Featured Stories
Related Forum Threads
- Please convince me that I don't need lens shift! Last post on 2/10/13 at 11:16pm in Digital Projectors - Under $3,000 USD MSRP
- What are your thoughts on the Elitech 120" 16:9 High Contrast Grey? Last post on 4/16/13 at 8:33am in Screens
- Panasonic ETPKA110H Ceiling Mount for Panasonic PT-AE8000, any reasons why this mount is soo... Last post on 11/6/12 at 12:27pm in Digital Projectors - Under $3,000 USD MSRP
- Best mount for Epson 8350 Last post on 11/25/12 at 12:47pm in Digital Projectors - Under $3,000 USD MSRP
- Official Epson Home Cinema 3020 Thread Last post on Today at 7:36 pm in Digital Projectors - Under $3,000 USD MSRP
Panasonic PT-AR100 MSRP$ 1,999 - 4000U replacement... kind of - Page 15
Gear mentioned in this thread:

My AR100U currently has about 25 hours on it and it has what I call vertical waves in the image. The best way that I can describe the waves is a rainbow of red, blue, green about a half inch wide and about an inch apart from the top to the bottom of the screen. (Throw of 18 feet and a screen size of 119" diagonal or a little under 9 foot across) The waves will go away if you take the image just slightly out of focus. Another way to get rid of the waves is to enlarge the image to about 12 foot across. With the image at about 12 foot across I then see the "screen door" effect. The problem also shows itself in the "Test Pattern Menu" which proves it is not any kind of signal or input issue. The best I can figure from everything I have tried is that it has something to do with the focus ?
I'm no expert, but I've torn apart my old AX200U several times, right down to the prism. A couple of thoughts crossed my mind...
1) Bad electrical connection / grounding of one of the LCDs
2) Chemical pattern on either the prism or one of the LCDs (from cleaner?)
...just my over-tired brain meandering.
I'm going to bed. Discuss amongst yourselves. Good luck!
- Mr.G
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Real Genius
-
- offline
- 2,386 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Select All Posts By This User
I took a few pictures of my AR100 on my 120" white screen 1.1 gain. Excuse the quality since the Kodak digital camera I used is pretty old and the pictures have a blue cast that is not on the screen. The shots are taken off the Disney WOW Blu-ray. I used the white pluge for the pixel shots, first at about 8 feet, then 4 feet and finally right up next to the screen - within a foot. The camera was angled up a little to keep me out of the shot. I haven't calibrated my projector since I'm waiting for more hours on the bulb before I do. Hope the pictures help.






Panasonic has an interesting concept of customer service. For those of you thinking of this Panasonic projector or another model pay attention. I am almost 40 years old, I have a dedicated home theater, I am not using a hallway. The distance from the projector to the screen is 18 feet and I set at about 14 feet (this info is for later) I bought this projector for price, to get me by for now. I had it overnighted from projector people ($95). I went over the time limit on the lamp for their return policy before I realized I had a lemon.
The Online Chat Service - First I start with the online chat several weeks ago about seeing this wave pattern in the image. As Jimbo8528 said you mostly see it in "sky" scenes. The online chat said to send Panasonic
photographs, so I did. It can clearly be seen in the photographs. As I would periodically go to the online chat they first told me they didn't receive the photos. I sent them again while I was online chatting and verified they had them. Then they said they emailed me more questions (that I had already answered) to an email address that wasn't mine. Then they said they are getting an email error when they try to email me to the email address I verified with them. FISHY ?
The Phone Call - He politely starts talking about the failed email attempts. I didn't care. At this point the wave issue which Jimbo85281 and I are describing has turned into just the "Screen Door Effect" at no matter what size I have it at. I crossed the 31 hour mark this weekend. I told him this in an over 20 minute phone conversation. "How far away are you setting ?" "And you can see it at 14 feet away ?" Does this freaking matter ? I still have an old ae900u which doesn't have the "Screen Door Effect". He said that he thought it could be a lens alignment issue since I could blur it and make it go away.
The Solution - As Jimbo85281 said, they asked me to send it in. You pay to send it to them. No problem I knew that before I bought it. He says (pay attention here) "IF THEY DON'T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH IT THEY WILL CHARGE YOU $130" Now at my age do I believe that they will fix it send it back and say nothing was wrong with it and ask for $130 ? I did not set it up to be fixed yet. I am going to watch it to see if it gets better or worse. Then maybe get it fixed and if I have problems get the Better Business Bureau involved. Epson anyone ?
What are we looking for in the blue/green closeup again? I see the waves in your other photos, and I would be pissed about that, but the blue/green image just looks like a super close up shot showing normal pixel structure. Sorry if I'm missing something.
- Jimbo85281
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 76 Posts. Joined 11/2011
- Location: Arizona
- Select All Posts By This User
I think the reason the AE900 and AR100 look so different form up close is because the 900 had "smooth screen" technology which somehow (electronically or just tight pixel structure) eliminated space between pixels to compensate for it's low resolution (720P) Your pixel structure looks normal on the 100U. If you had an LCoS or DLP projector, it would look much more like your 900U in that they have less space between pixels. I have a 133" screen and I'm 13" away. I cannot make out pixel structure from that distance and I have 20/15 vision. If you have eyes like an eagle then maybe you could see them from a reasonable distance.

