AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › Purpose of flat response below 20Hz - Why does it matter?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Purpose of flat response below 20Hz - Why does it matter? - Page 18

post #511 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by sb1 View Post

The "punch" everyone loves but also seems to contunually hunt in their own systems is a product of not only dynamics (or just plain volume), but also the ability to turn the entire system up, high frequencies and all. If your rig is hampered by mismatched high frequencies, reverb, and phase issues from hell in the higher khz regions, there's no way you can get the volume of that punchy area up high enough without the rest of the system seeming far too loud. Then people boost their sub and it sounds boomy and muddy. Then they blame their sub for being the weak link. Then they buy a new sub and wonder why it's no better.

This. +1,000,000


Newbs...take notice.
post #512 of 582
Quote:
Nothing so far mentioned by A55 is a realistic issue in the cinema or home theater environment.

What I have done is cited the science. You have right to comment and give your opinions on it.
Quote:
Good grief the whole conspiratorial angle to why cinema theaters do not have low hitting subs.

Not a conspiracy at all. I don't know if they are famliar with any studies on infrasounds and how they affect human being. That is why I said that I would do some research. However, I'm not content to accept the company line like the sheeple tend to do.
Quote:
Has more to do with economics more than anything else.

And you know that how? I told you I spoke to Mr Syme at SMPTE and the reason he gave was that people don't hear sounds below 20hz anyway, so below 20hz content, according to him, is superflous.
Quote:
Fairly certain one big factor is that it requires a lot of power to sufficiently pressurize a cinema theater space with lower frequencies with authority, in addition to the sound bleed issue. Still happens a lot though even with '30hz' subs.

You're "fairly" certain means you're not 100% certain.
Quote:
That sonic weapon methodology completely falls outside the scope of the usage of infrasonics in movie soundtracks.

You clearly missed the point. You're absolutely wrong, sonic weapons absolutely employ the use of infrasounds, they are said to effective because the target can't hear them. Infrasounds are used in psychological warfare to demoralize and disturb the enemy.
Quote:
Why A55 has not been banned for all this bunk is mind boggling

I should be banned for making arguments supported by science in the Audio Video Science Forum.
post #513 of 582
post #514 of 582
Quote:
No one is doubting that infrasonics could be harmful if used AS A WEAPON. A subwoofer is not a weapon
.

No subwoofers are not sonic weapons, that's not the issue. The issue is infrasound (below 20hz), can infrasounds be used as sonic weapons? I am convinced that the answer is yes. Here's another issue, can a subwoofer capable of producing infrasounds (like the ones popular around here), cause the same affects as a sonic weapon? The subject here is "infrasounds" played back loud enough to as to cause internal organs to shake, thereby resulting in nausea, dizziness and or a lost of equlibrium on the target? It really isn't about the means by which those infrasounds are delivered to the target. The target in the case of the commericial cinema would be the patrons, in the case of the home theater, the target would the HT enthusiast/consumer.
post #515 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by bfreedma View Post


Just like someone from Philly to try to make some jokes. You're probably mad because your none your sports teams can win.biggrin.gif
post #516 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post

.
No subwoofers are not sonic weapons, that's not the issue. The issue is infrasound (below 20hz), can infrasounds be used as sonic weapons? I am convinced that the answer is yes. Here's another issue, can a subwoofer capable of producing infrasounds (like the ones popular around here), cause the same affects as a sonic weapon? The subject here is "infrasounds" played back loud enough to as to cause internal organs to shake, thereby resulting in nausea, dizziness and or a lost of equlibrium on the target? It really isn't about the means by which those infrasounds are delivered to the target. The target in the case of the commericial cinema would be the patrons, in the case of the home theater, the target would the HT enthusiast/consumer.

You honestly don't see the difference between a subwoofer putting out a max of 110-120db of infrasonics for a few seconds vs. the focused arrays you referenced earlier which put out 150+db of infrasonics for minutes?

Or that the reason that commercial theaters generally don't produce infrasound isn't because of the shared walls of today's multiplex setups and the difficulty in containing bass and avoiding bleed over into the adjacent theaters?
post #517 of 582
Quote:
I have been tweaking my 15H this afternoon. I moved it slightly, reran Audyssey and have tried various port EQ and Q positions. Two ports open EQ2 Q of .3 sounds good to me, but I am actually flatter to 16hz using 1 port open, EQ2, q.3.
The other thing.. All the low freq test tones have me literarily feeling sick to my stomach...[/




Thank you for being honest about it.

