #33 of 137
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Sonneborn View Post

I wish you could drop by. I think you would be happy with what you would see.

Art


Art, I have followed the evolution of your theater for years and it is truly amazing what you have done with the place. I have no doubts that I would be floored if I actually experienced it in person. If you ever plan another HT meet I would really like to make the trip.
post #34 of 137
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERuiz View Post

That's what my wife told me once. 20 years later, I still am happy. :-D lol

BTW dropzone7, I know my system is not the most prettiest or flashy of builds, but it shows you how much you can do with a small place to work with. My dedicated room is only 12.5' x 14.5' x 8' and I'm running a 48" CIH 2.40 AR setup with an Epson 8350. Yes, manual zooming but I got it perfected to the point I can setup between ARs in less than 30 seconds.

Go to the HT Build forum and look for the Ruiz Cinema thread.

Edit: here is the link http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1325282


Hey, that looks great! Very nice job of the screen, I love the cozy look and I bet the screen size at that distance makes it a very immersive experience. Our room sizes are very similar so it's nice to see that you were able to fit the large couch and loveseat in there. That's one thing I want to change down the road is my seating. Unfortunately, the door to the room opens into the room right where my first chair is. There is room to get by but I would prefer there was a little more clearance. I hope one day to have either theater seating that shares armrests to save space or perhaps reclining sofas.
post #35 of 137
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVX View Post

How about this?

Thanks Mark! This is what I have mind but as you can see my L/R speakers would be in the way which leaves me with either having to mount above the screen or sacrifice some room depth and put them behind an AT screen. The later is my preference even though I lose some space.
post #36 of 137
Dropzone7 I appreciate your interest in CIH. Alot of us have been there done it. My 2 cents: Having started with a Runco crt, sony crt and a 106" screen with lots of dedicated space for it, it was great. However we relocated and although our house was excellent, dimensions of every room including a great room just didn't work out. I watched a CIH a a local new home open house and was blown away by it. I found a Panamorph U200 with sled for $500 by someone upgrading their system and bite the bullet not knowing how I would use it. I dug out a Infocus SP 4805 front projector to watch a movie on our 106" pull down screen. I thought what if I put the Panamorph lens in front of it what would happen. It immediately adjusted,scaled itself to widescreen. Top of screen went down, sides went out, picture color increased by 38% Infocus rep said this projector had a builtin scaler. I moved my projector back until it went to 110" overlapping the pull down 106" screen. I cut out a white board to fit the overlap, put black boarder around 3 sides, and super picture. We watched the movie "Australia" and it was awesome. Later on I found other affordable projectors couldn't scale like the Infocus Sp-4805. I also found that when i connected to my OPPO BDP-83SE bluray player it had a stretch mode and also put the sub titles on screen. Add that to the surround sound system. Others use zoom feature to enlarge picture but CIH is the only way to go. Panamorph.co used to have a great projector compatiblity chart that was real helpful in selecting lens /projector. Its no longer there? Still a good site to show what CIH looks like. Most local store no nothing about CIH or have ever seen one.
This forum is excellent, keep reading and learn. Thanks and enjoy!

P.S. Go to CIH screen setups this forum and see another Infocus SP-4805 CIH and other pictures
post #37 of 137
Thread Starter 
Well, the owner of the Prismasonic H1200R lens I mentioned earlier has taken pity on me and I will be buying it for an excellent deal. I know it's old tech now but I think it will be fine to start out with, especially considering I don't even have the projector or screen I need yet. My dad has an old Optoma HD70 DLP projector so at least I can play around with the lens on that for a while.
post #38 of 137
Thread Starter 
If I understand correctly, my throw ratio in this case would be 2.0 with 16' throw distance and 96" wide 16:9 image. I then take 1.33 x 96" and get 127" for my scope width. This is CIH of 54". Does anyone think this will be a problem using the Prismasonic H1200R lens? I have the lens now but no projector and no scope screen yet.

