AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › Subwoofer Hum w/ Long Coax Cable
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Subwoofer Hum w/ Long Coax Cable

post #1 of 34
Thread Starter 
I was hoping I could get a little help on a subwoofer hum issue. The sub is a Polk PSW505. Up until yesterday I had my subwoofer sitting in front of my TV stand, connected with a cheap, VERY thin, 6' composite cable. It was only a temporary setup until I could route a cable up the TV wall, thru the attic, and down the back wall. This would allow me to place my subwoofer on the back wall where I have room for it.

So yesterday I finished running the wire, which was a huge PITA. It's approximately 60' long. It's a solid copper RG6 tri-shield (60%) coax with RCA compression connectors I got from Home Depot. They are DataShark brand. I get it all hooked up. With everything connected and the receiver off, I can hear medium volume hum if I turn the volume up to 100% on the subwoofer. It was something I didn't recall hearing with my temporary setup.

I then begin experimenting with all sorts of configurations. I first bring the sub back next to the receiver and use the cheap store-bought composite cable and listen for a hum. There is a very faint hum with the sub volume at 100%, but you almost need the house dead silent and your ear just inches away. Out of curiosity I made a 6' cable with the RG6 coax and HomeDepot/DataShark connectors and the hum was no different than the cheap store-bought composite cable; VERY quiet hum.

So then I decide to isolate the sub from the receiver. With power to the sub and the 65' coax cable connected to the sub, but NOT to the receiver (this end just loose, laying on the ground), it makes the same medium level hum at 100% volume. As soon as I remove the 65' coax cable from the sub the hum gets so quiet, it's almost nonexistent. Same goes with the 6' store bought composite cable. As soon as I remove the composite cable from the sub, the hum goes from vary faint to almost non-existent.

Do you think the cable is picking up interference along with length? It just seems the longer the cable I attach, the louder the hum.

I know there are hundreds of sub humming threads on here and I read many, just couldn't find a solution that worked for me. Based off what I saw in other threads, Im going to list a few things ahead of time that may be asked. I do not have cable or satellite. I have an OTA antenna in the attic. The receiver and sub have 2-prong power cords. I think they are on the same circuit, but will need to confirm this.

Ideas? Thanks!
post #2 of 34
^^^

nope.... i think you have a ground loop...
post #3 of 34
I tend to agree (shocking, eh Chris? ). An easy check is to use a cheater plug on the sub and see if the hum goes away. If so, you can leave the cheater and take the shock risk (I have, since I rarely shower whilst handling the sub), or get an isolator to separate the grounds.

I do have a 20' cable to my subs now, and the cheapie cable I initially purchased did cause some noise/hum that went away when I upgraded the cable (to a better cheapie cable). This was due to a lousy shield and routing along with power lines. I strongly suspect Chris is right and a ground loop is the culprit.
post #4 of 34
^^^

lol, yea shocking...

you don't take your sub in the shower with you? and you call yourself an audiophile????
post #5 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccotenj View Post

^^^

nope.... i think you have a ground loop...

Ok, help me understand. If its a ground loop problem, then why does the hum go away when the 65' cable is disconnected from sub? OP states no hum with cheapie 6' cable versus 65 footer.

Sure sounds like an issue with the very long rca input cable, I mean 65' is really long. If it was a ground loop issue, it should do the same with the 6' rca cable.
post #6 of 34
^^^

'sperience, mostly... unfortunately, i've had to solve way too many "hum" issues....

also, he didn't tell us he also had a 65 foot extension cord from the sub back to the same outlet/circuit everything else is on...

65 feet is no problem for a low level subwoofer signal... you are drawing a seemingly "logical" conclusion that's not supportable...
post #7 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post

I tend to agree (shocking, eh Chris? ). An easy check is to use a cheater plug on the sub and see if the hum goes away. If so, you can leave the cheater and take the shock risk (I have, since I rarely shower whilst handling the sub), or get an isolator to separate the grounds.

