or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+) › Teranex 2D>3D -Not just for Millionaires any More
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Teranex 2D>3D -Not just for Millionaires any More - Page 4

post #91 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastl View Post

If you're asking whether it is HDCP compliant, the answer is NO. BlackMagic indicates that somewhere in their literature. Otherwise, nice little unit.

Based on that, has anyone tested this device to see if it strips the HDCP to allow the Teranex to work for regular blu-rays? http://www.hdfury.com/products/hdfury4-specs/
post #92 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by sipester View Post

Based on that, has anyone tested this device to see if it strips the HDCP to allow the Teranex to work for regular blu-rays? http://www.hdfury.com/products/hdfury4-specs/

I am fairly sure the answer is no. They have publicly acknowledged the device is not HDCP compliant and getting such compliance is no small matter. The device has a number of features that would not be allowed under HDCP so they would need to be disabled in HDCP mode.

And on top of all that BlackMagic Designs is a major hardware supplier to the motion picture and television industry. They can't afford to make enemies in Hollywood.

And last but not least, filtering out HDCP is illegal.
post #93 of 128
Sorry, but in simpler terms.....does this mean that this new BlackMagic Teranex 3D processor CAN'T be used to convert 2D Blurays to 3D for display on a 3D TV or Projector??? Thanks
post #94 of 128
It will input component video, and you could probably do something with that. Not a chance with HDMI input from a BluRay player!

I did get a chance to play around with the 2D unit last month. Very nice processor, especially considering the price. I don't think they are using a Realta or Reon inside. My impression is that they implemented the Teranex algorithms in an FPGA.
post #95 of 128
At ISE the Teranex guy (the only or one of the few left following the acquisition) told me the box was using the chipset developed under the ownership of the chipmaker (Silicon something I don't care to look up right now;-)), they could move it back to FPGA, if needed, that would be no issue, as it are the alghoritms that count, but there was no intention to move away from the chips. And that was at the previous price point about 10K above the currently announced price.
post #96 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by donaldk View Post

At ISE the Teranex guy (the only or one of the few left following the acquisition) told me the box was using the chipset developed under the ownership of the chipmaker (Silicon something I don't care to look up right now;-)), they could move it back to FPGA, if needed, that would be no issue, as it are the alghoritms that count, but there was no intention to move away from the chips. And that was at the previous price point about 10K above the currently announced price.

Yes, the whole idea of the custom chip was cost reduction. Using multiple FPGAs is more expensive to mass produce and a much higher risk of production line problems. Making a custom chip of this complexity is an expensive undertaking usually reserved for consumer products as that is about the only way to recoup the costs. This is what probably put Silicon Image out of business.

The same thing happened to Quvis. In the late 1990s they developed a Wavelet compression algorithm and produced a broadcast HD disk recorder that had impressive performance, higher picture quality then the HD VTRs on the market at the time. Then back around 2001, they pushed for this compression algorithm to become the DCI standard. And in preparation for that they embarked on a program to reduce the 2 large 12in square circuit boards chock full of FPGAs to a single chip. They also had some illusions of selling the chip to the DBS and cable STB companies as well to replace MPEG2. Well the DCI standard adopoted Motion JPEG and the DBS people went with MPEG4. The R&D costs to develop that chip put Quvis out of business for good! The last I heard the IP is now sitting within the bankruptcy court - no takers.
post #97 of 128
Big advantage of the FPGA is that you can easily reprogram the device, whereas you're stuck with what you've got in the ASIC. When they started to develop the Realta years ago, there probably was a big price-performance advantage. Not sure there is such a big cost performance difference these days. Anyway, when are you going to buy the 2D Teranex and rip the cover off to see what's inside?
post #98 of 128
Yeah, no-one is using the Silicon Optix chip as it is/was just too expensive for the mass consumer market like bulb projectors. Quvis, that name vaguely rings a bell.

Flexibility is nice, but it implies ongoing algorithm development.
post #99 of 128
Quote:
Flexibility is nice, but it implies ongoing algorithm development

Could be ongoing feature development too. The 2D is missing gamma adjustment. I figured for the price, something was missing.

