I already said a lot of that. The original question was basically how hot are this years plasmas, and subsequent responses raised the question of whether plasmas convert a higher percentage of their energy consumption into heating the room than say incandescent bulbs or LCD TVs.
I now believe no, there is no difference. All of them basically heat a room at the same fraction of their rated power draw: 100%.
Andy Sullivan, here's your original post about heat:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
andy sullivan 
I need a little ammunition if possible to defend the 2012's regarding heat. Someone said that the 55st50 is rated at 400 watts. I don't really know what that means but any heat related help would be appreciated.
You might not have noticed, but
the post just above yours shows a photograph of a European 50"VT50 clearly labeled as putting out 195 W.
And earlier in this thread
this guy said he measured 120 W on his 50"ST50
And rogo claimed 'a 65" plasma' would come in at around 300 W after calibration.
So whether your 50 incher puts out 100 or 200, or your 65 puts out 300, really we have a rough idea of how much power 2012 plasmas are using up: it's not 20 and it's not 2000. It's going to be something like 200.
So what fraction of that 200 W goes to "heating up the room"? Apparently all of it.
I just ran across something that made me realize this in
a wikipedia article (emphasis mine) :
A light bulb, for example, might have 2% efficiency at emitting light yet still be 98% efficient at heating a room (In practice it is nearly 100% efficient at heating a room because
the light energy will also be converted to heat eventually, apart from the small fraction that leaves through the windows)
So your 200W TV is basically going to heat a (windowless) room just like a 200W incandescent bulb or a 200W hot plate or a 200W LCD TV or a 200W laptop or anything else. Watts is watts.