AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › Anything easy I can do to help improve reception?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anything easy I can do to help improve reception?

post #1 of 66
Thread Starter 
I have an Antennacraft HBU22 antenna mounted in our attic. The coax goes from the antenna into a 4-way splitter in our structured wiring panel. It's roughly 50 feet or so of cable for each run from the antenna to the TV. No amps, preamps, or filters are currently installed.

Here's our tvfool data.

A few of the channels have occasional problems with the signal dropping low enough that the picture breaks up or completely disappears. In order of frequency of occurrence: KVIE (9), KTXL (40), KXTV (10), and KOVR (25). (I'm not sure if I've noticed problems with KOVR this Fall yet, but in the past, I definitely have.)

Is there something simple I might try to help alleviate these problems? Or should I just be happy that an attic-mounted antenna can get these as well as it does?

Thanks,

Ken
post #2 of 66
Ken:

What happens if your eliminate the splitter just for a test, and connect the antenna only to one set?
post #3 of 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenIAm View Post

I have an Antennacraft HBU22 antenna mounted in our attic. The coax goes from the antenna into a 4-way splitter in our structured wiring panel. It's roughly 50 feet or so of cable for each run from the antenna to the TV. No amps, preamps, or filters are currently installed.

Here's our tvfool data.

A few of the channels have occasional problems with the signal dropping low enough that the picture breaks up or completely disappears. In order of frequency of occurrence: KVIE (9), KTXL (40), KXTV (10), and KOVR (25). (I'm not sure if I've noticed problems with KOVR this Fall yet, but in the past, I definitely have.)

Is there something simple I might try to help alleviate these problems? Or should I just be happy that an attic-mounted antenna can get these as well as it does?

Thanks,

Ken

You have plenty of signal so you should not see break-up. My only concern is that you have the 4-way splitter located in your wiring panel. I would relocate the splitter somewhere else that is far away from any power cable. It's probably very noisy electrically inside the panel and the cable is probably picking up the noise. Are you using RG-6 coaxial cables?
post #4 of 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by rabbit73 View Post

Ken:

What happens if your eliminate the splitter just for a test, and connect the antenna only to one set?

Excellent question. A baseline needs to be established to recommend the best solution(s).
post #5 of 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenIAm View Post

I have an Antennacraft HBU22 antenna mounted in our attic. The coax goes from the antenna into a 4-way splitter in our structured wiring panel. It's roughly 50 feet or so of cable for each run from the antenna to the TV. No amps, preamps, or filters are currently installed.

Here's our tvfool data.

A few of the channels have occasional problems with the signal dropping low enough that the picture breaks up or completely disappears. In order of frequency of occurrence: KVIE (9), KTXL (40), KXTV (10), and KOVR (25). (I'm not sure if I've noticed problems with KOVR this Fall yet, but in the past, I definitely have.)

Is there something simple I might try to help alleviate these problems? Or should I just be happy that an attic-mounted antenna can get these as well as it does?

Thanks,

Ken

Make sure your antenna is pointed in the right direction, which in your case is SW.

If you do the test bypassing the splitter just using one TV, and all channels come in fine, then you probably need an amp. Or you can put the antenna outside and gain more signal strength thus not needing an amp.
post #6 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rabbit73 View Post

Ken:

What happens if your eliminate the splitter just for a test, and connect the antenna only to one set?

Sorry for the late reply. I have instant email notification set for this thread, but never received an email. I finally decided to check just in case, and sure enough, 3 replies waiting unanswered. Sorry.

The only way I could try that would be to run a cable directly from the antenna to a TV. That wouldn't be too hard, but the problem doesn't happen all that often (perhaps one program out of 5 or 10 programs?). I could check the signal strength that way and compare it to "normal", but I think I'd done that initially and didn't see too large a drop in signal strength. But it might be worth doing again now, anyway. Thanks!
post #7 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredengineer View Post

You have plenty of signal so you should not see break-up. My only concern is that you have the 4-way splitter located in your wiring panel. I would relocate the splitter somewhere else that is far away from any power cable. It's probably very noisy electrically inside the panel and the cable is probably picking up the noise. Are you using RG-6 coaxial cables?

I honestly don't know how I'd relocate the splitter. All the cables come in to the panel (of course), and it's beyond my skill set to try to move them from there. What I will do, though, is see if the wires that carry voltage (there are two, one 12v and one 120v) are near the cables or splitter and try to move them. Thanks!

ETA: Yes, they are RG-6 cables.
post #8 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikepier View Post

Make sure your antenna is pointed in the right direction, which in your case is SW.