Another question, I'm leaning towards a JVC projector once I'm ready to pull the trigger on all of this. Is there any particular model that is better suited to my kind of setup, being a CRT user right now and used to a film-like, not overly punchy image? I think I would prefer a model with CMS because I do like to tweak and I also want to have my calibration guy (Ken Whitcomb) dial it in every now and then. I don't mind going with an older unit like an RS1, RS2, etc. if it's a better fit for me.
LL
post #39 of 137
My throw is around 1.4 and caused pretty annoying geometry and focus issues so I have decided to sell my Panamorph lens and just zoom. Curved bars on a 2.76:1 BD like How the West Was Won were just too annoying. I think that 2.0 would work quite well.

I own the RS2 clone and it's color gamut is very wide. Unless you use a scaler to help this, the colors are way oversaturated.

Tom
post #40 of 137
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Monahan View Post

My throw is around 1.4 and caused pretty annoying geometry and focus issues so I have decided to sell my Panamorph lens and just zoom. Curved bars on a 2.76:1 BD like How the West Was Won were just too annoying. I think that 2.0 would work quite well.

I own the RS2 clone and it's color gamut is very wide. Unless you use a scaler to help this, the colors are way oversaturated.

Tom

I certainly don't want geometry and focus issues with a digital projector. Coming from CRT and all the work that goes into getting this right I would hate to see something like this that can't be corrected through setup. I'm really pushing it to get to 16' in my little room and that might even mean ceiling mounting the projector in the closet and cutting a porthole for the lens.

I do have a DVDO VP50Pro scaler which I currently use and plan to move to the new setup as well.
post #41 of 137
You usually need a throw of around 2 to 1 for acceptable pincushion, and that can be lost in the screen masking, so it shouldn't be an issue. I usually suggest that people try the zoom method first and see if they're happy with that, but at least you can now do comparisons between the two and decide which you prefer.

You may find the 1200 slightly softens the image (I used to have the 1000), but that may not be noticeable with movie content (it's obvious with test patterns), so later the upgrade to the Front Element may be next on your wish list if you decide to stick with the lens. At $500 it's a steal and you should be able to sell it on and get your money back no problem if you change your mind.

Either way, going CIH is a step forward from CIW so that alone is an upgrade in itself IMHO, so you can't lose.

Gary
post #42 of 137
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Lightfoot View Post

You usually need a throw of around 2 to 1 for acceptable pincushion, and that can be lost in the screen masking, so it shouldn't be an issue. I usually suggest that people try the zoom method first and see if they're happy with that, but at least you can now do comparisons between the two and decide which you prefer.

You may find the 1200 slightly softens the image (I used to have the 1000), but that may not be noticeable with movie content (it's obvious with test patterns), so later the upgrade to the Front Element may be next on your wish list if you decide to stick with the lens. At $500 it's a steal and you should be able to sell it on and get your money back no problem if you change your mind.

Either way, going CIH is a step forward from CIW so that alone is an upgrade in itself IMHO, so you can't lose.

Gary

Thanks Gary. Regarding the softening of the image, I bet that I won't even notice or be bothered by it coming from CRT. Going to digital I am going to have a much sharper image than I am used to already. Softening that a bit with the lens will probably still yield a sharper picture than I have now or maybe it will be much like I have now which I would be happy with.

I did not realize the upgrade was still available for this lens. Good to know. I'm so far away from making this happen I can't even visualize it right now. I can't decide if I want to do an AT screen or not. I will lose some very valuable throw distance if I do. On the other hand, I may not have room for my speakers at the left and right if I go with the wider scope screen.
post #43 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropzone7 View Post

Thanks Gary. Regarding the softening of the image, I bet that I won't even notice or be bothered by it coming from CRT. Going to digital I am going to have a much sharper image than I am used to already. Softening that a bit with the lens will probably still yield a sharper picture than I have now or maybe it will be much like I have now which I would be happy with.

