AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › The Audyssey Pro Installer Kit Thread (FAQ in post #1)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Audyssey Pro Installer Kit Thread (FAQ in post #1) - Page 83

post #2461 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmschnur View Post

You onkyo will tell you. Go to hardware , network in the setup menu.

Ah right. Thanks. Even I can manage that
post #2462 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post


Time for Ask Audyssey!

Jeff



Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

What about a speaker could "exempt" it from needing midcomp? Some report that they do not have "honkiness" with it off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Kyriakakis View Post

I have yet to hear one that doesn't need it... However, I have come across listeners who don't need it applied. The range of 2-4 kHz is where human hearing is the most sensitive. It is also the range where hearing loss starts to set in. If that is happening then an added midrange compensation dip will not be needed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Nah, that can't be it. Audiophiles have perfect hearing until the day they die.
post #2463 of 4227
"It is also the range where hearing loss starts to set in. If that is happening then an added midrange compensation dip will not be needed."

So, THAT is why I leave it off... One of the blessings(?) of getting old!
post #2464 of 4227
Thanks to all who encouraged me to get the levels corrected in my system. Putting the attenuators in and getting everything "trued-up" made a significant improvement in the perceived FR and surround envelopment with DEQ on.
post #2465 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by hjones View Post

Thanks to all who encouraged me to get the levels corrected in my system. Putting the attenuators in and getting everything "trued-up" made a significant improvement in the perceived FR and surround envelopment with DEQ on.

Great to hear!
post #2466 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmschnur View Post

You onkyo will tell you. Go to hardware , network in the setup menu.

Using the direct cable method, you need to setup Static address in BOTH the Integta & the computer that you are using. (You are no longer using DHCP to obtain the addresses)
post #2467 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by calentz View Post

Using the direct cable method, you need to setup Static address in BOTH the Integta & the computer that you are using. (You are no longer using DHCP to obtain the addresses)

Why in the computer ?
post #2468 of 4227
Both devices will need a static IP set.
post #2469 of 4227
As an update to my issue, we were finally able to establish and maintain communication between my Integra and the Audyssey software.

The problem was that I have a Control4 system that kept breaking the link between the Integra and the Audyssey software. Once we turned Control4 off, the link was established and stayed up for the entire calibration.

Thanks for all the help.
post #2470 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by calentz View Post

Using the direct cable method, you need to setup Static address in BOTH the Integta & the computer that you are using. (You are no longer using DHCP to obtain the addresses)

No really. All I do is make the connections and go to setup, hardware, network and write down the address of the Integra, then enter it in Pro. Whether DHCP is still on through the process is immaterial. No settings need be changed. It works just fine.
post #2471 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzcaraldo215 View Post

No really. All I do is make the connections and go to setup, hardware, network and write down the address of the Integra, then enter it in Pro. Whether DHCP is still on through the process is immaterial. No settings need be changed. It works just fine.

Agreed, if you did not turn off the Integra & the computer and just disconnected the original cables and connected the single linking cable the address would be retained.
post #2472 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by calentz View Post

Using the direct cable method, you need to setup Static address in BOTH the Integta & the computer that you are using. (You are no longer using DHCP to obtain the addresses)

Uh oh.... here we go... it's never as simple with a PC as it seems. I know how to set the static address in my 5509. How do I do it in a PC? (I am usually a Mac user).
post #2473 of 4227
Windoze 7? Control Panel|Network and Sharing .. change adapter settings.

Double-click on your LAN connection icon - click Properties. Highlight "Internet Protocol Version 4" and click Properties. (Or double-click IP V4.)

Click "Use the following IP address" and enter the IP address.

I'm not sure it matters what the four sets of numbers are, but typically 192.168. are used for the first two. Try 192.168.123.xxx where you use a different fourth set for each of the two devices, i.e. 1 and 2. No leading zeros, though you could use 10, 100 or 101.

Subnet mask - 255.255.255.0

Try leaving Default Gateway blank.

Leave the DNS fields blank.

Tip: Buy a cheap router, use two ethernet cables and let it dynamically assign IP address.
post #2474 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Uh oh.... here we go... it's never as simple with a PC as it seems. I know how to set the static address in my 5509. How do I do it in a PC? (I am usually a Mac user).

In my experience, it should not be necessary. As a precaution, turn the 5509 off and on again with DHCP on. it worked just fine the first time for me on an Integra 80.1.
post #2475 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzcaraldo215 View Post

In my experience, it should not be necessary. As a precaution, turn the 5509 off and on again with DHCP on. it worked just fine the first time for me on an Integra 80.1.

It is not the device that assigns itself an IP address, it is the Dynamic Host Controller and that is in the router. No router, no DHCP.

If it was networked at one time (with a router), then perhaps there is a residual IP address that it retains, but I don't know that.
post #2476 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Windoze 7? Control Panel|Network and Sharing .. change adapter settings.

Double-click on your LAN connection icon - click Properties. Highlight "Internet Protocol Version 4" and click Properties. (Or double-click IP V4.)

Click "Use the following IP address" and enter the IP address.

I'm not sure it matters what the four sets of numbers are, but typically 192.168. are used for the first two. Try 192.168.123.xxx where you use a different fourth set for each of the two devices, i.e. 1 and 2. No leading zeros, though you could use 10, 100 or 101.

