AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › OWNERS Thread for the Panasonic PT-AE7000U 3D Projector
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

OWNERS Thread for the Panasonic PT-AE7000U 3D Projector - Page 110

post #3271 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumper View Post

Hi all, also new to this thread. Have been reading lots and also didn't find my answer.

Got a home theater of 32m2 with a 170" 2.35:1 screen with active masking and curtains to mask back to 16:9. All powered by the PT-AT5000, Onkyo TX-NR5009, Apple TV3 and a Media PC with the nVidia GForce GT430. All HDMI 1.4.
I just came from the TX-NR5007 and PT-AE3000.
All of the above including 5 different light sources are controlled by computer home automation software. The reason I bought the PT-AT5000 is because I could not control the 3000's Lens Memory using rs232 and I want all to be automatic! In the 5000/7000 I don't use the auto zoom feature but rather have my computer control the zoom. I can do that because my software knows the aspect of all my content. This way I can control the curtains and masking as well.

But since I now got the 5000 and all is HDMI1.4 I am looking into 3D as well.
My question is this: How do I get to auto detect 3D while using a PC? My setup doesn't detect my Side by Side nor my Over Under movies automatically hence I have to start punching buttons on my touchscreen again to go to the 3D menu and select the appropriate 3D standard which kind of defeats the point of automation

It is also difficult to come up with macro's for this since all the menus are too smart. The last cursor position is stored and they are rotary so I cannot reset the menu cursor to the top and than go down one to get to the right menu option. Also there are no rs232 commands other than the 3D menu itself to be called for what I want to select.


Other than that:
- Love the color output
- Seems to be more silent than my 3000 in ECO but way louder in Normal lamp mode
- 3D is very dim but I am still waiting for my third gen glasses. Now using 2nd gen so hopefully that will change some of the effects
- Obviously love the fact that Lens Memory can now be controlled using rs232 which was the reason I bought it in the first place.

So if anybody has any pointers as to get my system to autodetect 3D, I would much appreciate that!

Richard

Bumper Richard, it sounds like you have a superb setup. Can you post pics of it? I enjoy seeing other HTs and I like comparing them to my DYI setup.

Wolfie
post #3272 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markoto View Post

Do you have Tron 3D Dreamliner? How is it on your screen?..The lens won't shift between 1.78:1 and 2.35:1 ratio when i watch it in 3D . Not sure what to do.

Anyone with 2.35:1 screen, how do you set up your screen and AE7000 when u have to watch a 3D movie that has two aspect ratio in it like Tron 3D. since the auto lens shift won't work when u watch it in 3D.

I set it to 2.35:1 at the beginning but when the 3D imax scenes come. It's too big for my screen and i can't do the auto shift or zoom functions.

sorry for my English

Unfortunately, 3D lens memory won't work with multi-aspect ratio movies. I would fix the lens memory to the tallest vertical AR of the film and go from there. You'll have the top and bottom black bars with the widescreen portions of the film, but it'll at least be watchable.

Wolfie
post #3273 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckenisell View Post

So, if I have a 2.35:1 screen and I try to watch The Dark Knight, the projector will use lens shift to switch aspect ratios and fill the screen vertically?

But, if the movie is in 3D (like Tron) and switches aspect ratios, then I just need to set it to IMAX aspect ratio and then during the 2.35:1 parts, it will just be black bars on top, bottom and sides?

that's my only problem with this projector.


Thank you Dreamliner
post #3274 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfie View Post

Unfortunately, 3D lens memory won't work with multi-aspect ratio movies. I would fix the lens memory to the tallest vertical AR of the film and go from there. You'll have the top and bottom black bars with the widescreen portions of the film, but it'll at least be watchable.

Wolfie

Thank you wolfie.
post #3275 of 4344
Some pictures as requested..
LL
LL
LL
LL
post #3276 of 4344
And the 16:9 masking setting..

