AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Onkyo Really Cutting Corners this Year?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Onkyo Really Cutting Corners this Year?

post #1 of 80
Thread Starter 
I noticed the THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) ratings on this year's crop of new Onkyos, (TX-NR509, 609, 709, etc.) are only spec'd (0.08%) at half power, whereas previous year's models are spec'd at full power (the industry standard).

http://www.us.onkyo.com/model.cfm?m=...s=Receiver&p=s

THD is one of the first things I check in a receiver, and in my opinion, this puts all of these models in the same class as no-name junk receivers.
post #2 of 80
What do you mean by half power?

And THD is not absolute. It rises with power output. You have to make sure you are comparing apples to oranges.

The rating below seems quite respectable, actually.

110 W + 110 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz,
0.08%, 2 channels driven, FTC)
post #3 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Augerhandle View Post
I noticed the THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) ratings on this year's crop of new Onkyos, (TX-NR509, 609, 709, etc.) are only spec'd (0.08%) at half power, whereas previous year's models are spec'd at full power (the industry standard).

http://www.us.onkyo.com/model.cfm?m=...s=Receiver&p=s

THD is one of the first things I check in a receiver, and in my opinion, this puts all of these models in the same class as no-name junk receivers.
As Michael pointed out the THD is 0.08% @ rated power (110W x 2) in 8 Ohms 20Hz-20kHz, so everything seems to be comparable to last year's models..

Just my $0.02...
post #4 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post
...You have to make sure you are comparing apples to oranges....
Did you mean "You have to make sure you are [not] comparing apples to oranges?"
post #5 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by AYColumbia View Post

Did you mean "You have to make sure you are [not] comparing apples to oranges?"

Fine, be that way I was tired. The dog ate my homework...etc
post #6 of 80
I don't know, I can see why one would say that. If you look at the specs for the TX-SR509 it's rated at 0.7% THD at rated power and 0.08% at half power. To be honest while THD is but one measure of quality, 0.7% is a pretty awful rating for a modern receiver in the price range of the 509. The 509 has a street price of $350. By way of comparison, I paid $350 for my Pioneer VSX-30 and it is rated at 0.08% at rated power.

Seems to me they've cheapened the amplifier quite a bit...
post #7 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdbrown View Post

I don't know, I can see why one would say that. If you look at the specs for the TX-SR509 it's rated at 0.7% THD at rated power and 0.08% at half power. To be honest while THD is but one measure of quality, 0.7% is a pretty awful rating for a modern receiver in the price range of the 509. The 509 has a street price of $350. By way of comparison, I paid $350 for my Pioneer VSX-30 and it is rated at 0.08% at rated power.

Seems to me they've cheapened the amplifier quite a bit...

This spec, (80 W + 80 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz,
0.7%, 2 channels driven, FTC)) from the 509, is not particularly impressive. However, it's a $400 receiver, and as such, when spec'd full bandwidth, maybe it's not too bad.

Yamaha's 471 is worse (85W (8ohms, 0.9% THD, but at 1khz)

The VSX 30 LISTS at $550, make sure you are comparing models with the same approximate MSRP!!
post #8 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

This spec, (80 W + 80 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz,
0.7%, 2 channels driven, FTC)) from the 509, is not particularly impressive. However, it's a $400 receiver, and as such, when spec'd full bandwidth, maybe it's not too bad.

Yamaha's 471 is worse (85W (8ohms, 0.9% THD, but at 1khz)

The VSX 30 LISTS at $550, make sure you are comparing models with the same approximate MSRP!!

MSRP means squat. Both receivers sell to me at the same price - $350. More to the point, the TX-SR508 is rated to 80wpc x2 at 0.08% while the TX-SR509 is 80wpc x2 at 0.7%. If MSRP is a sticking point to you then the VSX-521 retails at $249 yet it rates 80wpc x2 at 0.08% THD. The Denon AVR-1611 has a $399 MSRP and is rated at 75 wpc x7 at 0.08% THD.

It seems limited to the 509 model but either way it is not a good sign...
post #9 of 80
That's probably a fair comparison between the 508 and 509. Economy might still be tough, and they might be doing cost cutting.
post #10 of 80
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

What do you mean by half power?

And THD is not absolute. It rises with power output. You have to make sure you are comparing apples to oranges.

The rating below seems quite respectable, actually.

110 W + 110 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz,
0.08%, 2 channels driven, FTC)

Did you even read the link? (6th category down, called "THD") The 709 is spec'd at half power, the 708 from last year is spec'd 0.08% at rated power (110 watts per channel)

Here's the link for the 708 http://www.us.onkyo.com/model.cfm?m=...s=Receiver&p=s
post #11 of 80
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by M Code View Post

As Michael pointed out the THD is 0.08% @ rated power (110W x 2) in 8 Ohms 20Hz-20kHz, so everything seems to be comparable to last year's models..

