AVS Forum banner

McIntosh MX-121 - any thoughts?

119K views 686 replies 90 participants last post by  S4Patrick 
#1 ·
I realize that it's not out yet, and that info is scarce, but you guys are very resourceful and I figured that someone must have the lowdown.


Anything to add? Or any thoughts?
 
#2 ·
I have not heard anymore than you have I am sure. Kind of pricey for a processor, but obviously it looks nice next to their amps



I can understand a McIntosh amp owner with the cash being interested.


I wonder if they outsourced a lot of the work. That's a lot of complex functionality for a small company to manage. Are they affiliated with a larger company?


Has there been any mention of any room correction system?


There was some discussion here ( http://www.audioaficionado.org/mcint...s-mx121-2.html )
 
#3 ·

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman /forum/post/21411387



I wonder if they outsourced a lot of the work. That's a lot of complex functionality for a small company to manage. Are they affiliated with a larger company?


Has there been any mention of any room correction system?

McIntosh is one of the brands owned by D&M Holdings, who also have Denon and Marantz.


I'd venture a guess that McIntosh will use their room correction suite "Room Perfect", which seemed to do a good job when Kal reviewed it in the MX-150. Of course, that is just a WAG on my part.
 
#6 ·
Having just read an essay and seen a photo tour of the McIntosh factory, I can't imagine that shared ownership would affect their stalwart processes one bit. They're all about heritage, and they seem like the type of company which would ward off that type of outside influence (e.g. using Marantz components against their will) into their assembly lines. Though the economy is tough and anything's possible.
 
#8 ·
Dont bet the farm that Mcintosh will keep the MX121 up to date with timely updates!!


Who knows, next year they'll re-introduce another processor at half the price of the MX121 to burn those owners that bought one!
 
#9 ·

Quote:
Originally Posted by scanido /forum/post/21489233


Dont bet the farm that Mcintosh will keep the MX121 up to date with timely updates!!


Who knows, next year they'll re-introduce another processor at half the price of the MX121 to burn those owners that bought one!

In fact it's more likely that they will NOT introduce another processor at half the price, unless you have some insider's info which suggests otherwise? I realize this pisses off MX-150 owners, but that shouldn't tarnish the reality of the 121. McIntosh is simply adjusting to their sales figures, but they don't appear to give way to quality with this piece.


Immediately after hearing about the features of the 121 I ordered one. It will accompany Krell and Accuphase processors which I keep in other rooms. I'll get them all together for a shoot-out and post a review. I doubt it will outpace the Accuphase but I'm very curious how it stands up against the Krell. It will have better features but how will it rank in the category that matters most: sound.
 
#10 ·
Wouldn't be surprised if it's quite similar to the Marantz part under the skin. Maybe the same boards, but strung together in Binghamton rather than some Chinese village.


The multichannel amp they released also looks a bit cheesy. At that price, if they want to digitize the meters they should have a Retina display for each meter, not a few cheesy LEDs arrayed in a fan.


I know I would pay a lot of money for a modern, efficient (that is to say, Class D) amp with hi-rez virtual LCD/OLED "meters" and ~250W/7ch/8Ω. The electronics are just commodity parts, but I like the McIntosh look.
 
#11 ·
MX-121 is supposed to have Audyssey and not use Lyngdorf system used in the MX-150.


If you don't need 7 channels, then going to the MC205 (5-ch) is the same price as the new amp.


So, you can get the meters and spend half as much on the pre if it is more in your price range.


B.
 
#12 ·

Quote:
Originally Posted by DS-21 /forum/post/21499271


Wouldn't be surprised if it's quite similar to the Marantz part under the skin. Maybe the same boards, but strung together in Binghamton rather than some Chinese village.

+1.


Their processors aren't anything revolutionary; they're very nice, but they're still drawing from the same pool of commodity parts as everyone else (like Denon and Marantz are, like Harman is, etc). This isn't to say "don't" - if you like the look and have matching components, it's a very appealing option ("all McIntosh" rooms are very imposing, visually, the $100,000 price-tag might be a bit rough for some people to swallow though). That said, you can easily spend less for the same.


It's your own choice, but I wouldn't get too hung up on the "they're obsessed with heritage and this and that" blah blah - they're a business and their goal is to make money.
 
