Originally Posted by kbarnes701
Tell me, Jeff, do you see no benefit in passive bi-amping?
Well, there's the rub; without an active crossover, separate amps for the different frequency bands and wiring going to individual drivers
, it's not "bi-amping/tri-amping." Somehow I missed how we got to where two sets of full range signals driving two amps connected to speaker cabinets with their own internal passive crossovers is called "bi-amping." I suspect marketing boffos.Here is an excellent explanation of bi-amping and passive "bi-amping
." Note that the first reply comes from a believer.
"In science, contrary evidence causes one to question a theory. In religion, contrary evidence causes one to question the evidence." - Floyd Toole
Don't get me started ...