Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan1 
Not that I don't feel your pain, but seriously, if this is your beef, you would not be very happy with too many sub-$1k receivers, regardless of what brand you got. Most of the DSP of the even most expensive ones are equally "ghastly."
Anyway, it's a pretty inexpensive receiver, which is unique in some very good ways, but also has a number of flaws. I am just not sure that there is much else which will be better at this price level.

Not that I don't feel your pain, but seriously, if this is your beef, you would not be very happy with too many sub-$1k receivers, regardless of what brand you got. Most of the DSP of the even most expensive ones are equally "ghastly."

Anyway, it's a pretty inexpensive receiver, which is unique in some very good ways, but also has a number of flaws. I am just not sure that there is much else which will be better at this price level.
That part is relative I suppose; I wouldn't classify a $650 receive as inexpensive, but perhaps to others it is. Thankfully I paid about half of that, which does mitigate my dissatisfaction to a certain degree.
I guess my contention is if you buy a $90 Monoprice subwoofer you can assume less than stellar performance, but if you buy a $500 sub than your expectations should be fulfilled accordingly. Even though the latter might not be a $4000 JL Audio, you still shouldn't have to put up with a horribly designed and implemented $500 subwoofer. The flaws -- if any -- should not be disproportionally larger than the benefits. That's my take on it anyway...
Quote:
Actually, these 2 flaws would perhaps be some of the easiest issues to fix; use a normal color/intensity for the LED's, and replace the defective Sherwood auto-room EQ with Audyssey. Since Audyssey is such a recognized standard it's logical to assume the interface and implementation details are well established, so it shouldn't be like reinventing the wheel.