I think the reason the AE900 and AR100 look so different form up close is because the 900 had "smooth screen" technology which somehow (electronically or just tight pixel structure) eliminated space between pixels to compensate for it's low resolution (720P) Your pixel structure looks normal on the 100U. If you had an LCoS or DLP projector, it would look much more like your 900U in that they have less space between pixels. I have a 133" screen and I'm 13" away. I cannot make out pixel structure from that distance and I have 20/15 vision. If you have eyes like an eagle then maybe you could see them from a reasonable distance.
Jimbo, I think after having the "wave" issue and I noticed how the pixels weren't as tight as the 900 it is just making me paranoid that something else is wrong. That is what I am trying to figure out ?
- Mr.G
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Real Genius
-
- offline
- 2,386 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Select All Posts By This User

I think the reason the AE900 and AR100 look so different form up close is because the 900 had "smooth screen" technology which somehow (electronically or just tight pixel structure) eliminated space between pixels to compensate for it's low resolution (720P) Your pixel structure looks normal on the 100U. If you had an LCoS or DLP projector, it would look much more like your 900U in that they have less space between pixels. I have a 133" screen and I'm 13" away. I cannot make out pixel structure from that distance and I have 20/15 vision. If you have eyes like an eagle then maybe you could see them from a reasonable distance.
Funny how when I first got my AE900 projector I wanted to find a way to turn off the Smooth Screen technology since I was so accustomed to the pixel structure evident in my previous Panasonic PT-L720U projector. The 720U was considered a multimedia projector with a 1024x768 native resolution and a 4:3 aspect ratio. But it was a brighter projector with a 220W bulb and 2200 lumens so in a way I have come around full circle although the AR100U is still a much brighter projector with colors clearly superior to either of my earlier projectors and I've paid considerably less. I didn't think the move from 720p to 1080p was going to be as noticeable as it turned out to be. My usual sitting position is about 15 feet from the screen so I don't notice ANY pixel structure until I get as close as my previous photos show. I wear corrective glasses when I watch movies on this setup.
- JonfromCB
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 37 Posts. Joined 12/2011
- Location: Council Bluffs Iowa
- Select All Posts By This User
That being said, eliminate every possiblity you can. Is your screen tight and perfectly flat or even defective? Is there a reflection or light source hitting the screen where and when you notice the problem? Many horizontal issues can be power/electical issues. Is your power outlet grounded properly? Is there power interference from another electical or magnetic source in your home or near your PJ?
Reset EVERY setting back to "zero" or factory setting. Check to see if your problem is visable with all or only some aspects. Some aspects and combinations of V and or other edge enhancement/screen adjustments can really effect "center screen" picture quality on many PJs. Check your PJ position relative to your screen. Has the position of your PJ "violated" throw distance, angle (vertical or horizontal) in relation to your screen? Is the PJ too high or too low? Is the PJ as level as possible? Exaggerated lens/screen adjustments can cause alot of the described picture issues.
Hope this helps. ....Jon
- mustang5o
- Trader Feedback: 0
- NINJim
-
- offline
- 550 Posts. Joined 11/2003
- Location: Somewhere in middle America.
- Select All Posts By This User
Is this confirmed yet? I haven't found anything on this. I would be surprised if it didn't have the v-stretch mode since the PT-AX100U (720P) I currently own has it. I don't really need the lumens but then again the AX100U is bright as well but in best modes doesn't seem to be overwhelming in my generally completely dark room.
- dangc
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 641 Posts. Joined 9/2005
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Select All Posts By This User
It appears you are seeing Moire affect. This is typically caused by the pixel structure aligning with something in the screen itself. What kind of screen are you using? This would typically be caused by an AT woven or perf screen, but other screens can cause it too.
Try zooming out to make the image larger, but still focused to see if it goes away. If it does then it is moire caused by your screen.

