Filling the fridge with food or stuff like soda cans will triple the efficiency.
An empty fridge does not retain the cold as long and the compressor kicks on and runs more often.
A fridge full of stuff hold the cold inside longer so once it's all chilled it stays colder longer.
Also,
A 1986-era 18 c.f. fridge uses 1400 kWh a year, while a modern energy-efficient model uses only 350 kWh -- a whopping 75% reduction. At 15¢ kWh, trading in a pre-1986 fridge for a new efficient one would save about $158 a year in electricity costs. And some older fridges are even worse than the average.
350 kwh at even ten cents (.10) kwh is only $35
I pay about .067 kwh in MA
So yeah.. It's not a big deal if your running a new efficiency model but it can be huge if you have some old crapbox from the 70's or 80's.
Same is true for CPU. Generally speaking any Sandy or Ivy uses close enough to the same power that any energy saving is splitting hairs IMO.
Common mistake is an i5 uses more power than an i3 or pentium when at idle is close enough to be a non issue.
And while the more powerful CPU might use a bit more energy at full throttle it's doing way more work or calculations in the same time as the lower end CPU so cost to process again is splitting hairs.
An empty fridge does not retain the cold as long and the compressor kicks on and runs more often.
A fridge full of stuff hold the cold inside longer so once it's all chilled it stays colder longer.
Also,
A 1986-era 18 c.f. fridge uses 1400 kWh a year, while a modern energy-efficient model uses only 350 kWh -- a whopping 75% reduction. At 15¢ kWh, trading in a pre-1986 fridge for a new efficient one would save about $158 a year in electricity costs. And some older fridges are even worse than the average.
350 kwh at even ten cents (.10) kwh is only $35
I pay about .067 kwh in MA
So yeah.. It's not a big deal if your running a new efficiency model but it can be huge if you have some old crapbox from the 70's or 80's.
Same is true for CPU. Generally speaking any Sandy or Ivy uses close enough to the same power that any energy saving is splitting hairs IMO.
Common mistake is an i5 uses more power than an i3 or pentium when at idle is close enough to be a non issue.
And while the more powerful CPU might use a bit more energy at full throttle it's doing way more work or calculations in the same time as the lower end CPU so cost to process again is splitting hairs.

















I will run additional tests and post Kill-a-Watt photos when I can.

