AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Rear Projection Units › 2011 Mitsubishi DLP WD-73640 official thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

2011 Mitsubishi DLP WD-73640 official thread - Page 15

post #421 of 1821
Attached are my greyscale and primaries as measured with el cheapo i2 display.
Its not the best at 0 and 10% IRE, but nevertheless, less than 8Delta across the greyscale.


These are out the box natural, low temp measuremens. Contrast and Brightness set. Nothing else.

Is there a way to copy the Natural setting over to advanced and use as a starting point for a full cal?
LL
LL
LL
post #422 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69mach1-377 View Post

OK, going to get my 640 today and need to move my 62628 into the bedroom. It won't fit thru the hallway and door in the normal upright position, so I was thinking of carefully rotating it sideways, always suspended in air by 2 strong guys, to make the pass thru.
Is there a risk to damaging the beast by doing this?

The answer is no, but...
The guy who delivered the 640 suggested we use a runner rug, upside down, to place the side edge of the 628 on. It was not balanced, so I did that while he dragged it into the bedroom. Once there, we lifted it onto the stand. The tv worked fine after being sideways and dragged.
That advice and help was worth the $20 I tipped him.
The 640 fired up and no visible damage or screen issues, but I won't connect it until tomorrow probably.
post #423 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRaven72 View Post

2,4,5,7 is the service menu, hit 0 for geo correction, hit Video for other settings.

To be more explicit, I think the full procedure is:

1) Press Menu to display the regular menu
2) Press 2,4,5,7 in sequence (one at a time) to display the service menu (just some green text overlaid in the lower left of the screen)
3) Pressing 0 will pop another part of the service menu with a "Manual Geometry Alignment" option

That's just how to get in, I'm pretty clueless on what all those options are. I managed to tweak the geometry a bit, but didn't touch anything else. Can anyone point us to some more info?

Note that I agree with snoop, despite the screen feeling loose along the top edge, I don't see any impact on picture quality on my set. The top edge of the picture actually looks quite straight. There is some bowing along all the edges, but it's more pronounced on the sides, which I think is pretty normal for RPTVs. The only abnormal issue with my screen is a "bump" in the geometry along the right edge about halfway up. I can't completely compensate for that with the geometry adjustments.
post #424 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by GEP View Post

1. A lot heavier plastic - to span larger areas not supported in the middle. Also means special molds which costs a lot of money and are amortized over fewer units.
2. A lot bigger mirror - also heavier - an additional need for #1 above.
3. Metal Screen bezel - even the 82" has a metal screen bezel - this means several parts as well.
4. Heavier base peice to maintain stablity - these TVs have got to be top heavy and more so as the TV increases in size.
5. Specialize screen and Fresnel lens. You cannot just cut a larger size, the optical properties have to be adjusted to the display size. Again special tools to make the screen that cost a lot of money and are amortized over fewer units.

While the principles are the same between 73" and 92" sizes the details are not.

Certainly, however the stuff you mentioned dont cost 2-3x as much as the manufacturing cost of the 73". Its not like they're having to turn out an lcd or plasma panel that actually costs a lot more to make in larger sizes.

Quote:


As for more room for speakers, keep in mind that the way speakers work is to "pump" air. This air pumping action moves air both forward and becomes the sound waves we hear and moves air backwards. If they use the projection cavity as the behind the speaker space they need to keep the speaker somewhat small and somewhat weak. Otherwise the air movement inside the projection cavity would cause the screen to pump.

And yet they have a 16 speaker version of this (the 73840) that costs more and sounds fine and looks identical, and my old 55" jvc lcos set that was about the same setup only a little smaller had fabulous sound and bass. If I remember right they had a tunnel built into the cabinet with some speakers mounted in it.

I understand the idea of segmentation and selling up, but I'm an unhappy camper about the universal decision to make most tv sets with crappy, useless sound on the presumption that everyone will want to hook up a sound bar or a surround sound system. I physically cannot use a sound bar or surround sound system with the tv in the room I'm using it in, which is why I bought a rear projection set as those have enough room in the cabinet to install a decent speaker.
post #425 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoop View Post

I understand the idea of segmentation and selling up, but I'm an unhappy camper about the universal decision to make most tv sets with crappy, useless sound .

Wish in one hand and crap in the other, see which one fills up first
post #426 of 1821
Quote:


Originally Posted by snoop
I understand the idea of segmentation and selling up, but I'm an unhappy camper about the universal decision to make most tv sets with crappy, useless sound .

I think useless is going a little too far, but thats me. I guess next time do more research before pulling the trigger. Sorry to hear that you are an unhappy camper. You cant win 'em all is the saying, right?
post #427 of 1821
calimark: I, too have the i1display2 system.... How did you get it to track the DLP display? What software are you using? I'm using Match 3.6.2 on Windows...