BTW, these pictures were taken just before I got the 5000. Now you see the 3000 still hanging
LL
post #3277 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumper View Post

Some pictures as requested..

Very nice set-up. I did notice, though, that you have no masking for the top horizontal edge. Any particular reason you did it that way?

Wolfie
post #3278 of 4344
There simply is not much room to paint a black top masking. 16:9 fills exactly to the top and a full 2.35:1 zoomed out left and right would also hit the top. However right at the top my ceiling starts and it would look a bit odd to paint a black line which is actually not directly on the screen. Still thinking about it though but it doesn't bother me that much.

I think I got the answer to my question as well. I probably need Windows 7 with nVidia 3DTV. I still run XP Pro. So now I have two good reasons to upgrade... DTS HD Master audio and 3DTV. Both cannot be done using XP. Since I run over 25 rs232 ports controlling all kinds of devices, upgrading is not going to be a simple task.

Did you post screenshots of your DIY somewhere? Mine is completely DIY as well btw.
post #3279 of 4344
Has anyone found a solution to the slight lag that happens every once in a while for non-bluray material? I get it on my HTPC every few minutes and althought it is very slight, it still bothers me. I also notice it occasionally on fios/cable.

There are a lot of pages on it somewhere in the middle of the thread but I haven't seen anything on it for quite a while.

Blurays play fine. I assume this comes down to something about how the PS3 sends the signal vs a HTPC.
post #3280 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKNice View Post

Has anyone found a solution to the slight lag that happens every once in a while for non-bluray material? I get it on my HTPC every few minutes and althought it is very slight, it still bothers me. I also notice it occasionally on fios/cable.

There are a lot of pages on it somewhere in the middle of the thread but I haven't seen anything on it for quite a while.

Blurays play fine. I assume this comes down to something about how the PS3 sends the signal vs a HTPC.

Is it similar to what ejhuzy and I discussed on the previous two pages (108 & 109)?
post #3281 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamliner View Post

^ the projector holds 5 (or 6) lens save positions, so you have no problem doing what you are thinking about.

It also needs to be mounted at a height still within the screen image.

I would consider using a large 16 x 9 fixed screen with a screen masking system.

I do not like drop down screens, as you typically can see roller lines.

A masking system would without question have more if an awe effect.

With variable height screen masking, you could perfectly setup masking for 2.35:1, 2.39:1, 2.40:1, 1.85:1, 1.78:1.

And regular TV could be 16x9 within 2.35:1.

You'd basically be able to mask anything from TV to IMAX without an bars or cropping.

Thanks for your input!

We can sit *up to* 14' (eyes to screen) in the room currently designated. Someone I spoke to who might be our installer (anyone dealt with Bang & Olufsen?) recommended 106" 2:4:1, and no larger than 110" as perfect. They offered to bring a projector and audition sizes before making a final decision. Also, we're limited on throw distance as well, so screens above 115" won't work according to the Panny calculator.

BUT, you are right, the 113" 16:9 Black Diamond (55.5" x 98.6"), will accommodate the same Scope image as the 106" 2:4:1 screen (40.8" x 97.8") that I was planning on. How would I project the 2:35 image, so that it appears exactly as it would zoomed on a Scope screen (40.8" x 97.8")? Does all of this limit how/where I mount the projector?

What masking would you recommend? I originally considered the Carada Masquerade, but that cash is going into other parts of the house now that we're not building a dedicated bat cave. Are there any magnet based masking panels out there?
post #3282 of 4344
No I have a 16:9 screen. It's so strange that some 16:9 content does not quite fill the screen at the top, but others do. Again all content I'm talking about I believe is 16:9. Some give me a small 3 inch or do black bar at the top only. Totally filled screen at the bottom. Anyone know why this is?
post #3283 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyper_Eye View Post

Is it similar to what ejhuzy and I discussed on the previous two pages (108 & 109)?

