AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › 'Luck' on HBO
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

'Luck' on HBO - Page 3

post #61 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

So far, the narrative is pretty murky. All that "pick 6" betting action was a jetliner of jargon just flying over my head.

You're not alone. Hopefully it becomes easier to understand as the season goes on.
post #62 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan View Post

I'll be right there with you, I enjoyed John, was sorry to see it canceled.

Oh yeah I forgot. There were three of us.

Quote:
Originally Posted by machpost View Post

You're not alone. Hopefully it becomes easier to understand as the season goes on.

I've read some critical reviews that say it really starts to come together later on and gets very compelling by the end of these first 9 episodes. These first few eps they're setting up the chessboard, introducing the characters, setting the tone, etc. I'll wait on 'em; I'm just not sure how many others will.
post #63 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

All that "pick 6" betting action was a jetliner of jargon just flying over my head.

Most of the actual terms were beyond me but I did get why choosing the 5th horse in the 4th race made sense. By winning that race, the longshot, it not only would pay good for that race but would boost the overall payout on the Pick 6 as very few bettors would have chosen the 5th horse for that race leaving very few to split the proceeds. It was a longshot pick in the ultimate longshot betting strategy, the Pick 6.
post #64 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan View Post

Most of the actual terms were beyond me but I did get why choosing the 5th horse in the 4th race made sense. By winning that race, the longshot, it not only would pay good for that race but would boost the overall payout on the Pick 6 as very few bettors would have chosen the 5th horse for that race leaving very few to split the proceeds. It was a longshot pick in the ultimate longshot betting strategy, the Pick 6.

I know absolutely nothing about horse racing, even though I grew up in West Virginia where there's always been sanctioned racing (at Charlestown). Couple of elementary questions:

Are the horses numbered in any given race according to their respective rank? If so, is that determined by their previous race results or by prejudgment/speculation? Or, is the 5th horse just the horse in the #5 slot in the starting gate?

So, if I pick the 5th horse in a race, that's always a longshot and #1 is always the favorite?
post #65 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

Are the horses numbered in any given race according to their respective rank? If so, is that determined by their previous race results or by prejudgment/speculation? Or, is the 5th horse just the horse in the #5 slot in the starting gate?

No ranking, just a random drawing for the post positions-- which are in numerical order. The only "ranking" would be the "morning odds." These are established by the track odds maker handicapping each race separately and are then listed in the newspapers, programs, etc. The actual odds are based on the pools of money bet on the race.
post #66 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

So far, the narrative is pretty murky. All that "pick 6" betting action was a jetliner of jargon just flying over my head.

I'm glad to find my wife & I weren't the only ones. I've been watching gambling & mob movies a long-long time Both of us were sitting there wondering what the H are they talking about

Part of the problem was jargon and part was the speed of the dialog, even with captioning it was a bit hard to follow the gamblers. Other characters, not so much a problem. Hopefully, we'll catch on. Neither of us are at all familiar with horse racing.

I don't remember if Deadwood threw the viewer right in the middle of the story like that, it's been a few yrs since I watched it again on disc. But it seems to me Milch did similar things. It took an ep or 2 to sort out the style of the show.
post #67 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

I'm glad to find my wife & I weren't the only ones. I've been watching gambling & mob movies a long-long time Both of us were sitting there wondering what the H are they talking about

Part of the problem was jargon and part was the speed of the dialog, even with captioning it was a bit hard to follow the gamblers. Other characters, not so much a problem. Hopefully, we'll catch on. Neither of us are at all familiar with horse racing.

I don't remember if Deadwood threw the viewer right in the middle of the story like that, it's been a few yrs since I watched it again on disc. But it seems to me Milch did similar things. It took an ep or 2 to sort out the style of the show.

David Milch refuses to spell things out for the viewer. He wants you to dig in and discover things for yourself. Most of his writing is better appreciated after multiple viewings. He flat refuses to "write down" to the common viewer.
The end result is usually a LOT of information and story packed into very few lines, there are no "small lines". Every word is there for a reason.
post #68 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post


Part of the problem was jargon and part was the speed of the dialog, even with captioning it was a bit hard to follow the gamblers. Other characters, not so much a problem. Hopefully, we'll catch on. Neither of us are at all familiar with horse racing.

I posit that it isn't really necessary to understand the finer points of gambling to understand what was taking place. The serial gamblers were riding the coattails of the "gifted but flawed" gambling ace using the money of the flunky who flittered into their circle. Their plan was an intricate longshot, and it played out as a win. Now we watch how well (how poorly) they hold together as a group, and witness the various strengths and weaknesses of humanity in play.

