AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › The New Master List of BASS in Movies with Frequency Charts
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The New Master List of BASS in Movies with Frequency Charts - Page 181

post #5401 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Palmer_Cass View Post


Flage would also have to run Spectrumlab in LOG scale instead of Linear scale in order to see 0 - 24 kHz properly. People who post here only use the Linear scale.

When comparing two movies with the same settings in SL - we also see the difference in "output level".
The difference in output level is always adjusted to the Volume we prefer in our Hometheater when we actually see the movie.
Isnt the difference within in each movie more interesting?

Will this version make it easier to "see/feel" ULF bass in our systems? I prefer to stay the way it is today - at linear level.

Super8_ch3_log_scale.jpg
post #5402 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by venkatesh_m View Post

Bosso,
The charts look essentially the same as the ones I showed for the Asian region blu rays but the differences seem to be the intensity of mine. I believe I am not clipping as well, why the differences?
I am taking the signal from the LFE out from my BD player and the volume is set at 100%. Maybe that is the reason
http://www.avsforum.com/t/1333462/the-new-master-list-of-bass-in-movies-with-frequency-charts/5100#post_22408177

Mine is set up for optimal transfer from my mic through my interface. Since you're going straight off your player into your sound card there may be a level setting difference in your sound card menu, which, since I don't use that method, is something I'm not familiar with.

You can go to "options" in SpecLab, "Spectrum (2), and change the "offset" to correct the intensity difference.

FFTsettings2.jpg

Also check your scroll speed. Mine is 80 ms. Yours looks to be slower, so LMK if it's 80 or different.
post #5403 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steveo1234 View Post

When you get a chance to watch battleship please give a comparison to Avengers. Im interested....
Also, if Battleship and avngers looks similar on the waterfalls we are measuring the wrong things. Battleship was horribel (3 stars), avengers was really good (4,5 stars) in my own subjective opinion.

I just checked out some scenes from different movies. Avatar is better than Avengers which is better than Battleship. I gave Avatar a 4 rating so Avengers a 3.5 and battleship a 3. This is based on feel. I used to get out my spl meter and judge by what it hit during the scene and how that spl created tactile sensations(extension). Transformers would be a 4 or 4.5. I have to recheck it again.
post #5404 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steveo1234 View Post

When you get a chance to watch battleship please give a comparison to Avengers. Im interested....
Also, if Battleship and avngers looks similar on the waterfalls we are measuring the wrong things. Battleship was horribel (3 stars), avengers was really good (4,5 stars) in my own subjective opinion.

It's Avengers I haven't seen. Battleship was a three star to my ears.

I'm actually not sure which was the worse movie: Aeon Flux or Battleship. Bass content seemed about the same, though AF is a lot shorter movie.
post #5405 of 8208
If you were capturing from the AVR sub out, it would certainly make sense to disable any auto-EQ (Audyssey, MCACC, YPAO). My question is: Where would you want to set the crossovers as this would have an impact due to re-directed bass from other channels, no?

I plan on getting myself set-up to provide graphs, but wanted to make sure we're all on a level playing field.
post #5406 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Spankenstein View Post

If you were capturing from the AVR sub out, it would certainly make sense to disable any auto-EQ (Audyssey, MCACC, YPAO). My question is: Where would you want to set the crossovers as this would have an impact due to re-directed bass from other channels, no?
I plan on getting myself set-up to provide graphs, but wanted to make sure we're all on a level playing field.

My suggestion is to take the feed off the player, digitally, if you have that capability. That eliminates the AVRs analog SW out roll off and gives the most accurate presentation.
post #5407 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxmercy View Post

You must not have listened to the same film, or you lack extension below 28Hz.
Post your frequency response at the listening position.
I saw the film last night at -20dB, hence my comments that the film is DEFINITIVELY NOT reference material. I am running a peak v avg graph right now to confirm my suspicions, and while it has healthy levels, 1/2-way through the film, there is a BRICK WALL filter that begins cutting at 28Hz, with 20Hz EIGHTEEN dB down from the 28Hz average level.
This is the biggest bass disappointment this year, bar none. Bar none.
I have double checked my settings, my levels, and SpecLab. I pray that the second half of the film gets better, but do not have my hopes up.
This is pure conjecture, but it Looks like the mixers took the blown subwoofer drivers seriously and then put the brick wall in place prior to the finished product to prevent any further delays? Who knows.
Maybe I have a defective disc. Got the 2D version at Wal-Mart. Can someone else confirm these findings?
I'll post the finished graph when the film has finished, hope the final battle somehow does not get filtered.
And to all of you who gave 4.5+ stars, I question your system's frequency response.
JSS

Actually, my sub is -3db @ 16Hz. In fact, I thought the bass I heard from the beginning of the movie prior to the credits was riveting.
post #5408 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossobass View Post

My suggestion is to take the feed off the player, digitally, if you have that capability. That eliminates the AVRs analog SW out roll off and gives the most accurate presentation.

