AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Philharmonic Audio - Dennis Murphy
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Philharmonic Audio - Dennis Murphy - Page 104

post #3091 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eternal Velocity View Post

I'm glad they fulfilled your expectations. I'm using about a handful of fill, with the speaker baffle about 5.5 feet from the rear wall, and the drivers about 4 feet from the side walls (would have prefered more). I think the delay does add to clarity without taking away the open soundstage. I only have about 5 degrees of toe-in. I think you're going to love what you get out of these speakers. Now go add a 650w @ 4 ohm stereo amp - IE the Crown XLS2000 - and four Funk Audio TSAD subs biggrin.gif - and finish things off with some ceiling treatments.

I would suggest skipping the ceiling treatments and concentrating on good California Cabernets. Anyhow, the installation looks great Nethawk. I'm very happy to hear the Phil's do well up against the rear wall. And I'm also glad you like the center. I wish I could continue to make those, but something had to give. And I'm sure Jim Salk will do a great job with the design. Sorry I missed you. But nothing on this planet could get me to drive down Rt. 66 and back on a late Friday afternoon.
post #3092 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nethawk View Post

My apologies for the delay, it's been a crazy weekend around here.
I picked up my speakers on Friday and had a chance to sit and chat with Del. Wonderful guy, I had a great time with him and wish we lived closer together, I'm sure we would become friends.
The speakers themselves are amazing, all it took was a few seconds with the demo CD to realize I had made the right choice. Hopefully with more time I will be able to provide a more detailed review, but after Friday night and Saturday morning I have had little chance to listen. Classical, folk, rock, alternative and quite a bit of African music has been pushed through at this point and there have been no disappointments, and many interesting surprises. I will say this - all that talk about these not being good speakers for rock music might have been over-exaggerated. I didn't play but a few classic rock and alternative tunes and they were just as much a surprise as anything else. For example, for the first time ever I was able to make out the lyrics to Linkin Park "Bleed it Out". They were words - who knew? smile.gif
I still have to experiment to gain the right amount of fill, distance from back wall, etc. but for now with just the bottom front of the speakers with fill they sound just fine to me.
Not to brag or disappoint others who missed the opportunity, but the center channel speaker is just as amazing as the towers.
Pics are below, Del did a great job of matching color of my custom stand, even though we did so by sharing pics via email. The speakers look great in my home, and will enjoy hosting events in my HT for years to come. Apologies for divergent white balance, my pro flash system seems to be destined for Canon repair.

The wait is finally over. They look great! Enjoy!
post #3093 of 4114
Thanks for the tips EV, I'll be doing plenty of experimenting, although due to couch on left wall I can't go much farther than 2' from back wall. I may shift everything slightly right, but then there are the classic steel support columns farther right that I'm betting will wreak havoc on sound quality.

My room is very friendly, when I remodeled the basement I put up 5 1/2" wide wood planks (manual paneling, if you will) on the ceiling that seem to have helped, as well as the thick carpet. See below for "under construction". Like all good geeks, I'll probably set up with REW for detailed measurements and subsequent necessary treatment. For now it sounds very good, and the Phils are nicely crossed over at 60Hz with the Rythmik FV15HP subwoofer. Funk Audio will have to wait until that winning lottery ticket! I've switched between Denon 4311 and Anthem MCA 20 Series II, 370w @ 4 ohms and at reference volume (I don't listen any louder than this) I detected no difference in dynamics. If given the opportunity I'll certainly try higher output but I won't soon be making an amp purchase just for the Philharmonics.



Mr. Woods, yessir, but this is the basement where my bar is also located. I was afraid logs would soak up too much cognac wink.gif
post #3094 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Murphy View Post

I would suggest skipping the ceiling treatments and concentrating on good California Cabernets. Anyhow, the installation looks great Nethawk. I'm very happy to hear the Phil's do well up against the rear wall. And I'm also glad you like the center. I wish I could continue to make those, but something had to give. And I'm sure Jim Salk will do a great job with the design. Sorry I missed you. But nothing on this planet could get me to drive down Rt. 66 and back on a late Friday afternoon.