I first used the Prismasonic H1000 with a 720 DLP pj, and I'd already seen quite a few CRTs including the likes of G90s, and thought that the slight softening did give the image a more CRT look. It was possibly like an 8" tubed CRT I guess - I'd seen a Barco 808 and it still looked a tad sharper but I think that was partly down to the owner running the 808 at slightly higher res which I think softened it slightly too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dropzone7 View Post

I did not realize the upgrade was still available for this lens. Good to know. I'm so far away from making this happen I can't even visualize it right now. I can't decide if I want to do an AT screen or not. I will lose some very valuable throw distance if I do. On the other hand, I may not have room for my speakers at the left and right if I go with the wider scope screen.

They do the FE upgrade, but not 100% sure if it'll fit the 1200 now that I've looked again:

http://www.prismasonic.com/account/order_form.php

Speak to ANSI who posts here as Prismasonic and see what he has to say.

Could you change the speakers for ones that will fit under the screen? The AT option is a good one but unless you can move the pj into the room behind and have it fire through a porthole it's probably a compromise too far - AT and solid screens both have pros and cons, you just have to pick which one ticks the most boxes for you. Having a shorter throw may mean the need for a curved screen if it's going to work at all at a shorter throw in your room.

Gary
post #44 of 137
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Lightfoot View Post


Could you change the speakers for ones that will fit under the screen? The AT option is a good one but unless you can move the pj into the room behind and have it fire through a porthole it's probably a compromise too far - AT and solid screens both have pros and cons, you just have to pick which one ticks the most boxes for you. Having a shorter throw may mean the need for a curved screen if it's going to work at all at a shorter throw in your room.

Gary

What about putting "in wall" speakers behind an AT screen when I don't actually have a "wall" where the screen is? There is a window behind my screen that I have filled in with foam and fabric to darken it out. The screen wall is probably half window and half wall with the window right in the center of that wall. I have a picture here somewhere before I closed it all up.
post #45 of 137
Thread Starter 
Here is what it looks like behind my current screen, before I filled anything in and finished it all off.
LL
post #46 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropzone7 View Post

What about putting "in wall" speakers behind an AT screen when I don't actually have a "wall" where the screen is? There is a window behind my screen that I have filled in with foam and fabric to darken it out. The screen wall is probably half window and half wall with the window right in the center of that wall. I have a picture here somewhere before I closed it all up.

I've not used in-wall speakers but if you make a baffle wall in the window, having three identical speakers might work better. CAVX (Mark Techer) will be able to give you more info on that if you ask him. That would certainly be a way round the speaker problem, plus the front will look tidier with nothing other than the screen on show (if that's the sort of look that you like). If you can have a black wall all you'll see is the image with no distracting reflections from speakers near the screen. In my last set up I covered the speakers in black cloth and the screen had a floating in space look about it which might give a more immersive viewing.

There are lots of in-walls available (I've been looking myself), so plenty to choose from at various prices. Can you get any demos?

Gary
post #47 of 137
Thread Starter 
There are a few places around here I could demo in-wall speakers. I guess the only way I am going to know for sure is to pull down my current screen and start building some sort of false wall or baffle wall like you say.
post #48 of 137
You might be able to fit the L&R speakers in the wall, and make a baffle wall for the window to house the centre. That should allow you to keep your screen where it is and the pj throw doesn't get reduced.

Gary
post #49 of 137
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Lightfoot View Post

You might be able to fit the L&R speakers in the wall, and make a baffle wall for the window to house the centre. That should allow you to keep your screen where it is and the pj throw doesn't get reduced.

Gary

I had considered that and you have a good point. My first concern was if the spacing would be correct for 16:9 imaging as well as 2:35 material. Looking at the photo of the wall again I think maybe it would be okay. I'm not exactly sure how I would handle the baffle wall in the window but I'm willing to try it in order to save my thrown distance and still have an AT screen. I really love my Ascend speakers and I think I would be sacrificing some pretty dynamic sound by going with in-walls but who knows. I guess it's time to start researching speakers to find something comparable to my Ascends but without a cabinet.