Thanks.... Jan

Quote:
Originally Posted by calimark View Post

Attached are my greyscale and primaries as measured with el cheapo i2 display.
Its not the best at 0 and 10% IRE, but nevertheless, less than 8Delta across the greyscale.


These are out the box natural, low temp measuremens. Contrast and Brightness set. Nothing else.

Is there a way to copy the Natural setting over to advanced and use as a starting point for a full cal?
post #428 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRaven72 View Post

We prefer the Optoma ZD101's here. We also have the True Depth 3d and Ultimate 3d glasses but those still had the DLP Link Green Tint you could see through them. DLP Link glasses that is. That way didn't have to fool with the whole emitter deal. The ZD101's are perfect color wise and for clarity.

I was going to get the xpands to try them, but they were too expensive to buy at store vs. buying online these others online. ($120 for a pair at the place I bought the TV.---->PTV)

DRAVEN, are these the glasses you say are green? I see the lens itself is tinted, however the reviews seem overwhelmingly positive, and at $59 it seems a good deal.What say you? .... are the Optoma's worth the extra money?
post #429 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkeener71 View Post

I think useless is going a little too far, but thats me. I guess next time do more research before pulling the trigger. Sorry to hear that you are an unhappy camper. You cant win 'em all is the saying, right?

I spent 3 weeks researching what to buy and every review I saw about this set said the built in audio was more than satisfactory. I guess a lot of people think tinny sound with absolutely no bass at all is good.
post #430 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alaskan_awd View Post

BTW any one looking for some settings or at-least a good starting point, I used these settings for a 73738 and they look pretty dang good.
Picture Mode: ADV
DeepField Imager: Off
Super Resolution: Off
EdgeEnhance: Off
Video Noise: Off
Brightness: 29
Contrast: 52
Color: 33
Tint: 31
Sharpness: 31
Gamma: 2.2
Red High: 982
Green High: 1011
Blue High: 1020
Red Low: 1
Green Low: 2
Blue Low: 2
Blue Only: Off
Red Adjust: 13, 2, 0
Green Adjust: 2, 12, 2
Blue Adjust: 0, 5, 13
Magenta Adjust: 11, 6, 11
Cyan Adjust: 3, 14, 12
Yellow Adjust: 14, 13, 3

So I found the time to set mine up and used these settings before watching Fast Five on BR last night. At first there seemed to be extra red skin tones, but by the middle of the movie they were gone. Not bad for it's debut, I guess there is a break-in period?
Anyone else happy with these settings?
post #431 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoop View Post

I spent 3 weeks researching what to buy and every review I saw about this set said the built in audio was more than satisfactory. I guess a lot of people think tinny sound with absolutely no bass at all is good.

Good for what? It is on par for a tv. Why get a big tv and then not also get a good sound system? Ever hear of this new fangled 'surround sound'?
post #432 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoop View Post

I spent 3 weeks researching what to buy and every review I saw about this set said the built in audio was more than satisfactory. I guess a lot of people think tinny sound with absolutely no bass at all is good.

Enough, please!
post #433 of 1821
http://www.edealinfo.com/deal/Mitsub...TV/20111210114

Man am I glad I got this on Black Friday.
post #434 of 1821
Dumb question, but I want to try and tweak some of the geometry a bit, I get into the service menu and hit 0 and then select manual geometry. I see where you can move the "+" marker around but I don't understand how you make adjustments. How do you make the adjustments for each color/line?
post #435 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan J View Post

calimark: I, too have the i1display2 system.... How did you get it to track the DLP display? What software are you using? I'm using Match 3.6.2 on Windows...

Thanks.... Jan

Color HCFR ( free sw ). And I used the patterns from the AVS image set ( see calibration forum). I just put up the patterns via PS3--did not burn to DVD.
post #436 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69mach1-377 View Post

So I found the time to set mine up and used these settings before watching Fast Five on BR last night. At first there seemed to be extra red skin tones, but by the middle of the movie they were gone. Not bad for it's debut, I guess there is a break-in period?
Anyone else happy with these settings?

I found Natural Low temp mode to be very accurate. Please see the charts I posted earlier.
Minor tweaking needed for absolute perfection.

BTW: Is there anyone else on this thread that has taken greyscale readings on their televison or done a full cal?
post #437 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by calimark View Post

I found Natural Low temp mode to be very accurate. Please see the charts I posted earlier.
Minor tweaking needed for absolute perfection.

BTW: Is there anyone else on this thread that has taken greyscale readings on their televison or done a full cal?

I have no clue what any of that graph stuff means.

Alaskan_awd: Thank you for the settings.
post #438 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by calimark View Post

I found Natural Low temp mode to be very accurate. Please see the charts I posted earlier.
Minor tweaking needed for absolute perfection.

BTW: Is there anyone else on this thread that has taken greyscale readings on their televison or done a full cal?

