AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › 69% of U.S. Homes Have HDTVs
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

69% of U.S. Homes Have HDTVs

post #1 of 104
Thread Starter 
CES: Over Two Thirds of U.S. Homes Have HDTVs

The penetration of HDTVs has increased from 17% in 2006 to 69%, according to a new survey from Leichtman Research Group

By George Winslow -- Broadcasting & Cable, 1/4/2012 11:36:37 AM

The number of HDTV in U.S. households continues to rise, hitting 69% according to new consumer research from Leichtman Research Group, Inc. (LRG), up from 17% in 2006. That means 52% of U.S. homes have adopted it in the last five year.

The survey also found that a growing number homes have multiple HD sets, with 48% of HDTV households having more than one HDTV. Overall, about one-third of all U.S. households now have multiple HDTV sets -- up from about one-sixth of all households two years ago, and 4% five years ago.

Yet about 45% of TV sets in HD households, and close to 60% of all TV sets in the US, are not HDTVs, which means a great deal of viewing still occurs in standard definition.

"In just the past five years, over half of all US households have adopted HDTV, bringing the total to nearly 70% of all households having at least one HDTV set" said Bruce Leichtman, president and principal analyst for Leichtman Research Group, Inc. "While lower prices have helped to expand the base of HD households, and those who have multiple HDTV sets, still close to 60% of all TV sets in US households are not HDTVs -- this provides ample opportunity for the sale of more HDTV sets going forward."

The findings are based on a survey of 1,302 households throughout the United States for the new LRG study, "HDTV and 3D TV 2011." It is the ninth annual iteration of the HD study.

The survey also found relatively robust demand for new HD sets, despite poor economic conditions. About 21% of all households purchased a new TV set in the past 12 months, and 19% of all households plan to purchase a new TV set in the next 12 months.

But the survey found sluggish growth in 3D sets. Less than 3% of all U.S. households currently have an HDTV set that is 3D-capable -- and 45% of this group do not watch any content in 3D.

In terms of demand for 3D sets, nearly 80% of adults in the U.S. have heard of 3D TV. But of those who have heard of 3D TV, only 5% are very interested in getting a 3D TV.

In other findings, the report notes that higher income groups are much more likely to have HD sets, prices for HD sets continue to drop and that the amount of HD programming continues to increase.

About 85% of those with annual household incomes over $75,000 have an HDTV compared to only 47% for those households with incomes below $30,000. About two thirds (67%) of homes with incomes of $30,000-$75,000 had HD sets.

Mean reported spending on an HDTV sets was about $940, a drop of about 23% from two years ago, and about half the cost five years ago.

Respondents who get their HD programing from a cable, satellite or telco provider reported a significant increase in the number of HD channels, with the mean number of HD channels hitting 75. That is up from 28 five years ago and about 53 channels two years.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/art...Have_HDTVs.php
post #2 of 104
Who wants to be the 1st to post:

"but how many actually get HD."

or

"how many arent actually getting HD but think they are."
post #3 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcowboy7 View Post

Who wants to be the 1st to post:

"but how many actually get HD."

or

"how many arent actually getting HD but think they are."

But...how many actually get HD?

or

How many arent actually getting HD but think they are?

or

How many aren't getting HD and don't care that they're watching stretched SD?

or

How many don't watch HD because they don't want to pay extra for HD through their cable provider - and haven't tried getting it for free OTA?

post #4 of 104
Good thread. Thanks for the posting.

Yeah, my friend has a LED HDTV but no HD service! He says his new TV already produces a good picture and he doesn't need the extra $20+ month in HD service. I don't even think he messes with trying to find HD-OTA
post #5 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young C View Post

Good thread. Thanks for the posting.

Yeah, my friend has a LED HDTV but no HD service! He says his new TV already produces a good picture and he doesn't need the extra $20+ month in HD service. I don't even think he messes with trying to find HD-OTA

I don't understand this "mess" thing. What mess?

I connected a small, set top, powered antenna to a digital set at my father's house, hit scan and found several local channels. It was that easy. You can pick up a good antenna for around $30 at radio shack, try it out and return if if nothing comes in. All you're out is a little gas money driving to the store.