Thanks, Dave. I'll either have to use the 7.1 analog out from the Sony BDP-1000ES since my PC doesn't have an HDMI audio IN and optical won't be passing the HD audio formats. Maybe there is a way for SL to capture from a BD while being played within the PC.
post #5409 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Spankenstein View Post

Thanks, Dave. I'll either have to use the 7.1 analog out from the Sony BDP-1000ES since my PC doesn't have an HDMI audio IN and optical won't be passing the HD audio formats. Maybe there is a way for SL to capture from a BD while being played within the PC.

That will work. My experience with Sony players analog out is that they're flat to 3 Hz, so should be accurate enough. Make sure you set the sats to small and sub to yes in the players menu to send all bass to the SW out. I've done both and compared them and I think the anny out of the player is gonna be just fine.

I have my settings in a file that you can just upload into SL and be running, if you're interested, LMK.
post #5410 of 8208
Great news! I knew Sony was good fer sumpthin'!

If you're refering to the .INI file for SpecLab, I'll just get it in the .zip file from your site, correct?

Kinda excited to get this going and contribute positively to this thread.
post #5411 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Spankenstein View Post

Great news! I knew Sony was good fer sumpthin'!
If you're refering to the .INI file for SpecLab, I'll just get it in the .zip file from your site, correct?
Kinda excited to get this going and contribute positively to this thread.

Yes, the zip has SL and the .ini file.

I posted earlier for another member that you may have to adjust the "offset" if the levels are too high. Just play a scene and adjust the offset until it looks right, with highest peaks at around -5dBFS (whitish color).

Love to see more posters with SL graphs. Good luck and LMK if there's anything I can help with. cool.gif
post #5412 of 8208
Saw that. I'll dink around with it this weekend.

Thanks again for the help!
post #5413 of 8208
4.5 stars for The Avengers huh? About to take it for a spin right now...wink.gif
post #5414 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flageborg View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by djbluemax1 View Post


If they could get SL to work on a 64-bit platform, I could try messing around with it. As it is, I can only watch from the sidelines and try to make sense of what I'm seeing.

I am running SL on computers with Windows 7 and 64-bit version....
You are? Hmm... I'm going to try it on my laptop.


Max
post #5415 of 8208
FWIW, the waterfalls I posted were also done in a windows 7, 64bit os version.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
post #5416 of 8208
I just demoed a few scenes to compare to the avengers to get an idea what to rate it which I gave 4 stars initially. Avatar, avengers, batman begins, and LOTR:FOTR. I compared them to each other and Avengers comes close to Avatar with the difference being Avatar digging deeper with more hair raising bass and Avengers havin more Midbass punch. Then came batman which went deeper and louder than both. FOTR wins this hands down with its overall soundtrack as good as any. It reminds me of immortals without clipping. All the bass and the surround and front stage is awesome. There was an effect that happned several times in one scene that never happened ever during Avatar and the Avengers. So I give it 4 stars if prefer Midbass punch and I give it 3.5 stars if you like 20hz stuff. Avatar is 4 stars. I think all the transformer movies, batman(Christian bale), LOTR, etc... Have better bass than the Avengers. I still love the movie!
post #5417 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbaby View Post

Actually, my sub is -3db @ 16Hz. In fact, I thought the bass I heard from the beginning of the movie prior to the credits was riveting.

What speakers/subwoofers/receiver do you have in your system?
post #5418 of 8208
Watched the Avengers last night at -12. I had not seen it. The movie was really entertaining and I got some good laughs out of it, plenty of action too. I thought the movie itself was great. I also thought the picture quality was great and the surround use was good but not top tier. I would give it a 3.5 for bass maybe even a 3. It had tons of bass quantity and loudness but it didn't have the diversity and creative use of the bass that my favorites do. I don't mean just the sub bass either. Still a really enjoyable movie just not bass demo material. YMMV
post #5419 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricci View Post

Watched the Avengers last night at -12. I had not seen it. The movie was really entertaining and I got some good laughs out of it, plenty of action too. I thought the movie itself was great. I also thought the picture quality was great and the surround use was good but not top tier. I would give it a 3.5 for bass maybe even a 3. It had tons of bass quantity and loudness but it didn't have the diversity and creative use of the bass that my favorites do. I don't mean just the sub bass either. Still a really enjoyable movie just not bass demo material. YMMV