I hear ya Dennis, I don't blame you one bit. It took me 3.5 hours one Friday afternoon to get from Herndon near Dulles airport to Sperryville (about 54 miles) because of a Garth Brooks concert at Nissan. A crowded commute is one thing, highway 66 full of tobacco spitting, cowboy hat wearing rednecks in standstill traffic is an experience unto itself (no offense meant to cowboy hat wearing, tobacco spitting rednecks!).

We're long overdue for a weekend in DC, I'll stop by and concentrate on your cabernets soon.

The photos are very deceiving, the speakers are out about 16" from the back wall now. There is approximately 10" of space between stand and back wall, in the one pic it appears to be right up against it.
post #3095 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodsart View Post

New furniture pics 004.JPG 1912k .JPG file



Very, very comfortable!!!

Love the "Inmate" chairs!!!!biggrin.gif



New furniture pics 002.JPG 1727k .JPG file


Perfect chair and ottoman for 2 channel with the phils, at least for now!!!

Ahhhhh, I feel as though I am "held captive" in these chairs!!!!!eek.gifbiggrin.gif

Beautiful room, Woods!

Your Phils are close to the large cabinet between them.........how does that affect the reflected sound?

Marv
post #3096 of 4114
Congrats Net, It's about time you finally got to enjoy those things. Everything looks awesome and I kinda sorta hate you for getting the last center wink.gifbiggrin.gif
post #3097 of 4114
Hey Nethawk...thanks for the kind words, but I think I got lucky on the color match. Like I said earlier, it's always a crapshoot working off email pics since the original photo and the monitors and its settings all make a difference. I'm glad it all worked out. The color really looks great in your pics.
post #3098 of 4114

Hey, the Phils are pulled from the wall and out a bit placing them about 20" from the cabinet front and about 15" from the sides.

 

They move freely with felt glides. I would prefer to leave them there, but earlier I mention WAF issue. Watching TV is no issue since most of programing is dialoge, however, with Comcast new HD 1080i programing, WOW, simply amazing sound and picture quality.

 

However, TWIMC........my wife is more precious than gold or the phils to me! Sorry Dennis!!!!biggrin.gif

 

I think Dennis mention straight forward was just fine, towing in was not necessary, but matter of taste.....close to the wall, on hardwoods, rugs and carpets, treated walls or not, they shine right wherever they are planted!

 

Honestly I think Dennis planned it that way for the dummies like me!

 

We are also in the process of purchasing rugs since the old ones are now 7 years old and ready for replacement, but 6 different shaped rugs that we are happy with is difficult.

 

The phils will definitey perform better, me thinks!

 

Any wall treatment, with the exception of drapes, would not work, since diffusers are used to treat sound aberrations in rooms such as echoes, the only kind I will use to treat "them echoes" would be rugs and of course the new furniture, which is more than we had before. The room treatments would cost a fortune and look funky anyway in a room this size. 20X24.

 

 As I mentioned before, I loved the sound without any furniture, kind of crazy......sounded like 10' speakers blasting away! Many reflections and many echoes there.

 

Anyway, sorry, I got off on all that, but thanks for the compliment, we do enjoy our home!

post #3099 of 4114
@nethawk...

oooo... i bet you are happy today... smile.gif

that match job is really nice... but more importantly, how do they sound?

when is the open house so i can hear them? smile.gif
post #3100 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nethawk View Post









Wow! That looks awesome! I like. biggrin.gif

Congrats on your beautiful Philharmonic speakers!
Edited by AcuDefTechGuy - 7/25/12 at 6:00am
post #3101 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delwon View Post

Hey Nethawk...thanks for the kind words, but I think I got lucky on the color match. Like I said earlier, it's always a crapshoot working off email pics since the original photo and the monitors and its settings all make a difference. I'm glad it all worked out. The color really looks great in your pics.

The speaker colors in the photos is true. They're as great to look at as they are to listen to, my wife loves them as much as I do. If they weren't so darned heavy I would like to take one outside and photograph it in natural light next to my little waterfall.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccotenj View Post

@nethawk...
oooo... i bet you are happy today... smile.gif
that match job is really nice... but more importantly, how do they sound?
when is the open house so i can hear them? smile.gif

They sound great Chris. I keep riffling through my music collection, marveling at those nuances that I had never caught before in cuts I've listened to for 30 or more years. Determined to beat the speakers, I've shifted tactics now, deliberately looking for songs that are sure to sound mediocre - my score is way down. Jethro Tull was the highlight from the ten or so songs I listened to today. Last night Stevie Ray Vaughan's "Little Wing" practically had me in tears. My favorite so far (I knew it would be) is Rimsky-Korsakov's Sheherazade, I get goosebumps every time. I've listened to a bit of Wagner and Respighi but I haven't given the speakers enough classical time yet.