I get that some people can't get a usable signal. I have trouble getting my ABC station where my place is located.

But it's silly to not even try.
post #6 of 104
The annual XX% of U.S. Homes Have HDTVs thread with the annual responses
post #7 of 104
Thread Starter 
After years of watching only SD on Comcast and DirecTV, my aunt finally got FiOS and HD channels to go with her HDTV. Miracles can happen.
post #8 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetworkTV View Post

I don't understand this "mess" thing. What mess?

I connected a small, set top, powered antenna to a digital set at my father's house, hit scan and found several local channels. It was that easy. You can pick up a good antenna for around $30 at radio shack, try it out and return if if nothing comes in. All you're out is a little gas money driving to the store.

I get that some people can't get a usable signal. I have trouble getting my ABC station where my place is located.

But it's silly to not even try.

Yeah. He just lacks interest. Doesn't want to take the time or to fool around with it. His new HDTV is fine enough.

One day he'll get it.
post #9 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young C View Post

Good thread. Thanks for the posting.

Yeah, my friend has a LED HDTV but no HD service! He says his new TV already produces a good picture and he doesn't need the extra $20+ month in HD service. I don't even think he messes with trying to find HD-OTA

If he's happy with SD programming why did he get a HD TV? He can't afford a HDTV but not $20 a month for HD programming? That's like a guy buying a Lamborghini then never driving it because he says he can't afford the gas.
post #10 of 104
And less than 1% calibrate their HDTV, I'm sure.

Not surprised with the 3D statistics, however.
post #11 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCF68 View Post

If he's happy with SD programming why did he get a HD TV? He can't afford a HDTV but not $20 a month for HD programming? That's like a guy buying a Lamborghini then never driving it because he says he can't afford the gas.

His CRT TV was going out. He had to replace his TV. These days, you can not buy a SDTV. Everywhere you go, they sell HDTVs.
Edit: I'm sure you can find SDTVs on Ebay, Garage Sales, and Pawn Stores... but going to the general retail store..

He has a lot of "projects" in his life. HDTV is the least of his concern. Now he needs like $10,000 for his wedding, $5,000 to fix his project race car, etc.

Just priorities, I guess.
Anyways.
post #12 of 104
That's right. You can't find a SD TV any more unless you're buying a used one.

A buddy of mine has been clamoring for a HDTV for some time. Their CRT went out last week. He thought he was finally going to get a HDTV until his wife blocked his path again and got an old CRT off a friend. She flat refuses to get a HDTV.
post #13 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRM4 View Post

A buddy of mine has been clamoring for a HDTV for some time. Their CRT went out last week. He thought he was finally going to get a HDTV until his wife blocked his path again and got an old CRT off a friend. She flat refuses to get a HDTV.

Sounds like he needs a new wife.
post #14 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeKlim View Post

And less than 1% calibrate their HDTV, I'm sure.

Calibrate? I'd be happy if they just used a picture mode other than Dynamic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeKlim View Post

Not surprised with the 3D statistics, however.

Neither am I. As I've been saying all along, 3D is nothing more than a fad. I've got a 3DTV, two pairs of glasses, and three sources (cable, Xbox 360, and Blu-ray) and I rarely even bother with it.
post #15 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young C View Post

His CRT TV was going out. He had to replace his TV. These days, you can not buy a SDTV. Everywhere you go, they sell HDTVs.
Edit: I'm sure you can find SDTVs on Ebay, Garage Sales, and Pawn Stores... but going to the general retail store..

He has a lot of "projects" in his life. HDTV is the least of his concern. Now he needs like $10,000 for his wedding, $5,000 to fix his project race car, etc.

Just priorities, I guess.
Anyways.

$10,000 for a wedding...great googley moogley...

My sister and her husband spent $2500 - trip to Europe and castle rental included. It's been almost 10 years and they've used the money they didn't spend on a wedding (combined with what they don't spend on TV) to do a lot of other traveling together over the years.

