Quote:
Originally Posted by fleaman 
Well for me, the end result is what I look for, even if that means I have to bypass something to get a better result. If you need to go through your AVR's processing to justify the the purchase price, that is your prerogative I suppose. Since you never tested the scenario that I mentioned, you'll never know. But I suppose ignorance can be bliss in this case
Of course, but in this case, from your description, it seemed like the unit might of possibly been either defective, or your AVR's processing was cancelling out some/most of the darbee processing. I've read hundreds of darbee posts and I kid you not, there seems to be a 97%+ (perhaps even approaching 99%) positive success rate. As you can see, I've been around AVS for a LONG time and I've never, ever, seen any product have such a huge positive member posting percentage. Nothing comes close. I was was a skeptic too, like most here before they got the darbee, but I was really blown away by the improvements. I have a sharp DLP projector, I have a top of the line LCD/LED, and I see the same amount of improvement on them both, there is absolutely no guessing or questioning about it here.
If you did the test as I mentioned, and it did reveal a better picture, all you probably would have to do is turn the processing off in your AVR, so that it's just pass-through. And if this set up gave you a noticeably better PQ than just the AVR's processing alone, you would have better PQ in the end. Wasn't that the goal

Well for me, the end result is what I look for, even if that means I have to bypass something to get a better result. If you need to go through your AVR's processing to justify the the purchase price, that is your prerogative I suppose. Since you never tested the scenario that I mentioned, you'll never know. But I suppose ignorance can be bliss in this case

Of course, but in this case, from your description, it seemed like the unit might of possibly been either defective, or your AVR's processing was cancelling out some/most of the darbee processing. I've read hundreds of darbee posts and I kid you not, there seems to be a 97%+ (perhaps even approaching 99%) positive success rate. As you can see, I've been around AVS for a LONG time and I've never, ever, seen any product have such a huge positive member posting percentage. Nothing comes close. I was was a skeptic too, like most here before they got the darbee, but I was really blown away by the improvements. I have a sharp DLP projector, I have a top of the line LCD/LED, and I see the same amount of improvement on them both, there is absolutely no guessing or questioning about it here.
If you did the test as I mentioned, and it did reveal a better picture, all you probably would have to do is turn the processing off in your AVR, so that it's just pass-through. And if this set up gave you a noticeably better PQ than just the AVR's processing alone, you would have better PQ in the end. Wasn't that the goal

I understand your point. Maybe I should have tried to connect it directly to the TV but I never thought about that at the time. The Marvell QDEO processing shouldn't affect this, though.
And you are using a DLP projector (which makes total sense) and I believe your LCD/LED Sharp is two years plus old and I know it doesn't have the inherent processing that the Samsung LED/LCD does - - and I'm not trying to be negative or denigrate your TV. It also has to do with where your starting point is - - PQ wise.
Here are a couple pictures of my current TV - via satellite (Directv). It's an older movie (Aliens & a Cowboy flick on Sony) - just an example and the pictures might not transfer well, but I'm pretty happy with the PQ as is. I'm always looking to improve and we'll see what technology comes down the pike in the next couple of years. Thx - Rico.
