I do have a 20' cable to my subs now, and the cheapie cable I initially purchased did cause some noise/hum that went away when I upgraded the cable (to a better cheapie cable). This was due to a lousy shield and routing along with power lines. I strongly suspect Chris is right and a ground loop is the culprit.

A cheaper plug is a 3 prong to 2 prong adapter, correct? The sub has a 2 prong plug on it already.
post #8 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccotenj View Post

^^^

'sperience, mostly... unfortunately, i've had to solve way too many "hum" issues....

also, he didn't tell us he also had a 65 foot extension cord from the sub back to the same outlet/circuit everything else is on...

65 feet is no problem for a low level subwoofer signal... you are drawing a seemingly "logical" conclusion that's not supportable...

No, I did not have a power extension cord from the same outlet as the receiver, but that did cross my mind as something else to try and I will when I get home from work. I am also not 100% sure the 2 different outlets are on the same circuit, but I think they are. This too I will have to confirm when I get home.

But my question is does it really matter about the receiver and where its getting it power since this happens without the sub even connected to the receiver?

Lets image I don't even have a receiver. I plug the sub into wall outlet "A" and turn the sub volume up to 100%, hum is VERY VERY quiet, almost nonexistent. I then attach only 1 end of the cheap composite RCA cable to the LFE IN port on the sub. The hum gets slightly louder, but still very quiet. You would need your ear withing a foot to hear it. I unplug the cheap cable and then plug the 6' coax cable I made and there is no change to the volume of the hum compared to the cheap 6' cable. I remove the 6' coax and move the sub to the back of the room and plug the power into wall outlet "B" and there is almost nonexistent hum (just as it was when powered by wall outlet "A" with no LFE cable attached), but as soon as I attach the 65' coax to it, its hums at a medium level. The other end of the 65' coax is connected to nothing, its just going up the back wall, through the attic, down the TV wall and laying on the floor.
post #9 of 34
Thread Starter 
Oh, I wanted to add, the hum stops completely, from the best I can hear, when in standby mode.
post #10 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccotenj View Post

^^^

'sperience, mostly... unfortunately, i've had to solve way too many "hum" issues....

also, he didn't tell us he also had a 65 foot extension cord from the sub back to the same outlet/circuit everything else is on...

65 feet is no problem for a low level subwoofer signal... you are drawing a seemingly "logical" conclusion that's not supportable...

Sorry, but the OP said nothing of a 65' extension cord in his original post. A 65' rca coax input cable YES.
post #11 of 34
^^^

read for content, please...
post #12 of 34
I missed the two-prong plugs on both. Could still be a loop, but reading the OP's post again I am not sure the hum is there when the AVR is on?

If the 65' cable is not connected to the AVR, just to the sub, then yes it is a big antenna picking up all sorts of noise, thus the hum. The shorter cable picks up less.

Does the hum go away, or get reduced, when the AVR is on? The output of the AVR may be undefined (and high-impedance) when it is off. You could also try shorting the other end of the cable when it is not hooked to the AVR. If there is no, or insignificant, hum with everything hooked up and on, then forget about it and play some tunes (movies, whatever).
post #13 of 34
I had the same issue with one of my subs a few years back. Tried hooking up an el cheapo long RCA cable to connect my computer's audio output.

If you buy a good quality shielded RCA cable it should fix the problem.
post #14 of 34
Yeah, if you notice the OP states when A-B'ing with 6' rca cable versus 65' cable is when he detects hum, rca cables not connected to AVR.
And he states he just spent considerable time installing the 65' cable, hence I doubt he pulls it out the walls for A-B testing. It seems to be picking up the hum from some other power source, or its construction.
OP states quite clearly "NO HUM" when connecting or using 6' el cheapo rca cable.
There is a reason why pros use XLR cabling and connections for long runs where other power cabling may cross or pass closely (induced interference)
post #15 of 34
I am hoping for his sake that is not it but it may well be. If so, he may have to pull new cable. And, yeah, I always used XLR in the pro world unless it was right around the mixing console, and often even then to help suppress all the noise in a live sound environment.

