Originally Posted by videobruce
You can also add limited reception in Southern Ontario near the border, including Ft. Erie. This would affect some Canadian viewers also.
Looking at the maps I have, coverage in Fort Erie will improve.
Current (11): http://www.rabbitears.info/contour.p...ontour=N&map=Y
Proposed (15): http://www.rabbitears.info/contour.p...ontour=N&map=Y
I guess CHCH has too many viewers.
On the contrary, CHCH was inundated with complaints from viewers, and not just in Fort Erie. This move is intended to fix those.
And looking at signal levels in Fort Erie from the current signal, I will venture to suggest that many people there are having problems with the current signal anyway, so it is not as though some great loss is about to befall them regardless.
More college educated stupidly. What's wrong with where they are?? What, too confusing to have the same physical channel number as their 'virtual' number?
Almost nobody outside of this forum and others like it care or take this sort of thing into account, since it's a ridiculous argument. Should WGRZ move back to RF2 to satisfy this, even if that means 90% of viewers lose the ability to receive it? No, what matters is that people can receive the signal, which the flood of reception complaints showed is not the case with the channel 11 signal.