Anyone else would like to share how they were affected by infrasounds?
post #518 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post

Just like someone from Philly to try to make some jokes. You're probably mad because your none your sports teams can win.biggrin.gif

It's not a joke.
post #519 of 582
WRT inrasounmds in movies, isn't their duration relatively short suggesting that any physiological effect is of comparatively short duration and may not mimic the effects experienced for sustained duration and level in the sundry scientific studies?
post #520 of 582
My business partner and I back in the 70's used to take pride in the fact that our subwoofers could make drunks puke on the dance floor when they were stupid enough to linger in front in them. Does that count? Ha, ha ...
_____________
Best Regards,
Carl Huff
post #521 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post

What I have done is cited the Pseudoscience. You have right to comment and give your opinions on it.
There fixed it for you.
Quote:
Not a conspiracy at all. I don't know if they are famliar with any studies on infrasounds and how they affect human being. That is why I said that I would do some research. However, I'm not content to accept the company line like the sheeple tend to do.

What company line? But you will tow the company line of one case that supposedly backs up your fallacious premise.
Quote:
And you know that how? I told you I spoke to Mr Syme at SMPTE and the reason he gave was that people don't hear sounds below 20hz anyway, so below 20hz content, according to him, is superflous.

That sounds like a company line, if not an alright dismissive reply to possibly hostile questioner. I am sure if that statement is true that there is more context that would further clarify what he supposedly said. Who knows, you could be making it all up, especially with the lack of context and actual reference.
Quote:
You're "fairly" certain means you're not 100% certain.

Yes, unlike you I can openly admit to a supposition rather than mascarading one as an authoritative irrefutable statement that have not been thoroughly vetted.
Even admitting uncertainty does not necessarily refute the possible veracity of the statement.
Quote:
You clearly missed the point. You're absolutely wrong, sonic weapons absolutely employ the use of infrasounds, they are said to effective because the target can't hear them. Infrasounds are used in psychological warfare to demoralize and disturb the enemy.

No you missed your own point, the usage of such infrasonics occurs only under very specific conditions that fall outside any concern for those in either a public or home theater. Every scenario you have brought up that initially and superficially seems to affirm your agenda are outliers that hold no bearing in the discussion of home theater situations.
Quote:
I should be banned for making arguments supported by "science"in the Audio Video Science Forum.
I believe Inigo Montoya sums it up best.

montoya.jpg

Best Regards
KvE
post #522 of 582
I remember when I used to chase the short bus so I could point and laugh at the retards for mindless entertainment. Now I just come to this thread.
post #523 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post

.
No subwoofers are not sonic weapons, that's not the issue.

Thank you. It seems you finally understand the difference and we can move on....
post #524 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post

.
The subject here is "infrasounds" played back loud enough to as to cause internal organs to shake, thereby resulting in nausea, dizziness and or a lost of....

Wait... wait... WAIT...

This is NOT a detrimental effect of infrasonics! This is a beneficial effect...

You can either do this:



to get a "Colon Cleansing"

Or, you can simply use your subwoofer(s) to hit "The Brown Note"



I might turn my Home Theater into a Colon Cleansing Clinic! I would need to add a better ventilation system, but...

On second thought.... it doesn't work:



Oh well. rolleyes.gif

Craig
post #525 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post

On second thought.... it doesn't work:Oh well. rolleyes.gif
Craig

What's funny is that he found it exhilarating and wanted to share the experience with everybody else. Fancy that!
post #526 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chu Gai View Post

WRT inrasounmds in movies, isn't their duration relatively short suggesting that any physiological effect is of comparatively short duration and may not mimic the effects experienced for sustained duration and level in the sundry scientific studies?

Did you not read the post where I cited comments from Dr. Davis on sonic weapons?


"The device emits bursts of sound that cause an overwhelming sense of dizziness and nausea"

A burst happens suddenly, its not necessarily continuous.
post #527 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaviorMachine View Post

What's funny is that he found it exhilarating and wanted to share the experience with everybody else. Fancy that!

