or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Software › Chinatown
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Chinatown - Page 4

post #91 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

Certainly the DVDbeaver shot is not as detailed....no question.

It's also not as red.
post #92 of 119
Thread Starter 
http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleich...ess=#vergleich
post #93 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by haineshisway View Post

Paramount has done stellar work on three films: White Christmas, Breakfast at Tiffany's, and The Ten Commandments. Those three are as good as any Blu-rays ever released. The work on them was done by a man named Ron Smith, who clearly knew what he was doing. He is no longer at Paramount - they thought they could do without his services - they cannot. That is why we got the older transfer of To Catch a Thief used for the last DVD - as good as it is, if they did a transfer from the VistaVision negative it would be as good as The Ten Commandments. That is why Chinatown is off the master used for the last DVD release - it looks good, but could look MUCH better. When Ron was there, there was so much hope for great classic film transfers. Now - not so much.

lets bring back Ron !!
post #94 of 119
Quote:

In cap#9 the EE is gone from the staircase rail (and that's good).

Is this the same master as the DVD?
It kinda looks like it...
post #95 of 119
From the review at HD DIGEST:

I'm usually not a big fan of Dolby TrueHD tracks, which I feel tend to lack the clarity and nuance of their DTS-HD counterparts, but the TrueHD 5.1 soundtrack for 'Chinatown' just might change my mind.

Um, really?
post #96 of 119
At least things are starting to look up for this Blu-ray release.

Still, a new transfer for Blu-ray would have been better.
post #97 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

From the review at HD DIGEST:

I'm usually not a big fan of Dolby TrueHD tracks, which I feel tend to lack the clarity and nuance of their DTS-HD counterparts, but the TrueHD 5.1 soundtrack for 'Chinatown' just might change my mind.

Yikes! This, again?

Excepting production errors, lossless is lossless is lossless.
post #98 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by spectator View Post

Yikes! This, again?

Excepting production errors, lossless is lossless is lossless.

Though I do enjoy reading reviews online from various sites, quotes like the one above always have me doing a facepalm. One of the few reviewers that I actually trust is Gary Reber at Widescreen Review. He's been doing this since the laserdisc days and is fantastic. Just my two cents...
post #99 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

Though I do enjoy reading reviews online from various sites, quotes like the one above always have me doing a facepalm. One of the few reviewers that I actually trust is Gary Reber at Widescreen Review. He's been doing this since the laserdisc days and is fantastic. Just my two cents...

I'm an old WR reader, from issue #2.
post #100 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

Though I do enjoy reading reviews online from various sites, quotes like the one above always have me doing a facepalm. One of the few reviewers that I actually trust is Gary Reber at Widescreen Review. He's been doing this since the laserdisc days and is fantastic. Just my two cents...

I read WSR until it turned into the DTS Newsletter and the reviews turned into mere capsules that told you nothing.

It was right around the time DVD started hitting it big and Reber was complaining about it being a format for the masses and proposed a LD sized format.
post #101 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterTHX View Post

I read WSR until it turned into the DTS Newsletter and the reviews turned into mere capsules that told you nothing.

It was right around the time DVD started hitting it big and Reber was complaining about it being a format for the masses and proposed a LD sized format.

Yeah, the reviews have gotten smaller, but he still knows his stuff...
post #102 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul nyc View Post

From the review at HD DIGEST:

I'm usually not a big fan of Dolby TrueHD tracks, which I feel tend to lack the clarity and nuance of their DTS-HD counterparts, but the TrueHD 5.1 soundtrack for 'Chinatown' just might change my mind.

Um, really?

I have not been able to tell the AQ difference between DTS, Dolby and Uncompressed PCM HD audio myself, I am no audiophile however.
post #103 of 119
Well?!?!
post #104 of 119
I received mine today, and I'm happy to check on a scene and report back. Any scene in particular?
post #105 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penman View Post

I received mine today, and I'm happy to check on a scene and report back. Any scene in particular?

Congrats!
How bout: Best & Worse?!?!
post #106 of 119
I looked at the credits and the dam hearing sequence (where the livestock are brought in as protest), and I thought both looked very good.

Some posted screenshots showed Gittes' skin tones that looked too red (to my eyes), but they (and the rest of the colors) looked fine on my set-up (RS-1, 122" screen).

I was pleased overall by what I saw in those two sequences.
post #107 of 119
^^^
Thanks for the input; can't believe I haven't pickED this up yet...
post #108 of 119
Picked this up at Fry's for $12.99.
post #109 of 119
I thought most of the movie looked like upscaled dvd.
post #110 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickB View Post

I thought most of the movie looked like upscaled dvd.

How so?!?!
post #111 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickB View Post

I thought most of the movie looked like upscaled dvd.

