AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Integra DHC-80.3
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Integra DHC-80.3 - Page 69

post #2041 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Big nulls are certainly a problem - and best resolved with traps as you say. Otherwise the danger is that the amp is asked to do more and more, to no avail, until it eventually gives up. Boom!

Ya for your average joe running a B&M sub with a plate amp and receiver power. For lots of us, we run so excessive that it would have to be a pretty extreme to not be about to EQ fairly flat with electronics alone. Traps can only do so much but as fitz says, there are no traps that work under 100hz so the ONLY way to EQ is electronic
post #2042 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by fitzcaraldo215 View Post

Audyssey does not trim the channels. The prepro does. Audyssey merely reports its calibration level findings to the prepro. I would have thought Audyssey would have told you that and that as an ostensibly practicing Pro calibrator/ installer you would have known that. Limits to the amount of level trim, plus/minus, are purely a function of the prepro. Offhand, I do not know what the Integra's limits are.

If you are not talking about channel level trims, but about relative EQ boost/cut at specific frequencies, then yes, Audyssey has limits to protect the amps/speakers, especially when boosting room nulls. It is a valuable feature.

Your point about individual preference has been conceded here, over and over. But, I would again have thought that as a Pro calibrator, you would be using the target curve editing in Pro for just that purpose.

What mystifies me is a guy who represents himself as a Pro calibrator, but who just does not like Audyssey. Do your clients know this? I would suggest, that if you do not like what it does, that you consider moving on to something better, if in your mind it exists. You might be much happier, less defensive and cynical.

As far as predicted vs. independently measured results are concerned, you have not told us a thing about your independent measurement protocol and instrumentation. Why should we take you seriously? Independent measurements can be either good or bad depending on how they we re taken. But, in any case, two different sets of measurements taken by two different methods using different equipment, mike positions, spatial averaging techniques, etc. are likely to differ. Such is the nature of the beast of room acoustics. So, why do you assume that Audyssey is wrong and your independent measurements are right?

lol, I never said I didn't edit the curve but isn't personal preference the whole reason to use audyssey in the first place? You can not believe me if you want, I don't care one way or the other but you are making cracks at me for the same thing you are doing I'm afraid. Some of you guys just make me laugh. I'm still wondering if you know so much, why aren't you doing pro- calibrations? You can make great money. Whether I believe in audyssey or not doesn't make a difference, it's up to the user to decide, not me, I'm just giving them a service.
This is just something I do for retirement money for my parents, i don't need the money, in fact all my money I make from this goes into my mom and dads retirement fund as well as 1/4 of every pay check I get from my day job. They have nothing but I'll make sure to tell them fitz says I should quit because I don't believe in it
post #2043 of 3694
Thread getting derailed....

I suppose we should move on to integra dhc issues now.
post #2044 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpete12 View Post

KBarnes:

thanks, that helped quite a bit. I do have a question. Audyssey is setting my surrounds (mk-150's dipole) to 40 hz. There is no way these little speakers are handling these low bass freq's. I have two seaton submersives. Should I change everything to 80, or maybe just the rears, or leave them as is.

I would definitely take the surrounds up to 80 Hz. There's really no downside to that at all. Why make them work so hard when you have two exceptionally capable subs just crying out for the job?
post #2045 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post

Ya for your average joe running a B&M sub with a plate amp and receiver power. For lots of us, we run so excessive that it would have to be a pretty extreme to not be about to EQ fairly flat with electronics alone. Traps can only do so much but as fitz says, there are no traps that work under 100hz so the ONLY way to EQ is electronic

There's no way you'll EQ out a 20 or 30 dB null with electronics. Certainly not with Audyssey as it is designed specifically NOT to even try, for obvious reasons.
post #2046 of 3694
Kbarnes:

I will turn the sides and rears to 80hz. I cant remember what the others were, but I think the center is 100hz should that goto 80 as well (the speaker will easily handle 60 and up)?
post #2047 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post

lol, I never said I didn't edit the curve but isn't personal preference the whole reason to use audyssey in the first place?

No! It's exactly NOT that! The reason to use Audyssey is to try to achieve reference!
post #2048 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpete12 View Post

Kbarnes:

I will turn the sides and rears to 80hz. I cant remember what the others were, but I think the center is 100hz should that goto 80 as well (the speaker will easily handle 60 and up)?

