Simple question, is it worth to wait for the new V700 (that should sell at around 550 euro in europe) or just take its predecessor SD90 (can buy for 400 euro)?
From the specs I can see extended zoom (21x vs 26x), better image stabilization (4-axis vs 5-axis), frontside illuminated sensor vs backside illuminated sensor and some 3D stuff I do not care about.
I plan to use it mostly for shooting my family, so I do not think I need the extended zoom range. The better image stabilization would be handy but is it that much better? Also from what I red the backside illuminated sensors are constructed better than frontside ones in terms of capturing light (the wiring is behind the photocathode layer). But maybe a newer frontside illuminated sensor is better than an older backside one? I am going to shoot a lot inside (bulb lightning) so low light performance is probably the most important factor. But again, is it going to be that much better to justify 150euro difference? What do you guys think?
I do not mind waiting for the new one. I currently shoot with Nikon D7000 in FullHD but it is kinda hard to keep the focus (manually) on rapidly moving targets (like my son).
So to sum it up, is the price difference worth the better image stabilization and (hopefully) better low light performance?
From the specs I can see extended zoom (21x vs 26x), better image stabilization (4-axis vs 5-axis), frontside illuminated sensor vs backside illuminated sensor and some 3D stuff I do not care about.
I plan to use it mostly for shooting my family, so I do not think I need the extended zoom range. The better image stabilization would be handy but is it that much better? Also from what I red the backside illuminated sensors are constructed better than frontside ones in terms of capturing light (the wiring is behind the photocathode layer). But maybe a newer frontside illuminated sensor is better than an older backside one? I am going to shoot a lot inside (bulb lightning) so low light performance is probably the most important factor. But again, is it going to be that much better to justify 150euro difference? What do you guys think?
I do not mind waiting for the new one. I currently shoot with Nikon D7000 in FullHD but it is kinda hard to keep the focus (manually) on rapidly moving targets (like my son).
So to sum it up, is the price difference worth the better image stabilization and (hopefully) better low light performance?
















