Quote:
Originally Posted by wspohn 
Given all the stuff they DID load on this unit, a lot of which is probably not going to see much use in the average HT, it seems a tad chintzy not to have made it wireless capable, especially when you can buy an entire DVD player that DOES have that feature for about the price of the Pioneer adaptor.
I've had mixed success with add on adaptors and finally ran a hard wired connection to my router upstairs so I could plug in anything that needed an update without futzing with it when it had lost the access info after not being connected for 6 months.

Given all the stuff they DID load on this unit, a lot of which is probably not going to see much use in the average HT, it seems a tad chintzy not to have made it wireless capable, especially when you can buy an entire DVD player that DOES have that feature for about the price of the Pioneer adaptor.
I've had mixed success with add on adaptors and finally ran a hard wired connection to my router upstairs so I could plug in anything that needed an update without futzing with it when it had lost the access info after not being connected for 6 months.
FWIW, a wired connection IS the way to go. However, if that just isn't going to happen, then a bridge is probably better.
Why?
Take my situation for example: I can "see" (with a sensitive enough antenna) 20+ wireless networks from my living room - and I don't even live in very dense housing. ALL of them are in the 2.4GHz range. I am running the only 5GHz network that I've been able to detect (it's not an exclusivity thing, but rather a bandwidth thing) in my living room. In a nutshell, with any older networking (wifi) equipment, I wouldn't be able to take advantage of the 5GHz spectrum. However, with a bridge, I just had to replace my main router and get a bridge. Buying a new receiver (and gaming console, and HTPC, and... etc) just to take advantage of the 5GHz spectrum wouldn't have been an option.
I have wifi on 3 of the 4 components connected to my bridge (PS3, Wii, Mac Mini) but don't use their built-in wifi because I get so much better throughput with my bridge.
In two years, I may be upgrading again if the technology is available and there is a need.
(Side note: Years ago, I would stream between my ReplayTV's over a wifi connection. However, my neighbors were using a channel for their wifi network that wasn't one of the "friendly" ones. (eg 1, 6, 11) So, it would affect me as it would trample over the channel I was trying to use. Since they weren't bright enough to change their default passwords, I kindly changed their network to one of those channels to solve the problem.
Rather than do something like that these days, it's easier just to use the 5GHz network and avoid the masses altogether.)


























