New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Star Trek 2 - Page 5

post #121 of 414
1/6/12 at 9:41am
Quote:
Originally Posted by morpheo View Post

don't get me wrong i did enjoy avatar (or tron: Legacy) in 3d... While i'm not a 3d fan i admit, i can appreciate the effect when it works and is appropriate. It's the conversions i can't stand.

+1
Reply
Reply

AVS Top Picks

post #122 of 414
1/6/12 at 9:47am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morpheo View Post

A good movie doesn't need 3D to make money.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Nelson View Post

the point of Avatar - it's a 3D showcase tour of an imaginary world. I found it to be spectacular and if he can do as good a job with the next one I'll be very happy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonyeuw View Post

Personally I think when the 3D is used to create a sense of depth( Avatar?), if done right it does add to the experience. Can't stand the cheap 'pop-out' 3D trickery though....

+1 to all of these posts.
Reply
Reply
post #123 of 414
1/6/12 at 3:44pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliens View Post

Star Trek 2: Khan - The Battle over Corinthian Leather

Made My Day

Ta Da Daaa!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vsg97bxuJnc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=TIYFB7eXrlU
Reply
Reply
post #124 of 414
1/8/12 at 2:31am
Star Trek sequel to possibly shoot in IMAX

Quote:


While it was reported last month that J.J. Abrams’ untitled Star Trek sequel was planning a 3D release on May 17, 2013, the director tells MTV News that the film will shoot in 2D and will be post-converted. The more exciting news, however, is that Abrams is interested in potentially bringing IMAX to the final frontier.

“We’re shooting on film, 2D, and then we’ll do a good high-end conversion like the ‘Harry Potter’ movie and all that,” says Abrams. “Luckily, with our release date now we have the months needed to do it right, because if you rush it, it never looks good… We were talking about [shooting in IMAX] and I would love to do it. IMAX is my favorite format; I’m a huge fan.”

http://blog.bigmoviezone.com/?p=12889
Reply
Reply
post #125 of 414
1/8/12 at 5:17pm
J.J. did not want 3d:

http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/01/0...trek-2-in-3-d/
Reply
Reply
post #126 of 414
1/14/12 at 1:34pm
Thread Starter 
http://www.slashfilm.com/star-trek-2...g-starts-week/

I did not fight for the 3D. It was something that the studio wanted to do, and I didn’t want to do it. And then, when I saw the first movie converted in sections, I thought that it actually looked really cool. So, I was okay with their doing it, as long as I could shoot the movie the way I wanted to, in anamorphic film, and then let them convert it. So, those who want to see it in 3D, which looked pretty cool, can do it, and those that want to see it in 2D can do that too.

Filming started this week!
Reply
Reply
post #127 of 414
1/14/12 at 6:12pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Clark View Post

J.J. did not want 3d:

http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/01/0...trek-2-in-3-d/

Yay! If they do do 3d I hope its a good conversion. Ill consider watching it in 3d
Reply
Reply
post #128 of 414
9/16/12 at 1:05am
Wonder if this is going to be the first film to have IMAX footage post-converted to 3D? Abrams shot 35mm scope and IMAX 15/70, Paramount is releasing in 3D.

Last week, the official title was revealed: 'Star Trek Into Darkness'. Notice no number (roman numeral or otherwise) in the title and no colon (as in 'Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home'). Will keep the JJ-verse films from being confused with previous Trek film series.
Reply
Reply
post #129 of 414
9/19/12 at 1:33pm
I hope they don't ruin my Star Trek with a bunch of cheesy, gimmicky 3-D effects.
Reply
Reply
post #130 of 414
9/19/12 at 1:52pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post

I hope they don't ruin my Star Trek with a bunch of cheesy, gimmicky 3-D effects.

I hope they don't ruin MY Star Trek with a bunch of cheesy, gimmicky Lens Flare effects.
Reply
Reply
post #131 of 414
9/19/12 at 2:32pm
I want lens flares in IMAX 3D.
Reply
Reply
post #132 of 414
9/19/12 at 2:36pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdurani View Post

I want lens flares in IMAX 3D.

You would! rolleyes.gif
Reply
Reply
post #133 of 414
9/19/12 at 3:04pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdurani View Post

I want lens flares in IMAX 3D.
LOL.smile.gif
Reply
Reply
post #134 of 414
9/19/12 at 3:08pm
I hope they don't ruin my Star Trek by making it anything like any of the prior films and television shows.
Reply
Reply
post #135 of 414
9/19/12 at 3:16pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdurani View Post

I want lens flares in IMAX 3D.
I want JJ to step out in front of the camera and shine a flashlight into it. In 3D.
Reply
Reply
post #136 of 414
9/19/12 at 4:03pm
"Star Trek Into Darkness?" The new name for the film reminds me of the newest batman franchise....The Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises....common people, let's be more imaginative rolleyes.gif
Reply
Reply
post #137 of 414
9/19/12 at 4:58pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by KBMAN View Post

"Star Trek Into Darkness?" The new name for the film reminds me of the newest batman franchise....The Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises....common people, let's be more imaginative rolleyes.gif
So if I make a movie titled, "My Dark Hole"...you're going to think of Batman?
Reply
Reply
post #138 of 414
9/19/12 at 5:12pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sb1 View Post

So if I make a movie titled, "My Dark Hole"...you're going to think of Batman?