It sounds similar.. Sorry I must have read over your posts. I don't know if you mentioned this or if I read it elsewhere in this thread, but changing my htpc to 50hz and setting plex to adjust refresh rate to match video got rid of it almost completely!

Thanks.
post #3284 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKNice View Post

Has anyone found a solution to the slight lag that happens every once in a while for non-bluray material? I get it on my HTPC every few minutes and althought it is very slight, it still bothers me. I also notice it occasionally on fios/cable.

There are a lot of pages on it somewhere in the middle of the thread but I haven't seen anything on it for quite a while.

Blurays play fine. I assume this comes down to something about how the PS3 sends the signal vs a HTPC.

Probably discussed earlier as well, but video slowing down or speeding up every once in a while has to do with refresh rates vs audio syncing to video. Most movies are 23.975 frames per second so if 24p is selected the video will not be a 100% in sync resulting in frame dropping or changing video speed to get the audio back in sync after a while.
NTSC @ 25fps will be much more noticeable on 24p. Every second one frame has to be dropped. Reclock tries to solve this issue by averaging this video frame problem so it can't be seen but still every now and then it shows. I had lots of trouble with it and it all went away when stepping up to 60Hz.
Simple thought; create multiples of the video frames into your Hz setting to give the computer some time to fix the problem.
24 * 2.5 = 60 (Cinema)
30 * 2 = 60 (NTSC)
25 * x = 60 (PAL) -> at least the pc has much time or many frames to fix your sync.

Now try 24 frames @ 50Hz. 2 * 24 = 48 leaving the pc with 2 frames thus creating a problem which shows in speed changes in video. Hope this makes a bit of sense. Just up your refresh rate to the highest possible and you will see the least lip sync problems together with video speed changes.
post #3285 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumper View Post

Probably discussed earlier as well, but video slowing down or speeding up every once in a while has to do with refresh rates vs audio syncing to video. Most movies are 23.975 frames per second so if 24p is selected the video will not be in sync resulting in frame dropping or chaning video speed to get the audio back in sync.
NTSC @ 25fps will be much more noticeable on 24p. Reclock tries to solve this issue by averaging this video frame problem so it can't be seen but still every now and then it shows. I had lots of trouble with it and it all went away when stepping up to 60Hz.
Simple thought; create multiples of the video frames into your Hz setting to give the computer some time to fix the problem.
24 * 2.5 = 60 (Cinema)
30 * 2 = 60 (NTSC)
25 * x = 60 (PAL) -> at least the pc has much time or many frames to fix your sync.

Now try 24 frames @ 50Hz. 2 * 24 = 48 leaving the pc with 2 frames thus creating a problem which shows in speed changes in video. Hope this makes a bit of sense. Just up your refresh rate to the highest possible and you will see the least lip sync problems together with video speed changes.

Thanks Bumper, but I had all of my problems at the highest hz which was 60. I have literally tried every setting on the AE7000 and I thought every setting in the Nvidia control panel on my HTPC. It wasn't until I landed on 50hz in the pc settings and the player was on adjust refresh to match video (ie. mostly 23.975) that it's finally buttery smooth. It may be placebo, but I think the lips are not 100% perfect as they were when I was at 60hz, but they certainly won't be noticeable for anyone watching in my theater.

Thanks for the info though.. I don't understand everything you said, but I think that having the 23.975 being closer to half of 50hz has finally gotten me straight.

-TK
post #3286 of 4344
I can't fix the issue the same way obviously because I am not using an HTPC. I am having this issue with Directv and Xbox 360. I still need to try bypassing my receiver. Should bypassing my receiver work I am still going to have an issue though as that is not really an option.
post #3287 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumper View Post

It is also difficult to come up with macro's for this since all the menus are too smart. The last cursor position is stored and they are rotary so I cannot reset the menu cursor to the top and than go down one to get to the right menu option. Also there are no rs232 commands other than the 3D menu itself to be called for what I want to select.

