Quote:
Quote:
Only the 82 and 92 840's have the higher contrast screen.
Only the 82 and 92 840's have the higher contrast screen.
Keep in mind the glossy screen can cause a significant amount of glare. I do like the overall picture better with the glossy screens, as it rids the TV of the "silk screen effect", which is slightly bothersome on my current WD-65C9. The differences in the models are probably more feature-related than picture quality related. I think we've pretty much all but reached a plateau for picture quality. I know back when I was comparing the 737/837/C9, the main differences I found were feature-wise and having little if any to do with the picture quality. Pretty much all TV's (when properly calibrated) are going to look very similar, aside for technology-inherent artifacts, such as DLP's rainbow/silk screen effect, or LCD's motion artifacts. Even at work that's how most of the TV's are, a new model comes out priced $500 higher than the last and it's all for new features (and of course a quoted slightly higher contrast ratio or picture processing gimmick).























. My couch is just 17" high at a distance of 18' from the TV screen. People that would view this TV are between 5'2" to 5' 11". I know this would be a bad setup. Any suggestions on how I can make it work (other than getting a new stand)?

lol, I kid. 