Agree 100% the bass is there with quantity but the quality of it and the way it was used was not very diverse or creative. I could understand if they filtered it at 20hz thats fine...but 30hz?....seriously WTF!. Surround use was ok, but nothing special at all compared to other movies. Enjoyable movie regardless of that though.....just wish the studios wouldnt do an half arsed effort in mixing these movies.
post #5420 of 8208
Where exactly is the evidence of filtering at 30hz? I'm not seeing that. these graphs are showing plenty of content down to 20hz and even some below that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by venkatesh_m View Post

Flageborg,
I am not sure why, but there seems to a slight difference in our graphs. I am using bosso's .ini file and colour scheme. Direct sub out from Oppo, all speakers set to small and 120Hz. Soundcard 48000 input as per bosso's file. I checked the levels using the discrete DVD disc with only LFE channel using sweeps and it was about right. The version is also different as I am in Asia. The long term charts does show that the output below 30Hz is limited. The 1st chart is the same Chapter 14 from when Loki throws Stark out of the window. Due to our window settings being different the differences are there but general chart stays the same.

The next one is the part where Banner changes into the Hulk (I'm always angry)

Last chart - Hulk Smash!

The chart in the bottom shows the long term average from the start of Chap 14 (Loki throwing Stark out of window) till the battle ending and they all part ways.(1:40 till 2:10) The output below 30Hz seems to be low as well.

There is a lot of bass content but as I mentioned content below 30Hz seems much less. Still there seems to be output till about 10Hz. As this is my 1st time trying to get waterfalls correct (in Win 7), let me know if there are any mistakes.
post #5421 of 8208
@ mojomike,
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxmercy View Post


I have to assue that is the MIN-MAX average for the entire film. That being the assumption, look at the roll-off below the peak @ 30Hz. Looks suspicously like a 4th/5th order pass filter. Even in the other waterfalls, (dependant on intensity) everything has that same charateristic.

That's the definition of "filtered" that I and others are meaning, not a brick-wall filter at a specific frequency.
Edited by Dr. Spankenstein - 9/28/12 at 10:17am
post #5422 of 8208
Flageborg,i appreciate your charts god work : ) hope you can give the movie "Inside" à shot,its à french horror flick With insane bass into singel digits,check it out ; ) even Bosso cant complain on this one : )
post #5423 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by mojomike View Post

Where exactly is the evidence of filtering at 30hz? I'm not seeing that. these graphs are showing plenty of content down to 20hz and even some below that.
Thanks for that. I thought I was looking at the charts wrong, I know nothing is like a brick wall, but I figured that if it were filtered, then there would be absolutely nothing down low, It looks like there is content, just not that loud or intense because it looks green instead of red. Unless I am reading the charts wrong.
post #5424 of 8208
There is certainly a lack of content below 20hz, but do to the emphasis of output between 30 and 50hz, the strength at 20hz is still up there with everything at 70hz and above. It does look like the sound guys were shooting for bass that would be most useful for the commercial theaters as well as probably 99+% of home theaters. The bottom line is that the only bass content that is lacking is that which is below 20hz.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Spankenstein View Post

I have to assue that is the MIN-MAX average for the entire film. That being the assumption, look at the roll-off below the peak @ 30Hz. Looks suspicously like a 4th/5th order pass filter. Even in the other waterfalls, (dependant on intensity) everything has that same charateristic.
That's the definition of "filtered" that I and others are meaning, not a brick-wall filter at a specific frequency.
post #5425 of 8208
I just watched Avengers last night with a group of friends, Everyone was impressed with the bass and there is certainly a lot of it, but I could easily tell there was a real lack of <25hz and below - That is the stuff that makes your pant legs and your hair vibrate. Every once in a while there was a bit of a sense of the deep stuff, but when compared to something like The Incredible Hulk there was a huge difference. It is a bit disappointing given that stuff like the building collapse could have been so much better if it had the really deep stuff. As a side note I was also surprised with the 16:9 aspect ratio given the type of movie.
post #5426 of 8208
I was wondering why it filled the whole screen lol. I thought I had my PQ settings messed up.
post #5427 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by mojomike View Post

There is certainly a lack of content below 20hz, but do to the emphasis of output between 30 and 50hz, the strength at 20hz is still up there with everything at 70hz and above. It does look like the sound guys were shooting for bass that would be most useful for the commercial theaters as well as probably 99+% of home theaters. The bottom line is that the only bass content that is lacking is that which is below 20hz.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Spankenstein View Post

I have to assue that is the MIN-MAX average for the entire film. That being the assumption, look at the roll-off below the peak @ 30Hz. Looks suspicously like a 4th/5th order pass filter. Even in the other waterfalls, (dependant on intensity) everything has that same charateristic.
That's the definition of "filtered" that I and others are meaning, not a brick-wall filter at a specific frequency.
The bass at 20Hz is down 15-20db from 30Hz. That difference coupled with the typical reduced perception of lower frequencies means that there isn't much at 20Hz at all. Yep, filtered at 30Hz.