Just my $0.02...

See my post above, and read the proper category. Where does the 709 say 0.08% @ rated power?
post #12 of 80
I missed the THD section, probably because they claimed .08% THD above that with the rated power claim.

As they say 110 watts, 20hz to 20kzh, .08% THD two channels, FTC, I have NO clue why they then say something like .08% THD half power. I don't know what that means, as it does not match up with the FTC power specified.

Confusing, and I don't know where they are coming from.
post #13 of 80
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

I missed the THD section, probably because they claimed .08% THD above that with the rated power claim.

As they say 110 watts, 20hz to 20kzh, .08% THD two channels, FTC, I have NO clue why they then say something like .08% THD half power. I don't know what that means, as it does not match up with the FTC power specified.

Confusing, and I don't know where they are coming from.

Even the FTC rule is confusing.

According to how one reads the FTC Trade Regulation Rule 16, Part 432 http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text...0.32.2&idno=16 only the FTC frequency range (20Hz-20kHz) needs to be disclosed at rated power, the FTC THD can be listed for any power level above 250 mW.

(red highlight by me)
Quote:




§ 432.2 Required disclosures. [snip]...

(b) In addition, whenever any direct or indirect representation is made of the power output, power band or power frequency response, or distortion characteristics of sound power amplification equipment in any product brochure or manufacturer specification sheet, the following disclosures also shall be made clearly, conspicuously, and more prominently than any other representations or disclosures permitted under this part:

(1) The manufacturer's rated power band or power frequency response, in Hertz (Hz), for the rated power output required to be disclosed in paragraph (a) of this section; and

(2) The manufacturer's rated percentage of maximum total harmonic distortion at any power level from 250 mW to the rated power output, and its corresponding rated power band or power frequency response.

One can only assume whether that means that according to the FTC, the manufacturer can choose at which power level to quote THD numbers, or that it means the maximum THD must hold true at any frequency between 250mW and the rated power. Surely, Onkyo (or any other manufacturer) would not qualify its THD claim as being at only half power unless required to do so.
post #14 of 80
I just picked up a 509 the other day. I just checked on the onkyo site the 509 has the same power consumption as the 508, and it is still a discreet amp design. I am very happy with the power output of the 509.To me what onkyo added to the new 9 series more than makes up for any so-called loss.Also the 509 has the same dynamic power output as the 508.
post #15 of 80
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiny0011 View Post

I just picked up a 509 the other day. I just checked on the onkyo site the 509 has the same power consumption as the 508, and it is still a discreet amp design. I am very happy with the power output of the 509.To me what onkyo added to the new 9 series more than makes up for any so-called loss.Also the 509 has the same dynamic power output as the 508.

Exactly the point. For the past four years, Onkyo has been adding "features" at the expense of amplification quality. The average uninformed consumer will be fine with this, but I am not.

(BTW Tiny0011, low THD at rated power is much more important to amplifier quality than dynamic power or power consumption. A cheapo no-name receiver with higher dynamic power but high THD will sound like crap compared to quality receiver with low THD. As for power consumption, a battery operated iPod consumes much less power than a HT receiver, but can hardly be expected to run an eight speaker surround system, and a Class A amplifier consumes much more power than a Class B amp, usually with an increase in sound quality because of less noise and distortion. Again it is the actual design that contributes to the quality, not the resultant power consumption. All that being said, I'm sure that you will be happy with your purchase, while others may or may not.)
post #16 of 80
Im the proud owner of a TX-SR805. After that receiver was released things started to go down hill as far as amplifiers in Onkyo's are concerned. I only use my 805 as a pre pro now and I have dedicated amplifiers for all 7 channels. So switching to another receiver with poor power does not really worry me to much. What does concern me is some of the functions that have been taken away. Such as in when doing manual calibrations. In my 805 you can manually adjust the EQ as well as tone control for all channels. Now in most of the newer models you can only do this for the front channels and maybe the sub. No surround adjustment. My receiver also allows you to adjust individual channel volumes for all channels while watching a movie. These settings are not permanent and are reset when the receiver is powered off. Again this is only offered on the front and center channels and possibly the sub channel on some receivers. From what I can tell you need to go all the way up to the 5008 with Onkyo or up the chain with Integra to get the options that my 805 has. This does not seem like a step forward to me. I know what the answer is. Most people don't use this stuff. They just use Audyssey. Well that's not a good answer in my opinion. I wan't all the adjustment options. Give them back!! And put the honest power supplies and amplifiers that kick butt back in while your at it!!
post #17 of 80
Thread Starter 
Unfortunately, I think the trend will continue unless and until they start losing customers because of it. People in their Sales department are betting their jobs that they are right in making these changes.
post #18 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Augerhandle View Post