Here are the specifications on what I currently use.

For the L/R I have the CBM-170SE's

Typical In-Room Frequency Response 53Hz - 20kHz +/- 3dB
In-Room Sensitivity 91dB @ 1 watt / 1 meter
Frequency Response (Anechoic) 58Hz - 22kHz +/- 3dB
Sensitivity (Anechoic) 89dB @ 1 watt/ 1 meter
Average Impedance 8 ohms
Minimum Recommended Power 25 watts
Maximum Continuous Power* 200 watts
Maximum Short Term Peak Power* 400 watts
Cabinet Internally Braced 5/8" MDF, Magnetically Shielded, Bass Reflex via Rear Tuned Port
Dimensions H x W x D** 12" x 9" x 10"
Speaker Weight (each) 14 lbs each
Shipping Weight (pair) 32 lbs per pair
Tweeter (1) 27mm custom soft dome tweeter w/double-chambered neodymium magnet, ferrofluid cooled voice coil, wide dispersion faceplate
Woofer (1) proprietary 6.5” long throw composite polygel cone w/phase plug, non-resonant polymer chassis, rubber surround, shielded
Connectors (2) gold plated all metal 5 way binding posts
Inserts (2) ¼” x 20 inserts for simple mounting to wall mount brackets
*Unclipped peaks **Grille On


For the center I'm using the CMT-340SE

Typical In-Room Frequency Response 45Hz - 20kHz +/- 3dB
In-Room Sensitivity 92dB @ 1 watt / 1 meter
Frequency Response (Anechoic) 48Hz - 24kHz +/- 3dB
Sensitivity (Anechoic) 90dB @ 1 watt/ 1 meter
Average Impedance 8 ohms
Minimum Recommended Power 35 watts
Maximum Continuous Power* 240 watts
Maximum Short Term Peak Power* 400 watts
Cabinet Internally Braced 5/8" MDF, Magnetically Shielded, Bass Reflex via Rear Tuned Port
Dimensions H x W x D** 7.5" x 21" x 10.5"
Weight (each) 26 lbs each
Shipping Weight (each) 28 lbs each
Tweeter (1) High-definition 27mm soft dome tweeter w/damping chamber and wide roll surround, ferrfofluid damped voice coil, wide dispersion faceplate, magnetically shielded
Woofer (2) proprietary 6.5” long throw polygel cone woofers w/phase plug, non-resonant polymer chassis, rubber surround, shielded
Connectors (4) gold plated all metal 5 way binding posts, bi-wire ready.
Inserts (1) ¼” x 20 inserts for mounting to stands
*Unclipped peaks **Grille On
post #50 of 137
It might be difficult to match those exactly, and it's going to be difficult to know if the in walls are going to be as good until they're installed in your room (unless the demo room is very similar). I've not heard them, but the M&K 150 in-wall range usually get good reviews (the ones on the far right):

http://www.mksoundsystem.com/mkInWall.htm

As for placement, something like this should work for both 16:9 and 2.35:

http://www.thx.com/professional/cine...d-baffle-wall/

Gary
post #51 of 137
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Lightfoot View Post
It might be difficult to match those exactly, and it's going to be difficult to know if the in walls are going to be as good until they're installed in your room (unless the demo room is very similar). I've not heard them, but the M&K 150 in-wall range usually get good reviews (the ones on the far right):

http://www.mksoundsystem.com/mkInWall.htm

As for placement, something like this should work for both 16:9 and 2.35:

http://www.thx.com/professional/cine...d-baffle-wall/

Gary
Wow, those look awesome and I have heard good things about M&K but that is way out of my budget unfortunately. I would probably be looking to spend what one of those cost for all three. I was looking at some of the dual woofer Klipsch in-wall speakers in the $300-$400 each range. I have never owned the Klipsch brand but I have heard they are very bright, especially with the horn tweeters. I want something that is fairly formidable in appearance, like maybe 3' high when turned vertically.
post #52 of 137
I've heard good things about Klipsch too - can you get a demo of those? Ruben who started the SMX screen company had Klipsch behind his screen and he seemed quite pleased with them:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...ht=smx+klipsch


Many speakers that are designed to go behind perf screens often have horn tweeters (see the THX pic for example), so that's probably another plus for the Klipsch - assuming you like the sound that is.