Is this confirmed yet? I haven't found anything on this. I would be surprised if it didn't have the v-stretch mode since the PT-AX100U (720P) I currently own has it. I don't really need the lumens but then again the AX100U is bright as well but in best modes doesn't seem to be overwhelming in my generally completely dark room.
I'm not sure I know what you mean. The AR100 has the ability to fill the entire 16:9 screen with a 2.35:1 signal. I replaced an AX200 with the AR100 and it seems to have all the adjustments, plus some, that the 200 had.
- Mr.G
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Real Genius
-
- offline
- 2,386 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Select All Posts By This User

Is this confirmed yet? I haven't found anything on this. I would be surprised if it didn't have the v-stretch mode since the PT-AX100U (720P) I currently own has it. I don't really need the lumens but then again the AX100U is bright as well but in best modes doesn't seem to be overwhelming in my generally completely dark room.
I don't have a Scope screen so I haven't played with the screen size settings but you may want to download the owners manual (.pdf) and look at page 61.
http://www.projectorcentral.com/pdf/...anual_6499.pdf
- Trogdor2010
- Trader Feedback: 0
- The Burninator
-
- offline
- 322 Posts. Joined 7/2010
- Select All Posts By This User

I don't have a Scope screen so I haven't played with the screen size settings but you may want to download the owners manual (.pdf) and look at page 61.
http://www.projectorcentral.com/pdf/...anual_6499.pdf
Just checked, and it sounds like it has pretty comprehesive features. You can even adjust the stretch method (on P.57). That sounds very good for the price of the projector.
I have been a Panasonic owner for about 4 years now. AX200 and now the AR100. I suspect the reason is that there seems to be very little wrong with this PJ. Yes, there have been some issues but not like some of the other PJs (including the AX200) Also, it is not aimed at the purist. Meaning it is definitely a compromise. It probably is not as good as some of the other PJs in it's price range in a completely light controlled room. Although I am totally happy with my picture in a dark room. The one thing this thing does very well is throw a great picture with the lights on. It opens up a totally different usage profile that allows you to watch sports, etc. with people over with normal illumination. No bumping into things trying to get to the dip. Other than a couple of issues mentioned in this thread, I have not heard of any broad range problems with this PJ. Bulbs exploding, flickering etc. Problems tend to generate discussion. A quiet forum is generally a content forum.
- mpotoka
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 310 Posts. Joined 3/2005
- Location: Chicago
- Select All Posts By This User
- Mr.G
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Real Genius
-
- offline
- 2,386 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Select All Posts By This User
- Mr.G
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Real Genius
-
- offline
- 2,386 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Select All Posts By This User
It was late last night and I was tired but since the projector was warmed up I decided to run a quick test of the lumen output of my AR100U, partially because I know there are people interested in this projector and for my own curiosity. Rather than doing a comprehensive test using the required 9 point readings I opted for coderguy's method of 3 point measurements - center, lower left and upper right corners of the screen. I used an inexpensive digital illuminance meter I purchased several months ago. The AR100U has 7 picture modes which significantly change the light output.
As listed in the owner's manual:
[NORMAL] - For a general image.
[DYNAMIC] - For viewing at high brightness.
[GAME] - For use with games.
[SPORTS] - For sports program.
[REC709] - For HDTV standard (ITU-R BT.709) color temperature 6500K at the default setting.
[CINEMA 1] - Tuned by top Hollywood colorists for watching a movie with smooth image quality.
[VIVID CINEMA] - For use with a high luminance, clear picture mode.
The readings were taken using the LUX scale and converted to lumens and ft-L.
Screen size 119" - aspect ratio 16:9. The screen area is 41 square feet.
The distance from projector to screen 13 feet 7 inches.
This projector has NOT been calibrated. The bulb has 80 hours of use.
Below are the converted readings in order of brightness (ECO mode):
[DYNAMIC] - 1974 lumens (52.9 ft-L)
[SPORTS] - 1836 lumens (49.3 ft-L)
[NORMAL] - 1642 lumens (44.1 ft-L)
[GAME] - 1578 lumens (42.3 ft-L)
[VIVID CINEMA] - 1417 lumens (38.0 ft-L)
[CINEMA 1] - 804 lumens (21.6 ft-L)
[REC709] - 777 lumens (20.8 ft-L)
Since my measurement method was less than ideal just take these numbers as a gauge of what this projector is capable of.
Â
EDIT: I recently discovered that what I had thought was a 120" screen was in fact 119". Because screen size has a significant bearing on lumen and foot lambert calculations I have corrected the numbers here.