I'd leave the centre at 100 Hz.

4. Is it OK to change the Crossovers (XOs) from Audyssey's recommendation? (click here)

Or, try repositioning it slightly and re-running Audyssey. If it is on a shelf of some sort, move it forward so the leading edge is over the edge of the shelf by about an inch, for example.
post #2049 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

No! It's exactly NOT that! The reason to use Audyssey is to try to achieve reference!

Ya because everyone runs movies at reference? I bet if you took a poll, it would be under 10% of people run movies at reference or even had that as a goal when using audyssey. Most people run it because 1. It's there and why not. 2. try to get the best sound possible out of their equipment with the tools they have. I've personally never heard anyone running audyssey to try to achieve reference. Not to say NO one does but it's not something anyone I've ever talked to has ever brought up.
post #2050 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

There's no way you'll EQ out a 20 or 30 dB null with electronics. Certainly not with Audyssey as it is designed specifically NOT to even try, for obvious reasons.

Thats an extreme null and I said all but the extreme. Not many room will have 20-30dB null but with a dcx2496 or miniDSP, you'd be able to make a good dent out of the nulls and peaks as long as you have some half decent gear that isn't already being pushed to it's limits.
I'm gonna take a wild guess and bet you've never tried either one? Most us DIY guys use these in our systems because of the HPF and the eq.
post #2051 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post

Ya because everyone runs movies at reference? I bet if you took a poll, it would be under 10% of people run movies at reference or even had that as a goal when using audyssey. Most people run it because 1. It's there and why not. 2. try to get the best sound possible out of their equipment with the tools they have. I've personally never heard anyone running audyssey to try to achieve reference. Not to say NO one does but it's not something anyone I've ever talked to has ever brought up.

And neither did Keith.. he wasn't refering to SPL's...

The primary goal of Audyseey to achieve a reference frequency response for your room that closely approximates the environment(s) within which the content was created (i.e. the mixing stage.)

The other technologies they offer on AVR's help people who don't listen at refernce volume acheive the best approximation of what the content creators intended at any listening level.

If you offer your services as a paid "Pro" calibrator, I would expect you would also be able to explain to your "customers" the benefits of all the technologies available in Audyssey Pro capable units, and how it, in the end, will hopefully get them as close to our intended reference (i.e. how we intended the content to sound) regardless of what level they listen to it at.... rather than just telling them to pay extra for a Pro calbiration because "it's there and why not."

Just my .02.

And a friendly piece of advice... a debate is fine, but once the sarcasm sets in, it's really easy to veer into un wanted territory, and can lead to harsh penalties here on AVS... just a word of caution from someone who cares.
post #2052 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpete12 View Post

KBarnes:

thanks, that helped quite a bit. I do have a question. Audyssey is setting my surrounds (mk-150's dipole) to 40 hz. There is no way these little speakers are handling these low bass freq's. I have two seaton submersives. Should I change everything to 80, or maybe just the rears, or leave them as is.

I also have two SubMs & three Cat 12Cs (LCR) My surrounds are four Polk 10Bs & I am currently running them @ 60 Hz. (Audyssey had set them @ 40 Hz)
post #2053 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post

Ya because everyone runs movies at reference? I bet if you took a poll, it would be under 10% of people run movies at reference or even had that as a goal when using audyssey. Most people run it because 1. It's there and why not. 2. try to get the best sound possible out of their equipment with the tools they have. I've personally never heard anyone running audyssey to try to achieve reference. Not to say NO one does but it's not something anyone I've ever talked to has ever brought up.

The entire point of Audyssey is that when you run it (properly) it sets the system to reference. It makes no difference what you say about why people do this or that - that is the purpose of Audyssey, period. For those who want to listen at lower SPLs, that is why Dynamic EQ was developed. The listening SPL and the objective of achieving reference calibrations are two different things.
post #2054 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by N8DOGG View Post

Thats an extreme null and I said all but the extreme. Not many room will have 20-30dB null but with a dcx2496 or miniDSP, you'd be able to make a good dent out of the nulls and peaks as long as you have some half decent gear that isn't already being pushed to it's limits.
I'm gonna take a wild guess and bet you've never tried either one? Most us DIY guys use these in our systems because of the HPF and the eq.