Gary
post #53 of 137
Thread Starter 
I'm pretty sure I can find some place here to demo Klipsch speakers. Whether they have in-walls or not I'm not sure.

My mind is all over the place today. Now I'm thinking about whether or not my screen should be curved or not. I understand this helps with pincushion from the lens but I would hate to pay the extra money for curved if I don't really need it. If I end up with a throw of about 1.87 am I going to need the curved screen for sure?
post #54 of 137
You might be OK - you can try projecting onto a wall and see if the curve is too severe, but you might still be able to get away with allowing the curve spill onto the black masking (hard to check without a screen) and see what it looks like. Measure the difference between the centre height of the projected image and the height of the far left and right to see what the difference is. Post the results here or start a new thread to see what other people have and if they're relying on the asking or went for a curved screen to counter it. You're only a little under 2:1 so I would think you'd be OK with using the masking, but it doesn't hurt to see what other people are doing.

Gary
post #55 of 137
Thread Starter 
I'm in the process of selling everything in my room. My theater 2.0 will hopefully be up and running by the first of next year. It's the same old spare bedroom, just changing EVERYTHING in it. The two things I'm pondering most these days are:

1. What kind of projector to get.
2. What kind of in-wall speakers to get (baring in mind that the center has to go in front of a window!)
post #56 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropzone7 View Post

I'm pretty sure I can find some place here to demo Klipsch speakers. Whether they have in-walls or not I'm not sure.

I guess it all depends on what your ear likes. I am not a fan of Klipsch. I think they sound too harsh and too bright. Demo other brands to compare before deciding on Klipsch. My personal preference is Paradigm.
post #57 of 137
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnl View Post

I guess it all depends on what your ear likes. I am not a fan of Klipsch. I think they sound too harsh and too bright. Demo other brands to compare before deciding on Klipsch. My personal preference is Paradigm.

I agree. I have heard Klipsch towers and they are very dynamic and bright but you can only take that for so long. I think Paradigm looks like a contender but I really hate companies that only work through dealers because it makes it difficult for me to budget and compare prices.
post #58 of 137
Thread Starter 
So, would an Isco II lens be better than the Prismasonic H1200R I have now? I still don't have a projector yet so haven't even tried the H1200R.
post #59 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropzone7 View Post

So, would an Isco II lens be better than the Prismasonic H1200R I have now? I still don't have a projector yet so haven't even tried the H1200R.

Yes it would. I had a Prismasonic H1000 (very similar to the later 1200 but without the stops or remote option) and bought an ISCO II form the classifieds here a few months later just to see if it was any better or not. It was noticeably better with test patterns, and less so with video material, but still better enough for me to sell the Prismasonic, which I original didn't envisage doing.

HTH
post #60 of 137
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Lightfoot View Post

Yes it would. I had a Prismasonic H1000 (very similar to the later 1200 but without the stops or remote option) and bought an ISCO II form the classifieds here a few months later just to see if it was any better or not. It was noticeably better with test patterns, and less so with video material, but still better enough for me to sell the Prismasonic, which I original didn't envisage doing.

HTH

Hmm. I imagine most of my viewing will be video/movies and not test patterns. Is the cylindrical lens easier to integrate than the prism type lens? I'm probably going with a JVC DILA projector.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › 2.35:1 Constant Image Height Chat › Help an old CRT user with transitioning to digital and CIH