Um, no. It's the same transfer that was used for the last DVD, but it looks MUCH better than the DVD. However, if Paramount had kept Ron Smith and he'd done a fresh transfer, it would look astonishing now - it doesn't. It's adequate and perfectly okay, as befits a five or six year old transfer. But Paramount, like other studios, are very aware of how many units this will sell and I guess they finally decided that Ron wasn't worth the money and that it's just easier to release an older transfer.
post #112 of 119
out of curiosity , how much would it cost paramount to re-scan the negatives for a proper blu ray?
post #113 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by haineshisway View Post

Um, no. It's the same transfer that was used for the last DVD, but it looks MUCH better than the DVD. However, if Paramount had kept Ron Smith and he'd done a fresh transfer, it would look astonishing now - it doesn't. It's adequate and perfectly okay, as befits a five or six year old transfer. But Paramount, like other studios, are very aware of how many units this will sell and I guess they finally decided that Ron wasn't worth the money and that it's just easier to release an older transfer.

I guess my question is why the quality of a Blu-ray release should depend on the gifts and skills of a single person. Even if a studio is smart enough to hang on to their uniquely talented employee, accidents happen all the time. So why are all the best transfer eggs put in a single employee's basket*?

*Happy Easter!
post #114 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penman View Post

I guess my question is why the quality of a Blu-ray release should depend on the gifts and skills of a single person. Even if a studio is smart enough to hang on to their uniquely talented employee, accidents happen all the time. So why are all the best transfer eggs put in a single employee's basket*?

*Happy Easter!

It's only a question of people knowing what they're doing and having the resources to do it properly. Some do, some don't. Grover Crisp does. Ron did. Now someone makes the decision, "Oh, we've got an HD transfer from five or six years ago, let's just put that out, after all how much better can it look? Well, a fresh scan would look much better because the technology is better - it wouldn't cost all that much, but if someone did it or just left it to a lab and they didn't know what they were doing, well, it could even be worse. The Searchers is a perfect example - at the time a gorgeous transfer off the VistaVision negative - beautifully sharp - but you had someone who had no idea about the color and he screwed it up. He could have easily pulled their IB Tech reference print to use as a guide, but - he didn't. That, apparently, was too much bother. So, we have a way too yellow The Searchers that looks nothing like it should other than being pleasingly detailed and sharp. And that's why you need a Ron Smith or Grover Crisp - because they CARE, they do the research and the result is The Ten Commandments, White Christmas, and Breakfast at Tiffany's from Paramount, three transfers that perfectly replicate what those films should look like, and just about any transfer coming out of Sony.
post #115 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by filmoreXXX View Post

out of curiosity , how much would it cost paramount to re-scan the negatives for a proper blu ray?

The question is not the cost of scanning, which would run around 60k, but rather the cost of the entire process toward the creation of a new HD master.

That number would be around 120k.

A trifle they take from a great box they have. And an easy decision to make.

RAH
post #116 of 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by haineshisway View Post

It's only a question of people knowing what they're doing and having the resources to do it properly. Some do, some don't. Grover Crisp does. Ron did. Now someone makes the decision, "Oh, we've got an HD transfer from five or six years ago, let's just put that out, after all how much better can it look? Well, a fresh scan would look much better because the technology is better - it wouldn't cost all that much, but if someone did it or just left it to a lab and they didn't know what they were doing, well, it could even be worse. The Searchers is a perfect example - at the time a gorgeous transfer off the VistaVision negative - beautifully sharp - but you had someone who had no idea about the color and he screwed it up. He could have easily pulled their IB Tech reference print to use as a guide, but - he didn't. That, apparently, was too much bother. So, we have a way too yellow The Searchers that looks nothing like it should other than being pleasingly detailed and sharp. And that's why you need a Ron Smith or Grover Crisp - because they CARE, they do the research and the result is The Ten Commandments, White Christmas, and Breakfast at Tiffany's from Paramount, three transfers that perfectly replicate what those films should look like, and just about any transfer coming out of Sony.

Thanks for the thorough explanation.

I feel like we're almost better off with obviously craptastic work like Gladiator or Out of Africa, where the work is so conspicuously sub-par that consumer pushback can result in getting a better disc. In contrast, with a B-level job (The Searchers, Chinatown, et al.), there isn't enough of a consumer outcry to justify the expense of re-doing it. So this is probably the best Chinatown will look for a long, long time, I guess.
post #117 of 119
Any digital mastering artifacts on this release?
post #118 of 119
It would be nice to think that if Roman Polanski wasn't what he is, that he would be living in the U.S. and would be able to take interest in his films.
Analogous to the music industry, if the artist( in the case of film, the director) doesn't get involved, the level of care is a toss up.

I for one, would love to see The Fearless Vampire Killers in HD(Criterion?)
as well as other of his films done justice.

I bought Chinatown regardless.
I had to.
post #119 of 119
Thread Starter 
How is the Fincher/Towne commentary
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Software
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Software › Chinatown