AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+) › Datasat RS20i BETA test and comparison with ADA Rhapsody/Trinnov TEQ-12!!!!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Datasat RS20i BETA test and comparison with ADA Rhapsody/Trinnov TEQ-12!!!! - Page 8

post #211 of 1353
I think Carl was saying that multiple subs was a work in progress.

BTW Dan your room sucks
post #212 of 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanFrancis View Post

.......AND.......
apparently, although there are 5 channels that are subs, the Dirac treats them all like one channel. If I adjust the target curve of one of my channels labeled subwoofer, all channels labeled subwoofer change.

perhaps a call to Carl to verify proper technique...

Dan,

I see that you are making progress. Good for you!

I've been down this path before. Your problem is that you chose to label 'all' of your subwoofer channels as 'subwoofer' in the first screen. The Dirac Live application uses those names to uniquely identify each channel. Each channel needs to have a unique name. The way to handle multiple subwoofers is to leave them with their default channel names. If you do that Dirac will treat each subwoofer as a distinct and separate channel.

I will be monitoring this thread should you have any further questions.
______________
Best Regards,
Carl Huff
post #213 of 1353
Can you Label them Sub1, Sub2 ... ?
post #214 of 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by HFGuy View Post

Can you Label them Sub1, Sub2 ... ?

Nope. At some point it would make sense that those tags be added to the pulldown in the Dirac Live software tho.
____________
Best Regards,
Carl Huff
post #215 of 1353
Dan,

What do you think is causing the severe loss of response in the rear speakers above 4 kHz? Are they different than the surrounds? Are they blocked by something? Are the dipoles?
post #216 of 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by amirm View Post

Dan this is probably too late but a cute experiment might be to connect the devices in series and see if any of them can improve on the work of the other system! You can do stereo for this purpose as to limit the wiring hassle. I almost got there with this experiment before my TacT broke .

Connecting them in series might not be useful for cascading their effects, but it might make A/B switching a lot easier, since both units have bypass capability. I realize that "bypass" is still a trip thru the A/D and D/As, but that is minimal relative to the room EQ issues. That's what I did when I had the AP-20 so I could quickly A/B it against the SSP's PEQ.

That also solved the "no Dolby" issue since all the decoding was done upstream by the SSP. The AP-20 was just an 8-in 8-out EQ.
post #217 of 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl_Huff View Post

I've been down this path before. Your problem is that you chose to label 'all' of your subwoofer channels as 'subwoofer' in the first screen. The Dirac Live application uses those names to uniquely identify each channel. Each channel needs to have a unique name. The way to handle multiple subwoofers is to leave them with their default channel names. If you do that Dirac will treat each subwoofer as a distinct and separate channel.

That raises a different issue. If each sub is seen and adjusted individually, how does one verify or adjust their summed effects? One cannot assume they will optimally blend. I think this issue pertains not only to Dirac but to TEQ, too.
post #218 of 1353
Thread Starter 
Blocked partially by chair cushions (damn overstuffed chairs- I want Irwins), also the crossovers are similar, but not the same- the components are different (same values, but from different manufacturers) I'm sure some of that difference is an electrical response difference.

My guess, though, is that the chairs are shading the path of the tweeter-microphone, and that's causing the severe dip. This has shown up all along in this room, and it's a compromise that we're willing to take at the moment (I've had to update/upgrade things as time goes by, the chairs are on the chopping block). I will say this; they are of similar design to the very popular Berklines.

Dan

BTW- thanks Carl, I was thinking about that earlier on. Now that I've done it, can I go back to that screen and rename, then bypass taking the measurements all over- or do I have to start from scratch with the channels independently named??
post #219 of 1353
... can I go back to that screen and rename, then bypass taking the measurements all over- or do I have to start from scratch with the channels independently named??

Nope, sorry. You have to take the samples over again. The Dirac Live application begins to process the samples immediately after taking them. You only have one set of subwoofer samples at this point as the first four sample sets were overwritten by the last.
____________
Best Regards,
Carl Huff
post #220 of 1353
Thread Starter 
Got it, TEQ was the same way; I figured I was going to have to do that.

