AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Official 4:4:4 / Chroma Subsampling Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official 4:4:4 / Chroma Subsampling Thread - Page 8

post #211 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by eklu65 View Post

Any suggestions for a 50"+ tv in the $700-900 range? I play a lot of rpg's, so little text is pretty important. I was considering the UT50 for a while, but apparently it doesn't support 4:4:4 chroma subsampling. I guess some people were saying text was still legible in games though, so I'm not too sure. I was hoping to find some 2012 model recommendations, but I can't seem to find any solid info.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

This: LG 55" 1080p 120hz 55LS4500

Or This: LG 50" 1080p 120hz 50LS4000

The reason i chose only LG was that i searched all the other "quality" brands like Sony, Samsung, Sharp, Panasonic, Etc. and all of their LED 50"+ TV's are more expensive because they contain features like 3D, Smart TV, 240hz, etc. LG was the only brand that had enough variety from their site to offer 50"+ LED TV's in Full 1080p and 120hz without Smart or 3D TV in a 699 to 899$ range. Plus LG's have that "PC mode" feature so its a win-win in my opinion. The 50" also has Direct-Lit LED's instead of Edge-lit so contrast ratio will be greater on the 50", but if you want size, get the 55". the difference is minimal, really.

Does not mean you need to buy them from Best Buy, but its a good reference to what their suggested retail price is. Only downside is the # of HDMI ports LG recently uses with their HDTV's now.
Edited by MDA400 - 1/10/13 at 8:19am
post #212 of 263
Hi

If tv don't support 4:4:4, games will look 100% ALL COLORS without PC Mode? I'm about Panasonic U3 and E3

Thanks.
post #213 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDA400 View Post

This: LG 55" 1080p 120hz 55LS4500

Or This: LG 50" 1080p 120hz 50LS4000

The reason i chose only LG was that i searched all the other "quality" brands like Sony, Samsung, Sharp, Panasonic, Etc. and all of their LED 50"+ TV's are more expensive because they contain features like 3D, Smart TV, 240hz, etc. LG was the only brand that had enough variety from their site to offer 50"+ LED TV's in Full 1080p and 120hz without Smart or 3D TV in a 699 to 899$ range. Plus LG's have that "PC mode" feature so its a win-win in my opinion. The 50" also has Direct-Lit LED's instead of Edge-lit so contrast ratio will be greater on the 50", but if you want size, get the 55". the difference is minimal, really.

Does not mean you need to buy them from Best Buy, but its a good reference to what their suggested retail price is. Only downside is the # of HDMI ports LG recently uses with their HDTV's now.

Thanks for the reply! That's definitely a consideration. Due to where I work, I am also able to get a UN55EH6000 for around $640 (shhhh don't tell). I am just wondering if it has much input lag, and if it supports chroma subsampling.

It sounds like it's down to these three:
UN55EH6000
55LS4500
P55UT50
post #214 of 263
Hiya guys, fantastic thread, but forgive me if my question has already been answered, but it's a long thread lol.

I'm searching for an LCOS projector still and will be using alot of video games on it, and will soon be playing PC games on it too, so having 4:4:4 is of course a brilliant thing.

Do all TVs with a PC mode usually support the full 4:4:4? If so, I'll have to keep an eye out in reviews for one.
post #215 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by eklu65 View Post

Thanks for the reply! That's definitely a consideration. Due to where I work, I am also able to get a UN55EH6000 for around $640 (shhhh don't tell). I am just wondering if it has much input lag, and if it supports chroma subsampling.

It sounds like it's down to these three:
UN55EH6000
55LS4500
P55UT50

Choose either the LG or Samsung. I kind of lean towards LG for still putting 10 point calibration on most of their TV's, but that Samsung looks worth it for its features. Your choice, but those two. Like i said, LG and Samsung are known for having an option to "force" an input to a PC signal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Burton View Post

Hiya guys, fantastic thread, but forgive me if my question has already been answered, but it's a long thread lol.

I'm searching for an LCOS projector still and will be using alot of video games on it, and will soon be playing PC games on it too, so having 4:4:4 is of course a brilliant thing.

Do all TVs with a PC mode usually support the full 4:4:4? If so, I'll have to keep an eye out in reviews for one.

Usually they do. It's "PC" mode because at least by PC, Windows was followed with that word until Linux and Mac are just as capable so its bundled into one.
But anyways, with a PC, your probably using the RGB color space by default and are powerful enough to support millions of colors that RGB 4:4:4 (or YCbCr) supports.