20 to 30 dB nulls are fairly common.
post #2055 of 3694
Any word from Kris Deering regarding the "warmer" temperature bug when setting the receiver to "through"?
I am really curious as to what is happening in the VP of the 80.3. I also hope that Kris asks Onkyo/Integra if they resolved the issue he found when he first reviewed the unit. I am willing to bet they are related.

Paul
post #2056 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Hi Terry.

Yes you can test it without using Direct mode. Make sure you have Source set in the Input Output Assign menu. I think you do already.

Then go to Source Settings menu and go to Picture Adjust. On the Resolution setting, move through the settings until you get to 'Custom'. In that section make sure all the settings are at default but set Res to THROUGH. Back out of the menus.

Now put on a disc and find a screen with a fair bit of white content on it. Pause the disc at that screen.

Then go into the Home menu on the remote and click down to Video. There you will see that you can now switch modes from Through to Direct, Custom etc. What you need to do is first select Through and note the colour of the white part of the image. Then scroll along to Custom (where you also set Through, so it should stay the same) and you will see the white area of the image go whiter. IOW, the colour balance will go from warmer to cooler.

Custom is passing it correctly (as is Direct) and Through is giving a warm bias.

If you see the difference and you want to stay with the 'purer' white colour balance, simply select Custom in Picture Adjust for that source for future use. Make sure you have all the other bits of the custom setting set appropriately (probably all defaults).

Let me know how you get on. I'd guess this is something Onkyo can fix with a FW update once they acknowledge the issue.

EDIT: you may prefer the warmer balance of course. That's why screens etc have colour balance settings. But if your display has been calibrated, and I am guessing it has, then you will want it to be spot on I'd think. I mentioned before that I preferred the warmer tone, but I was using Hugo as a test disc and that has a lovely golden cast over much of the photography in the film and the Through setting enhanced it. I have since made sure I am using Direct for all relevant sources.

Keith, ... Well last night while watching something it just happened to come up with really Large Bold White Letters and I decided this would let me test the image for Whiteness.
This was on Dish HD watching CSI Miami.
I also tested this then with a Blu-Ray Disc, WOW ...

So the one setting (Input Output Assign menu) was "Source".
Then went down to picture and changed it back and forth between "Through" and "Custom".

This might Surprise you and it is going to not be easy for me to put into words but this is what took place.

The "Through" setting is like a (Softer, Dimmer, Off-White) sort of White Image.
The Runco produces so much Light that I did not know it was not as White as it could be.
If I had not read here about the effect of the "Through-Setting" I don't think I would ever have picked up on the image not being Totally-Brilliant-White.
I'm not intending here to Brag about the Runco but trust me it produces a great deal of light.

The {Custom} setting immediately with my Runco VX-11d just goes Crazy-White on the screen.
The Runco VX-11d is a Light-Engine .........
It is so much "Difference" that the image actually in {Custom} is just "Brilliant" to the eyes.
It was such a difference with my Runco producing the Light-Output it does you had to adjust to the New {Custom} setting.

I got the wife up there and did the Test between the two settings and she could not believe the difference.

So, thanks guys for the information on here regarding the settings on the 80.3 in reference to the "Pure-White-Image".

Mine will be on {Custom} forever !!!

Once again I am not on here trying to sell anyone on the Runco.
I use it in reference to why I did not even realize the image I have been looking at was not Totally White.

Terry
post #2057 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigerhonaker View Post

Keith, ... Well last night while watching something it just happened to come up with really Large Bold White Letters and I decided this would let me test the image for Whiteness.
This was on Dish HD watching CSI Miami.
I also tested this then with a Blu-Ray Disc, WOW ...

So the one setting (Input Output Assign menu) was "Source".
Then went down to picture and changed it back and forth between "Through" and "Custom".

This might Surprise you and it is going to not be easy for me to put into words but this is what took place.

The "Through" setting is like a (Softer, Dimmer, Off-White) sort of White Image.