One thing I can say for the Realta is that my processor (Calibre PVPRO HD) still gives the best/smoothest upscaling I've seen. That processor is 4.5 years old and has never failed to start up and run, has never crashed or locked up, and is still running the OEM firmware! More than what I can say for all the so-called "high-end" models discussed over on the LumaBay forum.
post #100 of 128
Calibre is a high-priced brand of scalers/processors, so it should life up to the price tag, and therefor last for a number of years. Good to hear these products do. But since few Teranex guys are left, wouldn't they have their hands full getting the product ready...
Edited by donaldk - 12/29/12 at 8:31pm
post #101 of 128
Here we are March 4th and the Blackmagic Design website still says that their Teranex 3D Processor is shipping in January. Anyone one have the inside scoop on this processor to be??? Maybe they are modifying it so that it can accept and process a HDMI input from a 2D bluray player???
post #102 of 128
The teranex 3D is in stock at B&H Photo finally!
Anyone picked one up yet? Very curious to see some real-world examples of 2D-3D conversion, as well as Laserdisc upscaled.
post #103 of 128
Thread Starter 
That is not true...
post #104 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by CINERAMAX View Post

That is not true...

What is 'that' confused.gif
post #105 of 128
Thread Starter 
Although the BH website says it is in stock, this unit will not be shipping in the near future, it continues to be delayed...

If it is anything remotely close to the vc-100 it is an incredible unit. For example on certain titles the end result is as good as many professional conversions. Specifically LOR Return of the King is amazing from beginning to end.
post #106 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark A Gonzalez View Post

My $2,700 Panasonic PT-AE7000 projector converts it at no additional charge. I just saved $20,000!!!

I own the AE-7000 and the 2D-3D conversion is so garbage-like it makes the term "craptastic" sounds glorious.

Anything IS better than Panasonic 3D conversion.
post #107 of 128
Thread Starter 
I looked at many converters including the similarly expensive JVC professional, the Terry is on a league of it's own.
post #108 of 128
FWIW, the Blackmagic Design website no longer states the Teranex 3D Processor is shipping in January. It now provides a "Find Reseller" button --- which shows 5 authorized online resellers and 10 authorized resellers in the US.

http://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/teranex/
post #109 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by CINERAMAX View Post

Although the BH website says it is in stock, this unit will not be shipping in the near future, it continues to be delayed...

If it is anything remotely close to the vc-100 it is an incredible unit. For example on certain titles the end result is as good as many professional conversions. Specifically LOR Return of the King is amazing from beginning to end.

Many local resellers listed on the Black Magic website. Fofic allows one to add it to order it, adding the 3D unit to the shoppingcart. No idea if that means it is shipping, or on backorder.
post #110 of 128
This whole 3D version availability seems like a hot mess. I'm just glad I'm not waiting to get one of them. I feel bad for those that are..
post #111 of 128
I don't get what all the arguing is about here. If you want a 3D unit, just call J&R and see if they have them in stock. Same for any other BMD dealer.
post #112 of 128
Thread Starter 
I have called everyone... it is not coming out anytime soon.
post #113 of 128
Two year on show at ISE, on Black Magic Design's catalog style booth, including price stickers, and still no units available, starting to look like Red;-).
post #114 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by waterm3732 View Post

FWIW, the Blackmagic Design website no longer states the Teranex 3D Processor is shipping in January. It now provides a "Find Reseller" button --- which shows 5 authorized online resellers and 10 authorized resellers in the US.

http://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/teranex/

I don't see AVS on their list. Do they not plan on selling it?
post #115 of 128
Ive just come back from this store:
http://www.videoguys.com.au/Shop/p/25643/blackmagic-teranex-3d-processor-teranex3d444.html
and they have floor stock. I saw it for myself. Problem is, I can't afford to buy without some reviews to see if the thing actually works.
post #116 of 128
It is definitely available in Australia, do the US resellers have it yet?
post #117 of 128
On Display at Blackmagic stand at SMPTE in Australia this week. Had a look at the 3D, didn't dazzle me, but then again it was a show setup.
post #118 of 128
Why would it not be hdpc compliant if it has an hdmi input?
Edited by ComputerTech0903 - 7/25/13 at 10:10pm
post #119 of 128
It wasn't designed for "consumer" use. The HDMI input is there as a basic interface for pro gear that isn't employing HDCP.
post #120 of 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComputerTech0903 View Post

Why would it not be hdpc compliant if it has an hdmi input?

HDCP is optional with HDMI. There are many pro HDMI products that do not employ HDCP. It costs money to license HDCP, like over $10,000 so thta's a lot for a small company. Note too that you can have HDCP on DVI as well.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+)
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Ultra Hi-End HT Gear ($20,000+) › Teranex 2D>3D -Not just for Millionaires any More