Milch is simply awesome at illustrating the jeweled and flawed aspects of humanity, regardless of the setting he chooses to use: the old West or a racetrack.
post #69 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdgrimes View Post

David Milch refuses to spell things out for the viewer. He wants you to dig in and discover things for yourself. Most of his writing is better appreciated after multiple viewings. He flat refuses to "write down" to the common viewer.
The end result is usually a LOT of information and story packed into very few lines, there are no "small lines". Every word is there for a reason.

Exactly, and here is a good article I posted in the HOTP thread a few weeks ago where he actually says that... check out specifically the 4th paragraph starting with "Of racing...


http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...1#post21496041
WSJ

HBO Takes Its Money to the Track

'Luck' has Dustin Hoffman, the 'Degenerates' and fractious, thoroughbred producers

By JOHN JURGENSEN

During a climactic horse race in the first episode of the new HBO series "Luck," four crusty gamblers try to win $2.7 million on a complex betting scenario known as a Pick Six. As the horses pound down the track and the stakes rise, one bettor looks confused. "What's happening?" he asks his more seasoned cohorts. "Will someone please tell me what's happening?"


"Luck," HBO's new show with Dustin Hoffman, Nick Nolte and John Ortiz, is set in the world of horse racing and features the return of "Deadwood" writer David Milch, John Jurgensen reports on Lunch Break. Photo: HBO.

The question is really on behalf of the viewers, most of whom will have little knowledge of the sport and its arcana. The same insular details that make racing ripe for on-screen drama also make it daunting to follow the stories. That tension has helped spur anticipation for "Luck," which marks Dustin Hoffman's first recurring role on television and a sometimes-fraught collaboration between executive producer Michael Mann and series creator David Milch, a lifelong devotee of the sport whose previous TV output includes the HBO western "Deadwood." The series starts Jan. 29.

Of racing, Mr. Milch said, "This is not a world that is easily known." He compares track denizens to adolescents in their use of intentionally "exclusionary language"triple boxes, Beyer figures, running for a tag. Add to that Mr. Milch's self-acknowledged reputation as a "slow unfolding" storyteller. (Indeed, a sneak preview of the "Luck" pilot last month tried some viewers' patience: one Twitter user compared it to "a stylish foreign-language film with the subtitles missing.") But Mr. Milch maintains that the audience bears some responsibility to meet him halfway: "It's a kind of contract that the viewer is willing to enter into."

"Luck" is set at Santa Anita, the sun-drenched Art Deco racetrack near Los Angeles. The location, and a powerful horse, figure into a long-game revenge plan by a taciturn crime kingpin recently released from prison, played by Mr. Hoffman. Among the other track archetypes: a haunted old horseman played by Nick Nolte; John Ortiz's gifted but unscrupulous trainer; an unpredictable jockey played by real-life Hall of Famer Gary Stevens; and the four scheming gamblers referred to in the script as the "Degenerates."

Behind the scenes, tensions smoldered between Messrs. Mann and Milch. In addition to the challenge of how to effectively render the racing culture in faithful detail, the two men, both known for their distinctive creative vision, clashed over control issues. To persevere, they negotiated a strict division of labor. Mr. Mann, who executive-produced"Miami Vice" and directed many films, including "Heat," said, "David's the boss on the writing, and I run everything from that point," including casting, music and hiring directors.

Mr. Milch, who wrote for groundbreaking Steven Bochco series including "Hill Street Blues" and "NYPD Blue," is known for a rigorous"I don't want to say insane," says Mr. Stevensattention to research and narrative detail. He produces scripts by dictation while prone and often leaning on an elbow, resulting in two torn rotator cuffs, the writer says.

The world of "Luck" is deeply familiar to Mr. Milch. His dad first took him to the track at Saratoga Springs, N.Y., at age 5. Some 60 years later, Mr. Milch says he still keeps a box there in his father's name. The writer has co-owned many horses, including one named Gilded Time that Mr. Stevens rode ("one of the best I sat on") before the colt went on to become a Breeders' Cup champion in 1992.

In "Luck," Mr. Milch said, he was less interested in portraying the world of moneyed owners and breeders than that of the sport's seedier devotees. "I've been with them my whole life," he said. "Any regular at the racetrack has some degenerate in them, and some are utterly so. Those were the ones I was interested in."

