Quote:
Originally Posted by vailvon 
That is right. You posted your graph and I posted mine, what's wrong with that? So you are saying, CM9 are not bright as a whole but with a brightish sounding high end IMO. NICE.. Let's leave it at that.
I'm not taking the thread off track as the thread says specifically about CM9. Yyz67 is interested on those speakers and I have it, you don't.
Please read more on ARC. You can turn it on or off if you like. I find the sound better with ARC though.

That is right. You posted your graph and I posted mine, what's wrong with that? So you are saying, CM9 are not bright as a whole but with a brightish sounding high end IMO. NICE.. Let's leave it at that.
I'm not taking the thread off track as the thread says specifically about CM9. Yyz67 is interested on those speakers and I have it, you don't.
Please read more on ARC. You can turn it on or off if you like. I find the sound better with ARC though.
I know what ARC is.
My graph is a quasi-anechoic one; yours is not. Please "read more on" quasi-anechoic.
In-room graphs only tell how a speaker is performing in the person's room. You also could have fudged the response with ARC but claimed not to.You can disagree all you want because we're sharing opinions, but the third party quasi-anechoic graph speaks for itself. Moving on...

Edit: I had forgotten about this thread and how enjoyable some of the reading was. I'm glad Monkish started it.

Edited by Nuance - 1/21/13 at 9:40am















.