Edited by Mr.G - 7/26/12 at 12:23pm
- kazkioken
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 26 Posts. Joined 8/2004
- Location: Los Angeles
- Select All Posts By This User
I have a question and would like your opinions and help for mounting my new AR100. As you can see with the attached picture I had a peculiar mounting situation as I can not drill into the concrete ceiling, and the windows provide no room to mount anything. So I had a friend whip up this mount for me which has been awesome on my ancient Panny AE900U. He makes various things for my racecar but I figured why not this so...after a quick sketch he whipped this up.
Anyways as you can see the mount plate for the existing AE900U is a metalplate with drilled holes. Taking the entire arm off the wall for him to remake another plate as it isn't an option, the wall stud mounts would come loose and remounting would be a huge pain. a
Any suggestions on the easiest way to adapt this plate to the new mount points on the AR100. I guess if they are the same it would be a miracle but I haven't seen the actual mounting points on the AR100 to know. I was thinking...a simple wooden adapter plate with dropped bolts attached to the metal plate, and then drop more bolts onto the new projector? Or...maybe metal wire harnesses attached to some hardware? Is there anything like this that is premade? I couldn't find anything online with an adjustable plate on both sides of the mount as...who would ever need such a thing? lol. Your ideas and help are greatly appreciated. Can't wait to get the thing up and test it on my screen.

- stickygreen
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 136 Posts. Joined 11/2006
- Location: vancity
- Select All Posts By This User

...since I've posted here, but always amazing to know there is this invaluable resource whenever one needs it. Anyways after neglecting the living for too long (the bedroom projector gets all the love and upgrading) I finally just ordered the AR100 from projectorpeople.com - the pricing was too good to pass up and the 8350 just happens to be out of stock on Amazon in Prime so...AR100 it is. I will be using it on a 98" Stewart Greyhawk (how's that for a blast from the past!) and am very excited as this seems to be a great solution for my needs of entertaining with the lights on.
I have a question and would like your opinions and help for mounting my new AR100. As you can see with the attached picture I had a peculiar mounting situation as I can not drill into the concrete ceiling, and the windows provide no room to mount anything. So I had a friend whip up this mount for me which has been awesome on my ancient Panny AE900U. He makes various things for my racecar but I figured why not this so...after a quick sketch he whipped this up.
Anyways as you can see the mount plate for the existing AE900U is a metalplate with drilled holes. Taking the entire arm off the wall for him to remake another plate as it isn't an option, the wall stud mounts would come loose and remounting would be a huge pain. a
Any suggestions on the easiest way to adapt this plate to the new mount points on the AR100. I guess if they are the same it would be a miracle but I haven't seen the actual mounting points on the AR100 to know. I was thinking...a simple wooden adapter plate with dropped bolts attached to the metal plate, and then drop more bolts onto the new projector? Or...maybe metal wire harnesses attached to some hardware? Is there anything like this that is premade? I couldn't find anything online with an adjustable plate on both sides of the mount as...who would ever need such a thing? lol. Your ideas and help are greatly appreciated. Can't wait to get the thing up and test it on my screen.
Drilling into a concrete ceiling isn't very difficult.. unless your strata prohibits it or something. I'd just get a regular mount, and attach it to the ceiling. Almost all new cordless drills have a hammer function, and they are good enough to put some quarter inch anchors into concrete. just ask the hardware guy at home depot for attaching into concrete, it's easier than you may think.
- Mr.G
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Real Genius
-
- offline
- 2,386 Posts. Joined 1/2007
- Select All Posts By This User
I've attached the drawing from page 81 of the owner's manual showing the mounting hole configuration. I upgraded from the AE900U and the holes are different. I purchased the Peerless PRG-UNV (which I highly recommend) to mount my AR100U, which is roughly twice as big and heavier (19 pounds versus 8 pounds) than the AE900U. BTW your existing mount is one of the most unique I've ever seen. Maybe you should wait for the projector to arrive before deciding on how to mount it. You never know, you may get just enough of the holes to match up with your current mounting plate.
Projector dimensions: Width = 18 1/2" Depth = 14 31/32" Height = 5 15/16".
http://www.projectorcentral.com/pdf/...anual_6499.pdf
EDIT: I just remembered that the Panasonic website has a CAD drawing of the projector mounting holes.
ftp://ftp.panasonic.com/pub/Panasoni...-AR100_CAD.pdf

