Quote:
Originally Posted by
mariob33 
Why do you feel that a consumer who paid their hard earned money for a product that was promised to do so much more than it currently does is being entitled or misguided?
They aren't necessarily. It depends on the foundations of the entitlement and the expression thereof. In this case neither was consistent with the proper way one should express these sorts of things. You are free to disagree of course, but like I stated earlier (differently) nothing occurs in a vacuum; there is a natural consequence for every choice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mariob33 
Any consumer is entitled to state their displeasure with a product they purchased if it doesn't deliver to their expectations.
Of course they are. I have a feeling that you didn't read what I wrote thoroughly. It's not the feeling or opinion that I took issue with, it was the delivery.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mariob33 
Goodwill is not a right it's a continually earned benefit. If certain actions lead your customer base to think you may not have their best interest in mind, no context is needed to express their displeasure.
Everything has context. It is ignorant to believe otherwise. Choosing to ignore context is an option we are free to take, but doing so says more about the speaker than the target.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mariob33 
If this was one of the larger conglomerates it would be ok to kill them in the public domain but for some reason anytime a "consumer" challenges the process/actions of a smaller ID company the consumer deserves to be chastised and not the company.
Again, there seems to be a failure to recognize the distinction b/w message and delivery. A statement of frustration is one thing ("I'm frustrated"), rude comments ("quit lazing around and fix my Echo") quite another. Oddly the OP here seems to have removed his post (or had it removed) so perhaps you missed it. I have a copy in my inbox if you'd like to read it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mariob33 
We can chastise MS, Panasonic and JVC because they have what appears to be endless resources, but not a smaller outfit whose employees participate In online forums. On that I call bull!
Call all you want. I don't agree with rude comments of the nature that were made in general, doesn't matter who the target is. If you want to behave poorly that is your prerogative, don't expect that everyone will sit idly by while you do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mariob33 
There are just as many people reporting issues/failures as those reporting grand success. What makes you so accurate in your assessment of the product works versus theirs? Perhaps your assessment (or mine) is wrong.
Where did I say this person's (or anyone's for that matter) experience was invalid? I can't speak to their experience, just my own; calling out that my experience is different is clarifying not censoring.
That said, I do believe that my knowledge of WMC, media frameworks, media streamers, HTPC, etc. uniquely qualifies me to judge a product's quality in a controlled, reliable way. This isn't the first product I've reviewed, been doing this a long time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mariob33 
The act of chastising or degrading another's words is an attempt to censor. And for some it's seen as a direct slap in the face. Just saying!
I don't agree with this, doing so would require some sort of obscene spiraling logic (who is censoring whom, does the first speaker get priority just because they are first, etc?). If being called out for bad behavior is perceived as censorship or a slap in the face, then I suspect it is just another artifact of the same poorly formed decision making skills which got them called out in the first place.
Anyone is free to disagree though. Everyone is entitled to an opinion no matter how misguided and ill informed. They should not be surprised however, that when they venture out in to the world and share them, that the foundations (or more precisely, the lack of) are highlighted - emperor/cloths style.