Quote:
Originally Posted by WVUfanMG 
So, after almost 4 months without my receiver and finally getting a replacement from Onkyo, my second 709 has failed. The first 5 HDMI ports (all on the same HDMI board) have failed. 6, 7 and the Aux on the front all work since they are on a separate board. My first unit lasted almost 2 months before failing, this one lasted less than 3 weeks. I almost feel bad for whoever I get at the call center tomorrow, because I am NOT happy. I should have known when the replacement unit they sent me was on the potential recall list for sound issues that this one wasn't a keeper. What the heck is going on with Onkyo??

So, after almost 4 months without my receiver and finally getting a replacement from Onkyo, my second 709 has failed. The first 5 HDMI ports (all on the same HDMI board) have failed. 6, 7 and the Aux on the front all work since they are on a separate board. My first unit lasted almost 2 months before failing, this one lasted less than 3 weeks. I almost feel bad for whoever I get at the call center tomorrow, because I am NOT happy. I should have known when the replacement unit they sent me was on the potential recall list for sound issues that this one wasn't a keeper. What the heck is going on with Onkyo??
Conspiracy... thats whats going on. Welcome to the club

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeJayK 
That pretty well sums up the way I felt about Audyssey. While the MultiXT would be nice, I feel I could get by with just the 2EQ and/or my own ears and tweaking. However, after I started reading in some other threads here, it seems like the consensus opinion of most users here is that 2EQ was all but unusable.
Would this mean swapping speaker wires in and out to get 7.2 in the main? Or is there some simpler way to accomplish this? Frankly, the size of my media room probably doesn't justify the expense/complexity of 7.2 anyway, so I'll probably just stick with 5.2 (or 5.1) at least for now.
Thanks for all your input. In the end, I found a used 709 for a decent price and so I decided to go that way. I figure that way I can experience the Audyssey myself and see just how much I value it and whether I miss the third zone.

That pretty well sums up the way I felt about Audyssey. While the MultiXT would be nice, I feel I could get by with just the 2EQ and/or my own ears and tweaking. However, after I started reading in some other threads here, it seems like the consensus opinion of most users here is that 2EQ was all but unusable.
Would this mean swapping speaker wires in and out to get 7.2 in the main? Or is there some simpler way to accomplish this? Frankly, the size of my media room probably doesn't justify the expense/complexity of 7.2 anyway, so I'll probably just stick with 5.2 (or 5.1) at least for now.
Thanks for all your input. In the end, I found a used 709 for a decent price and so I decided to go that way. I figure that way I can experience the Audyssey myself and see just how much I value it and whether I miss the third zone.
If you wanted to KEEP the 7.2 then you would be plugging and unplugging wires unless you used the zone 2 line outputs to another receiver... if you set your 709 up in a 5.2 setup then you could use the rear channels as your zone 2 outputs without having to move wires constantly. I've been considering going back to a 5.2 myself just for simplicity factor and the fact that no sources are really playing in 7.1 or 7.2 anyways. The extra sound is always "simulated" by the 709. I love the way it "simulates" but I think overkill for my 21' x 11' x 9' - H room. Some people would say no such thing when concerning home theaters. Some people hate surround sound all together and still rock 3.1 or 3.2 setups. But its simply a matter of taste. Diff. strokes for diff. folks you know... How big is your room?
No problem... glad to give feedback if its helpful at all.
Good choice on the 709. I LOVE mine... I'm trying to pick up a couple more for other rooms in my house (bedroom and bar/pool table room)
As far as difference in Audessey's... The MultiQ-XT has subwoofer adjustment vs the 2EQ does not. Biggest difference in the world. The sub distances and frequencies are one thing I dont usually mess with from the Audessey calibration and I love the difference in sound I get out of my subs with the calibration vs. w/o..
