If he hears noise when one end of the cable is plugged into the sub and the other end open, it's a pretty meaningless test.
post #16 of 34
Thread Starter 
I have read all your replies and appreciate them. I'm going to mess around with it tonight and get back with what I find.

DonH50, I now understand how testing the cable connected to the sub and leaving the other end open is pointless. I believe connecting the other end to the receiver only reduces the hum slightly, and does not eliminate it, but I need to confirm this.
post #17 of 34
If the sub cable is close to any electrical wires, try moving it away from them.

Next time, run quad shield instead of tri-shield. It costs about the same.
post #18 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by KidHorn View Post

If the sub cable is close to any electrical wires, try moving it away from them.

Next time, run quad shield instead of tri-shield. It costs about the same.

A power line conduit runs down the back wall parallel to the sub-woofer cable, about 6 inches away. There is fiberglass insulation and one 2x4 wall stud between them. It may also be in contact perpendicularly with other electrical conduits in the attic. In those cases I can re-route it. But the cable iteself and where it comes down the back wall are not changeable.

I didn't think quad vs tri-shield made much a difference. I know it doesn't for TV (OTA, cable, or satellite) But this home theater stuff is all new to me. Running a new cable is pretty much out of the question. Running this one was extremely difficult. If I would have know this before had, I would have bought the best cable available, I just didn't think it mattered. I thought the coax I had was of decent quality and sufficient for a sub-woofer cable, therefore I used it.
post #19 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by wizdawg View Post

A power line conduit runs down the back wall parallel to the sub-woofer cable, about 6 inches away. There is fiberglass insulation and one 2x4 wall stud between them. It may also be in contact perpendicularly with other electrical conduits in the attic. In those cases I can re-route it. But the cable itself and where it comes down the back wall are not changeable.

I didn't think quad vs tri-shield made much a difference. I know it doesn't for TV (OTA, cable, or satellite) But this home theater stuff is all new to me. Running a new cable is pretty much out of the question. Running this one was extremely difficult. If I would have know this before had, I would have bought the best cable available, I just didn't think it mattered. I thought the coax I had was of decent quality and sufficient for a sub-woofer cable, therefore I used it.

Running an audio cable adjacent and parallel to a 110v AC cable is asking for interference. The moving electrons in the AC cable will induce movement in the audio cable, just like they do in windings in a transformer. If there is any way to create distance between the two,
do it. If the cables must cross, try to make the cross a 90-degree
angle.

If you go with a better-shielded cable, is it possible to use the existing
cable to pull the new cable?
post #20 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SelfGovern View Post

Running an audio cable adjacent and parallel to a 110v AC cable is asking for interference. The moving electrons in the AC cable will induce movement in the audio cable, just like they do in windings in a transformer. If there is any way to create distance between the two,
do it. If the cables must cross, try to make the cross a 90-degree
angle.

If you go with a better-shielded cable, is it possible to use the existing
cable to pull the new cable?

Well using the existing cable to pull a new cable would make it a lot easier, but then it just goes from VERY VERY hard to Very hard, haha. My biggest worry is that if I do replace the cable, that the new one is no different.
post #21 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post

I missed the two-prong plugs on both. Could still be a loop, but reading the OP's post again I am not sure the hum is there when the AVR is on?

If the 65' cable is not connected to the AVR, just to the sub, then yes it is a big antenna picking up all sorts of noise, thus the hum. The shorter cable picks up less.