That it definitely is (unless it's moved, which I doubt because this has been a problem since I initially installed it about a year ago).

Quote:


If you do the test bypassing the splitter just using one TV, and all channels come in fine, then you probably need an amp. Or you can put the antenna outside and gain more signal strength thus not needing an amp.

Ok, that makes sense. I'll definitely give that a try tomorrow and report back. An amp is easily doable, moving it outside unfortunately is not. Thanks!
post #9 of 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenIAm View Post

Sorry for the late reply. I have instant email notification set for this thread, but never received an email. I finally decided to check just in case, and sure enough, 3 replies waiting unanswered. Sorry.

The only way I could try that would be to run a cable directly from the antenna to a TV. That wouldn't be too hard, but the problem doesn't happen all that often (perhaps one program out of 5 or 10 programs?). I could check the signal strength that way and compare it to "normal", but I think I'd done that initially and didn't see too large a drop in signal strength. But it might be worth doing again now, anyway. Thanks!

To temporarily bypass the splitter, remove it and reconnect a single coax, using a barrel splice. Radio Shack or home centers usually have them.


What is your roof made of?

Is your antenna pointed correctly? In this image, the stations are to the right of the antenna.

--------------------------------------> TV towers
post #10 of 66
At 30+ miles from the towers, I don't think you'll have very reliable signals with an attic antenna. It probably should be outside, and ten feet above the roof (unless you are on a hill already). Still, getting a few feet away from the roofing and the indoor stuff will help.

The structured wiring system should be fine, as long as the connections are done properly and the connectors are tightly screwed on (just a bit more than 'finger tight").

KVIE is on channel 9, a high-band VHF channel. Many things in the home (even the TV set itself) can cause interference to the VHF frequencies. So, getting the antenna outdoors, and up away from the ceiling/attic wiring and air-conditioning ducts should help a lot. You might also look at the remaining analog stations, and see if they have interference at times. Something could be causing a momentary "pop", which would equate to a second or two dropout in Digital.
post #11 of 66
After Kenglish's suggestion - the next thing I'd try would be either a preamp from the structured wiring box to the antenna, or a distribution amp in the SW panel. But even doing this - you don't want to overdrive your amp, so you want just enough to fix the problem, no more.
post #12 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by arxaw View Post

To temporarily bypass the splitter, remove it and reconnect a single coax, using a barrel splice. Radio Shack or home centers usually have them.

Ah, thanks. That's good to know (if I can remember it!). I think I actually have a few of those somewhere ....

Quote:


What is your roof made of?

Is your antenna pointed correctly? In this image, the stations are to the right of the antenna.

--------------------------------------> TV towers

Our roof is tile. But wouldn't the signal be coming through the exterior walls (i.e., sides) of the house, as opposed to the roof? I guess not, or you wouldn't have asked.

That is the way I have the antenna pointed; thanks for checking.
post #13 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenglish View Post

At 30+ miles from the towers, I don't think you'll have very reliable signals with an attic antenna. It probably should be outside, and ten feet above the roof (unless you are on a hill already). Still, getting a few feet away from the roofing and the indoor stuff will help.

The structured wiring system should be fine, as long as the connections are done properly and the connectors are tightly screwed on (just a bit more than 'finger tight").

KVIE is on channel 9, a high-band VHF channel. Many things in the home (even the TV set itself) can cause interference to the VHF frequencies. So, getting the antenna outdoors, and up away from the ceiling/attic wiring and air-conditioning ducts should help a lot. You might also look at the remaining analog stations, and see if they have interference at times. Something could be causing a momentary "pop", which would equate to a second or two dropout in Digital.

When the problem occurs, it often lasts longer than a second or two. It's more like 10 or 20 seconds, and if it happens, it usually keeps happening throughout that program (not always, but usually).

I know that roof mounting is highly superior, but that really isn't an option here. We'd rather keep it the way it is (if there were no other way to improve it) than roof mount. But read on ....
post #14 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooper View Post

After Kenglish's suggestion - the next thing I'd try would be either a preamp from the structured wiring box to the antenna, or a distribution amp in the SW panel. But even doing this - you don't want to overdrive your amp, so you want just enough to fix the problem, no more.

In case I need to try that, is there a way to determine what is "just enough"?

But, before we proceed, here is what I learned:

I did a direct connection from the antenna to the TV, and found there was a significant improvement. In doing so, I also found a few more connections behind the TV than I had remembered. But then, it was 2 years ago, not 1 as I had thought, so no wonder.

