I was so excited about my next upgrade, an Oppo BDP-95. I have read all the reviews of how great the DAC and analog output section is and was prepared to pull the trigger and settle into sonic (and video) bliss. It seemed to be the most cost-effective upgrade for my system. That is, until I "luckily" realized that an Oppo BDP-95 would cause a ton of frustration and headaches for my system.
Why? #1: Bass Management #2: My system pre/pro is an 8-year old Yamaha RX-V2400 receiver (that does have a dedicated 7 ch discrete analog input but DOES NOT apply a 10dB LFE correction and DOES NOT give the option of adjusting LFE levels for individual sources (i.e. crank up the level on the actual sub and lower the speaker levels for digital sources). So, the Oppo BDP-95 is nothing but a pipe dream that cannot be used in my very obsolete system at this time. I have a 5.1 satellite/sub system, so I have to use bass management. I have also read that while performance out of the Oppo BDP-95's non-sw channels have excellent (best-in-class) performance, that the performance from the BDP-95's handling of the SW channel is severely lacking in depth, detail, and level, even if properly calibrated. I'm thinking a fully loaded BMW X-5 with 4WD but fitted with bald tires and trying to run in the snow!!
What I'm looking for: A good quality receiver or separate dedicated pre/pro that performs all the latest surround formats well, but that specifically sounds good for music (most of my full and high rez music will be listened to in 2.1 mode).
Unfortunately, I've heard that almost all receivers have progressively sacrificed amps/pre-amp/analog stage, power supply performance over the years to cram in tons of features and formats. I'm willing to spend up to $3k (range of $1.5-$3k) for either a well-built high quality receiver or separate pre-pro that is also a noticeable sound quality upgrade in the DAC, analog output/pre-amp as compared to the Yamaha RX-V2400. I would like something as close as possible to the performance of the BDP-95. If the performance is not noticeably better than RX-V2400 (wrt to DAC, analog output to amp for 2.1 music), then it is a waste of money for me.
For example, I have read somewhere that a Marantz AV7005 was decent with music (not sure how good), but that the corresponding pre-pro from Onkyo/Integra was excellent with HT but was severely lacking with music. The most I could afford would be something at the price of the NAD T187 but have no idea how that performs with music (DACs, analog output stage, etc.) or what other musical alternatives are.
If the Marantz is so good, I would consider a Marantz + Oppo 95, but my understanding is the Oppo 95 really shines if used in dedicated 2 ch playback with large full range speakers. I have read that bass played through it's SW output is lacking in many ways, which is very disappointing, given how highly reviewed that player was.
Why? #1: Bass Management #2: My system pre/pro is an 8-year old Yamaha RX-V2400 receiver (that does have a dedicated 7 ch discrete analog input but DOES NOT apply a 10dB LFE correction and DOES NOT give the option of adjusting LFE levels for individual sources (i.e. crank up the level on the actual sub and lower the speaker levels for digital sources). So, the Oppo BDP-95 is nothing but a pipe dream that cannot be used in my very obsolete system at this time. I have a 5.1 satellite/sub system, so I have to use bass management. I have also read that while performance out of the Oppo BDP-95's non-sw channels have excellent (best-in-class) performance, that the performance from the BDP-95's handling of the SW channel is severely lacking in depth, detail, and level, even if properly calibrated. I'm thinking a fully loaded BMW X-5 with 4WD but fitted with bald tires and trying to run in the snow!!
What I'm looking for: A good quality receiver or separate dedicated pre/pro that performs all the latest surround formats well, but that specifically sounds good for music (most of my full and high rez music will be listened to in 2.1 mode).
Unfortunately, I've heard that almost all receivers have progressively sacrificed amps/pre-amp/analog stage, power supply performance over the years to cram in tons of features and formats. I'm willing to spend up to $3k (range of $1.5-$3k) for either a well-built high quality receiver or separate pre-pro that is also a noticeable sound quality upgrade in the DAC, analog output/pre-amp as compared to the Yamaha RX-V2400. I would like something as close as possible to the performance of the BDP-95. If the performance is not noticeably better than RX-V2400 (wrt to DAC, analog output to amp for 2.1 music), then it is a waste of money for me.
For example, I have read somewhere that a Marantz AV7005 was decent with music (not sure how good), but that the corresponding pre-pro from Onkyo/Integra was excellent with HT but was severely lacking with music. The most I could afford would be something at the price of the NAD T187 but have no idea how that performs with music (DACs, analog output stage, etc.) or what other musical alternatives are.
If the Marantz is so good, I would consider a Marantz + Oppo 95, but my understanding is the Oppo 95 really shines if used in dedicated 2 ch playback with large full range speakers. I have read that bass played through it's SW output is lacking in many ways, which is very disappointing, given how highly reviewed that player was.













) i would try to listen to those components yourself, you are interested in, to get to judge them by your own taste and preferences. You might still read through the different threads here to get a feeling for what you probably like best.
, that the latest generation of the Onkyos, i.e. (5509 / 5009 and 3009) have improved significantly in their "pure" stereo performance, being now one of the best around, while still keeping their excellent HT performance. They compete directly with the new Yamaha RX-A3010 AVR, whilst the Marantz seems to be still lacking in HT features and formats.