Though the first nine-episode season of "Luck" was shot at Santa Anita while the track was in season, Mr. Milch says he never hit the betting windows. "You can only serve one master at a time," he said.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...ridayjournal_2[/quote]
post #70 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by LL3HD View Post

HBO Takes Its Money to the Track

'Luck' has Dustin Hoffman, the 'Degenerates' and fractious, thoroughbred producers

By JOHN JURGENSEN


Mr. Milch, who wrote for groundbreaking Steven Bochco series including "Hill Street Blues" and "NYPD Blue," is known for a rigorous—"I don't want to say insane," says Mr. Stevens—attention to research and narrative detail. He produces scripts by dictation while prone and often leaning on an elbow, resulting in two torn rotator cuffs, the writer says.

Hey, who says writers aren't athletes? Milch had to go on injured reserve and couldn't dictate for 2 months.
post #71 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph View Post

Milch is simply awesome at illustrating the jeweled and flawed aspects of humanity, regardless of the setting he chooses to use: the old West or a racetrack.

He sure did that in Deadwood. I've seen the whole series start to finish twice. I would agree that it was brilliantly executed & acted. The barrage of profanity took some time to get used to but even that seemed realistic for a gold rush frontier town where hookers, drunks, crooks, the dregs of society would be commonplace.

Luck certainly has potential.
post #72 of 263
Found the pilot boring.
post #73 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

Oh yeah I forgot. There were three of us.

Four! I loved JFC, mainly for how off-beat it was.

larry
post #74 of 263
As one who has 'singled' a horse on a Pick 6 ticket more than once, I enjoyed the episode. Also liked the scenes from 'the backside' (the barns and training areas not open to the public) and hall of fame jockey Gary Stevens made an apperance as well.
post #75 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandu View Post

As one who has 'singled' a horse on a Pick 6 ticket more than once, I enjoyed the episode. Also liked the scenes from 'the backside' (the barns and training areas not open to the public) and hall of fame jockey Gary Stevens made an apperance as well.

Been there ... But what's great about Gary Stevens, in that scene after the horse was put down, was his performance. No "real" actor could have sold that line (...Jim Beam) as gut wrenchingly perfect as he did. I look forward to more heartfelt scenes with him.
post #76 of 263
Good to see Frank Holman from Crime Story at the beginning of last night's Luck...Pauli and Ray next???
post #77 of 263
I found I had to really pay attention to gather the meaning of the "jargon" those folks around the track use. Still, I'm glad they didn't explain everything to us neophytes. Also, there are still a lot of gaps in the characters' backstories that they can explore later.

I have only two specific complaints:
1) Despite Mann's usual brilliant direction, I'm getting very tired of the ubiquitous shakycam/woozy focus/teal'n'orange tricks;
2) Yet another show/movie with virtually an all-white cast? OK, there was one Latino, but other than a few other ethnicities seen briefly in long shots, everybody was Euro. I'm white, but it seems a bit unrealistic in today's world.

I'll try to stick with subsequent episodes.
post #78 of 263
Couple of questions:
1) Why did Escalante put the horse up for claim? Trying to drive up the odds? If so, he got greedy.
2) Why does Ace need a go-between? I'm having some trouble seeing what his strategy is going forward.

jdg
post #79 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDG View Post

Couple of questions:
1) Why did Escalante put the horse up for claim? Trying to drive up the odds? If so, he got greedy.

Yes, trying to make money betting on the horse. He didn't want anyone to claim it, just drive up the odds.
Quote:


2) Why does Ace need a go-between? I'm having some trouble seeing what his strategy is going forward.

jdg

He's scamming the group that let him go to prison. Not sure yet, but the object might be to make them lose a lot of money on the investment.
post #80 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdgrimes View Post

Yes, trying to make money betting on the horse. He didn't want anyone to claim it, just drive up the odds.

He's scamming the group that let him go to prison. Not sure yet, but the object might be to make them lose a lot of money on the investment.

Part 1 - went over my head We couldn't figure out the deal with the claim.
Part 2 - no problem figuring that out - I'm there. Payback!

This will be like Nucky setting up his enemies in BE only in slow motion, layers on layers of making the scam seem like a good deal to his "partners"

Should be fun to watch unfold
post #81 of 263
The show is starting to grow on me. I'm liking it but you really have to pay attention understand all the dialogue. It looks like Ace's bedroom talk is going to end each show?

larry
post #82 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdgrimes View Post

Yes, trying to make money betting on the horse. He didn't want anyone to claim it, just drive up the odds.

He's scamming the group that let him go to prison. Not sure yet, but the object might be to make them lose a lot of money on the investment.