By setting your TV to treat the Input as a PC, it checks for certain variables such as is it 50/60hz? is it progressive? anything that is standard at PC level is how this mode gets its name. Any interlaced resolution or refresh rate lower than 60hz, does not fall within a digital "standard. NTSC is 60hz and PAL is 50hz so these have been around for a long time and computers as they evolved, followed these standards.

ANY panel should support 4:4:4 that is equipped with HDMI or a VGA port and mostly all HDTV's do, but its usually only enabled to the full space by using a PC sending a PC signal (1920x1080@60hz as opposed to 1080/60p which is used for broadcast terms). This will also make your display set itself up so it expects a full 0-255 RGB contrast level. I have done this with a budget-brand Emerson 32" 720p TV and by HDMI, sending a "PC" signal from my Xbox 360 puts the "budget" TV into PC mode and makes the input lag almost non-existant with no overscan.

uncalibrated Sharpness could affect the micro image from a Digital SLR camera that put use on this forum to check 4:4:4 pixel support so calibrate your sharpness too when you get a PC signal working.

As for the LCOS projector, since its based on DLP technology which uses mirrors that switch rapidly, Its not advised for gaming. The mirrors that switch "rapidly" do not switch fast enough as to an electric pulse that switches a pixel's subpixel color "rapidly". Electricity is a form of light and nothing is faster than light so its a good start to buy a Fixed-Pixel display.
Edited by MDA400 - 1/16/13 at 12:03pm
post #216 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDA400 View Post

Choose either the LG or Samsung. I kind of lean towards LG for still putting 10 point calibration on most of their TV's, but that Samsung looks worth it for its features. Your choice, but those two. Like i said, LG and Samsung are known for having an option to "force" an input to a PC signal.
Usually they do. It's "PC" mode because at least by PC, Windows was followed with that word until Linux and Mac are just as capable so its bundled into one.
But anyways, with a PC, your probably using the RGB color space by default and are powerful enough to support millions of colors that RGB 4:4:4 (or YCbCr) supports.

By setting your TV to treat the Input as a PC, it checks for certain variables such as is it 50/60hz? is it progressive? anything that is standard at PC level is how this mode gets its name. Any interlaced resolution or refresh rate lower than 60hz, does not fall within a digital "standard. NTSC is 60hz and PAL is 50hz so these have been around for a long time and computers as they evolved, followed these standards.

ANY panel should support 4:4:4 that is equipped with HDMI or a VGA port and mostly all HDTV's do, but its usually only enabled to the full space by using a PC sending a PC signal (1920x1080@60hz as opposed to 1080/60p which is used for broadcast terms). This will also make your display set itself up so it expects a full 0-255 RGB contrast level. I have done this with a budget-brand Emerson 32" 720p TV and by HDMI, sending a "PC" signal from my Xbox 360 puts the "budget" TV into PC mode and makes the input lag almost non-existant with no overscan.

uncalibrated Sharpness could affect the micro image from a Digital SLR camera that put use on this forum to check 4:4:4 pixel support so calibrate your sharpness too when you get a PC signal working.

As for the LCOS projector, since its based on DLP technology which uses mirrors that switch rapidly, Its not advised for gaming. The mirrors that switch "rapidly" do not switch fast enough as to an electric pulse that switches a pixel's subpixel color "rapidly". Electricity is a form of light and nothing is faster than light so its a good start to buy a Fixed-Pixel display.
thanks for the reply, it's all sounding good to me. So basically I should look for a display device with a VGA (or DVI?) port and they usually should be 4:4:4 with 0-255?

And one last question which you did mention. What about 720p signals, most console games, are 720p 60hz, what happens there?
post #217 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Burton View Post

thanks for the reply, it's all sounding good to me. So basically I should look for a display device with a VGA (or DVI?) port and they usually should be 4:4:4 with 0-255?

And one last question which you did mention. What about 720p signals, most console games, are 720p 60hz, what happens there?