The "test" was using frequency sweeps 20-100hz. Obviously, weak sauce subwoofers ... tongue.gif
post #528 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by ack_bk View Post

Exactly..
Auditor55, repeat after me, a subwoofer is not a weapon.... A subwoofer, is not a weapon.... A subwoofer is not a weapon...
You would have to go out of your way to great lengths (assuming you even have the right room and equipment) to hit 150db at the listening position for extended lengths of time.
Consider:
http://www.data-bass.com/data?page=systems&type=0
This is Max Burst! not a single badass sub Ricci measured could hit a max burst (let alone sustained burst) of 150db. Nothing is even close.

When you got sick from the low frequency sweeps was that due to being exposed 150 dbs? I doubt it?
post #529 of 582
Once again, since you say harnful affects only occur at LF 150 dbs or higher.


Scientific Applications and Research Associates (SARA) - This agency's alleged infrasound research showed, "infrasound at 110 - 130 dB would cause intestinal pain and severe nausea. Extreme levels of annoyance or distraction would result from minutes of exposure to levels 90 to 120 dB at low frequencies (5 to 200 Hz), strong physical trauma and damage to tissues at 140 - 150 dB, and instantaneous blastwave type trauma at above 170 dB.
post #530 of 582
Perhaps it's time for a "don't feed the troll" message. Anybody who's just dying to drag themselves back through this for the 10th time can just search for the multiple other threads that have wasted lots of bytes on the issue. As tempting as it may be, I don't think there's any real point to continuing to debate under the cirumstances.

just my /05m though, and ya'll can continue as long as ya wanna. I'll be missing out on it though. smile.gif
post #531 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhan1000 View Post

Here is a report released by the Health Protection Agency who performed an exhaustive literature search on the adverse effects of infrasound :
http://www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1265028759369
The Health Protection Agency is not some hack organization, but was set up by the UK government to protect its citizens from infectious and environmental hazards.
After careful review of the literature, including assessing the strength of each study, here is the first part of their summary as seen on page 142:
"Volunteer studies investigating the potential effects of infrasound are relatively limited. The quality of many of the early studies is questionable, and they often yield conflicting results. Very few studies appear to have been published in recent years. Overall, there is little evidence to suggest that acute exposure to infrasound at levels commonly experienced in the environment is capable of causing any consistent physiological or behavioral effect, although there is a general paucity of high quality research in this area. Nevertheless, there is some evidence that infrasound levels at levels above the hearing threshold may cause a decrease in wakefulness. Finally, aural pain and damage may result from very intense exposures above a threshold of about 140dB or more depending on the frequency."
I take this to mean that there is little evidence to suggest that infrasounds causes destruction to one's innards, with the exception of some ear pain and hearing loss. However, this can happen at any frequency.

They need to update their information. Here we have a poster in here admitting that he got sick from low frequency sweeps, which I doubt he cranked his system above 140 dbs.

He wrote:

"The other thing.. All the low freq test tones have me literarily feeling sick to my stomach..."

That is exactly my point, that is what all the science is attesting to, however you guys want to explain it away in order to justify your expenditures.

I'm mean really, how much more evidence do you need. Here this poster is attacking my arguments and at the same time in complete agreement with me. I wish more posters with infrasound capable systems would come forward and share their expirence.
post #532 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post


They need to update their information. Here we have a poster in here admitting that he got sick from low frequency sweeps, which I doubt he cranked his system above 140 dbs.
He wrote:
"The other thing.. All the low freq test tones have me literarily feeling sick to my stomach..."
That is exactly my point, that is what all the science is attesting to, however you guys want to explain it away in order to justify your expenditures.
I'm mean really, how much more evidence do you need. Here this poster is attacking my arguments and at the same time in complete agreement with me. I wish more posters with infrasound capable systems would come forward and share their expirence.

Just because you feel sick to your stomach, doesn't mean that it's harmful to your body!!!

 

People feel sick to their stomach for all kinds of things that aren't harmful... heights, roller coasters, walking in circles, even swinging on a swing make some people feel sick...is it harmful though? NO.

 

And yes, I have an infrasonic capable system...still alive and well. :)

post #533 of 582
Does a SubMersive count as a infrasound capable system? If it qualifies, it's given me a few awkward b*ners! wink.gif Is it mental or a physical response? I don't care I love feeling the bottom end! cool.gif Low Hz +db is sic, not sick.
post #534 of 582
Test sweeps are significantly different than program material. When I was setting up a sub 15hz IB sub I didn't get sick, but I definitely wanted to get it over with...

To the topic of thread though, my take is while getting below 20hz is critical and fun for movies, and maybe less so for music, getting there "flat" isn't critical because our ability to hear distortion significantly decreases as the waves get longer. So does our ability to hear them at the same level as the rest of the material.