Come on down! I'll let you carry the speaker outside for me!
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzz092888 View Post

Congrats Net, It's about time you finally got to enjoy those things. Everything looks awesome and I kinda sorta hate you for getting the last center wink.gifbiggrin.gif

Hehe, cute. tongue.gif It will become a family heirloom, one of those cherished items passed down from generation to generation until it becomes as famous as Stradivari's Red Mendelssohn. Murphyus' Il altoparlante biondo biggrin.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcuDefTechGuy View Post

Wow! That looks awesome! I like. biggrin.gif
Congrats on your beautiful Philharmonic speakers!

Thank you sir! Del refused to violate your red treasures with copycats, I had to settle on the blonde twins. wink.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saturn94 View Post

The wait is finally over. They look great! Enjoy!

Thanks Saturn! When life begins every day there is no waiting, only anticipating. OK I lie, the anxiety was freaking killing me. smile.gif
post #3102 of 4114
Nethawk,

Congratulations on the 3 piece Phil set! They look amazing and enjoy hearing your take on how they sound. Just stunning how it all looks together.

Jim
post #3103 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrlittlejeans View Post

Sometimes you don't know what you've got till it's gone.
The Phils are some of the best speakers I've ever heard. I decided I don't want to be without a pair and I also decided to go for the Phil 3's as there was always a small part of me wondering what I was missing. I know Dennis says there is no difference except for some bass response but I think the power handling on the revelator is a bit better than the SB and I sometimes like to listen to music louder than normal and I think the Phil 3's might be a bit better than the 2's in that regard.
Where I'll put them isn't decided yet. My theater room doesn't have enough room for the 3's and the 3.7's so I can't pull an ADTG. I'm just mailing the check to Del now so it will likely be two months before I get the 3's. You could say I've got some time to decide where I'll put them.smile.gif
I've also got some Soundfield Monitor 1's arriving in a few weeks so I could potentially have a nice little shootout... M1's weighing in at $1,300 vs Phil 3's vs Magnepan 3.7's at $6k.
One thing is certain - I'll be keeping the Phils long term. Dennis has made a helluva speaker and I thank him for it.

So I just finished reading through the entire thread, and I have always been a HUGE fan of Magnepans, ever since i heard my first pair of MG12s like 7 years ago. But since then Ive never really had enough space for speakers, specially not maggies. So Ive been focusing alot more of my time and energy into my headphone rig. But i think soon that ill have enough space to set up an awesome speaker rig(hopefully within the next year). Ive been keeping up with all the developments at Salk thinking i would probably head in that direction for the value, but after discovering this thread, it seems like i can get a very similar sound for less money, just in slightly less fancy cabinets(which doesnt bother me at all) by going with Philharmonic audio instead. but part of me still wants maggies, and Ive got my heart set on the 3.7s, so TL;DR, i cant wait to read your comparison of the Phil 3s with the maggies biggrin.gif
post #3104 of 4114
nethawk - those look great - nice job on getting that look in the room
post #3105 of 4114
Hi. Here's a high gloss red mahogany Phil 3 I just picked up from Del. It isn't hand-rubbed, so it doesn't have a mirror finish. But it is high gloss and very attractive for a lot less money.


glossmahogphils 003.jpg 193k .jpg file
post #3106 of 4114
Very nice Del!
post #3107 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Murphy View Post

Hi. Here's a high gloss red mahogany Phil 3 I just picked up from Del. It isn't hand-rubbed, so it doesn't have a mirror finish. But it is high gloss and very attractive for a lot less money.
glossmahogphils 003.jpg 193k .jpg file

Nice!

Is that a new coffee table?
post #3108 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saturn94 View Post

Nice!
Is that a new coffee table?