I've tried making macros like down, down, down, enter, down, down, enter... then everything backwards to restore initial selection state of the menu. But even that doesn't work - depending on whether input signal is 2D or 3D, sometimes some items in submenus are grayed out and skipped, or enabled when you don't expect them, so it seems it is just not possible to make a macro that would always work

It may be possible with a custom rs232 application that would first query the projector "what mode are you in?", then decide which commands to send... was too lazy so far to do it , but it's not too difficult actually...
post #3288 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyper_Eye View Post

I can't fix the issue the same way obviously because I am not using an HTPC. I am having this issue with Directv and Xbox 360. I still need to try bypassing my receiver. Should bypassing my receiver work I am still going to have an issue though as that is not really an option.

I'm having the issue with a Directv DVR that doesn't give me the control over the frame rate. I believe everything is output at 60p/i.

Hyper, I'm not sure what to hope for regarding removing the AVR from the equation. Either way we have a problem, either it's the AVR or the Panny.

What AVR are you using? I'm using a Pioneer Elite VSX-01.

I personally believe this is a bug in the 7k. Just my guess though.
post #3289 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejhuzy View Post

I'm having the issue with a Directv DVR that doesn't give me the control over the frame rate. I believe everything is output at 60p/i.

Hyper, I'm not sure what to hope for regarding removing the AVR from the equation. Either way we have a problem, either it's the AVR or the Panny.

What AVR are you using? I'm using a Pioneer Elite VSX-01.

I personally believe this is a bug in the 7k. Just my guess though.

It is a Yamaha RX-V471. I also think this is a bug with the 7k. I used the same cables and AVR with the Epson 8700UB and I tested a BenQ W6000 with them for around a week. I never saw this issue before I hooked up the Panny.
post #3290 of 4344
My AE7000 died today. Turned it on for the first time in about a week and the lamp light started blinking and it shut off. The lamp is fine and when I called support and told them the lamp status light was blinking and not solid, they immediately told me I had to send it back for repair. Cross-shipping was not an option and they don't cover shipping to (only back from) so that's costing me $40. No clue when I'll get it back, either. All told, not a fun evening.
post #3291 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by modul8tr View Post

recommended 106" 2:4:1, and no larger than 110" as perfect. They offered to bring a projector and audition sizes before making a final decision. Also, we're limited on throw distance as well, so screens above 115" won't work according to the Panny calculator.

My projector is at about 16 feet from the screen and I'm about 14 feet away.

My screen is 136" (scope).

Make sure to calculate distance using the manual (downloadable).

I really think it's tough to go "too big". If you go too small, you'll eventually want bigger, I've never seen a 'its too big' thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by modul8tr View Post

BUT, you are right, the 113" 16:9 Black Diamond (55.5" x 98.6"), will accommodate the same Scope image as the 106" 2:4:1 screen (40.8" x 97.8") that I was planning on. How would I project the 2:35 image, so that it appears exactly as it would zoomed on a Scope screen (40.8" x 97.8")? Does all of this limit how/where I mount the projector?

If your using a 16:9 screen, you'd never need to adjust the projector for anything other than TV (if you wanted it smaller to maintain the awe-effect of movies).

Think of it this way: scope is referred to as CIH (constant image height) because the height stays the same for all aspects and the width changes.... 16x9 is CIW (constant image width) because the width stays the same for all aspects and the height changes.

If I was planning a dedicated room, personally, I would choose a 16x9 screen limited only by physical room limitations (ceiling, heads, etc). I would get one that is acoustically transparent and put my speakers behind it.

Go see an IMAX movie and tell me you notice that the 95% of the film isn't filling the screen horizontally.

Go big, fill your field of vision and post pics.
post #3292 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by xamphear View Post

My AE7000 died today. Turned it on for the first time in about a week and the lamp light started blinking and it shut off. The lamp is fine and when I called support and told them the lamp status light was blinking and not solid, they immediately told me I had to send it back for repair. Cross-shipping was not an option and they don't cover shipping to (only back from) so that's costing me $40. No clue when I'll get it back, either. All told, not a fun evening.