I also thought that Ace, being just released from prison, wants to keep a low profile and not have his name directly associated with any questionable business.

Doug
post #83 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by PooperScooper View Post

It looks like Ace's bedroom talk is going to end each show?

larry

Maybe.
post #84 of 263
Nice to see currently active jockey Chantal Sutherland get a quick cameo.
post #85 of 263
Okay, I admit it - I'm officially lost in this show's byzantine jargon, mumbled dialog, and murky plotlines. I had no trouble following JfC or Deadwood, so I don't think it's just me. I watch with a buddy - also a veteran of those previous Milch efforts, and he's been scratching his head as well.

Going to have to go to HBO.com and try to get some cheat sheets, do a relationship outline on paper, and try to sort it all out. Will have to turn on subtitles as well to understand what the hell they're saying. But I'm hanging in there!
post #86 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

Okay, I admit it - I'm officially lost in this show's byzantine jargon, mumbled dialog, and murky plotlines. I had no trouble following JfC or Deadwood, so I don't think it's just me. I watch with a buddy - also a veteran of those previous Milch efforts, and he's been scratching his head as well.

Going to have to go to HBO.com and try to get some cheat sheets, do a relationship outline on paper, and try to sort it all out. Will have to turn on subtitles as well to understand what the hell they're saying. But I'm hanging in there!

Well you must know how much I love this show but I do get a laugh out of your tactics. You're a true loyal solder

Actually, I've had to resort to the CC feature on this one and it's no fault of the audio quality. They talk fast/loud/low and mumble too, just like in real life. I wish I could CC some conversations I've had but if I had a real life option I'd ask the genie for a real life DVR but I digress.

I found DW to be much more pleasurable after I popped on the CC. However on BD the CC was very slick and easy. With my FIOS I have what seems like countless options and variations on fonts etc. After 10 minutes of tinkering I now have a very nice CC set up and I am now “hearing” their dialogue much better. And as I said, this is no knock to the mix. I love the overall audio etc.
post #87 of 263
Me three on the CC issue, and I listen at, or very near, a reference level so I know it's not a hearing or gain issue.

From a post in the HOTP thread, emphasis by me,
Quote:
Question: Watched the first episode of Luck. It looked gorgeous. The cast is outrageously talented. Unfortunately, it felt like John From Cincinnati. Is this worth sticking with, or is this another HBO vanity project whose grasp exceeded its reach? — Rick

Matt Roush: Luck is nowhere near as inscrutable and self-consciously opaque as John From Cincinnati, although even when you can understand what the actors are saying — lots of method mumbling going on here, delivering that peculiar David Milch-ian syntax — you may not always understand what they're talking about, because they often speak in horse code. There's no question Luck is a test of the viewers' patience, and like many HBO dramas, isn't always seen to its best advantage in weekly hour-long chapters. But even consuming the entire nine-episode series over a couple of days, as I did earlier this year, wasn't as satisfying as I'd hoped, though as you'd expect, there are some terrific and moving moments along the way, usually involving horses, and there are some exceptionally acted character studies. For some, including a stable of discerning critics, that's enough to balance things out in the win column. I'm not so sure.
post #88 of 263
I just make believe I understand what they're saying and I'm much happier. Seriously, I don't think I'm totally in the dark. I'm just waiting to see how it plays out.

What was the Peruvian trainer saying to Ace about his horse - something about it's legs being messed up? That isn't the same horse, Delphi, that Nolte was talking about that had it's legs broken for the 30 million dollar insurance policy? I wouldn't think a race horse could come back after having broken legs.

larry
post #89 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

I had no trouble following JfC...

OK: you just lost all credibility with this statement. ;-)

jdg
post #90 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDG View Post

OK: you just lost all credibility with this statement. ;-)

jdg

I was talking about the jargon and the mumbling. In JfC, although the plotline was waaay out there, they spoke a form of English I'm familiar with. I had no trouble hearing and understanding the dialog in 'Deadwood' as well. That's not the case here.

I'm not begrudging Milch his right to make the show he wants to make. He thinks the audience will gradually come to understand all the "horse-talk" and betting jargon after a number of hours of exposure to it. I'm just not sure they will, and they may start to flee from this show as they did with JfC. But there's really no excuse for all the unintelligible mumbling. They could fix most of that with dialog looping in post, seems to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LL3HD View Post

Well you must know how much I love this show but I do get a laugh out of your tactics. You're a true loyal solder.

Yeah, I'll follow General Milch wherever he leads. But this is the most difficult campaign yet. Winter at Valley Forge difficult.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › 'Luck' on HBO