Starring Ron Jeremy as Captain Kirk.biggrin.gif
Reply
Reply
post #139 of 414
9/23/12 at 12:40pm
well, there WAS a movie called The Black Hole biggrin.gif
Reply
Reply
post #140 of 414
11/16/12 at 10:23pm
Similar to the way Christopher Nolan has been previewing his Dark Knight movies, the first 9 minutes of 'Star Trek Into Darkness' to be shown before IMAX presentations of 'The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey':

http://trekmovie.com/2012/11/14/breaking-9-minute-preview-of-star-trek-into-darkness-to-debut-in-imax-3d-on-december-14/

Official 'Star Trek' teaser/trailer to be attached to non-IMAX presentations of 'Hobbit':

http://trekmovie.com/2012/11/15/exclusive-first-star-trek-into-darkness-trailer-also-premiering-dec-14th/

Parts of the movie were shot in film-based (15/70) IMAX.
Reply
Reply
post #141 of 414
11/16/12 at 11:11pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdurani View Post

Similar to the way Christopher Nolan has been previewing his Dark Knight movies, the first 9 minutes of 'Star Trek Into Darkness' to be shown before IMAX presentations of 'The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey':
http://trekmovie.com/2012/11/14/breaking-9-minute-preview-of-star-trek-into-darkness-to-debut-in-imax-3d-on-december-14/
Official 'Star Trek' teaser/trailer to be attached to non-IMAX presentations of 'Hobbit':
http://trekmovie.com/2012/11/15/exclusive-first-star-trek-into-darkness-trailer-also-premiering-dec-14th/
Parts of the movie were shot in film-based (15/70) IMAX.

This time im going to avoid trailers, they just take to much fun out of the movie experience.
Reply
Reply
post #142 of 414
11/17/12 at 4:42am
Agreed 100%
Reply
Reply
post #143 of 414
11/17/12 at 12:35pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovieSwede View Post

This time im going to avoid trailers
How about watching the first 9 minutes of the film?
Reply
Reply
post #144 of 414
11/17/12 at 1:09pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdurani View Post

How about watching the first 9 minutes of the film?

What ever happend to patience. wink.gif

Movies should be watched in from start to finish without breaks.
Reply
Reply
post #145 of 414
11/17/12 at 1:42pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovieSwede View Post

What ever happend to patience. wink.gif
Movies should be watched in from start to finish without breaks.
You obviously don't sneak a flask into the theater.
Reply
Reply
post #146 of 414
11/17/12 at 5:09pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sb1 View Post

You obviously don't sneak a flask into the theater.
One of the reasons why I have an HT is that is too damn hard to sneak a growler into the neighborhood theater.

I just got tired of being questioned....
"What's in the baby stroller?"
"Your wife is STILL pregnant?"
"You're PREGNANT!?!"
That kind of stuff really pulled me out of the whole Going-To-The-Movies thing...
Reply
Reply
post #147 of 414
11/17/12 at 7:37pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

One of the reasons why I have an HT is that is too damn hard to sneak a growler into the neighborhood theater.
I just got tired of being questioned....
"What's in the baby stroller?"
"Your wife is STILL pregnant?"
"You're PREGNANT!?!"
That kind of stuff really pulled me out of the whole Going-To-The-Movies thing...
Oh, I see. You're still at that point in your life when you care what others think. Don't worry. Even a guy your age can learn. You'll always be my hero, though.
Reply
Reply
post #148 of 414
11/18/12 at 7:08pm
Damn. I don't want to see any extended previews for ST2. I just want to watch The Hobbit and be left alone.mad.gif When I'm ready to see ST2 I'll just pay for a ticket.
Reply
Reply
post #149 of 414
11/18/12 at 7:43pm
****! Sounds like the new Star Trek is going to be variable aspect. Please at least give us a constant aspect blu ray option when this hits! mad.gif
Reply
Reply
post #150 of 414
11/18/12 at 11:56pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sb1 View Post

You're still at that point in your life when you care what others think.
Not really....it's the "EITHER POUR THE BEER OUT OR THESE SECURITY GUARDS WILL ESCORT YOU OUT, SIR" that always put a damper on the experience.

Quote:
Don't worry. Even a guy your age can learn.
Trust me here: I don't train easily.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toe View Post

****! Sounds like the new Star Trek is going to be variable aspect and constant lens flare.
FIXED.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home

AVS Top Picks