Subnet mask - 255.255.255.0

Try leaving Default Gateway blank.

Leave the DNS fields blank.

Thanks Jeff. I will try it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Tip: Buy a cheap router, use two ethernet cables and let it dynamically assign IP address.

That's how I have been doing it, with an old router I had lying around. I just thought that the one cable idea seems easier and neater. I can leave the cable permanently hanging out the back of the 5509 and just connect to the lappy as required.
post #2477 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post


Quote:


Originally Posted by Chris Kyriakakis
I have yet to hear one that doesn't need it... However, I have come across listeners who don't need it applied. The range of 2-4 kHz is where human hearing is the most sensitive. It is also the range where hearing loss starts to set in. If that is happening then an added midrange compensation dip will not be needed.

This would appear to be in conflict with Kal's observation here.
post #2478 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Thanks Jeff. I will try it.



That's how I have been doing it, with an old router I had lying around. I just thought that the one cable idea seems easier and neater. I can leave the cable permanently hanging out the back of the 5509 and just connect to the lappy as required.

I suppose once you have manually assigned an IP address to the 5509, that wouldn't need to be done again. But the laptop probably normally is on DHCP, so you'd need to configure it manually every time. To me, the router, DHCP and two cable - wham, bam, thank you, ma'am - seems easier.

Jeff
post #2479 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUR View Post

This would appear to be in conflict with Kal's observation here.

That comment is related to midrange compensation? I didn't get that, bit I am ready to receive enlightenment.

Jeff
post #2480 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

That comment is related to midrange compensation? I didn't get that, bit I am ready to receive enlightenment.

Jeff

The thing with age-related higher frequency hearing loss is that those affected don't notice it. I have it for sure but I don't notice that I can't hear those high frequencies except in an audiometry test at the audiologist's. I guess the harmonics and fundamentals of the frequencies enable us to 'fill in' the part we cannot hear explicitly. Our brain adapts IOW. So if we then EQ the FR, this will give a disconnect between the real world and the audio system - possibly making the audio system sound 'wrong'. If I am right, then Chris is, er, wrong
post #2481 of 4227
"Higher frequency" isn't in the midcomp range, and that is the source of my uncertainty ...
post #2482 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

"Higher frequency" isn't in the midcomp range, and that is the source of my uncertainty ...

Chris asserted that the hearing loss starts in the range where midcomp kicks in.
post #2483 of 4227
Yes, he did. But I always thought it was the highs that go first. FWIW, I prefer the midcomp ON. The one female vocal we listened to, Chaka Khan, sounded terrible w/o it.

Jeff
post #2484 of 4227
Is the mid comp. Active when not using the pro, but doing measurements with mic that comes with the denon?

Or is this feature only a PRO option?

Thanks
post #2485 of 4227
Turning ot off is only an option with Pro. It is built into the Audyssey curve on the consumer version of MulEQ (and not defeatable).
post #2486 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

Yes, he did. But I always thought it was the highs that go first.

Sure thing. For me, the last really great highs were in the 60's

Quote:
Originally Posted by pepar View Post

FWIW, I prefer the midcomp ON. The one female vocal we listened to, Chaka Khan, sounded terrible w/o it.

Jeff

I've not even tried messing with it. Just left it on, as per the concensus. One less thing to fiddle with.
post #2487 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post


Sure thing. For me, the last really great highs were in the 60's

I've not even tried messing with it. Just left it on, as per the concensus. One less thing to fiddle with.

For my Montis with no xover from mid to high, I leave it off. For all my other speakers I then put in a 3db dip at the mid to high xover point. Chris had said in his blog that the point of mid comp was to correct a problem with this xover and voices.

This approach can only be done using Pro.

My approach seems to work fine in my setting.
post #2488 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

The thing with age-related higher frequency hearing loss is that those affected don't notice it. I have it for sure but I don't notice that I can't hear those high frequencies except in an audiometry test at the audiologist's. I guess the harmonics and fundamentals of the frequencies enable us to 'fill in' the part we cannot hear explicitly. Our brain adapts IOW. So if we then EQ the FR, this will give a disconnect between the real world and the audio system - possibly making the audio system sound 'wrong'. If I am right, then Chris is, er, wrong

Eh, what? I can't hear you.
post #2489 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by hclarkx View Post

Chris K called it "honky" and I don't know how that relates to "nasal" but .. and don't quote me .. my recollection is that men's voices tend to be largely under 1 kHz while women's voices range up to and above 2 kHz. Hence it would be only women's voices that are affected.

I've never turned mine off. I should try doing that.

Some consonants are spoken without the vocal cords, and therefore are speaker independent. These fall within the range that is being discussed.

See http://www.hdhearing.com/learning/part2.htm
post #2490 of 4227
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzcaraldo215 View Post

Eh, what? I can't hear you.

I wouldn't mind for my normal, age-related hearing loss to progress a bit...I seem to be getting more sensitive to high frequencies as I age. A few dB attenuation in my ears above 5kHz and I wouldn't have even needed the pro kit!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › The Audyssey Pro Installer Kit Thread (FAQ in post #1)