Any TV/monitor that has a VGA or HDMI port should support 4:4:4 and Full Range RGB (0-255). Resolution SIZE does not matter so you can still get 4:4:4 at 720p, but you have send your display a 1280x720@60hz (720p) PC signal instead of an HDTV 720p signal and thats the tricky part. Nvidia videocards do not do this easily unless you make a custom resolution. AMD has an option already in its drivers for it. Using a VGA cable automatically sends this "PC" signal format. Using HDMI, you must know a way to get the videocard to treat it as DVI with audio, as HDMI is essentially that. DVI video standard, but a seperate connection in the cable for audio

I have a feature to force this 4:4:4 mode on progressive HDTV broadcast signals on my TV and when i found this out, i switched back and forth quickly to see the difference in text using my Xbox 360. So i know it works, but you'll get the most out of it if the source device (a console for example) supports 0-255 levels which is all in the video chip of the device and mostly every computer-oriented device does these days. even Apple's litte Apple TV device.
post #218 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDA400 View Post

Any TV/monitor that has a VGA or HDMI port should support 4:4:4 and Full Range RGB (0-255). Resolution SIZE does not matter so you can still get 4:4:4 at 720p, but you have send your display a 1280x720@60hz (720p) PC signal instead of an HDTV 720p signal and thats the tricky part. Nvidia videocards do not do this easily unless you make a custom resolution. AMD has an option already in its drivers for it. Using a VGA cable automatically sends this "PC" signal format. Using HDMI, you must know a way to get the videocard to treat it as DVI with audio, as HDMI is essentially that. DVI video standard, but a seperate connection in the cable for audio

I have a feature to force this 4:4:4 mode on progressive HDTV broadcast signals on my TV and when i found this out, i switched back and forth quickly to see the difference in text using my Xbox 360. So i know it works, but you'll get the most out of it if the source device (a console for example) supports 0-255 levels which is all in the video chip of the device and mostly every computer-oriented device does these days. even Apple's litte Apple TV device.
I see, thanks a lot for explaining.
post #219 of 263
(Useless post)
Edited by MDA400 - 1/31/13 at 8:58am
post #220 of 263
Just tested out my Samsung UN46ES6003 and it supports 4:4:4 with audio over HDMI if (and only if) you set the input name to PC
post #221 of 263
OK so what is the point of this thread then if any TV with HDMI will support 444 chroma? All LCD/LED TV's have HDMI now.
post #222 of 263
I suspect its because TVs need the ability to enable it through a mode. Otherwise everything would be in 4:4:4, which movies and TV don't use. But that's just my amateur guess.
post #223 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Burton View Post

I suspect its because TVs need the ability to enable it through a mode. Otherwise everything would be in 4:4:4, which movies and TV don't use. But that's just my amateur guess.

Exactly. Every HDTV supports 4:4:4 (with exception of Rear-Projection and DLP because they use lines or mirrors and do not accurately represent 4:4:4 like the fixed-pixel grid it was designed for) .
You just need a way to enable it when using an attached device. This would be either RENAMING your HDMI's input label to PC (Only works on Samsung and LG as far as i have used), Setting your Sony to Graphics picture mode with Full pixel aspect ratio, or sending any brand of fixed-pixel HDTV a PC-oriented signal (named 1280x720 instead of 720p for example. 1280x720 is PC. 720p is an ITU-named consumer simplification for specifying the PC resolution of 1280x720@60hz which you know, progressive is shown in a single 60 field image).

You do not want to enable it with movies because they are shot in 4:2:0 at most. It would be maybe a bit sharper with presenting each color in its own available pixel, but since you don't have source to fill those pixels, there may be uneven-ness in color. HDTV's default to 4:2:2 for TV cable/satellite broadcast and movie playback.
Edited by MDA400 - 2/14/13 at 6:38am
post #224 of 263
Hi there,
Does anyone know if the Samsung LN40E550 supports 4:4:4 chroma?

I have a choice between that and the LG 42CS560

Thanks smile.gif
post #225 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDA400 View Post

Exactly. Every HDTV supports 4:4:4 (with exception of Rear-Projection and DLP because they use lines or mirrors and do not accurately represent 4:4:4 like the fixed-pixel grid it was designed for) .
You just need a way to enable it when using an attached device. This would be either RENAMING your HDMI's input label to PC (Only works on Samsung and LG as far as i have used), Setting your Sony to Graphics picture mode with Full pixel aspect ratio, or sending any brand of fixed-pixel HDTV a PC-oriented signal (named 1280x720 instead of 720p for example. 1280x720 is PC. 720p is an ITU-named consumer simplification for specifying the PC resolution of 1280x720@60hz which you know, progressive is shown in a single 60 field image).

You do not want to enable it with movies because they are shot in 4:2:0 at most. It would be maybe a bit sharper with presenting each color in its own available pixel, but since you don't have source to fill those pixels, there may be uneven-ness in color. HDTV's default to 4:2:2 for TV cable/satellite broadcast and movie playback.
Wow. Are you saying on the part where you mentioned DLP, that DLPs don't support or even use subsampling or up sampling to 4:4:4?