So sometimes just being prodded into LOOKING at the situation is enough. Here's what was back there: From the wall jack, the coax was plugged in to a Panamax suppressor. (Totally unneeded, since the splitter in the wiring panel is well-grounded.) From there, it went to a 4-way splitter (2 of which were unused, but terminated).

Not too surprisingly, when I connected the TV directly to the wall jack, the signal strength was essentially identical to the direct antenna connection.

Eliminating the Panamax and replacing the 4-way splitter with a 2-way gives a clear improvement, but still not as good as the direct connection. I assume and hope that it is because it is a very cheap splitter (the 99-cent kind, or less), and a better splitter will help even more.

The direct connection puts ALL of the signals in the "good" (> 90%) signal strength area. With the cheap splitter, some of them drop down a bit to where they toggle between "average" and "good". (With the panamax and the 4-way splitter, those and others dropped down to "average".)

So the problem has probably already been solved, though it will take some time to verify. I do need to get a better splitter, though, unless I find that even the cheap ones are as good as they get (doubt it).

Thanks for the ideas, encouragement, and most of all -- prodding!
post #15 of 66
Mostly - you want just enough to cover your splitter losses (and other cable losses).
post #16 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooper View Post

Mostly - you want just enough to cover your splitter losses (and other cable losses).

So just add up the dB losses due to splitters and cable length, and that's the size? Got it! Thank you. I will keep that in mind as the next step, if I need it.
post #17 of 66
I'm in the Sacramento market also and I know that if TVFool is saying you have LOS to Walnut Grove and is showing Noise Margins >50 dB then you have tremendously strong signals. It's next to impossible that you're not getting enough signal. The much more likely problem is multipath.

You can probably solve the problem entirely by putting the antenna on the roof. What else is the antenna looking into close by? Are trees or buildings blocking the view to Walnut Grove?

You should easily be able to get 100% reception if you can position the antenna so that it clears most of the local ground clutter.

Just to compare, my TVFool report shows the Walnut Grove stations ranging from -9 to +4 dB Noise Margin and I'm 54 miles from the transmitters over 2 ridges and I get 99% reception, but I have a fancy antenna setup.

Chuck
post #18 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calaveras View Post

I'm in the Sacramento market also and I know that if TVFool is saying you have LOS to Walnut Grove and is showing Noise Margins >50 dB then you have tremendously strong signals. It's next to impossible that you're not getting enough signal. The much more likely problem is multipath.

You can probably solve the problem entirely by putting the antenna on the roof. What else is the antenna looking into close by? Are trees or buildings blocking the view to Walnut Grove?

You should easily be able to get 100% reception if you can position the antenna so that it clears most of the local ground clutter.

Just to compare, my TVFool report shows the Walnut Grove stations ranging from -9 to +4 dB Noise Margin and I'm 54 miles from the transmitters over 2 ridges and I get 99% reception, but I have a fancy antenna setup.

Chuck

I have no doubt that a roof-mounted antenna would get VERY strong signals. We are lucky in that our house has a pretty clear LOS to Walnut Grove. It's all open space from attic height in that direction until the first house which is about 250-300 yards away.

I'll probably try a preamp just to see if I can improve it further, but I'm hopeful that just by removing the Panamax and 4-way splitter and replacing with a better 2-way should do it.
post #19 of 66
Thread Starter 
Something's not making sense, though.

Why would a 4-way splitter degrade the signal more than a 2-way splitter? It shouldn't, right? (Assuming the unused outputs are properly terminated.)

Worse yet, the 4-way looks pretty decently constructed. In fact, here it is. The 2-way looks like junk.

So, I'm going to have to experiment a bit more, and think about this. But at least I know there's a good, strong signal at the jack.
post #20 of 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenIAm View Post

Something's not making sense, though.

Why would a 4-way splitter degrade the signal more than a 2-way splitter? It shouldn't, right? (Assuming the unused outputs are properly terminated.)

Worse yet, the 4-way looks pretty decently constructed. In fact, here it is. The 2-way looks like junk.

So, I'm going to have to experiment a bit more, and think about this. But at least I know there's a good, strong signal at the jack.

Since the signal is split 4 times, you only get 1/4 of the signal going to the TV, splitting 2 times means the TV get 1/2 of the signal.

Degradation of your signal with the 4 way splitter is a classic sign that you are not getting sufficient signal to the TV. That is why a pre-amp is recommended. A properly chosen pre-amp would allow you split the signal without seeing any degradation.
post #21 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredengineer View Post

Since the signal is split 4 times, you only get 1/4 of the signal going to the TV, splitting 2 times means the TV get 1/2 of the signal.