Yes - a slight yellowing of the whites as the balance veers off towards red. Like I said before, you don't really notice it so much until you see the comparison. This is one reason why displays really need to be calibrated rather than set by 'eye'. The human eye is very sensitive to some things and not very sensitive to others, so setting by eye is never reliable. Your experience here is the proof of that - until you saw 'true white' you were happy with the warm white.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tigerhonaker View Post


The {Custom} setting immediately with my Runco VX-11d just goes Crazy-White on the screen.
The Runco VX-11d is a Light-Engine .........
It is so much "Difference" that the image actually in {Custom} is just "Brilliant" to the eyes.
It was such a difference with my Runco producing the Light-Output it does you had to adjust to the New {Custom} setting.

One thing you probably ought to check with your installer, Terry, is what inputs/settings he was using when he did the calibration. If he calibrated it with the unit set to Through, then he will have balanced out the warmness which is being introduced by the bug. If he did, then the Custom setting may well be too bright for the room. A calibrator will calibrate to a light level used in the room when viewing (or to a Day and Night mode if the room is multi-purpose), so your guy will have probably calibrated to a typical dark theatre. If he did that and used the Through setting, it will still be correct - he will have compensated for the artificial warmth introduced by the bug.

Or of course, he may have calibrated to Direct (most likely) in which case your Custom setting is also correct as Custom with a Res of Through is the same as Direct if all the other settings are left untouched. I understand you can't use Direct mode due to handshake issues. If your calibrator did calibrate to Direct then Custom is the mode you want to be using now.
post #2058 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Yes - a slight yellowing of the whites as the balance veers off towards red. Like I said before, you don't really notice it so much until you see the comparison. This is one reason why displays really need to be calibrated rather than set by 'eye'. The human eye is very sensitive to some things and not very sensitive to others, so setting by eye is never reliable. Your experience here is the proof of that - until you saw 'true white' you were happy with the warm white.



One thing you probably ought to check with your installer, Terry, is what inputs/settings he was using when he did the calibration. If he calibrated it with the unit set to Through, then he will have balanced out the warmness which is being introduced by the bug. If he did, then the Custom setting may well be too bright for the room. A calibrator will calibrate to a light level used in the room when viewing (or to a Day and Night mode if the room is multi-purpose), so your guy will have probably calibrated to a typical dark theater. If he did that and used the Through setting, it will still be correct - he will have compensated for the artificial warmth introduced by the bug.

Or of course, he may have calibrated to Direct (most likely) in which case your Custom setting is also correct as Custom with a Res of Through is the same as Direct if all the other settings are left untouched. I understand you can't use Direct mode due to handshake issues. If your calibrator did calibrate to Direct then Custom is the mode you want to be using now.

Keith, ...

Quote:


I understand you can't use Direct mode due to handshake issues. If your calibrator did calibrate to Direct then Custom is the mode you want to be using now.

He used "Direct" for calibration with the Runco set-up.
We did not know there was going to be an issue with "Hand-Shake" issues until we loaded in a Blu-Ray movie.
It still worked but just took way to long to "Lock" onto the Blu-Ray from Dish/Satellite source.
So we then changed from Direct and put it on "Through" which worked fine as far as the "Hand-Shake" issue.

I would not have known to be honest to even check the White Image.
It looked just fine to be honest until I took the Time to Switch between the "Through & Custom" modes.

There is a Big difference when going to Custom with the Runco having the Light Output it does.
And that is even lighting up my 123" screen.

The Blu-Ray movies now have what is referred to as that WOW factor in certain Scenes.

Glad I read this here on AVS and took the Time to check it out.

Regards,
Terry
post #2059 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigerhonaker View Post

Keith, ...


He used "Direct" for calibration with the Runco set-up.
We did not know there was going to be an issue with "Hand-Shake" issues until we loaded in a Blu-Ray movie.
It still worked but just took way to long to "Lock" onto the Blu-Ray from Dish/Satellite source.
So we then changed from Direct and put it on "Through" which worked fine as far as the "Hand-Shake" issue.

I would not have known to be honest to even check the White Image.
It looked just fine to be honest until I took the Time to Switch between the "Through & Custom" modes.

There is a Big difference when going to Custom with the Runco having the Light Output it does.
And that is even lighting up my 123" screen.

The Blu-Ray movies now have what is referred to as that WOW factor in certain Scenes.

Glad I read this here on AVS and took the Time to check it out.