I intend to buy a Mitsubishi DLP soon so that's my I'm asking.
post #226 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Burton View Post

Wow. Are you saying on the part where you mentioned DLP, that DLPs don't support or even use subsampling or up sampling to 4:4:4?

I intend to buy a Mitsubishi DLP soon so that's my I'm asking.
any answers? I play a lot of video games and soon PC games so just need to make sure DLP front projectors will do well with 4:4:4
post #227 of 263
Why don't you guys just set your PC to 1366 resolution? This is the Max resolution on my TV and it automatically defaults to 444 chroma when using this resolution. Is it possible that this only works with 720 P televisions? Perhaps the 1080 P TVs don't automatically go into 444 chroma mode at 1366 because that is not its native resolution? In this case it could be more beneficial to buy a 720 P TV rather than a 1080 P if you're going to use 1366 resolution on a PC.

I have not been able to get 444 chroma subsampling at 720 resolution. I can, however, get it at 1366 or 1360 resolution. At those resolutions I don't have to touch anything on the TV as well as my PC is set to that resolution it automatically goes to 444 chroma.

But I'm still trying to get 444 chroma , with 720 because smaller text is just slightly bigger at 720 (wide stretched, not one-to-one ) then 1366. I'm hoping that text will be easier to read if I can get 720 444 chroma compared to 1366 444 chroma. This is on the basis that the text will be slightly bigger.

My TV doesn't have a menu option to set HDMI to PC mode like some Samsung's are supposedly able to do. Mine is a JVC 32 Emerald series. Does anyone have any advice?I have a Radeon 7700 and have enabled for 444 pixel format
post #228 of 263
1366x768 is a "PC" resolution. If it were some form of HDTV broadcast resolution, it would look like 768p. You are correct "720p" TV's are not 720p. They are 1366x768. By using a "PC" resolution sent over HDMI to your TV, you basically tell the TV to go into "monitor" mode, thus shutting off all enhancements like a Game Mode would, but also enabling 4:4:4 support.

And you are correct on 1080p native displays. These displays need a method of FORCING PC mode when its an HDTV Broadcast resolution like 720p or 1080p (essentially 1920x1080 in PC terms) to enable 4:4:4 support. Thats why its best to buy an Samsung or LG at first because they are mostly the brands that always provide this way to force it (usually by renaming your HDMI input from "HDMI 1" to "PC" ). Its also possible with a Sony brand TV, but you need to change multiple settings to enable 4:4:4 reproduction.

Also, Rear-Projection TV's and DLP TV's usually do not accept those PC resolutions over HDMI. If they even HAVE a VGA port, then thats the only way because DLP and RP are types of analog TV's that use light guns (CRT RPTV) or lamps shining color on fast-switching mirrors (DLP). They are not fixed pixel displays so they can't accept a specific X by X resolution that is specified like 1366x768 like a Digital Bit-for-Bit Flat panel display could (LCD, LED-LCD, Plasma)
Edited by MDA400 - 2/19/13 at 11:51am
post #229 of 263
What did you mean before when you said that the mirrors on a DLP don't accurately represent 4:4:4 like a flatscreen?
post #230 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Burton View Post

Wow. Are you saying on the part where you mentioned DLP, that DLPs don't support or even use subsampling or up sampling to 4:4:4?

I intend to buy a Mitsubishi DLP soon so that's my I'm asking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Burton View Post

any answers? I play a lot of video games and soon PC games so just need to make sure DLP front projectors will do well with 4:4:4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Burton View Post

What did you mean before when you said that the mirrors on a DLP don't accurately represent 4:4:4 like a flatscreen?

Basically, i said above that analog TV's do not operate by "bits" like digital displays handle information, but with frequencies in hertz. they are straight electric. Digital is electric too, but have that logic portion like a computer that converts electricity to a storage called a " Bit".

Digital displays have a memory bank of what image they receive before they output it to their panel. This is why flat panel Digital displays have INPUT DELAY/LAG. A CRT does not have this because the technology basically receives an electric frequency that is output to specific color temperature display in lines in interlace form. That makes them 1-2 milliseconds if anything, delayed. Not detectable by a human's brain.

DLP on the other hand uses mirrors. it still converts electricity to color through frequency but is output over a lamp. The mirrors aren't as fast as logical bits or straight electricity so it is the worse technology for gaming, even though clarity is great.