Wait until you have about 300 hours on the lamp to calibrate. It should then be pretty stable until the end of the lamp life. The grayscale on my 65835 was under 1 dE for most of the range after calibration.

Attachment 230445 Attachment 230446 Attachment 230447
LL
LL
LL
post #439 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by calimark View Post

I found Natural Low temp mode to be very accurate. Please see the charts I posted earlier.
Minor tweaking needed for absolute perfection.

I tried that last night but still found light skin to look kind of pasty and the color seems off a bit. The blues aren't deep enough it seems. I only have about 10 hours on the set so far.
Would tint adjustments help?
Maybe I'll pop in a DVD with the THX video helper and do some tweaking.
Even with this issue, the 640 seems to look better and sharper than my older 62628 in spite of it's larger size. Very pleased, as is my wife.
post #440 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Augerhandle View Post

Wait until you have about 300 hours on the lamp to calibrate. It should then be pretty stable until the end of the lamp life. The grayscale on my 65835 was under 1 dE for most of the range after calibration.

Attachment 230445 Attachment 230446 Attachment 230447

Very nice. Thanks a bunch.
Is there a way to copy natural to adv and use as a starting point?
How many passes did you make to achieve those results.
I'll wait as recommended to do full cal
post #441 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69mach1-377 View Post

I tried that last night but still found light skin to look kind of pasty and the color seems off a bit. The blues aren't deep enough it seems. I only have about 10 hours on the set so far.
Would tint adjustments help?
Maybe I'll pop in a DVD with the THX video helper and do some tweaking.
Even with this issue, the 640 seems to look better and sharper than my older 62628 in spite of it's larger size. Very pleased, as is my wife.

I can't say if tinit will work. Am no expert but I can say properly cal'd images do appear 'weak' as most tbs come with blown out settings to ooooh and ahhhh us.
Did you at least set brightness and contrast using a pattern?
post #442 of 1821
Not yet...that is my next step.
But should I wait a while to let it settle in?
post #443 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69mach1-377 View Post

Not yet...that is my next step.
But should I wait a while to let it settle in?

Probably should.
post #444 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkeener71 View Post


I have no clue what any of that graph stuff means.

Alaskan_awd: Thank you for the settings.

These are actually nicholc2's settings, I quoted him in the original post.
post #445 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alaskan_awd View Post

These are actually nicholc2's settings, I quoted him in the original post.

Yep! and those settings after 300 hrs are killer on my 73738
post #446 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiofan1 View Post

Yep! and those settings after 300 hrs are killer on my 73738

They are for that TV. I tried them on my 640 and the skin tones had a slight green/yellowish tint, little on the dark side too. Wasn't my thing. I actually think with this years model they are pretty close to calibrated out of box on Natural. I made some slight mods to the Natural setting for regular viewing. 3D I set on bright for clarity and pop.
post #447 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empirical View Post

DRAVEN, are these the glasses you say are green? I see the lens itself is tinted, however the reviews seem overwhelmingly positive, and at $59 it seems a good deal.What say you? .... are the Optoma's worth the extra money?

Anyone?
post #448 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRaven72 View Post

They are for that TV. I tried them on my 640 and the skin tones had a slight green/yellowish tint, little on the dark side too. Wasn't my thing. I actually think with this years model they are pretty close to calibrated out of box on Natural. I made some slight mods to the Natural setting for regular viewing. 3D I set on bright for clarity and pop.

That's what I'm noticing. None of the skin tones look correct, light or dark.
I'll reserve judgement after more hours on the set though.
Clarity and definition are awesome. We watched Gnomeo and Juliet from the Dish HD feed last night, incredible.
post #449 of 1821
I'm still having issues with some games not working in certain resolutions, or they work but the screen is shrunk. Weird thing about it though is it is intermittent problem.

I'm gonna try this program (Power Strip) tonight and see if it helps, if it does I'll let you guys know.

http://www.entechtaiwan.com/util/ps.shtm
post #450 of 1821
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRaven72 View Post

They are for that TV. I tried them on my 640 and the skin tones had a slight green/yellowish tint, little on the dark side too. Wasn't my thing. I actually think with this years model they are pretty close to calibrated out of box on Natural. I made some slight mods to the Natural setting for regular viewing. 3D I set on bright for clarity and pop.

The natural mode on my 73738 is as close to perfect as well and I use it for regular tv veiwing, trust me I felt the same about the settings as well and fully expected them not to be perfect, but when I put in the Spears & Munsil disc the color clipping was dead on as well as blacks and whites. The gray scale on the Natural mode is outstanding to say the least and an increase in the red low by one or reduction by one on the the green low in addition to the posted settings gets you damm close to it. After the set settles try revisiting the original settings and use a good test disc to compare
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rear Projection Units
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Rear Projection Units › 2011 Mitsubishi DLP WD-73640 official thread