Your memory is way too good. Those really weren't meant to be coffee tables, but I was gifted with them and they are officially coffee tables. And so far Ben hasn't learned how to destroy metal and glass, so that's a step in the right direction.
post #3109 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Murphy View Post

Hi. Here's a high gloss red mahogany Phil 3 I just picked up from Del. It isn't hand-rubbed, so it doesn't have a mirror finish. But it is high gloss and very attractive for a lot less money.
glossmahogphils 003.jpg 193k .jpg file

Del, Beautiful cabinetry.
post #3110 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Murphy View Post

Hi. Here's a high gloss red mahogany Phil 3 I just picked up from Del. It isn't hand-rubbed, so it doesn't have a mirror finish. But it is high gloss and very attractive for a lot less money.
glossmahogphils 003.jpg 193k .jpg file

Red high gloss rules! biggrin.gif

The piano high-gloss is $1500/PR.

But how much is the regular high-gloss?

Speaking of red high-gloss, while we were in Cancun, there was a grand piano in red high-gloss finish. It immediately reminded me of my red Phil3. biggrin.gif
post #3111 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcuDefTechGuy View Post

Red high gloss rules! biggrin.gif
The piano high-gloss is $1500/PR.
But how much is the regular high-gloss?
Speaking of red high-gloss, while we were in Cancun, there was a grand piano in red high-gloss finish. It immediately reminded me of my red Phil3. biggrin.gif


The total upcharge for the gloss red ribbon mahogany is $150. $100 for the veneer, $50 for the gloss. Or, you can divide the piano gloss price by 10.
post #3112 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Murphy View Post

The total upcharge for the gloss red ribbon mahogany is $150. $100 for the veneer, $50 for the gloss. Or, you can divide the piano gloss price by 10.

Wow. $50 gloss is very, very inexpensive. And this is for 2 speakers? $50 gloss for both speakers? eek.gif

I'm paying $200 for simple gloss for one Funk 18.0 subwoofer. Not high-gloss piano gloss. Just simply gloss is $200 for one sub. The veneer comes standard. So each sub simple gloss is $200. Dual subs = $400.

Philharmonic Audio is making everyone look really bad in every way possible. eek.gif
Edited by AcuDefTechGuy - 7/29/12 at 11:59am
post #3113 of 4114
I guess both Dennis and I are charging too little for what we do biggrin.gif
post #3114 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delwon View Post

I guess both Dennis and I are charging too little for what we do biggrin.gif

I think for $50, everyone should get the gloss.

Really? $50 for both speakers? 2 speakers gloss (like in that red mahogany Phil3 picture which looks damn good) for just $50? Both speakers? I can't believe it. eek.gifbiggrin.gif
post #3115 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcuDefTechGuy View Post

I think for $50, everyone should get the gloss.
Really? $50 for both speakers? 2 speakers gloss (like in that red mahogany Phil3 picture which looks damn good) for just $50? Both speakers? I can't believe it. eek.gifbiggrin.gif


I can't believe it either. I think I misinterpreted an e-mail Del sent me. The $150 is just for the gloss. I think the total cost for the ribbon mahogany, stain, and gloss is more like $370.
post #3116 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Murphy View Post

I can't believe it either. I think I misinterpreted an e-mail Del sent me. The $150 is just for the gloss. I think the total cost for the ribbon mahogany, stain, and gloss is more like $370.

Okay, $150/pr for gloss is still a great price. Better than $400/pr. biggrin.gif
post #3117 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Murphy View Post

Hi. Here's a high gloss red mahogany Phil 3 I just picked up from Del. It isn't hand-rubbed, so it doesn't have a mirror finish. But it is high gloss and very attractive for a lot less money.
glossmahogphils 003.jpg 193k .jpg file

This is my first post.  I have been lurking around for more than a year and have put in my deposit for a philharmonic 3 before the CAF.  I stayed with the older design and is just a preference for a rounded edge over a cut edge.   

Nice speaker Del.  Mine isn't gloss, just standard mahogany stained red.  Nice work on matching on the veneer.  You just make me itch to get my hands on mine.  Guess it will be ~end of Aug before the cabinet is done.  

I have some placement constraints and can't go for mirror gloss finish because one side will be in front of the tv and will become a Christmas light in a theater setting.  Normal red stained wood shine is good for me.  I have yet to overcome WAF (size), so it will be interesting when I receive it!  I hope the philharmonic 3 can convince and change her mind.