Did you even read the link? (6th category down, called "THD") The 709 is spec'd at half power, the 708 from last year is spec'd 0.08% at rated power (110 watts per channel)

Here's the link for the 708 http://www.us.onkyo.com/model.cfm?m=...s=Receiver&p=s

They didn't spec the freq response of the 708 for the THD rating (as if that matters). All numbers published should be taken with a grain of salt as there's so many variables at play.
post #19 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by MandM View Post

They didn't spec the freq response of the 708 for the THD rating (as if that matters). All numbers published should be taken with a grain of salt as there's so many variables at play.

Do you mean don't believe the factory published numbers? Such as specs stating 130 WPC by the factory and then bench tested by an independent test and the amplifier only putting out 30 WPC. Thats reason enough for me to question the numbers published by the factory. Especially Onkyo since this seems to be their current trend. And Im a multiple Onkyo owner. At least I got my receivers before the numbers went down hill. This seems to be the trend in the last 3 years. Take more quality and power out of the products and then lie to the consumer.
post #20 of 80
Quote:


This does not seem like a step forward to me. I know what the answer is. Most people don't use this stuff. They just use Audyssey. Well that's not a good answer in my opinion. I wan't all the adjustment options. Give them back!! And put the honest power supplies and amplifiers that kick butt back in while your at it!!

Sounds to me like you should look elsewhere for your next receiver. If you're disappointed with Onkyo's offerings there are plenty of other brands to choose from.

Funny part is that you don't even use the honest power supplies and amplifiers that kick butt since you have external amps.
post #21 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by afrogt View Post

Sounds to me like you should look elsewhere for your next receiver. If you're disappointed with Onkyo's offerings there are plenty of other brands to choose from.

Funny part is that you don't even use the honest power supplies and amplifiers that kick butt since you have external amps.

The amplifiers in the 805 worked just fine for me for a while when my system was not as demanding. As good as the 805 is it still has its limits. I out grew the 805's amplifiers and have since switched to dedicated amplifiers. Im mainly disappointed with some of Onkyo's design changes since the 805. Not all of them but a lot of them.
post #22 of 80
I can't hear the difference between a receiver with different THD's with similar specs and are in the same price range.
post #23 of 80
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond Leggs View Post

I can't hear the difference between a receiver with different THD's with similar specs and are in the same price range.

Good for you! Whatever you do, don't turn it up...
post #24 of 80
According to my reading of the specs on the Onkyo website, the distortion of the Onkyo model 509 receiver at rated power is "downgraded" (worse) compared to the previous model 508. However, there is no such "downgrading" of models 609 and 709 compared to previous models 608 and 708. Look at the "Amplifier section: Power Output" under the specifications tab. Here is exact quoted text from the Onkyo web site (http://onkyousa.com/prod_class.cfm?class=Receiver)

TX-SR508
Quote:


Front L/R 80 W + 80 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz,
0.08%, 2 channels driven, FTC)

TX-NR509
Quote:


Front L/R 80 W + 80 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz,
0.7%, 2 channels driven, FTC)

TX-SR608
Quote:


Front L/R 100 W + 100 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz,
0.08%, 2 channels driven, FTC)

TX-NR609
Quote:


Front L/R 100 W + 100 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz,
0.08%, 2 channels driven, FTC)

TX-NR708
Quote:


Front L/R 110 W + 110 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz,
0.08%, 2 channels driven, FTC)

TX-NR709
Quote:


Front L/R 110 W + 110 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz,
0.08%, 2 channels driven, FTC)
post #25 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic icons View Post

According to my reading of the specs on the Onkyo website, the distortion of the Onkyo model 509 receiver at rated power is "downgraded" (worse) compared to the previous model 508. However, there is no such "downgrading" of models 609 and 709 compared to previous models 608 and 708. Look at the "Amplifier section: Power Output" under the specifications tab. Here is exact quoted text from the Onkyo web site (http://onkyousa.com/prod_class.cfm?class=Receiver)

The Onkyo site indicates the THD into 8 Ohms to be 0.08% @ 40W/CH for the 509. So yes in a direct comparison to the 508 it has higher THD, however most buyers of an entry-level AVR such as the 509 have no clue about THD %. Yet the 509 still had adequate power for many entry-level applications..

