Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Adams 
On the PC, the "Stereoscopic Player" software player seems to give me better results for playing the TD10 3D files than directly connecting the TD10 to the LG monitor. I think that this is because when the monitor is connected to the TD10, the SBS mode of playback has to be used, which limits horizontal resolution, while when "Stereoscopic Player" is used, the option for "Row Interlaced" is selected, which perfectly matches the monitor.
With "Stereoscopic Player" I do not need to select "Line Interlacing" on the LG monitor, though if I do, the image looks a bit different, though is still 3D.

On the PC, the "Stereoscopic Player" software player seems to give me better results for playing the TD10 3D files than directly connecting the TD10 to the LG monitor. I think that this is because when the monitor is connected to the TD10, the SBS mode of playback has to be used, which limits horizontal resolution, while when "Stereoscopic Player" is used, the option for "Row Interlaced" is selected, which perfectly matches the monitor.
With "Stereoscopic Player" I do not need to select "Line Interlacing" on the LG monitor, though if I do, the image looks a bit different, though is still 3D.
Thanks for the tip Richard however, I can't really check that out for myself as yet because my PC is not up to playing the TD10 3D files without the video being quite jerky and lagging massively behind the audio.
I've recently posted on a thread in the 3D Tech Talk forum seeking some advice as to whether a new GPU and maybe CPU might make it capable of doing so.
It would be nice if the TD10 had the option to output through HDMI in 1920x1080 over/under mode as that would suit our monitors perfectly given that the vertical resolution is compromised anyway: I wonder whether Sony could implement that sort of thing in a firmware update or something.















The strange fact is that my current monitor (lcd) is 300cd/m2, this LG only 250cd/m2...I think all this brightness comes from the LED backlight. Is there much difference between a normal monitor and a passive screen? I mean...to actually enjoy a sharp and soft view using a common monitor, you need only to stand at a distance far enough so that your eye cannot "count" the pixels, or see the grid created by them. But using such a type of monitor, that in addition to this has also a sort of "series of lines" for the 3D effect, is the "pixeling" quite more noticeable? Or, in 2D mode, it seems you're watching a common lcd monitor?