What this means for 4:4:4 is that it translates to bits of color per channel for PIXELS. analog display do not have "pixels" but "lines". So even if a DLP or CRT may accept a 4:4:4 potential picture, it can't produce it accurately like a Flat-Panel could. Read this for more clarification because they define X : X : X color sampling with pixels in mind: What is Color Subsampling?
Edited by MDA400 - 2/19/13 at 12:28pm
post #231 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDA400 View Post



Basically, i said above that analog TV's do not operate by "bits" like digital displays handle information, but with frequencies in hertz. they are straight electric. Digital is electric too, but have that logic portion like a computer that converts electricity to a storage called a " Bit".

Digital displays have a memory bank of what image they receive before they output it to their panel. This is why flat panel Digital displays have INPUT DELAY/LAG. A CRT does not have this because the technology basically receives an electric frequency that is output to specific color temperature display in lines in interlace form. That makes them 1-2 milliseconds if anything, delayed. Not detectable by a human's brain.

DLP on the other hand uses mirrors. it still converts electricity to color through frequency but is output over a lamp. The mirrors aren't as fast as logical bits or straight electricity so it is the worse technology for gaming, even though clarity is great.

What this means for 4:4:4 is that it translates to bits of color per channel for PIXELS. analog display do not have "pixels" but "lines". So even if a DLP or CRT may accept a 4:4:4 potential picture, it can't produce it accurately like a Flat-Panel could. Read this for more clarification because they define X : X : X color sampling with pixels in mind: What is Color Subsampling?
Ahhh! I understand now thanks, and for the link.
post #232 of 263
Four of the 32 inch LED TVs that I've tried over the past two years had a max resolution of 1366. Setting my PC to 1366 over HDMI provided a very satisfactory clarity on the TVs.

These brands were JVC, Visio, and two Westinghouse's.

If you are only going for 1366 resolution and don't care about 1920 resolution, then rest assured knowing that all four TV brands that I've tried support 444 chroma at their native 1366 resolution. Set your PC to 1366 and you will be fine.
post #233 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by adaweawe View Post

Four of the 32 inch LED TVs that I've tried over the past two years had a max resolution of 1366. Setting my PC to 1366 over HDMI provided a very satisfactory clarity on the TVs.

These brands were JVC, Visio, and two Westinghouse's.

If you are only going for 1366 resolution and don't care about 1920 resolution, then rest assured knowing that all four TV brands that I've tried support 444 chroma at their native 1366 resolution. Set your PC to 1366 and you will be fine.

That's good to know because I haven't had the opportunity to test multiple TV's in their native resolutions with a PC input. So if you can get a PC resolution output to your TV, then all flat panels MUST be able to support 444 chroma. A hint at this would be if the TV was capable of Deep Color and xvYCC since those color spaces support higher than the 4:4:4/8-bit per component colors.

For people with a 1080p TV, you would not want to set it to 1366x768 unless there is no way of forcing PC mode on an HDTV resolution or sending a 1920x1080 PC signal. You could always create a custom resolution within your graphics card to something like 1920x1079 with 1 line missing, to trick your display. The difference would hardly be noticeable.
post #234 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDA400 View Post

That's good to know because I haven't had the opportunity to test multiple TV's in their native resolutions with a PC input. So if you can get a PC resolution output to your TV, then all flat panels MUST be able to support 444 chroma. A hint at this would be if the TV was capable of Deep Color and xvYCC since those color spaces support higher than the 4:4:4/8-bit per component colors.

For people with a 1080p TV, you would not want to set it to 1366x768 unless there is no way of forcing PC mode on an HDTV resolution or sending a 1920x1080 PC signal. You could always create a custom resolution within your graphics card to something like 1920x1079 with 1 line missing, to trick your display. The difference would hardly be noticeable.
Yes it would no? The 1:1 pixel mapping would be lost so won't look as sharp.
post #235 of 263
Your right it wouldn't be 1:1 pixel mapping in reality, but it would still seem like it to someone who isn't sitting 5 inches from their display. 1 line out of 1080 lines is really minut. that custom resolution (1920x1079) is still put under the PC resolutions category when created. So like i said, you would still get 4:4:4 since its a "PC" signal, but in reality its over 1920x1079 and not 1920x1080. Now if you go down to 720p, thats of course, noticeable to most, but not some, on a 1080p TV.