Keep in mind that Onkyo has added USB, network and internet radio in the 509, features not found in the 508. Essentially they traded some output power for some great features, which is not a bad compromise.. IMHO..

Just my $0.02...
post #26 of 80
Yep. Eventually receivers will be $300, and have EVERYTHING you could ever want...

Except power. The power supply will be comparable to the wall wart charging your cell phone
post #27 of 80
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic icons View Post

According to my reading of the specs on the Onkyo website, the distortion of the Onkyo model 509 receiver at rated power is "downgraded" (worse) compared to the previous model 508. However, there is no such "downgrading" of models 609 and 709 compared to previous models 608 and 708. Look at the "Amplifier section: Power Output" under the specifications tab. Here is exact quoted text from the Onkyo web site (http://onkyousa.com/prod_class.cfm?class=Receiver)

TX-SR508

TX-NR509


TX-SR608

TX-NR609


TX-NR708

TX-NR709

Again, read the entire link. (especially 6th category down, called "THD")

The 609 and 709 is spec'd at half power, the 608 and 708 from last year is spec'd 0.08% at rated power (110 watts per channel)
post #28 of 80
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

Yep. Eventually receivers will be $300, and have EVERYTHING you could ever want...

Except power. The power supply will be comparable to the wall wart charging your cell phone

Exactly.

I have USB, network and internet radio capability in other components which connect to my receiver (which has enough clean power to run my 7.2 system). I should not need to add an additional amp (or amps) to accomplish this.

(IMHO) Joe Sixpack seems to want more features, to go along with the 240HZ processing, 20 million-to-one contrast ratio, extended warranties, and Monster cables he has already bought into. Maybe next year, they will have a built in Blu-ray player, and cable box, with a 32" LCD screen, running on eight D cell batteries, and change their name to Onkyosonic.

And that's fine. I will just shop a different brand. I just hope Joe Sixpack and others don't think they're getting the same quality receivers that they have been selling in the past...that would be sad.
post #29 of 80
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by M Code View Post

[snip]...So yes in a direct comparison to the 508 it has higher THD, however most buyers of an entry-level AVR such as the 509 have no clue about THD %. ...

Hmmm, that is exactly why the passed a FEDERAL LAW (FTC Trade Regulation Rule 16, Part 432) that the THD shall be disclosed to the consumer...
Quote:


clearly, conspicuously, and more prominently than any other representations or disclosures

and yet, you and others think this information is unimportant to your purchase. Hey guys, I was just pointing it out to those who understand it. As you said, "most buyers of an entry-level AVR such as the 509 have no clue about THD %".

If you think it's not important, then ignore this thread, but don't try to say it's not valid information.
post #30 of 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Augerhandle View Post

Again, read the entire link. (especially 6th category down, called "THD")

The 609 and 709 is spec'd at half power, the 608 and 708 from last year is spec'd 0.08% at rated power (110 watts per channel)

Again, read the complete set of specs on the Onkyo website (http://onkyousa.com/prod_class.cfm?class=Receiver), including the part of the specs that I quoted directly and you apparently would like to ignore.

The power spec of the TX-NR609 is "Front L/R 100 W + 100 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz, 0.08%, 2 channels driven, FTC)", exactly the same as the comparable spec of the TX-SR608. The power spec of the TX-NR709 is "Front L/R 110 W + 110 W (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz, 0.08%, 2 channels driven, FTC)", exactly the same as the comparable spec of the TX-NR708.

I am aware that "6th category down" there is a spec that reads
"THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) 0.08% (Rated power) "
for the TX-SR608 and TX-NR708,
while the comparable spec reads
THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) 0.08% (20 Hz-20 kHz, Half power)"
for the TX-NR609 and TX-NR709. But the THD spec for the newer models does not indicate any degradation of amplifier performance, as compared to the older models, if we take into account all the specs for the amplifier section (rather than taking one line from the specs out of context and ignoring other specs).

In other words, the power and THD specs for the older and newer models can be paraphrased as follows:

older models, TX-SR608 and TX-NR708: the rated power (80 W or 100W) is produced into 8 ohm loads, two channels driven, with 0.08% or less THD from 20 Hz - 20 kHz; and, in addition, the THD is 0.08% or less at the rated power

newer models, TX-NR609 and TX-NR709: the rated power (80 W or 100W) is produced into 8 ohm loads, two channels driven, with 0.08% or less THD from 20 Hz - 20 kHz; and, in addition, the THD is 0.08% or less at half the rated power, from 20 Hz - 20 kHz
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Onkyo Really Cutting Corners this Year?