Looks like another busy day tomorrow...

So far the tonality is very "Class A- like" . I can see how Peter would use this with Dirac and the PHC speakers- Dirac offsets the speakers' downfall: that horn.

There's certainly more work to be done, but the Dirac is doing a very nice job tonally for a semi-rough once-over. We'll see how things turn out as I drill-down into the capabilities of the device....

Dan
post #221 of 1353
Those TEQ screen shots sure are graphically interesting to look at.I guess that's one of the benefits of having all that processing power aboard.

Does the Trinnov tech only try to correct the minimum-phase portion and not the non-minimum phase?
post #222 of 1353
Thread Starter 
Steven, what do you mean by "minimum phase portion"? If you're talking about the greater number of phase rotations in the subs vs the highpass sections, or the midbass vs say the vocals- you can see (although somwhat tough to make out) that there is correction going on throughout the passband in the Phase response screens.

The specific filtering that Trinnov is using depends on where the corrections are and what the desired effect is. You have the ability to make the phase response look however you'd like, really (really mess it up if you want).

I hope I'm answering your question, I'm kind of guessing at what you're asking about.

minimum-phase filters? or phase rotations?

Clarify please, and if I can't answer your question, I'll ask Curt.

Dan
post #223 of 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanFrancis View Post

Steven, what do you mean by "minimum phase portion"? If you're talking about the greater number of phase rotations in the subs vs the highpass sections, or the midbass vs say the vocals- you can see (although somwhat tough to make out) that there is correction going on throughout the passband in the Phase response screens.

The specific filtering that Trinnov is using depends on where the corrections are and what the desired effect is. You have the ability to make the phase response look however you'd like, really (really mess it up if you want).

I hope I'm answering your question, I'm kind of guessing at what you're asking about.

minimum-phase filters? or phase rotations?

Clarify please, and if I can't answer your question, I'll ask Curt.

Dan

Hi Dan,

What I was trying ask is it a minimum-phase correction system.Audyssey MultEQ uses a minimum-phase correction and Dirac Live uses a mixed-phase approach.
post #224 of 1353
Thread Starter 
Mixed phase, like the Dirac. Trinnov uses both FIR and IIR filters, and you can specify some metrics regarding their usage in the advanced setup menu.

Dirac generates its filters on its own, you don't have any parameters that are changeable about Dirac, just the loudspeaker information.

Dan
post #225 of 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanFrancis View Post


So far the tonality is very "Class A- like" . I can see how Peter would use this with Dirac and the PHC speakers

Dan

Thanks for addressing this. Usually I see only the room correction being addressed without acknowledgment that there are other factors that contribute to the overall sound and maybe preference.
post #226 of 1353
Dan, what do you think of the noise floor on the RS20?

Neil
post #227 of 1353
Thread Starter 
Can't really say, I've had earplugs in and high-volume pink noise for the last day and a half. I haven't managed to listen critically yet. Let me get it setup, Dirac is being a pain in my a$$ again- not playing well for some reason.

Back to round 4...

Dan
post #228 of 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanFrancis View Post

... Dirac is being a pain in my a$$ again- not playing well for some reason. ...
Dan

Usually that is because the AP20 has dropped out of setup mode. Once the proxy software and Dirac Live has connected to the AP20 you must not 'twiddle' with the AP20 by toggling the touchscreen. The moment that you operate the touchscreen remote setup shuts off and control is given back to the AP20's touchscreen. The box can have but one master! To regain remote control you simply need to operate the 'setup' button on the proxy software. That redirects control away from the touchscreen to the Dirac Live application.
______________
Best Regards,
Carl Huff
post #229 of 1353
Thread Starter 
thanks for the info, but that's not it. This problem has Microsoft written all over it. Restarted Win7 re-plugged the USBPre and security dongle (for the third time) and we're doing OK now.

Just completed measurement 5, 10 more to go.

I wish Dirac had been written to be OS agnostic, since going Mac I have more problems with the Windows stuff than otherwise. My XP stuff works OK though.