Bummer. Keep us updated. How many hours? I'm already over 1200, I'm glad I bought the 4 year extended warranty.
post #3293 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by xamphear View Post

My AE7000 died today. Turned it on for the first time in about a week and the lamp light started blinking and it shut off. The lamp is fine and when I called support and told them the lamp status light was blinking and not solid, they immediately told me I had to send it back for repair. Cross-shipping was not an option and they don't cover shipping to (only back from) so that's costing me $40. No clue when I'll get it back, either. All told, not a fun evening.


Dude, seriously, how are you gonna cope? Do you have a back-up pj? That's what I have, just in case. My old pj still works and I have it as a back-up. It would still be a pain to remove if mine went down, though. So far, no problems for me.

Wolfie
post #3294 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamliner View Post

Bummer. Keep us updated. How many hours? I'm already over 1200, I'm glad I bought the 4 year extended warranty.

You obvbiously love yours. I'm barely over 1000 and I play mine an average of 5 hours every day and much more on the wekends.
post #3295 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamliner View Post

Bummer. Keep us updated. How many hours? I'm already over 1200, I'm glad I bought the 4 year extended warranty.

I'm not sure, but it had to have been less than 1000. The lack of it being functional makes it hard to check, but if I had to guess I'd say no more than 800 tops. Probably closer to 500.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfie View Post


Dude, seriously, how are you gonna cope? Do you have a back-up pj? That's what I have, just in case. My old pj still works and I have it as a back-up. It would still be a pain to remove if mine went down, though. So far, no problems for me.

No backup, unfortunately. I sold my AE2000 to a friend after I got the AE7000. I'll just be doing a lot of reading and playing around on my PC for the next couple weeks.
post #3296 of 4344
xamphear, sorry to hear about your poorly 7000. I'm sure you'll get a working one before you know it!

FYI, for others waiting on responses re: 3D crosstalk, I'm supposed to hear something today, finally. Will keep you all posted!
post #3297 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by xamphear View Post

My AE7000 died today. Turned it on for the first time in about a week and the lamp light started blinking and it shut off. The lamp is fine and when I called support and told them the lamp status light was blinking and not solid, they immediately told me I had to send it back for repair. Cross-shipping was not an option and they don't cover shipping to (only back from) so that's costing me $40. No clue when I'll get it back, either. All told, not a fun evening.

That's one thing I'm grateful to Epson for. Granted, I'm on my second 8100 and the third bulb (both previous bulbs died prematurely) but Epson stands by their products. Not only did they send me refurbs or new bulbs, they covered shipping in its entirety and shipped replacements overnight to me. Sure, Epson QC might be suspect but they stand behind their products.

Epson's customer service has been STELLAR. I've heard Panasonic's is not so much.
post #3298 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamliner View Post

My projector is at about 16 feet from the screen and I'm about 14 feet away.

My screen is 136" (scope).

Make sure to calculate distance using the manual (downloadable).

I really think it's tough to go "too big". If you go too small, you'll eventually want bigger, I've never seen a 'its too big' thread.

If your using a 16:9 screen, you'd never need to adjust the projector for anything other than TV (if you wanted it smaller to maintain the awe-effect of movies).

Think of it this way: scope is referred to as CIH (constant image height) because the height stays the same for all aspects and the width changes.... 16x9 is CIW (constant image width) because the width stays the same for all aspects and the height changes.

If I was planning a dedicated room, personally, I would choose a 16x9 screen limited only by physical room limitations (ceiling, heads, etc). I would get one that is acoustically transparent and put my speakers behind it.

Go see an IMAX movie and tell me you notice that the 95% of the film isn't filling the screen horizontally.

Go big, fill your field of vision and post pics.

Thanks again for you insight, it has been very helpful.