- kazkioken
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 26 Posts. Joined 8/2004
- Location: Los Angeles
- Select All Posts By This User

Drilling into a concrete ceiling isn't very difficult.. unless your strata prohibits it or something. I'd just get a regular mount, and attach it to the ceiling. Almost all new cordless drills have a hammer function, and they are good enough to put some quarter inch anchors into concrete. just ask the hardware guy at home depot for attaching into concrete, it's easier than you may think.
I would love to do this but I live in an apartment building and this is strictly prohibited - they actually check! Wonder though if it doesn't go in that far...
- Panasonic PT-AR100 MSRP$ 1,999 - 4000U replacement... kind of
Gear mentioned in this thread:
Recent Discussions
- › MITSUBISHI HC5, new 3D SXRD projector based on HC9000 2500 euros 58 seconds ago
- › 2013 Formula 1 in HD 1 minute ago
- › Talk me out of buying a a third floorstander (center channel woes) 1 minute ago
- › Official Panasonic VT60/VT65 Series Discussion Thread [No Street... 2 minutes ago
- › *Official* WD TV Live Streaming Media Player Thread 2 minutes ago
- › Microsoft fires the first shot in the "NEXT" generation.... 4 minutes ago
- › 'Grimm' on NBC HD 4 minutes ago
- › Cloud Atlas (Blu-ray) Official AVSForum Review 4 minutes ago
- › Fast & The Furious 6 4 minutes ago
- › The **OFFICIAL** Denon AVR-XX12 Model Owner's Thread 4 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › VIZIO 55 inch Class LED - M3D550KDE by indept
- › Optoma GT700 3D Game Time Projector by paul65000
- › InFocus X1A DLP Multimedia Video Projector by coastercard
- › BenQ W1070 1080P 3D Projector by arjjr
- › Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 by Natros
- › Epson V11H501020 PowerLite Home Cinema 3020 2D and 3D 1080p Home... by sailorb
- › Elite Screens ER110WH1 Sable Fixed Frame (110" 16:9 AR) by DDT0C
- › Elite Screens ER100WH1-A1080P2 Sable Fixed Frame Projection Screen by DDT0C
- › Peerless PRG Mount, Black by DDT0C
- › Epson 5020UB Powerlite Home Cinema 3D Front Projector by DDT0C
New Articles
- › Projector Review Contest by Nick Val
- › "List Your Gear to Win Some Gear"... by Nick Val
- › Most Economical Thin Client PC`s from RDP... by RDPThinClients
- › Media Browser 3 Announced by xzener
- › AVS Guide to Media Servers, Part 1 by Scott Wilkinson
- › Join the AVS Team! by Nick Val
- › 25 Top Blu-ray releases for 2012 by Ralph Potts
- › Sony Launches 4k Ultra HD Flat Panel - AVS... by Scott Wilkinson
- › Clarus Power Cords by Good Tunes
- › A Theater Is Just Is Not A Theater, Unless... by David Bott
About AVS | Join the Community | Advertise | Contact Us
© 2013 AVS is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map




















