Quote:
Originally Posted by GEP 
The TV converts any and every compatible incoming signal that is not already 1080p / 60Hz to 1080p / 60Hs. This is because the TV displays at only one rate, 1080p / 60Hz.
If you send 1080i into the TV, it de-interlaces that to 1080p. If you send 720p into the TV it upconverts that to 1080p. If you send 480p into the TV, it upconverts that to 1080p. If you send 480i, it de-interlaces that to 480p and then upconverts that to 1080p. If you send 1080p 30Hz into the TV it doubles that to 1080p 60Hz. If you send 1080p 24Hz (fps) it uses 3:2 pull down to convert that to 1080p 60HZ.
If you send 1080p 60Hz into the TV, the TV does not covert or change that. So you real question is where is the best place for your ATT box's signal to be converted from 1080i to 1080p? That will depend on where the best conversion circuits are. However LaserVue has rather good conversion circuits, it is might still be possible to have more expensive and better conversion circuits elsewhere. How much visible difference and whether it is cost effective would still remain a question that only trying could answer.

The TV converts any and every compatible incoming signal that is not already 1080p / 60Hz to 1080p / 60Hs. This is because the TV displays at only one rate, 1080p / 60Hz.
If you send 1080i into the TV, it de-interlaces that to 1080p. If you send 720p into the TV it upconverts that to 1080p. If you send 480p into the TV, it upconverts that to 1080p. If you send 480i, it de-interlaces that to 480p and then upconverts that to 1080p. If you send 1080p 30Hz into the TV it doubles that to 1080p 60Hz. If you send 1080p 24Hz (fps) it uses 3:2 pull down to convert that to 1080p 60HZ.
If you send 1080p 60Hz into the TV, the TV does not covert or change that. So you real question is where is the best place for your ATT box's signal to be converted from 1080i to 1080p? That will depend on where the best conversion circuits are. However LaserVue has rather good conversion circuits, it is might still be possible to have more expensive and better conversion circuits elsewhere. How much visible difference and whether it is cost effective would still remain a question that only trying could answer.
Thank you, that is very helpful. I'm not going to worry about spending a ton of money for the latest video processing in my new AVR then.
BTW, I am very happy with the picture quality of the Laservue. I upgraded from a Samsung 67A750 LED DLP and the Laservue wins hands-down in color and clarity. Me, and especially my wife don't like the look of the LED's, unless I see an 80 inch Elite LED or Panasonic Plasma for about 3K, the L75-A91 was the perfect choice for us. When I was in the store it didn't look all that great but once I got it home it really came to life and looked incredible. I've heard similar stories on this forum regarding how it looks in the store and agree that once you get one of these home, it makes all the difference.
Thank you for your help.























haha




Whats not funny is that everytime I talk with Mits they make it sound like they have never heard of anyone else receiving damaged or defective sets.