I think it's far more important to reduce bloat, or room modes, so the rest of the frequencies are not "muddied".
post #535 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post

They need to update their information. Here we have a poster in here admitting that he got sick from low frequency sweeps, which I doubt he cranked his system above 140 dbs.
He wrote:
"The other thing.. All the low freq test tones have me literarily feeling sick to my stomach..."
That is exactly my point, that is what all the science is attesting to, however you guys want to explain it away in order to justify your expenditures.
I'm mean really, how much more evidence do you need. Here this poster is attacking my arguments and at the same time in complete agreement with me. I wish more posters with infrasound capable systems would come forward and share their expirence.

I think the disconnect is what you consider science. You frequently cite anecdotes and then attempt to use them as scientific evidence. Truth be told, they are considered to be the weakest evidence there is. This is why that report does not include anecdotes. For your reading, this is what Wikipedia has to say about anecdotal evidence (Done A55 Style wink.gif):

"The expression anecdotal evidence refers to evidence from anecdotes. Because of the small sample, there is a larger chance that it may be unreliable due to cherry-picked or otherwise non-representative samples of typical cases.[1][2] Anecdotal evidence is considered dubious support of a claim; it is accepted only in lieu of more solid evidence. This is true regardless of the veracity of individual claims.[3][4][5]

The term is often used in contrast to scientific evidence, such as evidence-based medicine, which are types of formal accounts. Some anecdotal evidence does not qualify as scientific evidence because its nature prevents it from being investigated using the scientific method. Misuse of anecdotal evidence is a logical fallacy and is sometimes informally referred to as the "person who" fallacy ("I know a person who..."; "I know of a case where..." etc. Compare with hasty generalization). Anecdotal evidence is not necessarily representative of a "typical" experience; in fact, human cognitive biases such as confirmation bias mean that exceptional or confirmatory anecdotes are much more likely to be remembered. Accurate determination of whether an anecdote is "typical" requires statistical evidence.[6][7]"'
Edited by jhan1000 - 10/13/12 at 12:34pm
post #536 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnrgagne View Post

I think it's far more important to reduce bloat, or room modes, so the rest of the frequencies are not "muddied".
An excellent statement.
post #537 of 582
Yeah, the poster said he tested for 4-5 hours straight with high level sine waves and then felt sick to his stomach. You are trying to take things out of context to use them for your agenda. Again, nothing you posted or what has been said qualifies for reference level movie listening. A gun is not dangerous until you shoot someone. I guess if we all wanted to crank 10hz sinewaves at 120 dBs for 4 hours we can all feel sick to our stomachs except that makes it no more dangerous than getting car sick, riding on roller coasters, etc... How many times are we going to repeat ourselves and then try to say what you have cited is scientific proof! It is not and what it contains does not apply to this forum for subwoofers.
post #538 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by sb1 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by rnrgagne View Post

I think it's far more important to reduce bloat, or room modes, so the rest of the frequencies are not "muddied".
An excellent statement.

"bloat" and "muddied" sounds a lot like somebody in this thread. eek.gif
post #539 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post

They need to update their information. Here we have a poster in here admitting that he got sick from low frequency sweeps, which I doubt he cranked his system above 140 dbs.
He wrote:
"The other thing.. All the low freq test tones have me literarily feeling sick to my stomach..."
That is exactly my point, that is what all the science is attesting to, however you guys want to explain it away in order to justify your expenditures.
I'm mean really, how much more evidence do you need. Here this poster is attacking my arguments and at the same time in complete agreement with me. I wish more posters with infrasound capable systems would come forward and share their expirence.

Sigh... You left out the part where I said I did this all afternoon... And the part where nobody in my family has ever felt sick after watching a movie. What movie has 3+ hours straight of heavy mid to low frequency bass? None. Again, you can't cherry pick the data for your agenda.

Too much of anything is bad for you. ULF bass, in moderation, is not harmful, and there are no side effects.
post #540 of 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crabalocker View Post

Does a SubMersive count as a infrasound capable system? If it qualifies, it's given me a few awkward b*ners! wink.gif Is it mental or a physical response? I don't care I love feeling the bottom end! cool.gif Low Hz +db is sic, not sick.

you are now and forever uninvited from any subwoofer g2gs tongue.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › Purpose of flat response below 20Hz - Why does it matter?