Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTarHeel 
No e-mail but just got a phone call. (Someone tried to call yesterday, but I missed it, so he e-mailed.) The guy today suggested that the tuners in TVs might be better/stronger/more sensitive to pick up a low power station. I didn't think WGHP's 8.2 was low power, but I honestly didn't know and I told him so.
I asked if he had read the earlier messages about the frequency changeover, many people in the same boat, etc. - he had, but again suggested that those of us in different areas might still be able to get 8.2 OTA and not via D* if it was a low power station.
Regardless, he said he would escalate this to engineering (which I suspect some of you have heard before) but he was very profuse in his thanks for the additional information I had tried to explain to him.

No e-mail but just got a phone call. (Someone tried to call yesterday, but I missed it, so he e-mailed.) The guy today suggested that the tuners in TVs might be better/stronger/more sensitive to pick up a low power station. I didn't think WGHP's 8.2 was low power, but I honestly didn't know and I told him so.
I asked if he had read the earlier messages about the frequency changeover, many people in the same boat, etc. - he had, but again suggested that those of us in different areas might still be able to get 8.2 OTA and not via D* if it was a low power station.
Regardless, he said he would escalate this to engineering (which I suspect some of you have heard before) but he was very profuse in his thanks for the additional information I had tried to explain to him.
This goes to show the CSR's have no clue what they are doing. That is why I have no confidence any technical info goes above their immediate level. They have no idea what a subchannel is. If they think that a .2 of station is a DIFFERENT station technically, then they have no clue what is going on. Both stations are on the SAME TRANSMITTER. If 1 million watts is low power, the 8.2 is low power. It is the SAME power as the .1. Why? It is coming off the SAME DAMN TRANSMITTER! If you receive the .1 with no issues, the .2 will come in with the SAME reception. They don't get it.
Quote:
I also told him that we knew that the station itself had tried for months to have D* look into the issue with no resolution so far. We shall see...
I also told him that we knew that the station itself had tried for months to have D* look into the issue with no resolution so far. We shall see...
Stations go through the same thing the subscribers do. We had an issue with the stream breaking up prior to the transition and shortly after. Both times the technical people (one being a former broadcast engineer) kept saying it was our problem. After I sent a stream capture of our signal to them. The problem mysteriously fixed itself. Yeah, it happens.
Quote:
One area of ignorance my conversation with him brought up - I don't know if 8.2 was live before all the frequency issues, if it was EVER viewable via D* tuners, etc.
One area of ignorance my conversation with him brought up - I don't know if 8.2 was live before all the frequency issues, if it was EVER viewable via D* tuners, etc.
No. The .2 has only been active since December of 2010 so at the time of the transition and at the time channel 8 was shut down (March of 2010), there was only one stream, 8-1. DirecTV never added the .2 to the program guide until March or April. I don't remember which. Again, it was like pulling Eye Teeth with them. You can go back through this thread and see how long it took.
Since John Malone's Liberty bought DirecTV from News Corp, they run it like a cable company. When News Corp owned them, stations had direct access to the people we needed to talk to. No more now. You go through a gauntlet of people to get where you need to go and then there is no guarantee you will get the right person and you never get the right person the first time any more. This last call about the .2 issue, I literally had to call the emergency TOC number stations have when there is a technical issue. Of course they can't help because they just handle station interfaces and uplinks. They would have to have me email them all the info so it could be escalated up the chain. The program guide is done from a division called "Programming" which has nothing to do with programming. Go figure. It is the "Programming" division is what handles the program guide issues and they are VERY insulated from the outside word. The only reason I know that is when we were trying to get the .2 listed in the first place last year, it took months to get to them and then I had a devil of a time getting them to list it then. I suspect that is when this issue began since the .2 has never completely worked correctly from the get-go.












It almost makes me wonder if the level of service is possibly better with the CSRs at TWC? Could that actually be possible?