The movie itself was definitely enjoyable, the audio was pretty good, but the bass could definitely have been better, especially when you consider the bass in some of the other movies within the franchise (TIH and Iron Man). It appears that this trend is occurring in the newer movies in the franchise (Thor and now Avengers). Definitely looking forward to the next Avengers movie with the appearance of Thanos at the end of the first one, but hopefully, by then, they'll have moved away from this silly trend of filtering at 30Hz.


Max
Edited by djbluemax1 - 9/28/12 at 1:54pm
post #5428 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by djbluemax1 View Post

Thanks for the clarification. If they could get SL to work on a 64-bit platform, I could try messing around with it. As it is, I can only watch from the sidelines and try to make sense of what I'm seeing. So the graphs don't represent absolute digitally encoded levels? i.e. how would you know if a particular peak is really 0db or -8db?

I wonder if there's a way to set it to show that, or alternatively, another program that has that facility? You would think if you could read the audio track right off the BD, you could see if something was encoded at 0dbfs or -30db or anywhere in between. That would make it even easier to see if clipping was actually in the audio track or a problem with the measurement settings.


Max



You only know peak dB FS levels in a waterfall if you calibrate your system, only show one input channel on the waterfall, and you account for DD Dialnorm variances. In addition the color RED (as an example) shows a range of SPL levels that vary poster to poster. It could be +/- 3 B, or +/- 6 dB or whatever scale the poster uses.

In addition, only the upper spectrogram shows PEAK dB FS by frequency bin with any accuracy.

On a bass managed system, calibration is impossible. Add 5 channels of bass plus the LFE channel together, and the combined bass total will easily go over the 0 dB FS limit that is used on each individual digital channel if you do the math. Even 2 channels encoded with a -3 dB FS signal level will peak at a theoretical level of +3 dB FS.
post #5429 of 8208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flageborg View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Palmer_Cass View Post


Flage would also have to run Spectrumlab in LOG scale instead of Linear scale in order to see 0 - 24 kHz properly. People who post here only use the Linear scale.

When comparing two movies with the same settings in SL - we also see the difference in "output level".
The difference in output level is always adjusted to the Volume we prefer in our Hometheater when we actually see the movie.
Isnt the difference within in each movie more interesting?

Will this version make it easier to "see/feel" ULF bass in our systems? I prefer to stay the way it is today - at linear level.

Super8_ch3_log_scale.jpg



Not the way that you show it!

Try a single channel waterfall 3 to 24 kHz.
post #5430 of 8208
I just wanted to clarify my stance on this Avengers soundtrack for the few who seem rabid about my opinions and especially because they've chosen to give this soundtrack a 5 star (or A level, or whatever the top rating for others may be) rating.

First, yes, this soundtrack is filtered with at least a 4th order HPF at 30 Hz. There is no question about that, so please don't try to bait me with baloney on this point.

Second, concerning the so-called filtered 5 star soundtracks claim, alleging that there are "massive" numbers or "the vast majority" of titles that fit this description and that the titles with <20 Hz content are "less than 1%" baloney, let's just try to add that claim up. There are over 1,000 titles in this Master List thread, virtually all of which have <20 Hz content. So, that would mean that there are at least 100,000 titles of 5 star filtered soundtracks available.

...right. rolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gif

As far as Avengers being 5 star, I've sized and cropped the best examples of a true 5 star movie with bass to Avengers from 0 to 60 Hz. Both are mic'd at the LP at 0dBRL (reference level at my seat), with the subwoofer calibrated flat with the mains. I also zoomed in on a scene from A to show the filter estimate vs the scale I use in SL:

HULK.jpg

So, all I can say is, if A is 5 stars, TIH must be 200 stars.

With Thor, the BR is +10dB hotter than the DVD and the A graphs I did were of the DVD, so the intensity of the graph may be higher with A on BR, I don't know, but that's not gonna change anything in the comparison besides the simple fact that to most folks louder means better. Bumping the levels up changes nothing but the master volume level. It's simple enough to run my subs hot with Hulk as well, but loudness is not what I use to rate soundtracks.

Bottom line: there is no comparison whatsoever from any angle you look at it. Quantity, bandwidth, quality, enhancement of the viewing experience, added realism, etc., etc. Hulk is 5 stars, A is not. A is not 4 stars and I feel I was kind in giving it 3 stars.

Since this thread was jacked by a few haters maxmercy has pinged me to say he's done with posting peak-to-average graphs or any other graphs/tests he runs. I can't say I blame him or any of the others who've stopped posting such in this thread, but I'm taking a sentence here to ask him: Doc, please reconsider and please post the Thor PtoA graph and any future graphs you create here. I find them extremely valuable and I appreciate the time it takes to do them and post them here. smile.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › The New Master List of BASS in Movies with Frequency Charts