Oh. I thought there would be a 4dB loss for each split, which applied separately to each connection. I didn't realize you have to add them up. Thanks, that makes a lot more sense now.

Quote:


Degradation of your signal with the 4 way splitter is a classic sign that you are not getting sufficient signal to the TV. That is why a pre-amp is recommended. A properly chosen pre-amp would allow you split the signal without seeing any degradation.

I've been busy trying to read about this stuff this morning, but so far I haven't determined the difference between a "pre-amp" and an "amp". I'm guessing it might be the same device in general, but the name changes depending on where it is located. I clearly have more research to do.

I have an old Archer 4-way amplifier that I could try, just for fun. But it doesn't even have a size rating, and I see it's 50-400MHz so it wouldn't cover the whole reception range. Not a good choice for permanent use.
post #22 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenIAm View Post

I've been busy trying to read about this stuff this morning, but so far I haven't determined the difference between a "pre-amp" and an "amp". I'm guessing it might be the same device in general, but the name changes depending on where it is located.

Not entirely.

This post explains it well:
A pre-amp comes in two pieces: the amplifier and the power inserter, both of which are inserted into the coaxial antenna cable. The power inserter receives power from a regular wall outlet and sends the power to the amplifier via the coaxial cable. This allows the amplifier unit to be mounted outdoors, on the antenna mast directly below a roof-mounted antenna.

A distribution amp comes in one piece which is inserted into the coaxial antenna cable, and plugs directly into a regular wall outlet (possibly with a "wall-wart" type power supply). It has to be used indoors.

Also, a good pre-amp has a lower "noise figure" than most distribution amps, which is important if you have very weak signals that are near the edge of the "digital cliff." However, there are some low-noise distribution amps like the Kitztech units.
post #23 of 66
If all desired stations are reliable with one set connected, but deteriorates with multiple splits, a distribution amp is usually best. (Especially with a lot of strong signals around)
post #24 of 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenIAm View Post

I'll probably try a preamp just to see if I can improve it further, but I'm hopeful that just by removing the Panamax and 4-way splitter and replacing with a better 2-way should do it.

A preamp will not solve multipath. With such strong signals it's likely to overload and make the problem worse.

I'm using a preamp because I have no other choice with a 525' run of coax. My one strong station here is KUVS and TVFool shows it to have a Noise Margin of 55 dB, similar to most of your stations. I had to install a channel 18 notch filter ahead of the preamp because that one station overloaded my preamp. You have a dozen stations in that signal strength range.

There are really only two issues affecting reception of any DTV station. Is it strong enough and is the signal quality being degraded by multipath? A third issue is interference from something in your house but that's a distant third with the signal levels you have.

I had to go look up what a Panamax was. It's spec'd at <0.5 dB insertion loss. A typical 3-way splitter is 3.5 dB loss and a 4-way is 7 dB loss. So what you're planning to do will get you 4 dB. Eliminating a jumper cable might get you another 1 dB. You'll never notice an increase of 4 or 5 dB when you have 50 dB.

I think I can safely say that the signals are not too weak so that leaves multipath. There's no point in worrying about preamps, cable loss and splitters when you have 50 dB to play around with. These are things to consider when you have weak signals. You need to look at solutions that address multipath. Getting it out of the attic is the #1 solution. The #2 solution is moving the antenna in the attic and hoping you can find a more optimum location for all the stations. A larger and more directive antenna might help.

I've seen the difference between an attic mounted antenna under a wood shingle roof and an outdoor antenna on the same house and it is stunning.

Chuck
post #25 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Rules View Post

If all desired stations are reliable with one set connected, but deteriorates with multiple splits, a distribution amp is usually best. (Especially with a lot of strong signals around)

Unfortunately there's no room for a distribution amp in the wiring panel. So if I do that, I'd need to have the amp outside the panel and feed the cables through an opening in the cover (there is no opening now, so I'd have to make one, or simply not close it tightly). A pre-amp fits better with my setup, but if it isn't likely to work, it isn't even worth trying.
post #26 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calaveras View Post

A preamp will not solve multipath. With such strong signals it's likely to overload and make the problem worse.

I had to go look up what a Panamax was. It's spec'd at <0.5 dB insertion loss. A typical 3-way splitter is 3.5 dB loss and a 4-way is 7 dB loss. So what you're planning to do will get you 4 dB. Eliminating a jumper cable might get you another 1 dB. You'll never notice an increase of 4 or 5 dB when you have 50 dB.