My parents spent $250, most of which was for the photos (some of which contained the only images of people in the family who are no longer alive). They did the typical tour of Niagara Falls and New England for the honeymoon. Over 40 years later, still married...and on their 40th anniversary, they took the same trip they took on their honeymoon.

BTW: your friend ought to simply put the $5k race car money toward the wedding. His wife will undoubtedly make him get rid of it at some point anyway. She might dig it now, but as soon as he starts spending more time with it than he does her, she'll make the ultimatum. The same goes for motorcycles and time spent with his friends on weekends.
post #16 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy W View Post

As I've been saying all along, 3D is nothing more than a fad *right now



How much would it cost to get married in Ireland?
post #17 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingcarcas View Post

right now

I disagree. I do not see 3D taking off now or in the future.
post #18 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus Carr View Post

The penetration of HDTVs has increased from 17% in 2006 to 69%, according to a new survey from Leichtman Research Group ...

... and 59% are still tuning in SD.
post #19 of 104
This past Sunday I had gone to an old friends house. He's upgraded to an HDTV. Loves the picture. We were watching the game. (GO GIANTS) I noticed his picture looked rather dull for being an HDTV. It didn't look to be prom his picture settings. So I asked him. "Do you have this thing hooked up with HDMI?" His response. "Uh.. No? What's HDMI."

I'm baffled by this being as he has Direct TV with an HD box. Has an Xbox360 as well. Yet had nothing hooked up HD. Granted he's an old army friend and doesn't take the time to learn about tech. Still use to watching the good old CRTS back overseas lol.

As for the percentage of people that have an HDTV now. That doesn't surprise me one bit. 6 years ago is a very long time. The pricing back then was insanely high. We're talking a 40inch Samsung LCD for 10K. CRT sets were still being sold at your local stores. With CRTs no longer being an option. LCDs have slowly dropped prices in time. You can get a 20LCD for about $100. Prices only seem to get lower and lower. It was only a matter of time before HD became the standard and SD be ruled out. Don't you all remember the days YouTube wasn't HD? Them making the bug change was a big sign of how are world of HDTV is getting bigger and bigger.
post #20 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by JukeBox360 View Post

This past Sunday I had gone to an old friends house. He's upgraded to an HDTV. Loves the picture. We were watching the game. (GO GIANTS) I noticed his picture looked rather dull for being an HDTV. It didn't look to be prom his picture settings. So I asked him. "Do you have this thing hooked up with HDMI?" His response. "Uh.. No? What's HDMI."

I'm baffled by this being as he has Direct TV with an HD box. Has an Xbox360 as well. Yet had nothing hooked up HD. Granted he's an old army friend and doesn't take the time to learn about tech. Still use to watching the good old CRTS back overseas lol.

As for the percentage of people that have an HDTV now. That doesn't surprise me one bit. 6 years ago is a very long time. The pricing back then was insanely high. We're talking a 40inch Samsung LCD for 10K. CRT sets were still being sold at your local stores. With CRTs no longer being an option. LCDs have slowly dropped prices in time. You can get a 20LCD for about $100. Prices only seem to get lower and lower. It was only a matter of time before HD became the standard and SD be ruled out. Don't you all remember the days YouTube wasn't HD? Them making the bug change was a big sign of how are world of HDTV is getting bigger and bigger.

Don't know if anyone saw or knew about this, but, for one of the BCS bowl games, the 'swag bag' of goodies the players got contained a 32-inch flat screen TV! (I'm assuming they were wide-screen 16:9)

That's how common HDTV units are these days. They're (in some cases) giving them away.

EDIT: I just checked. It wasn't even a BCS Bowl! It was the Meineke Car Care Bowl of Texas, between two 6-6 teams! Texas A&M and Northwestern. Toshiba 32-inch flat screen TVs.
post #21 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young C View Post

His CRT TV was going out. He had to replace his TV. These days, you can not buy a SDTV. Everywhere you go, they sell HDTVs.
Edit: I'm sure you can find SDTVs on Ebay, Garage Sales, and Pawn Stores... but going to the general retail store..

He has a lot of "projects" in his life. HDTV is the least of his concern. Now he needs like $10,000 for his wedding, $5,000 to fix his project race car, etc.