Yesterday I explored creating a variable image size system, using a 10' wide scope screen. The reason being I still wanted a larger 16:9 pic for 3D. The problem is putting it on the wall that could accommodate it, might create an awkward seating layout that would ruin the flow of traffic between rooms. Also, doesn't seem I would be able to fill that full 10' width (an off the shelf Black Diamond) with my throw distance, so vertical masking would be necessary unless I went custom.

The opposite wall has a 108" wide space that seems to be the favored position for this project. However, due to the Revel F12's I'm planning to use for front L/R, I need just under 10" on either side. This makes the 106" 16:9 Black Diamond the current choice. This gives me a 93" wide CinemaScope picture, which is much larger than anything I've ever seen in my own home. And I get to use the speakers I'm really set on.

If I fill up the full 108" width, I'd have to go with an AT screen, get into framing that we were not planning (staircase on the other side of the wall), and potentially different/smaller speakers.

From your pics it looks like you have a white ceiling? Does the back scatter from the ceiling negatively affect the PQ on your Carada? Or are you finding the Panasonic bright enough to offset this? Our ceiling is going to be a crisp white, with dark'ish blue walls. This is part of the reason I was going to go Black Diamond, however, if I find it's not such a big deal I might consider a Stewart, Carada, or Da-LIte.
post #3299 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by modul8tr View Post

From your pics it looks like you have a white ceiling? Does the back scatter from the ceiling negatively affect the PQ on your Carada? Or are you finding the Panasonic bright enough to offset this? Our ceiling is going to be a crisp white, with dark'ish blue walls. This is part of the reason I was going to go Black Diamond, however, if I find it's not such a big deal I might consider a Stewart, Carada, or Da-LIte.

If it was a dedicated room I probably would have went with a dark ceiling, but honestly, I don't even notice the ceiling or any PQ issues because of it (I was initially very concerned because of the soffit over half the screen). My walls are painted a dark blue (I even repainted the ceiling white) and it sure looks nice.

I worked in Pro AV for a few years and worked with Stewart and Da-Lite, I find Carada to be higher quality than Da-Lite.
post #3300 of 4344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamliner View Post

My projector is at about 16 feet from the screen and I'm about 14 feet away.

I am similar. Projector is 15 feet away and I'm about 13.5 feet away.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamliner View Post

I really think it's tough to go "too big". If you go too small, you'll eventually want bigger, I've never seen a 'its too big' thread.

Exactly my thoughts as well. I think bigger is better. I've been playing with the zoom and some 3D content and I MUCH more prefer bigger for 3D. I wasn't happy until I was watching 16x9 3D that spanned the height of the entire wall.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamliner View Post

Think of it this way: scope is referred to as CIH (constant image height) because the height stays the same for all aspects and the width changes.... 16x9 is CIW (constant image width) because the width stays the same for all aspects and the height changes.

I'm still not sure if I want to go with CIW or CIH. If I go with CIH, I can take up the entire height of the wall and just have a 2.35 screen that I crop on the sides for narrower aspect ratios.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamliner View Post

If I was planning a dedicated room, personally, I would choose a 16x9 screen limited only by physical room limitations (ceiling, heads, etc). Go see an IMAX movie and tell me you notice that the 95% of the film isn't filling the screen horizontally.

Go big, fill your field of vision and post pics.

I like this train of thought, but I can't put the speakers behind the screen. So, now I may have to place the center speaker closer to the ground (or bottom of screen) and aim it up at the sweet spot. Not sure how much I'm going to like that.

I was thinking of going with a Da-Lite screen and one of their Multi-Mask Imagers. I don't know. I hate shopping for screens because, A) I feel like I have no clue, B) these masking systems are so darn expensive, C) Once I have them, I don't know how to use a universal remote to control them electronically, D)There are so many to choose from, all of the info is very overwhelming and it is not organized very well on the manufactures' web sites.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › OWNERS Thread for the Panasonic PT-AE7000U 3D Projector