I think I can safely say that the signals are not too weak so that leaves multipath. There's no point in worrying about preamps, cable loss and splitters when you have 50 dB to play around with. These are things to consider when you have weak signals. You need to look at solutions that address multipath. Getting it out of the attic is the #1 solution. The #2 solution is moving the antenna in the attic and hoping you can find a more optimum location for all the stations. A larger and more directive antenna might help.

I've seen the difference between an attic mounted antenna under a wood shingle roof and an outdoor antenna on the same house and it is stunning.

Chuck

Yeah, I just tried the Panamax by itself, and I could not see a difference in the signal strength. Unfortunately this TV doesn't give a number, but just a bar graph and a word ("good", "average", "poor" are the only values, I think). The bar graph is long enough to get a pretty good idea of the actual values, and I couldn't see it move a bit with the Panamax there or not. Still, no reason for it to be there.

I am absolutely convinced that all our reception problems would be solved by #1 (roof mounting). But that is not going to happen. A larger antenna might indeed work. But I'm not entirely convinced that the problem is multipath and not signal strength.

I have 50dB to work with, but the fooltv thingy doesn't know that it's mounted in an attic, right? So how much do I lose right there? I would think a lot. And the cable run might be longer than I thought. When I went up there to look at it, I saw there's a lot of extra cable hanging around. It isn't looped, just lying on the floor spread out, but it might be twice as long as I had thought. Still not that much, but perhaps 5dB or 6dB worth of loss due to cable length.

When I was fooling around with the direct antenna connection earlier, at first the signal was terrible. I don't know what changed (something must not have been tight), but I noticed at the time the picture was breaking up or completely lost even with the bar graph at about 50%.
post #27 of 66
Attic (ideal) will probably kill 50-75% of signal - not to mention it can greatly contribute to a multipath problem (or even be creating the problem in the first place). As always - the best solution is to put the antenna where it was designed to work - outside in free space. You DON'T have to put the antenna in the middle of your tile roof (I'd recommend against that for other reasons), but putting it on the end of a gable 3-10 feet above the tile could only help your situation.
post #28 of 66
For anyone not familiar with dB, it's hard to get across how big of a number 50 dB is. For power, it's a factor of 100,000.

A reduction in power of 75% is still only 6 dB. Even a reduction in dB of 75% out of a 50 dB Noise Margin would leave you 12.5 dB, which should still give you a signal quality number in the low 90's without multipath.

Let's say KOVR at 1 MW provided a 53 dB Noise Margin. They could reduce their power to 10 watts and you'd still be able to receive them.

At my location 14 miles from KMMW (channel 28) from Angels Camp, the FCC antenna pattern shows they should have 370 watts in my direction. I receive KMMW with a 40 dB noise margin. They could reduce power to 100 milliwatts and I'd still receive them.

KUVS has >60 dB noise margin with my antennas on the hilltop. I can receive KUVS with a little whip antenna inside my house while being blocked by the 100' manzanita covered hill that my antennas sit on.

This is why I say with a predicted Noise Margin of >50 dB you can rule out signal strength as the problem with certainty.

Chuck
post #29 of 66
Putting your antenna in the attic should not cause any problems. Any multipath present in the attic can easily be handled by the equalizer in the TV.

I have my antennas (separate VHF and UHF antennas) in the attic and use a pre-amp and receive all local stations with no problem. I ran a TVFool analysis and I can receive KCET which has a signal power of -84 dBm which is lower than your values. Note that all my reception involve one edge paths which includes multipath.

My TVFool results are:

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...4bbabadb1bba15
post #30 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooper View Post

Attic (ideal) will probably kill 50-75% of signal - not to mention it can greatly contribute to a multipath problem (or even be creating the problem in the first place). As always - the best solution is to put the antenna where it was designed to work - outside in free space. You DON'T have to put the antenna in the middle of your tile roof (I'd recommend against that for other reasons), but putting it on the end of a gable 3-10 feet above the tile could only help your situation.

Unfortunately, the only exposure we have to the antenna farm in Walnut Grove is at the front of our house (due to a 2-story home completely blocking that direction to our side). So when I say we can't put the antenna on the roof, I mean we have no desire to do so, due to aesthetics. The only option might be using a 20 foot mast attached to a gable at the rear of the house, but I don't think that idea would fly with the wife.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Technical
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › Anything easy I can do to help improve reception?