Does the hum go away, or get reduced, when the AVR is on? The output of the AVR may be undefined (and high-impedance) when it is off. You could also try shorting the other end of the cable when it is not hooked to the AVR. If there is no, or insignificant, hum with everything hooked up and on, then forget about it and play some tunes (movies, whatever).

so did i.... i was wrong.... dammit, i hate when that happens...

that would not be surprising... if i do not have the cables hooked up to the avr, and turn on the subs, they hum VERY loud... as soon as everything is glued together though, it goes completely away...
post #22 of 34
Aha, I'll have to note this day on my perpetual calendar!

wizdawg: 60 Hz is below the range of most RF feeds and thus does little damage (below the receiver's bandwidth). For an audio system, a long run of single-ended (e.g. RCA) cable near a power line is a recipe for hum. My hope is it goes away, or is reduced to insignificance, when the AVR is hooked up and on. If not, then you may have to look at other solutions. How about a wireless link?
post #23 of 34
^^^

lol... hey, i'm allowed to be wrong once a year...

still doesn't make me happy though... but when you are wrong, you gotta man up and admit it...
post #24 of 34
My allowance is much higher than that, at least I sure hope so!
post #25 of 34
I wouldn't run a new cable in the same spot as the old one. Going from tri shield to quad shield probably won't solve your problem. The problem is running the cable parallel to a close by large electrical cable. You need to run the coax cable farther from the electrical power cable or as someone stated earlier, run it parallel to the cable if possible.
post #26 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post

My allowance is much higher than that, at least I sure hope so!

according to swmbo, i make at least one a day..
post #27 of 34
Thread Starter 
Okay, I have done a little more experimenting. 1st off, let me start by saying when connecting the RCA coax cable end to the receiver, the hum does decrease slightly, but it's still evident.

2nd, I wanted to try something to determine if the home's 60hz electrical was interfering with the 65' subwoofer's coax cable, especially that segment that runs parallel to it down the back wall. Of course I couldn't turn off all the power to the house because then I would have nothing to power the sub, but I found a 50' power extension cord and plugged it in an outlet are far away from the subwoofer coax cable as possible and turned off all the circuit breakers except the one with the extension cord powering the sub. This of course cut the power to that segment where the coax and electrical conduit ran parallel to each other. Doing so made no difference in the volume of the hum. Based off that, wouldn't it be safe to say the hum isnt being caused by the homes 60hz electrical? Maybe the hum wouldn't disappear completely, but I would expect a significantly quieter hum at the very least. Thoughts?

Lastly, this is what I found most interesting and maybe someone can explain it to me. While unplugging and plugging the RCA connector at the receiver's subwoofer pre-out socket, to test how much less hum there is when it is connected, I noticed that when the metal outer barrel of the RCA plug makes contact with the barrel of the receiver's socket, the hum completely goes away. And then as you further push the RCA plug onto the receiver socket and the center pin of the RCA plug is fully seated (making contact inside the socket), the hum starts. I hope I clearly described what I am trying to get across.
post #28 of 34
Thread Starter 
This may not be necessary, but I am unsure my 3rd paragraph in my post above was clear. Hum based on 0 being none and 10 being the loudest. Thanks again for all the suggestions and help.

Hum volume 6


Hum volume 4


Hum volume 0


Hum volume 0
post #29 of 34
When you tie the grounds, the hum goes away, but when you re-introduce the signal it comes back. Could still be a ground loop, through the neutral of the power line, or the AVR having a hard time driving such a long run. Can you take a wire from the sub's chassis or RCA shield to the AVR's ground/chassis/shield and see if it makes any difference?
post #30 of 34
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonH50 View Post

When you tie the grounds, the hum goes away, but when you re-introduce the signal it comes back. Could still be a ground loop, through the neutral of the power line, or the AVR having a hard time driving such a long run. Can you take a wire from the sub's chassis or RCA shield to the AVR's ground/chassis/shield and see if it makes any difference?

Using a 14ga solid copper wire I was able to do sub chassis to AVR chassis, sub chassis to barrel part of the RCA plug attached to the AVR, and AVR chassis to the barrel part of the RCA plug attached to the sub and all 3 did the same thing. All 3 made the hum louder.

I am not able to do barrel of RCA plug on AVR to barrel of RCA plug on sub because I have no means to securing it. I would need a 2nd person to hold it on. I could test that tomorrow if it would be helpful.

But what does it mean that the hum got louder when I did what you described?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › Subwoofer Hum w/ Long Coax Cable