#13 ·

Quote:
Originally Posted by DS-21 /forum/post/21499271


Wouldn't be surprised if it's quite similar to the Marantz part under the skin.

In fact I would be very surprised. What evidence do we have that McIntosh would share a large percentage of their components with another company merely because it's owned by the same parent corporation? Some do this, some do not. McIntosh isn't exactly the type. So what "evidence" - proof - do we have?


I had Marantz's top-of-the-line processor here for a day (returned it immediately because it sounded merely "good"). The 121 is expected in a couple of weeks -- I'll also describe it as compared to my memory of the Marantz.
 
#14 ·

Quote:
Originally Posted by elambo /forum/post/21504389


In fact I would be very surprised. What evidence do we have that McIntosh would share a large percentage of their components with another company merely because it's owned by the same parent corporation? Some do this, some do not. McIntosh isn't exactly the type. So what "evidence" - proof - do we have?


I had Marantz's top-of-the-line processor here for a day (returned it immediately because it sounded merely "good"). The 121 is expected in a couple of weeks -- I'll also describe it as compared to my memory of the Marantz.

Ignoring that your description will mean nothing (that dog don't hunt), can we cut the brand-worship out?


You claim that McIntosh "isn't the type" and that they "care" - got any proof to substantiate this? You're the one making the claim after all.
 
#15 ·
Maybe just post a picture of the inside and we can all see what the part/build quality looks like.


No reason to guess either way. Since D&M&Mc are under the same umbrella that offers the ability to get better deals on part quantity. That should help reduce the price, nothing more...


B.
 
#17 ·
One thing that would be critical for me is to have balanced outputs on all seven channels to run to the amplifiers.


I sure don't want any unbalanced cables over 4 feet long running to an amplifier, which I would want to have located near the speakers.


That is one nice feature of the Marantz AV7500, but I would assume that a McIntosh unit would also have them.


Too bad Audio Research doesn't make one yet; made in Minnesota...ay-yup.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Webomatic /forum/post/21513338


From what I have been told the only thing Denon/Marantz about the MX121 is the HDMI chip set. The rest is McIntosh. It will use the Audyssey room correction rather than the Lindorff room correction. It will be a 7-channel processor
 
#20 ·

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal Rubinson /forum/post/21514256


See below.

It looks like from rear panel hookup posted that this unit is 7.2 which is two subwoofer output. That is fantastic because it really takes two subwoofers for right and left channels to dial in the room correction to sound properly especially for dedicated audio listening. From what I understand that the analog secton of this piece is all discrete electronics like their dedicated preamplifier line. These two factors are critical to me because it will serve as a center hub of my system that is all ultra high end audiophile components that I use as home theater and critical audio listening in stereo or multi-channel mode. Also, it looks like all the input and output features that i want seems to be convered with rear panel layout. So I think I will hold off upgrading my Krell HTS 7.1 to the Cary Cinema 12 now which is an excellent piece but is 7.1. Just wondering when MX121 will become available.
 
#21 ·
Looks fairly similar to the AV7005 from the back. The individual blocks are in different places, but labeling and layout is identical within blocks. Few features don't overlap, obviously, but still, looks very similar.
 
#23 ·

Quote:
Originally Posted by elambo /forum/post/21504389


In fact I would be very surprised. What evidence do we have that McIntosh would share a large percentage of their components with another company merely because it's owned by the same parent corporation?

That is what a rational company would do with commodity parts like A/V equipment, yes. And I suspect there will be more of that at DRM as time progresses.


However, given the picture Prof. Rubinson posted it seems that at the very least the layout is different.


There's no real advantage to be had by "going it alone." Except perhaps in loudspeakers, because there we're no longer talking about commodity electronic parts. I would love to hear the current McIntosh speakers with their arrays of black-domed Aura Whispers. That's a fantastic little driver.

Quote:
Originally Posted by elambo /forum/post/21504389


I had Marantz's top-of-the-line processor here for a day (returned it immediately because it sounded merely "good"). The 121 is expected in a couple of weeks -- I'll also describe it as compared to my memory of the Marantz.

I assume such "listening" was not properly even level-matched, let alone blind.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top