In general, 1:1 pixel mapping doesn't always mean 4:4:4. You can have 1:1 pixel mapping by having no over or underscan. This is set by using the aspect ratio names like "Just Scan" or "Screen Fit". While you are set at 1:1 pixel mapping, you could be feeding your TV a source that may be one of those "HDTV" resolutions in the form of "720p" or 1080p".

This would cause the TV to fall back to 4:2:2 since this is what movies and broadcast can provide. PC's are known to the TV to be capable of 4:4:4, but without sending your TV a "PC" signal (ie. 1920x1080), you would be providing a 4:4:4 source (PC) into a 4:2:2 window (your HDTV).

This throws away color information of second and third color fields (4 : x : x denoted by X's) and causes blurry colored text that is required by the missing color information. Red and Magenta are mostly affected because the second and third color fields have their red color information stripped when output at 4:2:2.

Don't know why it strips red and not blue or green, but that's why red and magenta colored text is blurry/fuzzy. Red and blue make purple and magenta is a form of purple so if blue or red was stripped, magenta would still look fuzzy.

You can look at this picture for this fuzziness in those colors: Tint Blue(RGB).png
It won't be fuzzy for magenta or red if you properly have your TV and source outputting and displaying 4:4:4. Also make sure your Sharpness isnt set so low you start "artificially" blurring the image.
Edited by MDA400 - 2/21/13 at 11:14am
post #236 of 263
With my Xbox I am connected to my Samsung in PC mode, 1080p (or as displayed on the TV 1920*1080@60Hz). No worries, gives the lowest lag.

However the picture is not as good. And unless I turn Sharpness up to 100 looks pretty bad.

My Samsung when set to PC mode only allows picture size to be set to 16:9 (screen fit is not selectable).

What is going wrong?
post #237 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwb100 View Post

With my Xbox I am connected to my Samsung in PC mode, 1080p (or as displayed on the TV 1920*1080@60Hz). No worries, gives the lowest lag.

However the picture is not as good. And unless I turn Sharpness up to 100 looks pretty bad.

My Samsung when set to PC mode only allows picture size to be set to 16:9 (screen fit is not selectable).

What is going wrong?
When in PC mode there is no need to worry that your not seeing the full image, you are. It's actually already enabled when set to 16:9. And also something else. Turning sharpness to zero in PC mode is wrong,if you do it will look far worse than the other modes, I think its deliberately artificially blurring the Image. You must set sharpness to 50 in PC Mode, that equals 0 in movie mode. So PC modes sharpness at 50 and movie modes 0 are the same.
post #238 of 263
My $200 Westinghouse at 1366 PC resolution looks clear and amazing. I can set the sharpness anywhere from 0 to 50 and the text is good. But it looks best when sharpness is that 10 or so. Sharpness at zero looks better than sharpness at 40. Over 50 it looks crappy an artificial.

Maybe my TV doesn't blur, but only sharpens when sharpness is set above zero. So anything above zero is overcompensation. Zero may very well be the best sharpness setting for my TV.
post #239 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Burton View Post

When in PC mode there is no need to worry that your not seeing the full image, you are. It's actually already enabled when set to 16:9. And also something else. Turning sharpness to zero in PC mode is wrong,if you do it will look far worse than the other modes, I think its deliberately artificially blurring the Image. You must set sharpness to 50 in PC Mode, that equals 0 in movie mode. So PC modes sharpness at 50 and movie modes 0 are the same.

I thought Samsung TV's DISABLE Sharpness when in PC mode. That and color saturation too because in PC mode, your telling your display detect EXACT information from the source. So your TV sets itself automatically for optimal sharpness and color based on the resolution and content type. weird...

If you have the ability to set sharpness in PC mode like i do with mine, look at this image to properly calibrate it then: Sharpness 1920x1080 Test
Edited by MDA400 - 2/27/13 at 12:08pm
post #240 of 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDA400 View Post

I thought Samsung TV's DISABLE Sharpness when in PC mode. That and color saturation too because in PC mode, your telling your display detect EXACT information from the source. So your TV sets itself automatically for optimal sharpness and color based on the resolution and content type. weird...

If you have the ability to set sharpness in PC mode like i do with mine, look at this image to properly calibrate it then: Sharpness 1920x1080 Test
My particular Samsung TV is the PS51E6500, the sharpness control WHILST in PC mode isn't disabled. But the use of Color, tint,10pwhite balance and a few others is. But the Sharpness, brightness, contrast ect are all fully calibrateble.

Maybe previous Samsungs are different to this model on....
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Official 4:4:4 / Chroma Subsampling Thread