Just priorities, I guess.
Anyways.

If he needs that much money seems like spending money on a HDTV shouldn't be a priority either.
post #22 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by humdinger70 View Post

Don't know if anyone saw or knew about this, but, for one of the BCS bowl games, the 'swag bag' of goodies the players got contained a 32-inch flat screen TV! (I'm assuming they were wide-screen 16:9)

That's how common HDTV units are these days. They're (in some cases) giving them away.

EDIT: I just checked. It wasn't even a BCS Bowl! It was the Meineke Car Care Bowl of Texas, between two 6-6 teams! Texas A&M and Northwestern. Toshiba 32-inch flat screen TVs.

I'm pretty sure that is against the rules to give players a TV. Players have lost their eligility of accepting gifts of much less value.
post #23 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCF68 View Post

I'm pretty sure that is against the rules to give players a TV. Players have lost their eligility of accepting gifts of much less value.

http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/J...ifts-List.aspx
post #24 of 104
Why can't they receive TVs? They're Bowl gives so somehow that's "allowed" by the NCAA. Players from my school received iPod Touches a couple years back.
post #25 of 104
Sadder still is the number of people who prefer to rent DVDs because they don't see any difference when they watch a blu ray.

Turns out watching a a blu ray on a 37" HDTV (playing through the TV's internal speakers, of course), from 15 feet away, you can't see (or hear) much, if any, difference. At least, not enough to justify the extra 50 cents for renting a blu ray vs a DVD at RedBox.

All too common scenario.

*sigh*
post #26 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetworkTV View Post

$10,000 for a wedding...great googley moogley...

My sister and her husband spent $2500 - trip to Europe and castle rental included. It's been almost 10 years and they've used the money they didn't spend on a wedding (combined with what they don't spend on TV) to do a lot of other traveling together over the years.

My parents spent $250, most of which was for the photos (some of which contained the only images of people in the family who are no longer alive). They did the typical tour of Niagara Falls and New England for the honeymoon. Over 40 years later, still married...and on their 40th anniversary, they took the same trip they took on their honeymoon.

BTW: your friend ought to simply put the $5k race car money toward the wedding. His wife will undoubtedly make him get rid of it at some point anyway. She might dig it now, but as soon as he starts spending more time with it than he does her, she'll make the ultimatum. The same goes for motorcycles and time spent with his friends on weekends.

haha. Well, I think I heard the number $10k.

Yeah, I can see where "the wife" would not like a project race car.
post #27 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRM4 View Post

A buddy of mine has been clamoring for a HDTV for some time. Their CRT went out last week. He thought he was finally going to get a HDTV until his wife blocked his path again and got an old CRT off a friend. She flat refuses to get a HDTV.

I bet she has pay TV and only watches the broadcast networks on it. When she gould get and HDTV and watch them in HD for free OTA.

My sister just bought her first HDTV a month ago. They watch very little TV. They took the SD converter box off their old CRT TV and tried to hook it up to the new HDTV. But I told them they didn't need to do that and new TVs comes with a digital tuner.
post #28 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCF68 View Post

I'm pretty sure that is against the rules to give players a TV. Players have lost their eligility of accepting gifts of much less value.

The gifts come from the Bowls themselves, so the players are not getting something from an agent (you know, an 'extra' benefit). The NCAA says it's OK with them.
post #29 of 104
I don't know a single person that DOESN'T have an HDTV. Almost all of them have multiple sets as well. My Sister has about 8 now. (She had none in 2006.)

Who does these surveys anyway?
post #30 of 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by adpayne View Post

I don't know a single person that DOESN'T have an HDTV. Almost all of them have multiple sets as well. My Sister has about 8 now. (She had none in 2006.)

Who does these surveys anyway?

I know a number of people that don't. Obviously they have different life priorities from a guy like me who hangs out AV forums. LOL But there are plenty of people out there that don't own any TVs, or if they do, it's an old CRT in a corner somewhere that rarely gets used, with wire hangers sticking out of where the antennas used to be...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › 69% of U.S. Homes Have HDTVs