Regards,
Terry

I thought he would have used Direct. Then you are good to go, Terry. Custom (as you have set it) is the same as Direct.
post #2060 of 3694
Does anyone know if this issue was also on the 80.2?
post #2061 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

I thought he would have used Direct. Then you are good to go, Terry. Custom (as you have set it) is the same as Direct.

Keith,

Yes it works the same in regards to not changing the picture at all.

I did take the time to call and let my Integra Dealer know of this situation.

All is A-OK on this end now with Snow White once again.

Sure am glad I kept up with this on going Thread.

Terry
post #2062 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigerhonaker View Post

Keith,

Yes it works the same in regards to not changing the picture at all.

I did take the time to call and let my Integra Dealer know of this situation.

All is A-OK on this end now with Snow White once again.

Sure am glad I kept up with this on going Thread.

Terry

I am glad you have it sorted, Terry. You have spent considerable time and money on your HT and it would be a great pity for a small software bug to spoil it. I am sure that at some stage Onkyo/Integra will release a FW update that fixes it - in the meantime you have a perfect solution.

I'm glad you kept up with the thread too - it is a pleasure to type to you and to see your HT.
post #2063 of 3694
Is there any audible difference in this unit than the 9.9?
post #2064 of 3694
hey Guys, i was thinking of getting this unit. It was either going to be an Anthem MRx receiver or this. Reading up on the Anthem, there seems to be a whole lot of issues with it that dont seem to get resolved. it has been out for a year and a half and still has issues.

So, I was just wondering if there are any known issues with the 80.3? Is there anything that people constantly have problems with or complain about? I am not referring to personal preferences as everybody has their own tastes. I am referring to actual problems with the unit, like it freezes, or doesnt change inputs or pops or whatever. Any well known issues with this model?

Thanks!
post #2065 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by njfoses View Post


I use direct for my bluray source but for directv and wii i would rather have the avr upscale everything to 1080p (which now works without handshake issues after altering the power on sequence of my devices.) I run hdmi and im on the latest firmware. I can use the custom 1080p setting and this conversation becomes a mute point but like kbarnes stated there is no reason the through setting should be altering the color temp.

What's the proper powering sequence to avoid handshake issues: TV, 80.3 and the cable box?
post #2066 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by op76 View Post

What's the proper powering sequence to avoid handshake issues: TV, 80.3 and the cable box?

Whatever works. Different combinations of HDMI systems from different manufacturers react differently. Some don't care at all about the order, but they seem to be in the minority. They're all *supposed* to renegotiate every time any HDMI device changes state-- whether it's a resolution change or a device powering on or off. Different bugs/features in the different firmware used by different manufacturers causes problems.

Edited to add:

A recent article on the AVS home page seems to blame cable set-top boxes for most of the problems. Replacing the STB (with a different model) seems to be their recommendation to fix at least half of the HDMI issues.
post #2067 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by 04rex View Post

hey Guys, i was thinking of getting this unit...So, I was just wondering if there are any known issues with the 80.3? Is there anything that people constantly have problems with or complain about? I am not referring to personal preferences as everybody has their own tastes. I am referring to actual problems with the unit, like it freezes, or doesnt change inputs or pops or whatever. Any well known issues with this model?

I have owned this unit for over six months. No issues so far! Some are bothering by the clicking noises of relays when you change channels or when something else changes, but they do not bother me. Clicks never happen during music playing or while watching a TV program, or when watching a Blu-ray disc.

Look back a few pages. There was an issue about a subtle shift in color balance when switching to Direct (I think). The situation did not apply to me so I did not read it in detail.

In any case, highly recommended. Enjoy!
post #2068 of 3694
Were can I find the discrete codes for 2nd 3rd zones?
post #2069 of 3694
^better question...

Where can I find the discrete IR codes? I'd like to proram my RTI T3v & K3 keypads for direct access.
post #2070 of 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Godking View Post
^better question...

Where can I find the discrete IR codes? I'd like to proram my RTI T3v & K3 keypads for direct access.
Onkyo Hex codes thru 2010 attached. They havent changed them but it's possible some new features may be excluded.

 

Onkyo_IR_AVR_121_(thru_2010_models).xls.zip 238.017578125k . file
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Integra DHC-80.3