Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ranger 
I just read Projectorcentral's review on the Panny...I think I am holding out for it..
http://www.projectorcentral.com/pana...tor_review.htmNot only does the AE7000 represent a major step beyond the AE4000 in picture quality, it is a step beyond so-called "higher end" 1080p projectors. Viewed side by side it will outperform some competing products that currently sell for up to triple the price. And most of these competing units do not have the array of features found on the AE7000.
I am trying not to be offensive to PC, but that is NO review imo. It's a subjective mix of opinion and marketing info. There are zero measurements (beside lumens) to validate any of the claims. I want to see ON/OFF, ANSI, Gray scale (out of the box) and Primary and secondary color measurements. That's a real review in my opinion.
I would wait for Kraine or Cine4home to post their impressions. They tell it like it is (good or bad) and have the factual measurements to back up their claims.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chuck Anstey 
Zombie,
Do you not include the JVC because it is a bit higher price point?
I have been following these threads and your reviews and I was wondering:
What new features/improvements (if any) do you think JVC has to do to the RS40 to arguably retain "Best overall projector under $5K"? Let's assume that the bulb issue was a "save a buck" mistake, lesson learned, fixed, move on and the RS40 doesn't have CMS so no issues there. From your posts it sounds like you think the Sony is a better overall projector than the RS40 for the features/qualities you value. Others may have a different opinion.
Chuck, I can't say much publicly, but imo, JVC isn't interested in hearing from their customers.
I can't recommend the current RS40 for the lamp issues alone. I will say that I liked my RS40 better than the RS50. The color was better out of the box and brighter as well.
They would have to prove themselves with a rock solid lamp, increase the refresh rates of the panels, find a way to reduce the warm up time for watching 3D (a known issue agree upon by most owners), reduce ghosting as the lamp ages, program a quality FI in 3D mode, etc.
it's a shame because it has some very nice virtues as well, but I have to look at the entire 'package' which imo at this time, the Sony trumps the JVC (with it's current version). Hopefully they are listening and will make a big improvement with the 2.0 product in the late fall.