Don't get me wrong, I totally understand the hassles a reseller would have to go through to really get a system perfected. And by perfected I mean by the owners opinion of it. I'd daresay that's an impossibility. Mainly because owners won't take the time and effort to understand what truly can and can't be done.
I know, my wife is a fine example of that. What she wants out of the systems is based on only what she's been willing to learn about it (and that's not much). So going to the next stage of translating that to a tech is, well, not going to happen. And when discussing the "possibilities" with salesmen it's nigh-on impossible to separate realistic needs and solutions from the dollar signs rolling around in the saleman's head. Or the salesman GREATLY underplays the amount of money that will need to be spent on really fleshing it all out.
I know this to be true from several friends with Crestron systems. They're astounded to learn what more the system can do that was never effectively articulated to them. All they know is what they got cost them an arm and a leg and really doesn't satisfy a lot of their "real world" needs. Mainly because the people that set it up don't live the same kinds of lives. Too much set up for people familiar with the system and not enough for actual homeowners. One could argue the owners could stand to learn more about the system. But at then the same could be argued about how the system was "designed" and I use that term loosely.
So the in-between ground of having tools available for owners WILLING to go the extra step seems like a pretty good idea. It's one thing to avoid making this public knowledge, that's an understandable means to contain support costs. It's another thing entirely to prevent it. That's short-sighted.
Sure, it raises the likelihood of a reseller not getting customization business. Of course, if they're not competent (again, this is a loosely defined term) that won't happen anyway. There wouldn't be a need for owner configuration if that wasn't a problem in the first place. That and it's extremely unlikely this 'empowered' owner is then going to turn around and be anything resembling competition to reseller either.
So preventing them from gaining access to the tools accomplishes, what, exactly? Antagonizing them so they become active voices speaking against the product line? Because that IS a lot more likely. Instead of them just being negative about the reseller (and who isn't a lot of the time) they're PO'd about the vendor too. Not exactly good PR.
I know, my wife is a fine example of that. What she wants out of the systems is based on only what she's been willing to learn about it (and that's not much). So going to the next stage of translating that to a tech is, well, not going to happen. And when discussing the "possibilities" with salesmen it's nigh-on impossible to separate realistic needs and solutions from the dollar signs rolling around in the saleman's head. Or the salesman GREATLY underplays the amount of money that will need to be spent on really fleshing it all out.
I know this to be true from several friends with Crestron systems. They're astounded to learn what more the system can do that was never effectively articulated to them. All they know is what they got cost them an arm and a leg and really doesn't satisfy a lot of their "real world" needs. Mainly because the people that set it up don't live the same kinds of lives. Too much set up for people familiar with the system and not enough for actual homeowners. One could argue the owners could stand to learn more about the system. But at then the same could be argued about how the system was "designed" and I use that term loosely.
So the in-between ground of having tools available for owners WILLING to go the extra step seems like a pretty good idea. It's one thing to avoid making this public knowledge, that's an understandable means to contain support costs. It's another thing entirely to prevent it. That's short-sighted.
Sure, it raises the likelihood of a reseller not getting customization business. Of course, if they're not competent (again, this is a loosely defined term) that won't happen anyway. There wouldn't be a need for owner configuration if that wasn't a problem in the first place. That and it's extremely unlikely this 'empowered' owner is then going to turn around and be anything resembling competition to reseller either.
So preventing them from gaining access to the tools accomplishes, what, exactly? Antagonizing them so they become active voices speaking against the product line? Because that IS a lot more likely. Instead of them just being negative about the reseller (and who isn't a lot of the time) they're PO'd about the vendor too. Not exactly good PR.



















). Yes, there are products more complicated than that, and more importantly, installations way more complicated than that.



. These types of debates have been going on for more years than I can count here. My position on this is well known and at odds with the majority in my industry. The link in my sig also speaks to an issue related to this.