Oh well, it works now .... so far ...

report when I'm done

Dan
post #230 of 1353
I don't use Mac, but for some reason I assumed Dirac was compatible with the Apple OS.
post #231 of 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raul GS View Post

I don't use Mac, but for some reason I assumed Dirac was compatible with the Apple OS.

Dirac Research will be soon releasing a new product that runs on both Windows and as a native app on the MAC. However the Dirac Live application that is used to configure both the AP20 & RS20i is a Windows only app. You must run Windows on your MAC for it to work on that hardware.
____________
Best Regards,
Carl Huff
post #232 of 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanFrancis View Post

thanks for the info, but that's not it. This problem has Microsoft written all over it. Restarted Win7 re-plugged the USBPre and security dongle (for the third time) and we're doing OK now.

Hey Dan... I use VMWARE Fusion (V. 4) on my Mac (XP Pro) and it is compatible with every Windows based, HT related software program I have ever tried (RTI, Lexicon, ADA, Halcro, QSC, Sonance, etc.).

Jeff
post #233 of 1353
Thread Starter 
I use the same, but if you read back early in the thread; I couldn't get Dirac Live to run in my XP VM. I did get it to run in Win7 32 bit.
But it's been tweaky since day one. This software was the reason I had so much trouble with the Datsat at the begining.

At this point it's important to point out that it DOES work in my Mac, just touchy.

Dan
post #234 of 1353
Thread Starter 
Just finished 17 measurements, optimizing now. Thats 17x12 channels; I started over 2 hours ago.

Dan
post #235 of 1353
Hi guys,

I'm from France and I own a Trinnov MC 2 (2nd generation) for almost 1 year.

- runtime + toolbox softwares
- 8 chanels output.





Dan, If I can help you in maximizing Trinnov's settings, I would be happy doing it.

Here below what I get after the calibration process:



post #236 of 1353
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanFrancis View Post

I use the same, but if you read back early in the thread; I couldn't get Dirac Live to run in my XP VM. I did get it to run in Win7 32 bit.
But it's been tweaky since day one. This software was the reason I had so much trouble with the Datsat at the begining.

At this point it's important to point out that it DOES work in my Mac, just touchy.

Dan

I suffered the same pain with my AP20 set up with a PC -- Dirac continually failed until I started over completely with a mac running XP. Even then it was a nail-biter as I kept expecting it to crash any second and make me start all over for the hundredth time. Dirac really needs to correct that software badly as it is incredibly sensitive to every little fart in the hardware/software chain. And Datasat needs to get on the stick and re-write the manual as it is not user friendly and out of date.
These machines absolutely need either a very OCD-driven theater hobbyist (me) or a pro familiar with them to get them to run as they are marketed.

Dan, your diligence and patience with this stuff is astounding!
post #237 of 1353
I am assuming that Datasat will need a new manual for the RS20i to make it easier to manage for people like me who are less capable.
post #238 of 1353
Important to know, with default parameters set in the Trinnov, you can expect to reach 75%/80% of product performance (so the SQ).

There are about 90/100 parameters you can play with ...
Basically, it's advisable to go through an integrator in order to get the best with this unit.
post #239 of 1353
Thread Starter 
OK, Datasat is probably 90% there- maybe 95% if I'm not being so conservative. Dirac went well this afternoon, I had a little scare- all the checkboxes that control impulse response correction were left unchecked. Why might this cause a scare? Well, Dirac doesn't really know what to do when it receives multiple responses per channel, and you end up with a funky looking response curve. So, it's very important that if you're using multiway loudspeakers to tell Dirac "yes, multiple speakers" per channel, and it ignores the impulse response correction= much prettier results.

I've got a couple thing left to tweak , but I'm quite happy with the results. I'll post screenshots again- this time I'll try to window my VM inside MacOS and get the whole Dirac screen captured inside the window, we'll see how it works out.


Dan
post #240 of 1353
Thread Starter 
OK, never mind on the screenshots, I left the security dongle in the demo theater with the measurement equipment. Sorry, but it's going to have to be tomorrow.

Dan
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+)
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+) › Datasat RS20i BETA test and comparison with ADA Rhapsody/Trinnov TEQ-12!!!!