I find it perplexing that some of you can't swallow them raising the price a tiny bit on a TV that outperformed the vt30 last year in basically all regards minus benchmarking blacks in a cave and some noisy shadow details.
Good blacks but poor everything else doesn't make a good premium TV.
Samsung fixed their two flaws: peeling & FBr.
IMO D7000/8000 was superior to the VT30 in Color, gamma, luminance, PWM noise, Calibration Controls, ARC that actually returns 5.1, less IR, Bluetooth glasses and to boot they had a better AR filter!
(I owned both, lots of hours calibrating both with a pro meter) The VT30 can be massaged into a place where it doesn't look bad at all, but it still never looked "right". However then you feed it a 4:4:4 signal and things go down hill pretty quickly.
So why is it crazy they want to charge the same as Panasonic? I guess is what I'm asking.
You may not want the extras but the E8000 does come with things that the VT50 doesn't. All Panasonic did was not include the 3d glasses and dropped the price $200.
I'm as excited about the VT50 as anyone else after getting all wound up from the Panasonic press/website info. But I'll use Panasonic's past few years of history to keep myself grounded and I'll also remind myself that Samsung brought it last year and donked Panasonic on the head with a hammer. This time around I'm going to wait as long as possible to see what bugs crop up for both manufacturers. My guess is the Samsung will be very well polished this year for all things PQ wise. I expect the new voice/motion control stuff will have some bugs since it's 1st generation. If you use last years models as a guide Samsung's list of stuff to fix PQ wise is MUCH smaller than Panasonic's.
Good blacks but poor everything else doesn't make a good premium TV.
Samsung fixed their two flaws: peeling & FBr.
IMO D7000/8000 was superior to the VT30 in Color, gamma, luminance, PWM noise, Calibration Controls, ARC that actually returns 5.1, less IR, Bluetooth glasses and to boot they had a better AR filter!
(I owned both, lots of hours calibrating both with a pro meter) The VT30 can be massaged into a place where it doesn't look bad at all, but it still never looked "right". However then you feed it a 4:4:4 signal and things go down hill pretty quickly.
So why is it crazy they want to charge the same as Panasonic? I guess is what I'm asking.
You may not want the extras but the E8000 does come with things that the VT50 doesn't. All Panasonic did was not include the 3d glasses and dropped the price $200.
I'm as excited about the VT50 as anyone else after getting all wound up from the Panasonic press/website info. But I'll use Panasonic's past few years of history to keep myself grounded and I'll also remind myself that Samsung brought it last year and donked Panasonic on the head with a hammer. This time around I'm going to wait as long as possible to see what bugs crop up for both manufacturers. My guess is the Samsung will be very well polished this year for all things PQ wise. I expect the new voice/motion control stuff will have some bugs since it's 1st generation. If you use last years models as a guide Samsung's list of stuff to fix PQ wise is MUCH smaller than Panasonic's.





























