Originally Posted by oink
Inconsistent PQ, IMO.
OK...but nothing spectacular and certainly could look better.
Better than what...and compared to what?
I understand "IMO", but what is your "O" based on?
I am assuming you have not seen the film element used for the original scan, so how can you assume this transfer does NOT look like the source element from which it was derived? I am again assuming you are applying some form of logic to form your "O", but what is that logic based on?
Let me go a step further. You claim inconsistency. Can I assume you mean some scenes look very good and others less so? Using your presumed logic, how would you account for this? Since your logic dictates this transfer could look better, would it then be logical to assume that the person doing the mastering arbitrarily decided that some scenes should look subjectively worse that others?
I'm just spitballing here...