Please allow me identify the reasons why I choose philharmonic.  First of all, I have not heard any of Dennis's voiced speakers when I placed my order.  However I am hooked to ribbon tweeters after hearing Golden Ears. Philharmonic 3 is the only speaker within my stretched price range that has both a ribbon and planar as tweeter and mid, and reaches frequency of a sub.  I figured if I factor the price of the sub into the front 2, the philharmonic 3 falls into my needs, wants and price range.  I ended up with Dennis's design instead of Salk and Ascend primarily because of the Neo8 and Raal.  From the forum, Dennis also mentioned that he chooses the drivers and cross over design based on the range that the drivers behaves properly, predictably and within the design limits.  This is akin to all cylinders (drivers) firing in harmony.  I know nothing about the ML-TL design and can't really figure it out unless I hear one.  I guess I'll find soon about the slow, hard hitting bass.

Using the wine metaphor, I correlate Dennis as the crossover designer on the speakers that he has voiced to the winemaker of the winery.  The "black" art that creates the cult like following in the wine industry is very similar in nature to the tweaks that Dennis does on every pair that he approves. That itself is priceless. I trust Dennis's ears.  Del's work has been marvelous.  The veneers matched nicely and he has really paid attention to details on those speaker based on pictures that I  have seen.  I look forward to enjoy my speakers  voiced by Dennis, ML-TL design by Paul and made by Del in due time.
post #3118 of 4114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee88 View Post

This is my first post.  I have been lurking around for more than a year and have put in my deposit for a philharmonic 3 before the CAF.  I stayed with the older design and is just a preference for a rounded edge over a cut edge.   
Nice speaker Del.  Mine isn't gloss, just standard mahogany stained red.  Nice work on matching on the veneer.  You just make me itch to get my hands on mine.  Guess it will be ~end of Aug before the cabinet is done.  
I have some placement constraints and can't go for mirror gloss finish because one side will be in front of the tv and will become a Christmas light in a theater setting.  Normal red stained wood shine is good for me.  I have yet to overcome WAF (size), so it will be interesting when I receive it!  I hope the philharmonic 3 can convince and change her mind.
Please allow me identify the reasons why I choose philharmonic.  First of all, I have not heard any of Dennis's voiced speakers when I placed my order.  However I am hooked to ribbon tweeters after hearing Golden Ears. Philharmonic 3 is the only speaker within my stretched price range that has both a ribbon and planar as tweeter and mid, and reaches frequency of a sub.  I figured if I factor the price of the sub into the front 2, the philharmonic 3 falls into my needs, wants and price range.  I ended up with Dennis's design instead of Salk and Ascend primarily because of the Neo8 and Raal.  From the forum, Dennis also mentioned that he chooses the drivers and cross over design based on the range that the drivers behaves properly, predictably and within the design limits.  This is akin to all cylinders (drivers) firing in harmony.  I know nothing about the ML-TL design and can't really figure it out unless I hear one.  I guess I'll find soon about the slow, hard hitting bass.
Using the wine metaphor, I correlate Dennis as the crossover designer on the speakers that he has voiced to the winemaker of the winery.  The "black" art that creates the cult like following in the wine industry is very similar in nature to the tweaks that Dennis does on every pair that he approves. That itself is priceless. I trust Dennis's ears.  Del's work has been marvelous.  The veneers matched nicely and he has really paid attention to details on those speaker based on pictures that I  have seen.  I look forward to enjoy my speakers  voiced by Dennis, ML-TL design by Paul and made by Del in due time.

Congrats Lee! You will absolutely love the Phil3. Nice you got the $3K price before the deadline. biggrin.gif

Unless you are just crazy like some people around here, the Phil3 should be the last speakers you will ever want. biggrin.gif
post #3119 of 4114
Thanks ADTG. You are probably right. I have space constraints and can't put more than 1 set of fronts. I like your shiny red speakers. biggrin.gif
post #3120 of 4114
Congrats on your choice Lee, and your speakers are gorgeous.

We all like ADTG's speakers, I might have gone that route myself but couldn't figure out how to fence them in. I had a fear the dogs would think they were fire hydrants and pee on them. biggrin.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Philharmonic Audio - Dennis Murphy